Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stage IIIaEarly Phase 1NCT05007587
Lenvatinib Plus HAIC of Modified FOLFOX Regime vs Lenvatinib Plus HAIC of ROX Regime in Patients With Advanced HCC
A Early Phase 1 study testing Lenvatinib, mFOLFOX regimen and ROX regimen in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stage IIIa, run by Zhejiang Cancer Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Lenvatinib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Modified FOLFOX Regime vs Lenvatinib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin Plus Raltitrexed in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stage IIIa
- What is being tested?
- Lenvatinib, mFOLFOX regimen and ROX regimen
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2021to 30 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Voluntary participation and informed consent, aged 18-75;
- Patients with HCC confirmed by histopathology or meeting the clinical diagnostic criteria in the 2019 edition of the diagnostic and therapeutic criteria for primary liver cancer;
- BCLC stage C patients with vascular invasion and without extrahepatic metastasis;
- Child Pugh liver function classification: A or B grade;
- ECOG physical strength score was 0-2 points;
- No previous systemic or local treatment, and the expected survival time is more than 3 months;
- According to recist1.1, the patient must have at least one measurable target lesion that has passed CT or MRI examination, and the tumor imaging evaluation was conducted within 2 weeks before receiving the study drug;
- Full organ and bone marrow function: WBC ≥ 3.0 × 109/L; NE≥1.5 × 109/L; PLT≥75 × 109/L; Liver and kidney function ALT and AST ≤ 5uln; TBIL≤2ULN; Albumin ≥ 28g / L; Cr≤1.5 ULN; International normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 1.5 or prothrombin time (PT) exceeding the normal control range ≤ 4 seconds;
Who cannot join
- Hepatocholangiocarcinoma, mixed cell carcinoma and fibrolamellar cell carcinoma are known;
- Uncontrollable ascites, hepatic encephalopathy or esophageal variceal bleeding;
- Patients with hypertension who can not be reduced to normal range after antihypertensive drug treatment (systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg);
- Patients with myocardial ischemia or myocardial infarction above grade II, poorly controlled arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia or myocardial infarction above grade II, poorly controlled arrhythmia (QTc interval ≥ 450 ms) (QTc interval was calculated by fridericia formula);
- Patients with history of gastrointestinal bleeding or definite tendency of gastrointestinal bleeding in the past 3 months, such as esophageal varices with bleeding risk, local active ulcer lesions, fecal occult blood ≥ +, can not be included in the group;
- Pregnant or lactating women, patients with fertility are unwilling or unable to take effective contraceptive measures;
- patients with a history of HIV infection;
- The researcher judges other situations that may affect the clinical research and the judgment of research results;
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital)
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022
About this study
Official title: Lenvatinib Combined With Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Modified FOLFOX Regimen Versus Lenvatinib Combined With Hepatic Arterial Infusion of ROX Regimen in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Lenvatinib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Modified FOLFOX Regime vs Lenvatinib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin Plus Raltitrexed in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Read the detailed description
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is one of the important means for the treatment of advanced liver cancer. A multicenter randomized controlled study has confirmed that modified FOLFOX hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced liver cancer and prolong the survival period of patients. The 2020 edition of CSCO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer has recommended oxaliplatin based FOLFOX arterial infusion regimen as the first-line treatment of advanced liver cancer. FOLFOX regimen is safe and effective, but fluorouracil needs more than 46 hours of long-term infusion, patients have difficulty in moving during catheterization, and increase the risk of thrombosis, so it is urgent to find a short-term infusion of fluorouracil. As a new antimetabolic drug, raltitrexed can be used for short-term infusion, and its plasma concentration half-life is longer than that of fluorouracil. Previous studies have shown that compared with FOLFOX arterial infusion regimen, oxaliplatin combined with raltitrexed regimen has longer overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in the treatment of advanced liver cancer. In addition, as an advanced liver cancer, lenvastinib has been recommended as a targeted drug for the first-line treatment of advanced HCC. This study intends to explore the efficacy and safety of modified FOLFOX regimen compared with oxaliplatin combined with raltitrexed (Rox regimen) in the treatment of lenvastinib combined with HAIC, so as to provide more clinical schemes for further improving the survival rate of patients with advanced liver cancer.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stage IIIa
- Being tested
- Lenvatinib, mFOLFOX regimen, ROX regimen
- Keywords
- Lenvatinib, HAIC, HCC
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LenvatinibDrug
Also called LENVIMA
8mg lenvatinib (weight<60kg) or 12mg lenvatinib (weight>60kg) QD
mFOLFOX regimenDrug
Also called Oxaliplatin+Leucovorin+Fluorouracil
HAIC was performed every 3 weeks. The mFOLFOX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 85mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 2 on day1 ; leucovorin , 400mg/m2 , from hour 2 to 3 on day 1 ; fluorouracil , 400mg/m2 , bolus at hour 3 ; and 2400mg/m2 over 46 hours on days 1 and 2.3mg/m2 , from hour 4 to 5 on day 1.
ROX regimenDrug
Also called Raltitrexed+Oxaliplatin
HAIC was performed every 3 weeks. The ROX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 100mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 4 on day1 ;raltitrexed , 3mg/m2 , from hour 4 to 5 on day 1.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lenvatinib,Then HAIC of mFOLFOX regimen | Experimental | Cohort1:Participants were treated with 8mg lenvatinib (weight<60kg) or 12mg lenvatinib (weight>60kg) orally once daily on days 1 through 21, and HAIC regimen was performed every 3 weeks. The mFOLFOX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 85mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 2 on day1 ; leucovorin , 400mg/m2 , from hour 2 to 3 on day 1 ; fluorouracil , 400mg/m2 , bolus at hour 3 ; and 2400mg/m2 over 46 hours on days 1 and 2. Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib; Drug: mFOLFOX regimen |
| Lenvatinib,Then HAIC of ROX regimen | Experimental | Cohort2:Participants were treated with 8mg lenvatinib (weight<60kg) or 12mg lenvatinib (weight>60kg) orally once daily on days 1 through 21, and HAIC regimen was performed every 3 weeks. The ROX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 100mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 4 on day1 ;raltitrexed , 3mg/m2 , from hour 4 to 5 on day 1. Receives: Drug: Lenvatinib; Drug: ROX regimen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective Response Rate and Disease Control Rate of the HCC Participants
ORR and DCR are validated indicators of the short-term clinical effects of hepatocellular carcinoma
Measured: from admission to discharge, up to 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Overall Survival and Progression-free Survival of the HCC Participants
OS and PFS are validated indicators of the long-term clinical effects of hepatocellular carcinoma
Measured: six months and twelve months
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Treatment-Related Adverse Events are important indicators of the safety for tumor treatment
Measured: from admission to discharge, up to 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Aug 2021
- Study start1 Jul 2021
- Primary completion30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stage IIIaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Zhejiang Cancer HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Shaoxing People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Jinhua Central Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jiaping Zheng, Doctor, Study chair, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05007587
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ZJPIRB-2021-211
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
PubMed 30207593Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration; Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, Brenner H, Dicker DJ, Chimed-Orchir O, Dandona R, Dandona L, Fleming T, Forouzanfar MH, Hancock J, Hay RJ, Hunter-Merrill R, Huynh C, Hosgood HD, Johnson CO, Jonas JB, Khubchandani J, Kumar GA, Kutz M, Lan Q, Larson HJ, Liang X, Lim SS, Lopez AD, MacIntyre MF, Marczak L, Marquez N, Mokdad AH, Pinho C, Pourmalek F, Salomon JA, Sanabria JR, Sandar L, Sartorius B, Schwartz SM, Shackelford KA, Shibuya K, Stanaway J, Steiner C, Sun J, Takahashi K, Vollset SE, Vos T, Wagner JA, Wang H, Westerman R, Zeeb H, Zoeckler L, Abd-Allah F, Ahmed MB, Alabed S, Alam NK, Aldhahri SF, Alem G, Alemayohu MA, Ali R, Al-Raddadi R, Amare A, Amoako Y, Artaman A, Asayesh H, Atnafu N, Awasthi A, Saleem HB, Barac A, Bedi N, Bensenor I, Berhane A, Bernabe E, Betsu B, Binagwaho A, Boneya D, Campos-Nonato I, Castaneda-Orjuela C, Catala-Lopez F, Chiang P, Chibueze C, Chitheer A, Choi JY, Cowie B, Damtew S, das Neves J, Dey S, Dharmaratne S, Dhillon P, Ding E, Driscoll T, Ekwueme D, Endries AY, Farvid M, Farzadfar F, Fernandes J, Fischer F, G/Hiwot TT, Gebru A, Gopalani S, Hailu A, Horino M, Horita N, Husseini A, Huybrechts I, Inoue M, Islami F, Jakovljevic M, James S, Javanbakht M, Jee SH, Kasaeian A, Kedir MS, Khader YS, Khang YH, Kim D, Leigh J, Linn S, Lunevicius R, El Razek HMA, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Marcenes W, Markos D, Melaku YA, Meles KG, Mendoza W, Mengiste DT, Meretoja TJ, Miller TR, Mohammad KA, Mohammadi A, Mohammed S, Moradi-Lakeh M, Nagel G, Nand D, Le Nguyen Q, Nolte S, Ogbo FA, Oladimeji KE, Oren E, Pa M, Park EK, Pereira DM, Plass D, Qorbani M, Radfar A, Rafay A, Rahman M, Rana SM, Soreide K, Satpathy M, Sawhney M, Sepanlou SG, Shaikh MA, She J, Shiue I, Shore HR, Shrime MG, So S, Soneji S, Stathopoulou V, Stroumpoulis K, Sufiyan MB, Sykes BL, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Tadese F, Tedla BA, Tessema GA, Thakur JS, Tran BX, Ukwaja KN, Uzochukwu BSC, Vlassov VV, Weiderpass E, Wubshet Terefe M, Yebyo HG, Yimam HH, Yonemoto N, Younis MZ, Yu C, Zaidi Z, Zaki MES, Zenebe ZM, Murray CJL, Naghavi M. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;3(4):524-548. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688.
PubMed 27918777Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, Luo R, Feng J, Ye S, Yang TS, Xu J, Sun Y, Liang H, Liu J, Wang J, Tak WY, Pan H, Burock K, Zou J, Voliotis D, Guan Z. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
PubMed 19095497Benson AB, D'Angelica MI, Abbott DE, Abrams TA, Alberts SR, Anaya DA, Anders R, Are C, Brown D, Chang DT, Cloyd J, Covey AM, Hawkins W, Iyer R, Jacob R, Karachristos A, Kelley RK, Kim R, Palta M, Park JO, Sahai V, Schefter T, Sicklick JK, Singh G, Sohal D, Stein S, Tian GG, Vauthey JN, Venook AP, Hammond LJ, Darlow SD. Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2019. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Apr 1;17(4):302-310. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0019.
PubMed 30959462Spallanzani A, Orsi G, Andrikou K, Gelsomino F, Rimini M, Riggi L, Cascinu S. Lenvatinib as a therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Nov;18(11):1069-1076. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1524297. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
PubMed 30220234Song DS, Song MJ, Bae SH, Chung WJ, Jang JY, Kim YS, Lee SH, Park JY, Yim HJ, Cho SB, Park SY, Yang JM. A comparative study between sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;50(4):445-54. doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-0978-3. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
PubMed 25027973Obi S, Sato S, Kawai T. Current Status of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy. Liver Cancer. 2015 Sep;4(3):188-99. doi: 10.1159/000367746. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
PubMed 26674592Lyu N, Kong Y, Mu L, Lin Y, Li J, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Zheng L, Deng H, Li S, Xie Q, Guo R, Shi M, Xu L, Cai X, Wu P, Zhao M. Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin vs. sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
PubMed 29471013Zhuang BW, Li W, Xie XH, Hu HT, Lu MD, Xie XY. Sorafenib versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;49(9):845-855. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz069.
PubMed 31063184Chen S, Zhang K, Liu W, Yu W. Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed in patients with intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II, single-arm, prospective study. Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;134:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.032. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
PubMed 32497895He M, Li Q, Zou R, Shen J, Fang W, Tan G, Zhou Y, Wu X, Xu L, Wei W, Le Y, Zhou Z, Zhao M, Guo Y, Guo R, Chen M, Shi M. Sorafenib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin vs Sorafenib Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;5(7):953-960. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0250.
PubMed 31070690
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lenvatinib Combined With Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Modified FOLFOX Regimen Versus Lenvatinib Combined With Hepatic Arterial Infusion of ROX Regimen in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05007587
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ZJPIRB-2021-211
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stage IIIa
- Keywords
- Lenvatinib, HAIC, HCC
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Zhejiang Cancer HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Shaoxing People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Jinhua Central Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lenvatinib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Modified FOLFOX Regime vs Lenvatinib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin Plus Raltitrexed in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Detailed description
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is one of the important means for the treatment of advanced liver cancer. A multicenter randomized controlled study has confirmed that modified FOLFOX hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with advanced liver cancer and prolong the survival period of patients. The 2020 edition of CSCO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer has recommended oxaliplatin based FOLFOX arterial infusion regimen as the first-line treatment of advanced liver cancer. FOLFOX regimen is safe and effective, but fluorouracil needs more than 46 hours of long-term infusion, patients have difficulty in moving during catheterization, and increase the risk of thrombosis, so it is urgent to find a short-term infusion of fluorouracil. As a new antimetabolic drug, raltitrexed can be used for short-term infusion, and its plasma concentration half-life is longer than that of fluorouracil. Previous studies have shown that compared with FOLFOX arterial infusion regimen, oxaliplatin combined with raltitrexed regimen has longer overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in the treatment of advanced liver cancer. In addition, as an advanced liver cancer, lenvastinib has been recommended as a targeted drug for the first-line treatment of advanced HCC. This study intends to explore the efficacy and safety of modified FOLFOX regimen compared with oxaliplatin combined with raltitrexed (Rox regimen) in the treatment of lenvastinib combined with HAIC, so as to provide more clinical schemes for further improving the survival rate of patients with advanced liver cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lenvatinib,Then HAIC of mFOLFOX regimen | Experimental | Drug: Lenvatinib, Drug: mFOLFOX regimenCohort1:Participants were treated with 8mg lenvatinib (weight<60kg) or 12mg lenvatinib (weight>60kg) orally once daily on days 1 through 21, and HAIC regimen was performed every 3 weeks. The mFOLFOX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 85mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 2 on day1 ; leucovorin , 400mg/m2 , from hour 2 to 3 on day 1 ; fluorouracil , 400mg/m2 , bolus at hour 3 ; and 2400mg/m2 over 46 hours on days 1 and 2. |
| Lenvatinib,Then HAIC of ROX regimen | Experimental | Drug: Lenvatinib, Drug: ROX regimenCohort2:Participants were treated with 8mg lenvatinib (weight<60kg) or 12mg lenvatinib (weight>60kg) orally once daily on days 1 through 21, and HAIC regimen was performed every 3 weeks. The ROX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 100mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 4 on day1 ;raltitrexed , 3mg/m2 , from hour 4 to 5 on day 1. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Voluntary participation and informed consent, aged 18-75;
- Patients with HCC confirmed by histopathology or meeting the clinical diagnostic criteria in the 2019 edition of the diagnostic and therapeutic criteria for primary liver cancer;
- BCLC stage C patients with vascular invasion and without extrahepatic metastasis;
- Child Pugh liver function classification: A or B grade;
- ECOG physical strength score was 0-2 points;
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Hepatocholangiocarcinoma, mixed cell carcinoma and fibrolamellar cell carcinoma are known;
- Uncontrollable ascites, hepatic encephalopathy or esophageal variceal bleeding;
- Patients with hypertension who can not be reduced to normal range after antihypertensive drug treatment (systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg);
- Patients with myocardial ischemia or myocardial infarction above grade II, poorly controlled arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia or myocardial infarction above grade II, poorly controlled arrhythmia (QTc interval ≥ 450 ms) (QTc interval was calculated by fridericia formula);
- Patients with history of gastrointestinal bleeding or definite tendency of gastrointestinal bleeding in the past 3 months, such as esophageal varices with bleeding risk, local active ulcer lesions, fecal occult blood ≥ +, can not be included in the group;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LenvatinibAlso: LENVIMA8mg lenvatinib (weight<60kg) or 12mg lenvatinib (weight>60kg) QD | Drug | Lenvatinib,Then HAIC of ROX regimen, Lenvatinib,Then HAIC of mFOLFOX regimen |
| mFOLFOX regimenAlso: Oxaliplatin+Leucovorin+FluorouracilHAIC was performed every 3 weeks. The mFOLFOX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 85mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 2 on day1 ; leucovorin , 400mg/m2 , from hour 2 to 3 on day 1 ; fluorouracil , 400mg/m2 , bolus at hour 3 ; and 2400mg/m2 over 46 hours on days 1 and 2.3mg/m2 , from hour 4 to 5 on day 1. | Drug | Lenvatinib,Then HAIC of mFOLFOX regimen |
| ROX regimenAlso: Raltitrexed+OxaliplatinHAIC was performed every 3 weeks. The ROX regimen was administered via hepatic artery: oxaliplatin , 100mg/m2 , from hour 0 to 4 on day1 ;raltitrexed , 3mg/m2 , from hour 4 to 5 on day 1. | Drug | Lenvatinib,Then HAIC of ROX regimen |
Primary outcome
Objective Response Rate and Disease Control Rate of the HCC Participants
Time frame: from admission to discharge, up to 4 weeks
ORR and DCR are validated indicators of the short-term clinical effects of hepatocellular carcinoma
2 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival and Progression-free Survival of the HCC Participants
Time frame: six months and twelve months
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time frame: from admission to discharge, up to 4 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 30207593Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 27918777Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration; Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, Brenner H, Dicker DJ, Chimed-Orchir O, Dandona R, Dandona L, Fleming T, Forouzanfar MH, Hancock J, Hay RJ, Hunter-Merrill R, Huynh C, Hosgood HD, Johnson CO, Jonas JB, Khubchandani J, Kumar GA, Kutz M, Lan Q, Larson HJ, Liang X, Lim SS, Lopez AD, MacIntyre MF, Marczak L, Marquez N, Mokdad AH, Pinho C, Pourmalek F, Salomon JA, Sanabria JR, Sandar L, Sartorius B, Schwartz SM, Shackelford KA, Shibuya K, Stanaway J, Steiner C, Sun J, Takahashi K, Vollset SE, Vos T, Wagner JA, Wang H, Westerman R, Zeeb H, Zoeckler L, Abd-Allah F, Ahmed MB, Alabed S, Alam NK, Aldhahri SF, Alem G, Alemayohu MA, Ali R, Al-Raddadi R, Amare A, Amoako Y, Artaman A, Asayesh H, Atnafu N, Awasthi A, Saleem HB, Barac A, Bedi N, Bensenor I, Berhane A, Bernabe E, Betsu B, Binagwaho A, Boneya D, Campos-Nonato I, Castaneda-Orjuela C, Catala-Lopez F, Chiang P, Chibueze C, Chitheer A, Choi JY, Cowie B, Damtew S, das Neves J, Dey S, Dharmaratne S, Dhillon P, Ding E, Driscoll T, Ekwueme D, Endries AY, Farvid M, Farzadfar F, Fernandes J, Fischer F, G/Hiwot TT, Gebru A, Gopalani S, Hailu A, Horino M, Horita N, Husseini A, Huybrechts I, Inoue M, Islami F, Jakovljevic M, James S, Javanbakht M, Jee SH, Kasaeian A, Kedir MS, Khader YS, Khang YH, Kim D, Leigh J, Linn S, Lunevicius R, El Razek HMA, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Marcenes W, Markos D, Melaku YA, Meles KG, Mendoza W, Mengiste DT, Meretoja TJ, Miller TR, Mohammad KA, Mohammadi A, Mohammed S, Moradi-Lakeh M, Nagel G, Nand D, Le Nguyen Q, Nolte S, Ogbo FA, Oladimeji KE, Oren E, Pa M, Park EK, Pereira DM, Plass D, Qorbani M, Radfar A, Rafay A, Rahman M, Rana SM, Soreide K, Satpathy M, Sawhney M, Sepanlou SG, Shaikh MA, She J, Shiue I, Shore HR, Shrime MG, So S, Soneji S, Stathopoulou V, Stroumpoulis K, Sufiyan MB, Sykes BL, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Tadese F, Tedla BA, Tessema GA, Thakur JS, Tran BX, Ukwaja KN, Uzochukwu BSC, Vlassov VV, Weiderpass E, Wubshet Terefe M, Yebyo HG, Yimam HH, Yonemoto N, Younis MZ, Yu C, Zaidi Z, Zaki MES, Zenebe ZM, Murray CJL, Naghavi M. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;3(4):524-548. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688.
- Results publication: PubMed 19095497Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, Luo R, Feng J, Ye S, Yang TS, Xu J, Sun Y, Liang H, Liu J, Wang J, Tak WY, Pan H, Burock K, Zou J, Voliotis D, Guan Z. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 30959462Benson AB, D'Angelica MI, Abbott DE, Abrams TA, Alberts SR, Anaya DA, Anders R, Are C, Brown D, Chang DT, Cloyd J, Covey AM, Hawkins W, Iyer R, Jacob R, Karachristos A, Kelley RK, Kim R, Palta M, Park JO, Sahai V, Schefter T, Sicklick JK, Singh G, Sohal D, Stein S, Tian GG, Vauthey JN, Venook AP, Hammond LJ, Darlow SD. Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2019. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Apr 1;17(4):302-310. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0019.
- Results publication: PubMed 30220234Spallanzani A, Orsi G, Andrikou K, Gelsomino F, Rimini M, Riggi L, Cascinu S. Lenvatinib as a therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Nov;18(11):1069-1076. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1524297. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 25027973Song DS, Song MJ, Bae SH, Chung WJ, Jang JY, Kim YS, Lee SH, Park JY, Yim HJ, Cho SB, Park SY, Yang JM. A comparative study between sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;50(4):445-54. doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-0978-3. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 26674592Obi S, Sato S, Kawai T. Current Status of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy. Liver Cancer. 2015 Sep;4(3):188-99. doi: 10.1159/000367746. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 29471013Lyu N, Kong Y, Mu L, Lin Y, Li J, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Zheng L, Deng H, Li S, Xie Q, Guo R, Shi M, Xu L, Cai X, Wu P, Zhao M. Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin vs. sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 31063184Zhuang BW, Li W, Xie XH, Hu HT, Lu MD, Xie XY. Sorafenib versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep 1;49(9):845-855. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz069.
- Results publication: PubMed 32497895Chen S, Zhang K, Liu W, Yu W. Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed in patients with intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II, single-arm, prospective study. Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;134:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.032. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 31070690He M, Li Q, Zou R, Shen J, Fang W, Tan G, Zhou Y, Wu X, Xu L, Wei W, Le Y, Zhou Z, Zhao M, Guo Y, Guo R, Chen M, Shi M. Sorafenib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin vs Sorafenib Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;5(7):953-960. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0250.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stage IIIa
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Nivolumab, Fluorouracil, and Interferon Alpha 2B for the Treatment of Unresectable Fibrolamellar Cancer
Stage III Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage IIIA Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing the Combination of Pevonedistat With Chemotherapy for Bile Duct Cancer of the Liver
Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Personalized Neoantigen Peptide-Based Vaccine in Combination With Pembrolizumab for Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors
Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
RecruitingPhase 2
Atezolizumab in Combination With a Multi-Kinase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Unresectable, Locally Advanced, or Metastatic Liver Cancer
Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Regorafenib and Durvalumab for the Treatment of High-Risk Liver Cancer
Stage IB Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8, Stage II Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jiaping Zheng, Doctor study chair
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Lenvatinib, mFOLFOX regimen and ROX regimen in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stage IIIa, run by Zhejiang Cancer Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective Response Rate and Disease Control Rate of the HCC Participants (time frame: from admission to discharge, up to 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05007587, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2021.