AgedNCT05016089
Simplified Pilates Training in Older Adults in Hong Kong
A study testing The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme in people with Aged, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study aims to examine the efficacy of the simplified Pilates exercise programme developed by a group of Pilates and rehabilitation experts in Hong Kong to reduce the risk of falling (the physical and psychological risk factors) of Hong Kong's older adults who might be prone to falling. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Aged
- What is being tested?
- The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2021to 31 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 to 99 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age 65 or above;
- score of less than 24/28 in the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA).
Who cannot join
- total score of less than 24 in the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C);
- presence of any untreated cerebral vascular disease, Parkinson's disease, or any other major neurological deficit;
- presence of any unstable medical condition that can affect safety during the exercise training;
- inability to sit and lie down on a Pilates exercise mat on the floor even with assistance.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong
Thomson Wong, PhD
About this study
Official title: The Efficacy of a Simplified Pilates Exercise Training in Reducing the Risk of Falling in Hong Kong's Older Adults: A Wait-list Randomised Controlled Trial
This study aims to examine the efficacy of the simplified Pilates exercise programme developed by a group of Pilates and rehabilitation experts in Hong Kong to reduce the risk of falling (the physical and psychological risk factors) of Hong Kong's older adults who might be prone to falling. It is hypothesized that a simplified Pilates exercise programme is efficacious in reducing the risk of falling (the physical and psychological risk factors) in Hong Kong's older adults who are at a medium to high risk of falling. There is no updated research that has specifically investigated an expertly designed simplified Pilates exercise programme and no research investigated it in Hong Kong as well. Therefore, this study is novel and important in investigating the efficacy of an expertly designed simplified Pilates exercise programme in Hong Kong's older population specifically developed for reducing the risk of falls. It could increase the intelligent choices of efficacious and easy-to-comply-with fall prevention exercise programmes (the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme) for older adults and reduce the impact of falls in the older population. The more the choices of simple and efficacious fall prevention programmes that are available for older adults, the more likely it is that they will be interested in complying with the programme. Consequently, this research could provide evidence of Pilates being used in fall prevention of older adults locally and globally.
Read the detailed description
This study will be a randomised controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of the simplified Pilates exercise programme (developed by a group of Pilates and rehabilitation experts in Hong Kong in our completed pilot study) by comparing it with the wait-list control.
A total of 60 older adults will be recruited from different collaborating community elderly and rehabilitation centres in Hong Kong using convenience sampling. The inclusion criteria will be the following: (1) age 65 or above and (2) score of less than 24/28 in the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA). The exclusion criteria will be the following: (1) total score of less than 24 in the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C), (2) presence of any untreated cerebral vascular disease, Parkinson's disease, or any other major neurological deficit, (3) presence of any unstable medical condition that can affect safety during the exercise training, and (4) inability to sit and lie down on a Pilates exercise mat on the floor even with assistance.
The participants (N = 60) will be randomly assigned using concealed block randomisation by an independent person through a sealed and opaque envelope system to either the simplified Pilates exercise group (SPEG; n = 30) or the wait-list control group (WLCG; n = 30). A computerised random-number generator will be utilised to prepare an allocation schedule. The participants in the SPEG will partake in exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions. All the training sessions will be conducted in Hong Kong by two experienced and certified Pilates trainers under the supervision of a registered physiotherapist. The participants in the SPEG will practise the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme. The WLCG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme after two scheduled assessment sessions and a waiting period of 12 weeks in between.
To examine the efficacy of the exercise programme, the participants of both the SPEG and WLCG will undergo two assessment sessions before training at baseline (T0) and just after the completion of all the exercise sessions (T1). In the baseline assessment (T0), a structural questionnaire will be used to ask the participants for their demographic information, detailed information regarding any previous falls, detailed medical history, use of prescribed drugs, social history, and socio-economic status. Following this, a series of assessments will be conducted to examine their balance ability, which will be measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS; primary outcome measure), and other physical and psychological fall risk factors (secondary outcome measures) in the two assessment sessions (T0 \& T1). Any adverse events will be reported and tracked. Participants will also be asked to prospectively record the number of falls they have experienced during the time between T0 and T1 using a structural calendar. The frequency of falls (secondary outcome measure) will then be collected at T1.
Balance ability (primary outcome measure) will be assessed using the BBS. Regarding the other physical fall risk factors (secondary outcome measure), flexibility will be measured using the 'sit-and-reach' (S\&R) test. A functional gait and balance assessment will be conducted using the POMA and Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests.
On the other hand, for the assessment of the psychological fall risk factors (secondary outcome measure), the MMSE-C will be used as a screening tool to examine the preliminary cognitive function at the beginning of training. Depression levels will be assessed using the Chinese version of the 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4C). Anxiety levels will be measured using the valid and reliable Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAT-SC \& STAI-TC). The valid and reliable Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International [FES-I (Ch)] will be utilised to assess the fear of falling. The valid and reliable Chinese version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC (Ch)] will be used to evaluate balance confidence.
- Conditions
- Aged
- Being tested
- The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme
- Keywords
- Efficacy, Simplified Pilates, Wait-list control, Falls prevention, Older adults, Risk of falling, Fall risk factors, Hong Kong
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programmeOther
The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme was developed by a group of experienced Pilates and rehabilitation experts from our completed pilot work.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Simplified Pilates exercise group (SPEG) | Experimental | The participants in the SPEG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions. Receives: Other: The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme |
| Wait-list control group (WLCG) | Other | The participants in the WLCG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks after two scheduled assessment sessions and a waiting period of 12 weeks in between. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions. Receives: Other: The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Baseline Balance Ability
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Measured: Day 0
Change from Baseline Balance Ability at 12 weeks
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (16)
Baseline Flexibility
Sit-and-reach (S\&R) test
Measured: Day 0
Change from Baseline Flexibility at 12 weeks
Sit-and-reach (S\&R) test
Measured: Week 12
Baseline Functional Gait and Balance Assessment
The Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)
Measured: Day 0
Change from Baseline Functional Gait and Balance Assessment at 12 weeks
The Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)
Measured: Week 12
Baseline Functional Gait Assessment
Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests
Measured: Day 0
Change from Baseline Functional Gait Assessment at 12 weeks
Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests
Measured: Week 12
Preliminary Cognitive Function
The Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C)
Measured: Day 0
Baseline Depression Levels
The Chinese version of the 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4C)
Measured: Day 0
Change from Baseline Depression Levels at 12 weeks
The Chinese version of the 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4C)
Measured: Week 12
Baseline Anxiety Levels
The Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAT-SC \& STAI-TC)
Measured: Day 0
Change from Baseline Anxiety Levels at 12 weeks
The Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAT-SC \& STAI-TC)
Measured: Week 12
Baseline Fear of Falling
The Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International [FES-I (Ch)]
Measured: Day 0
Change from Baseline Fear of Falling at 12 weeks
The Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International [FES-I (Ch)]
Measured: Week 12
Baseline Balance Confidence
The Chinese version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC (Ch)]
Measured: Day 0
Change from Baseline Balance Confidence at 12 weeks
The Chinese version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC (Ch)]
Measured: Week 12
Frequency of falls
Participants will be asked to prospectively record the number of falls they have experienced during the time between Day 0 and Week 12 using a structural calendar. The frequency of falls will be collected at Week 12.
Measured: Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Aug 2021
- Study start1 Oct 2021
- Primary completion31 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AgedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A randomised, controlled (wait-list control), and two-armed trial.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The University of Hong Kong, Education University of Hong Kong
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thomson Wong, PhD, BScPT, Principal investigator, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05016089
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18191091
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 21 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Efficacy of a Simplified Pilates Exercise Training in Reducing the Risk of Falling in Hong Kong's Older Adults: A Wait-list Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05016089
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18191091
- Conditions
- Aged
- Keywords
- Efficacy, Simplified Pilates, Wait-list control, Falls prevention, Older adults, Risk of falling, Fall risk factors, Hong Kong
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The University of Hong Kong, Education University of Hong Kong
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to examine the efficacy of the simplified Pilates exercise programme developed by a group of Pilates and rehabilitation experts in Hong Kong to reduce the risk of falling (the physical and psychological risk factors) of Hong Kong's older adults who might be prone to falling. It is hypothesized that a simplified Pilates exercise programme is efficacious in reducing the risk of falling (the physical and psychological risk factors) in Hong Kong's older adults who are at a medium to high risk of falling. There is no updated research that has specifically investigated an expertly designed simplified Pilates exercise programme and no research investigated it in Hong Kong as well. Therefore, this study is novel and important in investigating the efficacy of an expertly designed simplified Pilates exercise programme in Hong Kong's older population specifically developed for reducing the risk of falls. It could increase the intelligent choices of efficacious and easy-to-comply-with fall prevention exercise programmes (the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme) for older adults and reduce the impact of falls in the older population. The more the choices of simple and efficacious fall prevention programmes that are available for older adults, the more likely it is that they will be interested in complying with the programme. Consequently, this research could provide evidence of Pilates being used in fall prevention of older adults locally and globally.
Detailed description
This study will be a randomised controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of the simplified Pilates exercise programme (developed by a group of Pilates and rehabilitation experts in Hong Kong in our completed pilot study) by comparing it with the wait-list control.
A total of 60 older adults will be recruited from different collaborating community elderly and rehabilitation centres in Hong Kong using convenience sampling. The inclusion criteria will be the following: (1) age 65 or above and (2) score of less than 24/28 in the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA). The exclusion criteria will be the following: (1) total score of less than 24 in the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C), (2) presence of any untreated cerebral vascular disease, Parkinson's disease, or any other major neurological deficit, (3) presence of any unstable medical condition that can affect safety during the exercise training, and (4) inability to sit and lie down on a Pilates exercise mat on the floor even with assistance.
The participants (N = 60) will be randomly assigned using concealed block randomisation by an independent person through a sealed and opaque envelope system to either the simplified Pilates exercise group (SPEG; n = 30) or the wait-list control group (WLCG; n = 30). A computerised random-number generator will be utilised to prepare an allocation schedule. The participants in the SPEG will partake in exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions. All the training sessions will be conducted in Hong Kong by two experienced and certified Pilates trainers under the supervision of a registered physiotherapist. The participants in the SPEG will practise the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme. The WLCG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme after two scheduled assessment sessions and a waiting period of 12 weeks in between.
To examine the efficacy of the exercise programme, the participants of both the SPEG and WLCG will undergo two assessment sessions before training at baseline (T0) and just after the completion of all the exercise sessions (T1). In the baseline assessment (T0), a structural questionnaire will be used to ask the participants for their demographic information, detailed information regarding any previous falls, detailed medical history, use of prescribed drugs, social history, and socio-economic status. Following this, a series of assessments will be conducted to examine their balance ability, which will be measured by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS; primary outcome measure), and other physical and psychological fall risk factors (secondary outcome measures) in the two assessment sessions (T0 \& T1). Any adverse events will be reported and tracked. Participants will also be asked to prospectively record the number of falls they have experienced during the time between T0 and T1 using a structural calendar. The frequency of falls (secondary outcome measure) will then be collected at T1.
Balance ability (primary outcome measure) will be assessed using the BBS. Regarding the other physical fall risk factors (secondary outcome measure), flexibility will be measured using the 'sit-and-reach' (S\&R) test. A functional gait and balance assessment will be conducted using the POMA and Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests.
On the other hand, for the assessment of the psychological fall risk factors (secondary outcome measure), the MMSE-C will be used as a screening tool to examine the preliminary cognitive function at the beginning of training. Depression levels will be assessed using the Chinese version of the 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4C). Anxiety levels will be measured using the valid and reliable Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAT-SC \& STAI-TC). The valid and reliable Chinese version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International [FES-I (Ch)] will be utilised to assess the fear of falling. The valid and reliable Chinese version of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC (Ch)] will be used to evaluate balance confidence.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A randomised, controlled (wait-list control), and two-armed trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Simplified Pilates exercise group (SPEG) | Experimental | Other: The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programmeThe participants in the SPEG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions. |
| Wait-list control group (WLCG) | Other | Other: The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programmeThe participants in the WLCG will participate in the 16-style simplified Pilates exercise sessions (about 60 minutes each) in a group (about 10 participants in each group) twice a week for 12 weeks after two scheduled assessment sessions and a waiting period of 12 weeks in between. Each participant will undertake a total of 24 exercise sessions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- age 65 or above;
- score of less than 24/28 in the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA).
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- total score of less than 24 in the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-C);
- presence of any untreated cerebral vascular disease, Parkinson's disease, or any other major neurological deficit;
- presence of any unstable medical condition that can affect safety during the exercise training;
- inability to sit and lie down on a Pilates exercise mat on the floor even with assistance.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programmeThe 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme was developed by a group of experienced Pilates and rehabilitation experts from our completed pilot work. | Other | Simplified Pilates exercise group (SPEG), Wait-list control group (WLCG) |
Primary outcome
Baseline Balance Ability
Time frame: Day 0
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Change from Baseline Balance Ability at 12 weeks
Time frame: Week 12
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
16 secondary outcomes
Baseline Flexibility
Time frame: Day 0
Change from Baseline Flexibility at 12 weeks
Time frame: Week 12
Baseline Functional Gait and Balance Assessment
Time frame: Day 0
Change from Baseline Functional Gait and Balance Assessment at 12 weeks
Time frame: Week 12
Baseline Functional Gait Assessment
Time frame: Day 0
Change from Baseline Functional Gait Assessment at 12 weeks
Time frame: Week 12
Preliminary Cognitive Function
Time frame: Day 0
Baseline Depression Levels
Time frame: Day 0
Change from Baseline Depression Levels at 12 weeks
Time frame: Week 12
Baseline Anxiety Levels
Time frame: Day 0
Change from Baseline Anxiety Levels at 12 weeks
Time frame: Week 12
Baseline Fear of Falling
Time frame: Day 0
Change from Baseline Fear of Falling at 12 weeks
Time frame: Week 12
Baseline Balance Confidence
Time frame: Day 0
Change from Baseline Balance Confidence at 12 weeks
Time frame: Week 12
Frequency of falls
Time frame: Week 12
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Nov 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Aged
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Atrasentan in Pediatric Patients With Primary IgAN
Berger Disease, Bergers Disease
RecruitingObservational study
VIRal Pulmonary Infections in Older AGE
Viral Pulmonary Infections
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomson Wong, PhD, BScPT principal investigator
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing The 16-style simplified Pilates exercise programme in people with Aged, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Thomson Wong, PhD, BScPT ((852)27666717, thomson.wong@polyu.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Baseline Balance Ability (time frame: Day 0). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2022.