Fractures, BoneBMACNCT05017961
Comparing Efficacy of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) Combined With Allograft in Treatment of Calcaneus Fractures
A study testing Autograft, Allograft only and Allograft combined with BMAC in people with Fractures, Bone, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BMAC when used in conjunction with viable allograft bone for treating displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures, in terms of rate of allograft incorporation into the host tissue, bone healing, and functional outcome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Fractures, Bone
- What is being tested?
- Autograft, Allograft only and Allograft combined with BMAC
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2019to 10 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Closed displaced intra-articular fracture without any evidence of nerve or blood vessel injury, the fractures belonged to Sanders type III according to Sanders classification and amenable to open reduction internal fixation
- Life expectancy of at least 1 year
- Patient is willing to provide informed consent, is geographically stable and able to comply with the required follow up visits, testing schedule and medication regimen
- Adequate soft tissue coverage at the fracture site through primary closure.
- Unilateral or bilateral calcaneal fractures.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women or planning on becoming pregnant during the investigational period
- Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or other device study or previously enrolled in this study.
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1c levels > 10%)
- A current endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis
- Currently has untreated malignant neoplasm(s), or is currently undergoing radiation therapy or chemotherapy.
- Inadequate neurovascular status in the involved limb that may jeopardize healing.
- Patients who have a preexisting calcaneus deformity that cannot accommodate a reduction or a previous history of osteomyelitis in the index limb.
- Other ipsilateral lower extremity fracture(s) if, in the opinion of the investigator, the treatment and/or rehabilitation of such fracture(s) will substantially interfere with the treatment, rehabilitation or other requirements outlined in this protocol.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Efficacy of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Combined With Cryopreserve Allograft Bone in the Treatment of Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BMAC when used in conjunction with viable allograft bone for treating displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures, in terms of rate of allograft incorporation into the host tissue, bone healing, and functional outcome.
Read the detailed description
The study group will consist of patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures admitted to our academic level I trauma center that underwent open reduction internal fixation. Inclusion criteria will be patients with a closed displaced intra-articular fracture Sanders type III without any evidence of neurovascular injury. Patients will be randomly divided into three groups according to the plan of management: autograft alone, viable allograft combined with BMAC, or viable allograft alone. Radiographic imaging and three-dimensional standing computed tomography will be used to assess the articular surface, Bohler's angle, the crucial angle of Gissane, and the height, width and length of the calcaneus. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind-foot scoring system and visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to post-operative evaluation of the patients.
- Conditions
- Fractures, Bone
- Being tested
- Autograft, Allograft only, Allograft combined with BMAC
- Keywords
- calcaneus fracture, bone graft, bone marrow aspirate, stem cells
- Medical subject headings
- Fractures, Bone
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AutograftDevice
An autograft bone will be harvested from proximal tibia or posterior superior iliac crest. First the bony landmarks of the posterior iliac crest or proximal tibia are palpated. The skin is then injected down to and including the periosteum with 1% lidocaine without epinephrine. After 1 cm skin incision and gentle dissection of subcutaneous soft tissue, the bone harvesting device inserted through the skin and subcutaneous tissues until it reaches the cortical bone. Then, manual pressure is used to position the bone harvesting device against the dense cortical bone. A battery-powered power instrument is then will be used to drill the harvesting device into the medullary cavity. After the harvesting device insertion the cancellous strips of bone will be harvested and applied to the fracture site gap.At the conclusion of autograft bone harvesting procedure, the wound will be closed with 3-0 Nylon and a sterile dressing will be applied to the harvest site.
Allograft onlyDevice
The jar containing allograft tissue and cryopreservation solution will be placed in a sterile basin containing a warm (35°C to 39°C; 95°F to 102.2°F) sterile irrigant (Normal saline or 5% Dextrose in Lactated Ringer's Solution). The jar containing the allograft will remain in this solution until the contents of the jar flows freely upon inversion. The jar will be removed from the warm solution once free-flowing. Sterile gauze or the optional strainer will be used to decant the cryopreservation solution into a waste container. 5% Dextrose in Lactated Ringer's Solution will be added to the indicated fill line to immerse the allograft tissue. The cap will be replaced and inverted twice to suspend tissue until ready for use. 5% Dextrose will be decanted in Lactated Ringer's Solution prior to use. Implant will be used within 2 hours of thawing.
Allograft combined with BMACDevice
A bone marrow aspiration kit will be used for bone marrow aspiration. First the bony landmarks of the posterior iliac crest and sacroiliac joint are palpated. The skin is then injected down to and including the periosteum with 1% lidocaine without epinephrine. Then, the bone marrow aspiration trochar and needle are percutaneously inserted through the skin and subcutaneous tis- sues until it reaches the posterior iliac crest. The trajectory of the needle will be parallel to the iliac crest, or perpendicular to the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS) or Posterior Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS), depending on the harvest site used. After the trochar is inserted into the posterior iliac crest but prior to aspiration, 1 mL of heparin (1,000 U/mL) will be preloaded into the syringe. Approximately 60 mL of bone marrow will be aspirated, which requires the use of two 30-mL syringes. At the conclusion of BMAC harvesting, a sterile dressing will be applied to the harvest site.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Autograft | Active comparator | Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group an autograft will be used to fill the void. For the purpose of autologous grafting, cancellous strips of bone will be harvested from the posterior superior iliac crest or proximal tibia. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s). This will be the control arm. Receives: Device: Autograft |
| Allograft only | Other | Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group a cryopreserved allograft bone (Musculoskeletal Tissue Foundation, New Jersey, NJ) will be used to fill the void. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s). Receives: Device: Allograft only |
| Allograft combined with BMAC | Other | Following definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group a cryopreserved allograft bone (Musculoskeletal Tissue Foundation, New Jersey, NJ) combined with BMAC will be used to fill the void. For the purpose of BMAC preparation, bone marrow will be collected from iliac crest or proximal tibia. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s). Receives: Device: Allograft combined with BMAC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
Measured: baseline to 6 weeks
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
Measured: baseline to 12 weeks
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
Measured: baseline to 24 weeks
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
Measured: baseline to 52 weeks
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
Measured: baseline to 6 weeks
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
Measured: baseline to 12 weeks
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
Measured: baseline to 24 weeks
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
Measured: baseline to 52 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Aug 2021
- Study start10 Jul 2019
- Primary completion10 Jul 2019
- Study completion10 Jul 2019
Why it stopped: Unfortunately this study didn't receive funding.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Fractures, BoneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Alabama at BirminghamThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Johnson, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Investigators
- Michael Johnson, MD, Principal investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05017961
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-300003034
- Acronym
- BMAC
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 17 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Efficacy of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Combined With Cryopreserve Allograft Bone in the Treatment of Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05017961
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BMAC / IRB-300003034
- Conditions
- Fractures, Bone
- Keywords
- calcaneus fracture, bone graft, bone marrow aspirate, stem cells
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Unfortunately this study didn't receive funding.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of BMAC when used in conjunction with viable allograft bone for treating displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures, in terms of rate of allograft incorporation into the host tissue, bone healing, and functional outcome.
Detailed description
The study group will consist of patients with intra-articular calcaneal fractures admitted to our academic level I trauma center that underwent open reduction internal fixation. Inclusion criteria will be patients with a closed displaced intra-articular fracture Sanders type III without any evidence of neurovascular injury. Patients will be randomly divided into three groups according to the plan of management: autograft alone, viable allograft combined with BMAC, or viable allograft alone. Radiographic imaging and three-dimensional standing computed tomography will be used to assess the articular surface, Bohler's angle, the crucial angle of Gissane, and the height, width and length of the calcaneus. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind-foot scoring system and visual analog scale (VAS) will be used to post-operative evaluation of the patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Autograft | Active comparator | Device: AutograftFollowing definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group an autograft will be used to fill the void. For the purpose of autologous grafting, cancellous strips of bone will be harvested from the posterior superior iliac crest or proximal tibia. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s). This will be the control arm. |
| Allograft only | Other | Device: Allograft onlyFollowing definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group a cryopreserved allograft bone (Musculoskeletal Tissue Foundation, New Jersey, NJ) will be used to fill the void. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s). |
| Allograft combined with BMAC | Other | Device: Allograft combined with BMACFollowing definitive fracture reduction a bone defect often remained in the substance of the calcaneus beneath the reduced posterior facet. In this group a cryopreserved allograft bone (Musculoskeletal Tissue Foundation, New Jersey, NJ) combined with BMAC will be used to fill the void. For the purpose of BMAC preparation, bone marrow will be collected from iliac crest or proximal tibia. It shall be applied wherever bone loss exists as a result of the incident fracture or subsequent bone debridement(s). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Closed displaced intra-articular fracture without any evidence of nerve or blood vessel injury, the fractures belonged to Sanders type III according to Sanders classification and amenable to open reduction internal fixation
- Life expectancy of at least 1 year
- Patient is willing to provide informed consent, is geographically stable and able to comply with the required follow up visits, testing schedule and medication regimen
- Adequate soft tissue coverage at the fracture site through primary closure.
- Unilateral or bilateral calcaneal fractures.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women or planning on becoming pregnant during the investigational period
- Patient is currently participating in an investigational drug or other device study or previously enrolled in this study.
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1c levels > 10%)
- A current endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis
- Currently has untreated malignant neoplasm(s), or is currently undergoing radiation therapy or chemotherapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AutograftAn autograft bone will be harvested from proximal tibia or posterior superior iliac crest. First the bony landmarks of the posterior iliac crest or proximal tibia are palpated. The skin is then injected down to and including the periosteum with 1% lidocaine without epinephrine. After 1 cm skin incision and gentle dissection of subcutaneous soft tissue, the bone harvesting device inserted through the skin and subcutaneous tissues until it reaches the cortical bone. Then, manual pressure is used to position the bone harvesting device against the dense cortical bone. A battery-powered power instrument is then will be used to drill the harvesting device into the medullary cavity. After the harvesting device insertion the cancellous strips of bone will be harvested and applied to the fracture site gap.At the conclusion of autograft bone harvesting procedure, the wound will be closed with 3-0 Nylon and a sterile dressing will be applied to the harvest site. | Device | Autograft |
| Allograft onlyThe jar containing allograft tissue and cryopreservation solution will be placed in a sterile basin containing a warm (35°C to 39°C; 95°F to 102.2°F) sterile irrigant (Normal saline or 5% Dextrose in Lactated Ringer's Solution). The jar containing the allograft will remain in this solution until the contents of the jar flows freely upon inversion. The jar will be removed from the warm solution once free-flowing. Sterile gauze or the optional strainer will be used to decant the cryopreservation solution into a waste container. 5% Dextrose in Lactated Ringer's Solution will be added to the indicated fill line to immerse the allograft tissue. The cap will be replaced and inverted twice to suspend tissue until ready for use. 5% Dextrose will be decanted in Lactated Ringer's Solution prior to use. Implant will be used within 2 hours of thawing. | Device | Allograft only |
| Allograft combined with BMACA bone marrow aspiration kit will be used for bone marrow aspiration. First the bony landmarks of the posterior iliac crest and sacroiliac joint are palpated. The skin is then injected down to and including the periosteum with 1% lidocaine without epinephrine. Then, the bone marrow aspiration trochar and needle are percutaneously inserted through the skin and subcutaneous tis- sues until it reaches the posterior iliac crest. The trajectory of the needle will be parallel to the iliac crest, or perpendicular to the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine (ASIS) or Posterior Superior Iliac Spine (PSIS), depending on the harvest site used. After the trochar is inserted into the posterior iliac crest but prior to aspiration, 1 mL of heparin (1,000 U/mL) will be preloaded into the syringe. Approximately 60 mL of bone marrow will be aspirated, which requires the use of two 30-mL syringes. At the conclusion of BMAC harvesting, a sterile dressing will be applied to the harvest site. | Device | Allograft combined with BMAC |
Primary outcome
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
Time frame: baseline to 6 weeks
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
Time frame: baseline to 12 weeks
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
Time frame: baseline to 24 weeks
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system
Time frame: baseline to 52 weeks
The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system is the most commonly used instruments for measuring the outcome of treatment in patients who sustained a complex ankle or hindfoot injury. It combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. The scoring system range is from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best outcome score.
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: baseline to 6 weeks
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: baseline to 12 weeks
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: baseline to 24 weeks
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
Percentage of patient with satisfactory post treatment pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: baseline to 52 weeks
The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 10 being worse.
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fractures, Bone
Not yet recruiting
Biodegradable Magnesium Screws for Unstable Ankle Fracture Surgery
Ankle Fractures, Syndesmotic Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Developmental Origins of Suicide Mortality
Suicide Mortality
RecruitingObservational study
Duration of Immobilization After Reverse Total Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures
Proximal Humeral Fracture, Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Recruiting
No Reduction Compared to Closed Reduction for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 65 or Older
Distal Radius Fracture, Casting
RecruitingObservational study
A Clinical Study to Collect Real-wordt Data on Safety and Clinical Performance of the VCFix Spinal System for Treatment of Vertebral Compression Fractures of (Suspected) Osteoporotic Origin.
Vertebra Compression Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Johnson, MD principal investigator
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Autograft, Allograft only and Allograft combined with BMAC in people with Fractures, Bone, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of participant with satisfactory bone healing using American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scoring system (time frame: baseline to 6 weeks). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.