AzTrials
AzTrials

CalciphylaxisPhase 3BEAT-CalciNCT05018221

Better Evidence and Translation for Calciphylaxis

A Phase 3 study testing Vitamin K1, Magnesium citrate and Sodium Thiosulfate in people with Calciphylaxis, run by University of Sydney at 21 sites in 2 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This global platform study will evaluate multiple interventions, across several domains of therapeutic care, in adult patients with kidney failure and newly diagnosed calciphylaxis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Calciphylaxis
What is being tested?
Vitamin K1, Magnesium citrate and Sodium Thiosulfate
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
350 participants
Where
21 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
26 Aug 2021to Dec 2029
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Currently receiving haemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis that can be converted to haemodialysis, with planned ongoing haemodialysis a minimum of three times per week for at least the duration of the protocolised calciphylaxis treatments within this trial
  • Have a new calciphylaxis ulcer present for less than 10 weeks
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Eligible for randomisation in at least one recruiting domain
  • The participant and treating physician are willing and able to perform trial procedures

Who cannot join

  • Nil

Trial locations and contacts

21 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

21 sites in 2 countries

Australia16 sites, 16 recruiting
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital

    Adelaide

    Michael Collins

    Recruiting
  • Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service

    Birtinya, Queensland

    Rathika Krishnasamy

    Recruiting
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital

    Brisbane, Queensland

    Carmel Hawley

    Recruiting
  • Bundaberg Base Hospital

    Bundaberg, Queensland

    Clyson Mutatiri

    Recruiting
  • Cairns Hospital

    Cairns, Queensland, 4870

    Catherine Wilkinson, +610742269970, Catherine.Wilkinson@health.qld.gov.au

    Recruiting
  • Monash Medical Centre

    Clayton

    Peter Kerr

    Recruiting
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital

    Concord, New South Wales

    Angus Ritchie

    Recruiting
  • Townsville Hospital

    Douglas, Queensland, 4814

    Vikas Srivastava, +61744332650, vikas.srivastava@health.qld.gov.au

    Recruiting
  • Ipswich Hospital

    Ipswich, Queensland, 4305

    Sree Venuthurupalli, +61 7 4616 6451, sree.venuthurupalli@health.qld.gov.au

    Recruiting
  • St George Hospital

    Kogarah, New South Wales

    Brendan Smyth

    Recruiting
  • Liverpool Hospital

    Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170

    Angela Makris, + 61287383719, angela.makris@health.nsw.gov.au

    Recruiting
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital

    Melbourne, Victoria

    Irene Ruderman

    Recruiting
  • John Hunter Hospital

    New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305

    Pedro Gois, +61249213545, pedro.francagois@health.nsw.gov.au

    Recruiting
  • Royal Perth Hospital

    Perth, Western Australia, 6000

    Hemant Kulkarni, +61894676361, Hemant.Kulkarni@health.wa.gov.au

    Recruiting
  • Sunshine Hospital (Western Health)

    St Albans, Victoria

    Eugenia Pedagogos

    Recruiting
  • Westmead Hospital

    Westmead, New South Wales, 2145

    Grahame Elder, +61288906962, grahame.j.elder@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Australia

New Zealand5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Dunedin Hospital

    Dunedin

    Rob Walker

    Recruiting
  • Auckland City Hospital (Auckland DHB)

    Grafton

    Tze Goh

    Recruiting
  • North Shore Hospital (Waitemata DHB)

    Takapuna

    Janak de Zoysa

    Recruiting
  • Tauranga Hospital

    Tauranga

    Gavin McHaffie

    Recruiting
  • Whangarei Hospital

    Whangarei

    Sharen Supershad

    Recruiting

Other trials in New Zealand

About this study

This global platform study will evaluate multiple interventions, across several domains of therapeutic care, in adult patients with kidney failure and newly diagnosed calciphylaxis.

Read the detailed description

BEAT-Calci is a randomized, adaptive, multi-center, platform trial that will evaluate multiple interventions, across several domains of therapeutic care. The objective of the study is to establish high-quality evidence on the effect of a range of interventions in patients with kidney failure and newly diagnosed calciphylaxis. Calciphylaxis is a rare disease affecting 1-2 people in 10,000.

The trial will commence with a Dialysis Membrane Domain and Pharmacotherapy Domain. The Pharmacotherapy Domain of BEAT-Calci is a placebo-controlled, double blind, response adaptive, randomised controlled trial that will investigate whether any of the pharmacotherapeutic agents is superior to placebo in improving outcomes. The Dialysis Membrane Domain of BEAT-Calci is an open-label, randomised controlled two-way comparison between two different dialysis technologies.

The BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale (BCWAS) is the primary endpoint for the trial. It is an 8-point ordinal categorical scale of disease outcomes and will be used to determine each participant's outcome.

The trial will utilise a Bayesian adaptive sample size re-estimation approach for sample size calculations. The trial will continue to recruit until predefined superiority or futility rules are met. As the trial progresses, in response to information accumulating during the trial, there are various adaptations that can occur, including addition or removal of an intervention arm, response adaptive randomisation and addition of new therapeutic domains.

Conditions
Calciphylaxis
Being tested
Vitamin K1, Magnesium citrate, Sodium Thiosulfate, High Flux Dialyser, Medium Cut-off Dialyser
Medical subject headings
Calciphylaxis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin K1Drug

    Also called Phytonadione

    Vitamin K1 capsule (10mg) to be administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session.

  • Magnesium citrateDrug

    Magnesium Citrate tablet (150mg) to be administered 3 times per per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session.

  • Sodium ThiosulfateDrug

    Also called Intravenous Sodium Thiosulfate Injection

    Sodium Thiosulfate injection (25g/100ml) to be administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis.

  • High Flux DialyserDevice

    Also called High Flux Hemodialysis

    Hemodialysis using a high flux dialyser.

  • Medium Cut-off DialyserDevice

    Also called Medium Cut-off Hemodialysis

    Hemodialysis using a medium cut-off dialyser.

  • Placebo injection (normal saline)Drug

    Also called 0.9% sodium chloride solution

    Placebo to be administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis.

  • Placebo capsule (Vitamin K1)Drug

    Also called Matching placebo capsule

    Placebo to be administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session.

  • Placebo tablet (Magnesium citrate)Drug

    Also called Matching placebo tablet

    Placebo to be administered 3 times per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session.

Study groups in NCT05018221
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Placebo (Double-Blind Period)Placebo comparatorPlacebo Vitamin K1 Placebo Magnesium Citrate Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate
Receives: Drug: Placebo injection (normal saline); Drug: Placebo capsule (Vitamin K1); Drug: Placebo tablet (Magnesium citrate)
Vitamin K1 (Double-Blind Period)ExperimentalDose: 10mg Vitamin K1 capsules, administered 3 times per week following the subject's hemodialysis session. * Placebo Magnesium Citrate * Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate
Receives: Drug: Vitamin K1; Drug: Placebo injection (normal saline); Drug: Placebo tablet (Magnesium citrate)
Magnesium Citrate (Double-Blind Period)ExperimentalDose: 150mg Magnesium Citrate tablets, administered 3 times per day. On dialysis days, administration of the middle daily dose should occur following the subject's hemodialysis session. * Placebo Vitamin K1 * Placebo Sodium Thiosulphate
Receives: Drug: Magnesium citrate; Drug: Placebo injection (normal saline); Drug: Placebo capsule (Vitamin K1)
Sodium Thiosulfate (Double-Blind Period)ExperimentalDose: 25g Sodium Thiosulfate injection, administered intravenously 3 times per week, during the subject's last hour of hemodialysis. * Placebo Vitamin K1 * Placebo Magnesium Citrate
Receives: Drug: Sodium Thiosulfate; Drug: Placebo capsule (Vitamin K1); Drug: Placebo tablet (Magnesium citrate)
High Flux HemodialysisActive comparatorHemodialysis using a high flux dialyser
Receives: Device: High Flux Dialyser
Medium Cut-off HemodialysisExperimentalHemodialysis using a medium cut-off dialyser
Receives: Device: Medium Cut-off Dialyser

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale (BCWAS) - Baseline to Week 12

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the sentinel ulcer from Baseline to Week 12 on the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale. This is an 8-point ordinal categorical scale of change since baseline, which will be used to determine each participant's outcome. The scale is described as:

    1. Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer
    2. >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    3. 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    4. 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    5. Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area
    6. Development of new ulcers
    7. Amputation due to an ulcer
    8. All-cause death

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale - Baseline to Week 26

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the sentinel ulcer from Baseline to Week 26 on the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale. This is an 8-point ordinal categorical scale of change since baseline, which will be used to determine each participant's outcome. The scale is described as:

    1. Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer
    2. >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    3. 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    4. 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    5. Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area
    6. Development of new ulcers
    7. Amputation due to an ulcer
    8. All-cause death

    Measured: Week 26

  2. Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Weeks 4

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Weeks 4

    Scale described as:

    1. Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer
    2. >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    3. 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    4. 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    5. Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area
    6. Development of new ulcers
    7. Amputation due to an ulcer
    8. All-cause death

    Measured: Week 4

  3. Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Week 12

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Week 12

    Scale described as:

    1. Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer
    2. >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    3. 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    4. 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    5. Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area
    6. Development of new ulcers
    7. Amputation due to an ulcer
    8. All-cause death

    Measured: Week 12

  4. Distribution of each of the individual components of the BCWAS, assessed at Week 26

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the distribution of each of the individual components of the BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale, assessed at Week 26.

    Scale described as:

    1. Complete epithelialisation of the sentinel ulcer
    2. >50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    3. 20-50% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    4. 0-20% reduction in sentinel ulcer surface area
    5. Any increase in sentinel ulcer surface area
    6. Development of new ulcers
    7. Amputation due to an ulcer
    8. All-cause death

    Measured: Week 26

  5. Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 4

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 4 using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool

    Measured: Week 4

  6. Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 12

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 12, using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool

    Measured: Week 12

  7. Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool - from Baseline to Week 26

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the severity of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 26, using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool

    Measured: Week 26

  8. Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 4

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 4

    Measured: Week 4

  9. Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 12

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 12

    Measured: Week 12

  10. Sentinel ulcer surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 26

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the surface area of sentinel ulcer from Baseline, assessed at Week 26

    Measured: Week 26

  11. All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 4

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 4

    Measured: Week 4

  12. All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 12

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 12

    Measured: Week 12

  13. All ulcers total surface area - from Baseline, assessed at Week 26

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the total surface area of all ulcers (not only the sentinel ulcer) from Baseline, assessed at Week 26

    Measured: Week 26

  14. Change over time of self-reported pain

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported pain over time, assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale

    Measured: Week 26

  15. Self-reported pain at week 12

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported pain use at week 12 assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale

    Measured: Week 12

  16. Change over time of analgesic use

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes analgesic use over time, as measured by cumulative weighted analgesia dose from baseline to week 26

    Measured: Week 26

  17. Analgesic use week 12

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes analgesic use over time, as measured by cumulative weighted analgesia dose from baseline to week 12

    Measured: Week 12

  18. Composite self-reported pain and analgesic use over time

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the composite outcome of self-reported pain (assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale) and analgesic use over time

    Measured: Week 26

  19. Composite self-reported pain and analgesic use at week 12

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes the composite outcome of self-reported pain (assessed using the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale) and analgesic use at week 12

    Measured: Week 12

  20. Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 4

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 4, using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument

    Measured: Week 4

  21. Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 12

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 12, using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument

    Measured: Week 12

  22. Change in self-reported quality of life from Baseline to Week 26

    To determine whether addition of the intervention changes self-reported quality of life from Baseline, assessed at Week 26 using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument

    Measured: Week 26

  23. Time to first calciphylaxis-attributable infection from Baseline to Week 26

    Time in days to first calciphylaxis-attributable infection within 26 weeks post-randomisation

    Measured: Week 26

  24. All-cause hospitalisation days

    Count of all cause hospitalisation days (excluding day admissions for dialysis treatment within 26 weeks post-randomisation

    Measured: Weeks 0-26

  25. Mortality

    Incidence of mortality, as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  26. Kidney Transplantation

    Incidence of kidney transplantation, as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  27. Calciphylaxis recurrence

    Incidence of calciphylaxis recurrence as derived from hospital reports, within 5-years post-randomisation

    Measured: Up to 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2021
  2. Study start26 Aug 2021
  3. Primary completionDec 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
Adaptive, platform, randomized controlled trial, involving multiple interventions spanning several domains of therapeutic care.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
350 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05018221
Sponsor's protocol ID
BEAT-Calci
Acronym
BEAT-Calci
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
9 Aug 2021
Last updated
13 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Trial data will be disseminated in the form of a publication to a relevant clinical journal and presentation at appropriate scientific conferences. Individual participant data that underlie the results reported, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices), may be shared with Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by a review committee identified for this purpose.

Publications

  • Krishnasamy R, Jardine MJ; BEAT-Calci Trialists. Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials in Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Jan 1;36(1):147-149. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000497. Epub 2024 Aug 26. No abstract available.

    PubMed 39186385

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Vitamin K1, Magnesium citrate and Sodium Thiosulfate in people with Calciphylaxis, run by University of Sydney at 21 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 21 sites in Australia, New Zealand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sibyl Masterman (8036 5272, sibyl.masterman@sydney.edu.au), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

BEAT-Calci Wound Assessment Scale (BCWAS) - Baseline to Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05018221, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in