InfluenzaNCT05009251
Using Explainable AI Risk Predictions to Nudge Influenza Vaccine Uptake
A study testing Reminder, Risk reduction and Medical records-based recommendation in people with Influenza and Vaccination, run by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study team previously demonstrated that patients are more likely to receive flu vaccine after learning that they are at high risk for flu complications. Building on this past work, the present study will explore whether providing reasons that patients are considered high risk for flu complications (a) further… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza, Vaccination, Health Promotion
- What is being tested?
- Reminder, Risk reduction and Medical records-based recommendation
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 45,061 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 9 Sep 2021to 31 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 or older
- Current Geisinger patient at the time of study
- Falls in the top 10% of patients at highest risk, as identified by the flu-complication risk scores of machine learning algorithm (which operates on coded EHR data)
Who cannot join
- Has contraindications for flu vaccination
- Has opted out of receiving communications from Geisinger via all of the modalities being tested
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The study team previously demonstrated that patients are more likely to receive flu vaccine after learning that they are at high risk for flu complications. Building on this past work, the present study will explore whether providing reasons that patients are considered high risk for flu complications (a) further increases the likelihood they will receive flu vaccine and (b) decreases the likelihood that they receive diagnoses of flu and/or flu-like symptoms in the ensuing flu season. It will also examine whether informing patients that their high-risk status was determined by analyzing their medical records or by an artificial intelligence (AI) / machine-learning (ML) algorithm analyzing their medical records will affect the likelihood of receiving the flu vaccine or diagnoses of flu and/or flu-like symptoms.
Read the detailed description
Geisinger has partnered with Medial EarlySign and developed an ML algorithm to identify patients at risk for serious (moderate to severe) flu-associated complications on the basis of their existing electronic health record (EHR) data. Geisinger will apply this algorithm to current patients during the 2021-22 flu season.
This study will evaluate the effect of contacting patients identified as high risk with special messages to encourage vaccination. These communications will inform patients they are at high risk with either (a) no additional explanation, (b) an explanation that this determination comes from an analysis of their medical records, along with a short list of the top factors from their medical record that explain their risk, and (c) the additional explanation that an AI or ML algorithm made this determination, along with a short list of the top factors from their medical record that explain their risk.
Included in the study will be current Geisinger patients 18+ years of age with no contraindications for flu vaccine and who have been assessed by the Medial algorithm and assigned a risk score. The primary study outcomes will be the rates of flu vaccination and flu diagnosis during the 2020-21 season by targeted patients.
- Conditions
- Influenza, Vaccination, Health Promotion, Health Behavior, Risk Reduction
- Being tested
- Reminder, Risk reduction, Medical records-based recommendation, Algorithm-based recommendation
- Keywords
- Flu Vaccine, Choice Architecture, Machine Learning, Perceived Credibility, Personalized Risk Factors, Flu Complications
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human, Health Behavior, Risk Reduction Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ReminderBehavioural
Mailed letter, short message service (SMS) text, and/or patient portal message
Risk reductionBehavioural
Mailed letter, SMS, and/or patient portal message
Medical records-based recommendationBehavioural
Also called Credibility
Mailed letter, SMS, and/or patient portal message
Algorithm-based recommendationBehavioural
Also called Credibility
Mailed letter, SMS, and/or patient portal message
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| No-Contact Control | No intervention | Subjects in the no-contact control arm will receive no additional pro-vaccination intervention beyond the health system's normal efforts. Although some patients are currently targeted for flu vaccination encouragement due to a conventional non-ML assessment that they are at high risk for complications, these patients are not told that they are at high risk or that they have been targeted. |
| Reminder Control | Experimental | Subjects in the reminder control arm will receive messages reminding them to get the flu shot without being advised of their risk status. Receives: Behavioral: Reminder |
| High Risk Only | Experimental | Subjects in this treatment arm will receive messages telling them they have been identified to be at high risk for flu complications, without specifying how or why the health system believes this to be the case. Receives: Behavioral: Reminder; Behavioral: Risk reduction |
| High Risk with Explanation Based on Medical Records | Experimental | Subjects in this treatment arm will receive messages telling them they have been identified to be at high risk for flu complications via review of their medical records and will be provided a human-understandable short list of the top factors from their medical record that explain their risk. Receives: Behavioral: Reminder; Behavioral: Risk reduction; Behavioral: Medical records-based recommendation |
| High Risk with Explanation Based on Algorithm | Experimental | Subjects in this treatment arm will receive messages telling them they have been identified to be at high risk for flu complications via analysis of their medical records by a computer algorithm and will be provided a human-understandable short list of the top factors from their medical record that explain their risk. Receives: Behavioral: Reminder; Behavioral: Risk reduction; Behavioral: Medical records-based recommendation; Behavioral: Algorithm-based recommendation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Flu Vaccination at 2 Weeks After Final Outreach Date
Received flu vaccination
Measured: Within 2 weeks of the final outreach date, 57 days (8.14 weeks) after the study start
Secondary outcomes (4)
Flu Vaccination at 9 Weeks After Final Outreach Date
Received a flu vaccination
Measured: Within 9 weeks of the final outreach date, 106 days (15.14 weeks) after the study start
Flu Diagnosis
Received a "high confidence flu" diagnosis (with positive polymerase chain reaction [PCR]/antigen/molecular test) and/or "likely flu" diagnosis (as assessed via International Classification of Disease [ICD] codes or Tamiflu administration or positive PCR/antigen/molecular test)
Note that "likely flu" is a superset of the "high confidence flu" diagnoses.
Measured: 8 months (between September 9, 2021 and April 30, 2022)
Flu Complications
Diagnosed with flu-related complications
Measured: 11 months (between September 9, 2021 and July 31, 2022)
Healthcare Utilization
Visited ER or was hospitalized
NOTE: Our prespecified outcome was description was "Visited ER, was hospitalized, or had flu-related insurance claims." We did not receive claims data, so this outcomes includes only ER visits and hospitalizations.
Measured: 11 months (between September 9, 2021 and July 31, 2022)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2021
- Study start9 Sep 2021
- Primary completion5 Nov 2021
- Study completion31 Jul 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients from the high-risk sample will be randomly assigned to one of five arms: * No-Contact Control Arm * Reminder Control Arm * High Risk Only Arm * High Risk with Explanation Based on Medical Records Arm * High Risk with Explanation Based on Algorithm Arm
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider
- Enrolment
- 45,061 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Geisinger Clinic, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michelle N Meyer, PhD JD, Principal investigator, Geisinger ClinicChristopher F Chabris, PhD, Principal investigator, Geisinger Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05009251
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021-0483
- Other IDs
- P30AG034532
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 3 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data with no personally identifiable information will be made available to other researchers on the Open Science Framework for transparency. This will include the essential data and code needed to replicate the analysis that yielded reported findings.
Publications
Rosenbaum GM, Goren A, Shermohammed M, Wolk DM, Tice AM, Doyle JJ Jr, Meyer MN, Chabris CF. Algorithm-assisted personalized risk communication to encourage flu vaccination in the USA: three randomized field trials. Nat Hum Behav. 2026 Oct 5. doi: 10.1038/s41562-026-02603-4. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42834081
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Using Explainable AI Risk Predictions to Nudge Influenza Vaccine Uptake
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05009251
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021-0483
- Conditions
- Influenza, Vaccination, Health Promotion, Health Behavior, Risk Reduction
- Keywords
- Flu Vaccine, Choice Architecture, Machine Learning, Perceived Credibility, Personalized Risk Factors, Flu Complications
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 45,061 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Geisinger Clinic, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- 9 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 12 Jan 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study team previously demonstrated that patients are more likely to receive flu vaccine after learning that they are at high risk for flu complications. Building on this past work, the present study will explore whether providing reasons that patients are considered high risk for flu complications (a) further increases the likelihood they will receive flu vaccine and (b) decreases the likelihood that they receive diagnoses of flu and/or flu-like symptoms in the ensuing flu season. It will also examine whether informing patients that their high-risk status was determined by analyzing their medical records or by an artificial intelligence (AI) / machine-learning (ML) algorithm analyzing their medical records will affect the likelihood of receiving the flu vaccine or diagnoses of flu and/or flu-like symptoms.
Detailed description
Geisinger has partnered with Medial EarlySign and developed an ML algorithm to identify patients at risk for serious (moderate to severe) flu-associated complications on the basis of their existing electronic health record (EHR) data. Geisinger will apply this algorithm to current patients during the 2021-22 flu season.
This study will evaluate the effect of contacting patients identified as high risk with special messages to encourage vaccination. These communications will inform patients they are at high risk with either (a) no additional explanation, (b) an explanation that this determination comes from an analysis of their medical records, along with a short list of the top factors from their medical record that explain their risk, and (c) the additional explanation that an AI or ML algorithm made this determination, along with a short list of the top factors from their medical record that explain their risk.
Included in the study will be current Geisinger patients 18+ years of age with no contraindications for flu vaccine and who have been assessed by the Medial algorithm and assigned a risk score. The primary study outcomes will be the rates of flu vaccination and flu diagnosis during the 2020-21 season by targeted patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (care provider)
- Number of arms
- 5
- Model description
- Patients from the high-risk sample will be randomly assigned to one of five arms: * No-Contact Control Arm * Reminder Control Arm * High Risk Only Arm * High Risk with Explanation Based on Medical Records Arm * High Risk with Explanation Based on Algorithm Arm
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| No-Contact Control | No intervention | –Subjects in the no-contact control arm will receive no additional pro-vaccination intervention beyond the health system's normal efforts. Although some patients are currently targeted for flu vaccination encouragement due to a conventional non-ML assessment that they are at high risk for complications, these patients are not told that they are at high risk or that they have been targeted. |
| Reminder Control | Experimental | Behavioral: ReminderSubjects in the reminder control arm will receive messages reminding them to get the flu shot without being advised of their risk status. |
| High Risk Only | Experimental | Behavioral: Reminder, Behavioral: Risk reductionSubjects in this treatment arm will receive messages telling them they have been identified to be at high risk for flu complications, without specifying how or why the health system believes this to be the case. |
| High Risk with Explanation Based on Medical Records | Experimental | Behavioral: Reminder, Behavioral: Risk reduction, Behavioral: Medical records-based recommendationSubjects in this treatment arm will receive messages telling them they have been identified to be at high risk for flu complications via review of their medical records and will be provided a human-understandable short list of the top factors from their medical record that explain their risk. |
| High Risk with Explanation Based on Algorithm | Experimental | Behavioral: Reminder, Behavioral: Risk reduction, Behavioral: Medical records-based recommendation, Behavioral: Algorithm-based recommendationSubjects in this treatment arm will receive messages telling them they have been identified to be at high risk for flu complications via analysis of their medical records by a computer algorithm and will be provided a human-understandable short list of the top factors from their medical record that explain their risk. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Aged 18 or older
- Current Geisinger patient at the time of study
- Falls in the top 10% of patients at highest risk, as identified by the flu-complication risk scores of machine learning algorithm (which operates on coded EHR data)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Has contraindications for flu vaccination
- Has opted out of receiving communications from Geisinger via all of the modalities being tested
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ReminderMailed letter, short message service (SMS) text, and/or patient portal message | Behavioural | High Risk Only, High Risk with Explanation Based on Algorithm, High Risk with Explanation Based on Medical Records, Reminder Control |
| Risk reductionMailed letter, SMS, and/or patient portal message | Behavioural | High Risk Only, High Risk with Explanation Based on Algorithm, High Risk with Explanation Based on Medical Records |
| Medical records-based recommendationAlso: CredibilityMailed letter, SMS, and/or patient portal message | Behavioural | High Risk with Explanation Based on Algorithm, High Risk with Explanation Based on Medical Records |
| Algorithm-based recommendationAlso: CredibilityMailed letter, SMS, and/or patient portal message | Behavioural | High Risk with Explanation Based on Algorithm |
Primary outcome
Flu Vaccination at 2 Weeks After Final Outreach Date
Time frame: Within 2 weeks of the final outreach date, 57 days (8.14 weeks) after the study start
Received flu vaccination
4 secondary outcomes
Flu Vaccination at 9 Weeks After Final Outreach Date
Time frame: Within 9 weeks of the final outreach date, 106 days (15.14 weeks) after the study start
Flu Diagnosis
Time frame: 8 months (between September 9, 2021 and April 30, 2022)
Flu Complications
Time frame: 11 months (between September 9, 2021 and July 31, 2022)
Healthcare Utilization
Time frame: 11 months (between September 9, 2021 and July 31, 2022)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jan 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42834081Rosenbaum GM, Goren A, Shermohammed M, Wolk DM, Tice AM, Doyle JJ Jr, Meyer MN, Chabris CF. Algorithm-assisted personalized risk communication to encourage flu vaccination in the USA: three randomized field trials. Nat Hum Behav. 2026 Oct 5. doi: 10.1038/s41562-026-02603-4. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data with no personally identifiable information will be made available to other researchers on the Open Science Framework for transparency. This will include the essential data and code needed to replicate the analysis that yielded reported findings.
Related trials for Influenza
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 1
pH1N1 Blinded Challenge Study
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1406/CD388 for Prevention of Influenza (MK-1406-005/CD388.SQ.3.06)
Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michelle N Meyer, PhD JD principal investigator
Geisinger Clinic
Christopher F Chabris, PhD principal investigator
Geisinger Clinic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Reminder, Risk reduction and Medical records-based recommendation in people with Influenza and Vaccination, run by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Jan 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Flu Vaccination at 2 Weeks After Final Outreach Date (time frame: Within 2 weeks of the final outreach date, 57 days (8.14 weeks) after the study start). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05009251, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2025.