StrokeNCT05007002
Robot-based Therapy for Upper Limb Sensorimotor Impairments After Stroke
A study testing Robot-based therapy in people with Stroke, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
After a stroke, more than two out of three patients experience problems with upper limb movement and sensation. Current evidence on treatment of upper limb sensory impairments is scarce and shows unclear results. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Robot-based therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 14 Jul 2021to 13 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 18 years old
- A first-ever unilateral, supratentorial stroke (as defined by WHO)
- In the chronic phase after stroke (i.e. being at least 6 months after stroke)
- Motor deficits of the upper limb (Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment - Upper Extremity < 60/66)
- Somatosensory deficits of the upper limb (Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment < 36/40)
- Ability to perform, at least to some extent, active shoulder abduction and wrist extension against gravity
- Ability to perform passive and active sensory processing assessment task (primary outcome measure)
Who cannot join
- History of previous stroke or TIA
- Any serious musculoskeletal and/or other neurological conditions
- Serious communication or cognitive deficits
- No written informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Robot-based Therapy for Upper Limb Sensorimotor Impairments in the Chronic Phase After Stroke: a Pilot Study
After a stroke, more than two out of three patients experience problems with upper limb movement and sensation. Current evidence on treatment of upper limb sensory impairments is scarce and shows unclear results. Robot-based therapy has been increasingly used to treat upper limb motor impairments, with similar positive results as compared to conventional therapy. This study aims to investigate a novel robot-based therapy program for treatment of upper limb sensory impairments. The therapy program consists of 10 one-hour session spread over 4 weeks and will be evaluated for its effect in 20 chronic stroke patients. The investigators hypothesize that a 4-week robot-based therapy program can improve upper limb sensation and movement.
Read the detailed description
Up to 70% of stroke survivors show upper limb impairments consisting of motor and/or somatosensory impairments. These impairments often persist well into the chronic stage, and may lead to significant limitations in activities of daily living and may negatively affect quality of life. Different interventions have been investigated to treat upper limb motor impairments, including robot-based therapy, which shows similar positive results as compared to conventional therapy. Evidence on interventions for somatosensory impairments is scarce and often of low quality. This study therefore aims to evaluate the effect of a robot-based therapy program on sensorimotor function of the upper limb in a group of 20 chronic stroke patients.
The robot-based therapy will be provided using the Kinarm End-Point Lab (BKIN Technologies Ltd., Canada) and consists of passive and active therapy tasks for proprioception and sensory processing. The therapy consists of 10 one-hour sessions spread over 4 weeks. Clinical and robot-based motor and somatosensory assessments will be performed at 4 time points: twice at baseline, once at mid intervention, and once after 10 hours of therapy. The investigators hypothesize to find improvement in both upper limb motor and somatosensory function after the therapy program. The results from this pilot study will provide a basis for further research.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Robot-based therapy
- Keywords
- Stroke, Upper limb, Somatosensation, Sensory processing, Proprioception, Robot-based therapy, Robot-based assessment
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Robot-based therapyDevice
Active and passive therapy tasks for proprioception and sensory processing, with use of the Kinarm End-Point Lab (BKIN Technologies Ltd., Canada)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Robot-based therapy | Experimental | Chronic stroke patients receiving robot-based therapy Receives: Device: Robot-based therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Kinarm: sensory processing task
Newly-developed task on the Kinarm End-Point Lab used to assess passive and active sensory processing
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Secondary outcomes (15)
Kinarm: arm position matching task
Assessment of limb position sense using a 9-target mirror-matching task on the Kinarm Exoskeleton Lab
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: arm movement matching task
Assessment of limb movement sense using a mirror-matching task on the Kinarm Exoskeleton Lab
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: visually guided reaching task
Assessment of motor function using a 4-target centre-out reaching task on the Kinarm End-Point Lab
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: working memory task
Assessment of working memory on the Kinarm End-Point Lab, by asking the participant to remember the position of 3, 4, 5 or 6 targets simultaneously.
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Erasmus modified Nottingham sensory assessment
Clinical assessment of somatosensory function (including exteroception, proprioception and sensory processing) on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores meaning better performance
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Tactile discrimination test
Clinical assessment of sensory processing with an area under the curve based scoring system, with higher scores meaning better performance
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Functional tactile object recognition test
Clinical assessment of sensory processing on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 42, with higher scores meaning better performance
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Fugl-Meyer upper extremity assessment
Clinical assessment of motor function on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 66, with higher scores meaning better performance
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Action research arm test
Timed clinical assessment of motor activity performance on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 57, with higher scores meaning better performance
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Sensorimotor action research arm test
Timed clinical assessment of sensorimotor performance on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 57, with higher scores meaning better performance
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Montreal cognitive assessment
Clinical assessment of cognitive function on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores meaning better performance
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Star cancellation test
Clinical assessment of visuospatial neglect on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 54, with higher scores meaning better performance, and a score below 44 indicating the presence of visuospatial neglect
Measured: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: sensory processing task
Newly-developed task on the Kinarm End-Point Lab used to assess passive and active sensory processing
Measured: Change in 2 baseline measures taken 2 days apart, at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: sensory processing task
Newly-developed task on the Kinarm End-Point Lab used to assess passive and active sensory processing
Measured: Change during the first 2 weeks of a 4-week therapy protocol provided at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: sensory processing task
Newly-developed task on the Kinarm End-Point Lab used to assess passive and active sensory processing
Measured: Change during the last 2 weeks of a 4-week therapy protocol provided at least 6 months after stroke
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Aug 2021
- Study start14 Jul 2021
- Primary completion13 Jun 2022
- Study completion13 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof Geert Verheyden, KU Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05007002
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S61997[2]
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 11 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Saenen L, De Bruyn N, Verheyden G. Validity of a sensorimotor adaptation of the Action Research Arm Test (sARAT) in chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Sep;46(19):4532-4539. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2271837. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
PubMed 37872776
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Robot-based Therapy for Upper Limb Sensorimotor Impairments in the Chronic Phase After Stroke: a Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05007002
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- S61997[2]
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Stroke, Upper limb, Somatosensation, Sensory processing, Proprioception, Robot-based therapy, Robot-based assessment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Study start
- 14 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
After a stroke, more than two out of three patients experience problems with upper limb movement and sensation. Current evidence on treatment of upper limb sensory impairments is scarce and shows unclear results. Robot-based therapy has been increasingly used to treat upper limb motor impairments, with similar positive results as compared to conventional therapy. This study aims to investigate a novel robot-based therapy program for treatment of upper limb sensory impairments. The therapy program consists of 10 one-hour session spread over 4 weeks and will be evaluated for its effect in 20 chronic stroke patients. The investigators hypothesize that a 4-week robot-based therapy program can improve upper limb sensation and movement.
Detailed description
Up to 70% of stroke survivors show upper limb impairments consisting of motor and/or somatosensory impairments. These impairments often persist well into the chronic stage, and may lead to significant limitations in activities of daily living and may negatively affect quality of life. Different interventions have been investigated to treat upper limb motor impairments, including robot-based therapy, which shows similar positive results as compared to conventional therapy. Evidence on interventions for somatosensory impairments is scarce and often of low quality. This study therefore aims to evaluate the effect of a robot-based therapy program on sensorimotor function of the upper limb in a group of 20 chronic stroke patients.
The robot-based therapy will be provided using the Kinarm End-Point Lab (BKIN Technologies Ltd., Canada) and consists of passive and active therapy tasks for proprioception and sensory processing. The therapy consists of 10 one-hour sessions spread over 4 weeks. Clinical and robot-based motor and somatosensory assessments will be performed at 4 time points: twice at baseline, once at mid intervention, and once after 10 hours of therapy. The investigators hypothesize to find improvement in both upper limb motor and somatosensory function after the therapy program. The results from this pilot study will provide a basis for further research.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Robot-based therapy | Experimental | Device: Robot-based therapyChronic stroke patients receiving robot-based therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- At least 18 years old
- A first-ever unilateral, supratentorial stroke (as defined by WHO)
- In the chronic phase after stroke (i.e. being at least 6 months after stroke)
- Motor deficits of the upper limb (Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment - Upper Extremity < 60/66)
- Somatosensory deficits of the upper limb (Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment < 36/40)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- History of previous stroke or TIA
- Any serious musculoskeletal and/or other neurological conditions
- Serious communication or cognitive deficits
- No written informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Robot-based therapyActive and passive therapy tasks for proprioception and sensory processing, with use of the Kinarm End-Point Lab (BKIN Technologies Ltd., Canada) | Device | Robot-based therapy |
Primary outcome
Kinarm: sensory processing task
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Newly-developed task on the Kinarm End-Point Lab used to assess passive and active sensory processing
15 secondary outcomes
Kinarm: arm position matching task
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: arm movement matching task
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: visually guided reaching task
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: working memory task
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Erasmus modified Nottingham sensory assessment
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Tactile discrimination test
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Functional tactile object recognition test
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Fugl-Meyer upper extremity assessment
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Action research arm test
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Sensorimotor action research arm test
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Montreal cognitive assessment
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Star cancellation test
Time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: sensory processing task
Time frame: Change in 2 baseline measures taken 2 days apart, at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: sensory processing task
Time frame: Change during the first 2 weeks of a 4-week therapy protocol provided at least 6 months after stroke
Kinarm: sensory processing task
Time frame: Change during the last 2 weeks of a 4-week therapy protocol provided at least 6 months after stroke
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Jul 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37872776Saenen L, De Bruyn N, Verheyden G. Validity of a sensorimotor adaptation of the Action Research Arm Test (sARAT) in chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Sep;46(19):4532-4539. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2271837. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Stroke
Recruiting
Connectomic Alterations Following Acute Ischemic Stroke in the MCA Territory
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Clevidipine for the Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Stroke
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Testing How Well the Drug Extract of Ginkgo Biloba Leaves Tablets Works for People With Memory or Thinking Problems After a Stroke When Added to Standard Treatment
Ischemic Stroke Hospitalized, Impairment, Cognitive
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Anti-inflammatory and Anti-thrombotic Therapy With colcHicine and Low Dose Rivaroxaban for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Reduction in Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
CoMind Early Feasibility Study
Intracranial Pressure, Intracranial Pressure Changes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Robot-based therapy in people with Stroke, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Kinarm: sensory processing task (time frame: Change during 4 weeks of therapy provided at least 6 months after stroke). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05007002, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2022.