AzTrials
AzTrials

Pre-TermNCT05017727

Closed-loop Oxygen Control in Ventilated Infants Born at or Near Term

An observational study of Pre-Term and Respiratory Disease, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Ventilated neonates frequently require supplementary oxygen to allow for adequate oxygen delivery to the tissues and normal cell metabolism. Oxygen treatment should be monitored carefully as both excessive and inadequate dosing can have detrimental effects for the infants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 34 weeks and older
Conditions the study is for
Pre-Term, Respiratory Disease
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
31 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
5 Oct 2021to 17 Jan 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 34 weeks and older
  • All sexes
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: This will be a randomised controlled crossover study. We aim to recruit a minimum of 31 ventilated infants born at 34 weeks completed gestation and above and admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at our hospital over one year.

Who may be able to join

  • Infants born at 34 weeks completed gestation and above requiring mechanical ventilation and admitted to King's NICU
  • Any gender, ethnicity or other comorbidities

Who cannot join

  • Preterm infants less than 34 weeks gestation
  • Infants with cyanotic congenital heart disease
  • Infants undergoing planned procedures or surgery during the monitoring period
  • Infants on high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    London, SE5 0BD

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Does Closed-loop Automated Oxygen Control During Mechanical Ventilation Reduce Hypoxic Events? A Randomised Controlled Crossover Study in Ventilated Infants

Ventilated neonates frequently require supplementary oxygen to allow for adequate oxygen delivery to the tissues and normal cell metabolism. Oxygen treatment should be monitored carefully as both excessive and inadequate dosing can have detrimental effects for the infants. Hypoxia (giving too little oxygen) increases mortality and later disability whereas hyperoxia (giving too much oxygen) increases the risk of complications such as retinopathy of prematurity and lung disease. Although very preterm and low birth weight infants represent the majority of ventilated neonates, more mature infants may also require mechanical ventilation at birth and provision of supplementary oxygen. Therefore, they may suffer from complications related to hypoxia or hyperoxia. Hence, their oxygen saturation levels and the amount of the inspired oxygen concentration provided should be continuously monitored.

Oxygen control is traditionally monitored and adjusted manually by the nurse looking after the infant. Closed-loop automated oxygen control (CLAC) is a more recent approach that involves the use of a computer software incorporated into the ventilator. The software uses an algorithm that automatically adjusts the amount of inspired oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation levels in a target range. Evidence suggests that CLAC increases the time spent in the desired oxygen target range, decreases the duration of hypoxia and hyperoxia and reduces the number of manual adjustments required by clinical staff. However previous studies have been limited to very small infants. With this study the investigators aim to evaluate the effectiveness of CLAC in ventilated infants born at 34 weeks gestation and beyond. The achievement of oxygen saturation targets and the number of manual adjustments required will be compared between periods of CLAC and manual control in a cohort of patients that has not been included in previous studies and could also benefit from the intervention. The investigators will also evaluate if CLAC reduces investigations performed to ventilated babies(blood gases, X-rays).

Read the detailed description

This will be a randomised controlled crossover study. The investigators aim to recruit a minimum of 31 ventilated infants born at 34 weeks completed gestation and above and admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at King's College Hospital over one year. Participants will undergo two monitoring periods each lasting 12 hours (8:00am-20:00pm): one with standard manually controlled oxygen and one with closed-loop automated oxygen control. Randomisation will be used to determine whether the first period will be manual or closed-loop automated oxygen control. The two monitoring periods will take place on two consecutive days to allow for clinical conditions to remain as stable as possible.

Infants with known congenital cyanotic heart disease will be excluded from the study as well as those undergoing surgery or any planned procedures during the monitoring period.

Informed written consent will be requested from the parents or legal guardians of the infants and the attending Neonatal Consultant will be requested to verbally assent to the study.

Randomisation of eligible infants whose parents consent to the study will be performed using an online randomisation generator to determine whether the first monitoring period will be manual adjustment or closed-loop automated oxygen control ("intervention" period).

Patients will be ventilated using SLE6000 ventilators. Ventilation settings will be manually adjusted by the clinical team as per unit's protocol. During the intervention period, in addition to standard care, infants will be also connected to the OxyGenie closed-loop oxygen saturation monitoring software (SLE). This software uses oxygen saturations from the SpO2 probe attached to the neonate, fed into an algorithm, to automatically adjust the percentage of inspired oxygen to maintain oxygen saturations within the target range. Manual adjustments including the percentage of FiO2 will be allowed at any point during the study including the period of automated oxygen control if deemed appropriate by the clinical team. Oxygen saturation levels and automatic adjustments to the inspired oxygen concentration will be captured by the ventilator software. Manual adjustments will be recorded during both monitoring periods. In addition to data collected from the ventilator, medical notes will be reviewed to determine any adverse events or clinical interventions to participants during the study. The number of blood gas samples taken and chest radiographs performed during each monitoring period will also be recorded.

Being tested
Closed-loop automated oxygen control with Oxygenie Auto-O2 software (SLE6000)
Medical subject headings
Premature Birth, Respiration Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Closed-loop automated oxygen control with Oxygenie Auto-O2 software (SLE6000)Device

    The 'Oxygenie' is a closed loop automated oxygen control system that has been incorporated into a software module for the SLE6000 infant ventilators. This software control system allows targeting SpO2 values by controlling FiO2.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The decrease in the percentage of time spent in extremes of hypoxia

    That will be assessed by evaluating the infant's respiratory status.

    Measured: Over 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. The increase in the percentage of time spent within target oxygen saturation ranges (94-98%)

    This will be assessed by evaluating the infant's respiratory status.

    Measured: Over 24 hours

  2. The reduction in the number of manual adjustments required to the inspired oxygen concentration

    That will be assessed by reviewing the infant's medical records

    Measured: Over 24 hours

  3. The reduction in the number of blood gases and chest radiographs

    That will be assessed by reviewing the infant's medical records

    Measured: Over 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2021
  2. Study start5 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion17 Jan 2023
  4. Study completion17 Jan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
31 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05017727
Sponsor's protocol ID
298164
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
17 Aug 2021
Last updated
6 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Consortium on Safe Labor; Hibbard JU, Wilkins I, Sun L, Gregory K, Haberman S, Hoffman M, Kominiarek MA, Reddy U, Bailit J, Branch DW, Burkman R, Gonzalez Quintero VH, Hatjis CG, Landy H, Ramirez M, VanVeldhuisen P, Troendle J, Zhang J. Respiratory morbidity in late preterm births. JAMA. 2010 Jul 28;304(4):419-25. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1015.

    PubMed 20664042
  • Colin AA, McEvoy C, Castile RG. Respiratory morbidity and lung function in preterm infants of 32 to 36 weeks' gestational age. Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):115-28. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1381. Epub 2010 Jun 7.

    PubMed 20530073
  • Pike KC, Lucas JS. Respiratory consequences of late preterm birth. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2015 Jun;16(3):182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

    PubMed 25554628
  • Clark RH. The epidemiology of respiratory failure in neonates born at an estimated gestational age of 34 weeks or more. J Perinatol. 2005 Apr;25(4):251-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211242.

    PubMed 15605071
  • Gouyon JB, Ribakovsky C, Ferdynus C, Quantin C, Sagot P, Gouyon B; Burgundy Perinatal Network. Severe respiratory disorders in term neonates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;22(1):22-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00875.x.

    PubMed 18173781
  • Ramadan G, Paul N, Morton M, Peacock JL, Greenough A. Outcome of ventilated infants born at term without major congenital abnormalities. Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Feb;171(2):331-6. doi: 10.1007/s00431-011-1549-8. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

    PubMed 21833494
  • Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Clermont G, Griffin MF, Clark RH. Epidemiology of neonatal respiratory failure in the United States: projections from California and New York. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Oct 1;164(7):1154-60. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.7.2012126.

    PubMed 11673202
  • Walsh BK, Smallwood CD. Pediatric Oxygen Therapy: A Review and Update. Respir Care. 2017 Jun;62(6):645-661. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05245.

    PubMed 28546370
  • Baba L, McGrath JM. Oxygen free radicals: effects in the newborn period. Adv Neonatal Care. 2008 Oct;8(5):256-64. doi: 10.1097/01.ANC.0000338015.25911.8a.

    PubMed 18827514
  • Askie LM, Henderson-Smart DJ, Irwig L, Simpson JM. Oxygen-saturation targets and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 4;349(10):959-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa023080.

    PubMed 12954744
  • Supplemental Therapeutic Oxygen for Prethreshold Retinopathy Of Prematurity (STOP-ROP), a randomized, controlled trial. I: primary outcomes. Pediatrics. 2000 Feb;105(2):295-310. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.2.295.

    PubMed 10654946
  • BOOST-II Australia and United Kingdom Collaborative Groups; Tarnow-Mordi W, Stenson B, Kirby A, Juszczak E, Donoghoe M, Deshpande S, Morley C, King A, Doyle LW, Fleck BW, Davis PG, Halliday HL, Hague W, Cairns P, Darlow BA, Fielder AR, Gebski V, Marlow N, Simmer K, Tin W, Ghadge A, Williams C, Keech A, Wardle SP, Kecskes Z, Kluckow M, Gole G, Evans N, Malcolm G, Luig M, Wright I, Stack J, Tan K, Pritchard M, Gray PH, Morris S, Headley B, Dargaville P, Simes RJ, Brocklehurst P. Outcomes of Two Trials of Oxygen-Saturation Targets in Preterm Infants. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 25;374(8):749-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514212. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

    PubMed 26863265
  • Saugstad OD, Aune D. In search of the optimal oxygen saturation for extremely low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. 2011;100(1):1-8. doi: 10.1159/000322001. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

    PubMed 21150224
  • Williams LZJ, McNamara D, Alsweiler JM. Intermittent Hypoxemia in Infants Born Late Preterm: A Prospective Cohort Observational Study. J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;204:89-95.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.048. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

    PubMed 30287066
  • Lakshminrusimha S, Konduri GG, Steinhorn RH. Considerations in the management of hypoxemic respiratory failure and persistent pulmonary hypertension in term and late preterm neonates. J Perinatol. 2016 Jun;36 Suppl 2:S12-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.44.

    PubMed 27225960

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pre-Term and Respiratory Disease, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The decrease in the percentage of time spent in extremes of hypoxia (time frame: Over 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05017727, which also lists 27 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Sep 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in