AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative PainNCT05008614

Comparison of Continuous ESP Versus TEA After Thoracotomy

A study testing Erector spinae plane block group and Thoracic epidural analgesia group in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded study is designed to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block in patients undergoing thoracotomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pain
What is being tested?
Erector spinae plane block group and Thoracic epidural analgesia group
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
53 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
22 Jul 2021to 31 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients scheduled to undergo elective thoracotomy for lung cancer
  • European Cooperative Oncology Group 0 or 1
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification I-III
  • Willingness and ability to sign an informed consent document

Who cannot join

  • patients with chronic postoperative pain after thoracic surgery
  • patients undergoing thoracotomy with chest wall resection
  • allergies to anesthetic or analgesic medications
  • patients with coagulopathy or who continue to take anticoagulants
  • preoperative liver or renal dysfunction
  • patients with chronic pain, chronic opioid, analgesic or antidepressant or anticonvulsant use
  • Do not understand our study
  • Medical or psychological disease that can affect the treatment response

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, Seoul, KS013

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia After Thoracotomy: A Randomized Controlled Assessor-blinded Non-inferiority Trial

This prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded study is designed to evaluate the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block in patients undergoing thoracotomy. We hypothesize that US-guided ESP block is not inferior to thoracic epidural analgesia in terms of postoperative pain control in these patients.

Read the detailed description

Adult patients undergoing elective unilateral thoracotomy for lung cancer resection are randomly allocated to receive US-guided ESP block (n=31) or thoracic epidural analgesia (n=31). Both procedures are performed prior to surgery. Each patient was assessed by a blinded investigator on postoperative day (POD) 1,2 and 3. The primary outcome is pain severity evaluated by a numeric rating scale (NRS) at POD1.

Being tested
Erector spinae plane block group, Thoracic epidural analgesia group
Keywords
thoracotomy, lung cancer, interfascial plane block, nerve block
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative, Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Erector spinae plane block groupProcedure or surgery

    Also called ESP group

    Before surgery, an anesthesiologist will perform unilateral ESP block with catheterization under ultrasound guidance in the procedure room.

    Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution 0.2% ropivacaine is continuously infused to the erector spinae plane at T5 level via 18G 85 mm perineural catheter (Silverstim, Vygon, Ecouen, France) (basal infusion: 10ml/hr, bolus 5ml, lockout time: 20min)

  • Thoracic epidural analgesia groupProcedure or surgery

    Also called TEA group

    Before surgery, an anesthesiologist will perform unilateral ESP block with catheterization under fluoroscopy guidance in the procedure room.

    Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution 0.2% ropivacaine is continuously infused to the erector spinae plane at T5 level via 17-gauge catheter (FlexTip Plus®, Teleflex Medical, USA) (Silverstim, Vygon, Ecouen, France) (basal infusion: 3ml/hr, bolus 1ml, lockout time: 20min)

Study groups in NCT05008614
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Erector spinae plane block group (ESP group)ExperimentalPatients receiving continuous unilateral ESP block. Interventions: Procedure: Ultrasound-guided unilateral ESP block via catheter placement for continuous infusion Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution Device: 21-gauge 85 mm perineural catheter, 18-gauge 100 mm stimulator needle (Silverstim, Vygon, Ecouen, France)
Receives: Procedure: Erector spinae plane block group
Thoracic epidural analgesia group (TEA group)Active comparatorPatients receiving thoracic epidural analgesia. Interventions: Procedure: Fluoroscopy-guided thoracic epidural analgesia Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75% Injectable Solution Device: 17-gauge Tuohy needle (FlexTip Plus®, Teleflex Medical, USA)
Receives: Procedure: Thoracic epidural analgesia group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximum postoperative pain score at rest on postoperative day 1

    pain score measured by the 11-pointed numeric rating scale (0: none/10: worst pain)

    Measured: Maximum pain score among the 9 am and 4 pm measurements on postoperative day 1

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Postoperative pain score at rest

    Change in the pain score at rest measured by the 11-pointed numeric rating scale (0: none/10: worst pain) from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 3

    Measured: 9am/4pm on postoperative day 1, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 2, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 3

  2. Postoperative pain score at movement

    Change in the pain score at movement measured by the 11-pointed numeric rating scale (0: none/10: worst pain) from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 3

    Measured: 9am/4pm on postoperative day 1, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 2, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 3

  3. Change in the total consumption (ml) of patient-controlled analgesia

    total consumption (ml) of epidural or erector spinae plane patient-controlled analgesia

    Measured: 9am/4pm on postoperative day 1, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 2, 9am/4pm on postoperative day 3

  4. Change in the quality of recovery-15 scale from baseline to postoperative day 3

    measured by the Korean version of the quality of recovery-15

    Measured: Day before surgery and 4pm on postoperative day 3

  5. Postoperative pulmonary function test

    measured at outpatient clinic

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  6. Incidence of chronic postoperative pain

    measure by the Korean version of the pain DETECT

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

  7. Incidence of chronic postoperative pain

    measure by the Korean version of the pain DETECT

    Measured: 6 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Aug 2021
  2. Study start22 Jul 2021
  3. Primary completion15 May 2024
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A prospective randomized controlled assessor-blinded non-inferiority trial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
53 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05008614
Sponsor's protocol ID
2104-142-1214
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
3 Aug 2021
Last updated
4 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Erector spinae plane block group and Thoracic epidural analgesia group in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximum postoperative pain score at rest on postoperative day 1 (time frame: Maximum pain score among the 9 am and 4 pm measurements on postoperative day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in