Acute Ischemic StrokeNCT05018650
A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System (SUMMIT MAX)
A study testing Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System in people with Acute Ischemic Stroke, run by Route 92 Medical, Inc. at 30 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The SUMMIT MAX study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Route 92 Medical MonoPoint® Reperfusion System with the Hi Point 88 and HiPoint 70 Reperfusion Catheters for aspiration thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 30 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Dec 2021to 22 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The consent process has been completed and documented according to applicable country regulations and as approved by the IRB / Ethics Committee
- Age >=18 years
- Patient presenting with clinical signs consistent with an acute ischemic stroke
- Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >= 6
- Pre-stroke modified Rankin Score (mRS) <= 2
- Baseline ASPECTS >= 6
Show all 10Show fewer
- Endovascular treatment initiated (defined as time of groin puncture) within 8 hours from time last known well
- If indicated, thrombolytic therapy shall be initiated per clinical guidelines. If eligible for thrombolytic therapy, subjects should be treated as soon as possible and lytic use should not be delayed regardless of potential eligibility for mechanical neurothrombectomy.
- The patient is indicated for aspiration neurothrombectomy with the Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System as determined by the Investigator
- Angiographic confirmation of a large vessel occlusion of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery or distal internal carotid artery
Who cannot join
- Known pregnancy or breast feeding
- In the Investigator's opinion, any known comorbidity (including COVID-19 positivity) that may complicate treatment or prevent improvement or follow-up
- Known serious, advanced, or terminal illness with anticipated life expectancy < 12 months
- Known history of severe allergy to contrast medium
- Known to have suffered a stroke in the past 90 days
- Known connective tissue disorder affecting the arteries (e.g. Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome)
Show all 34Show fewer
- Any known previous cerebral hemorrhagic event
- Any known pre-existing coagulation deficiency
- Known hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or oral anticoagulant therapy with INR >3.0
- Known baseline platelet count <50,000/µL
- Known baseline blood glucose of <50 mg/dL or >400 mg/dL
- Known to be participating in another study involving an investigational device or drug
- Clinical symptoms suggestive of bilateral stroke or stroke in multiple territories.
- Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evidence of recent/ fresh cerebral hemorrhage (the presence of microbleeds is allowed)
- Baseline CT or MRI showing intracranial tumor (except small meningioma <= 2cm) or significant mass effect with midline shift due to the tumor
- Presumed septic thrombus, or suspicion of bacterial endocarditis
- Inability to access the cerebral vasculature in the opinion of the neurointerventional team
- Unlikely to be available for a 90-day follow-up (e.g. no fixed home address)
- Evidence of arterial dissection in a vessel that must be traversed
- Evidence of high-grade stenosis or occlusion (i.e., tandem occlusion) in a vessel that must be traversed
- Known active or recent history of cocaine or methamphetamine abuse (within last 6 months)
- Known history or presence of aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in the territory of the target lesion
- For all patients, severe sustained hypertension with SBP >200 and/or DBP >120; for patients treated with a lytic, sustained hypertension despite treatment with SBP >185 and/or DBP >110
- Treatment with heparin within 48 hours with a partial thromboplastic time more than two times the laboratory normal or treatment with any LMWH within 48 hours
- Renal failure with serum creatinine >3.0 or Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) <30
- Ongoing seizure due to stroke
- Evidence of active systemic infection
- Known cancer with metastases
- Angiographic evidence of a dissection in the extracranial or intracranial cerebral arteries
- Arterial stenosis requiring balloon angioplasty or stenting at the time of the procedure
- Angiographic evidence of multiple cerebrovascular occlusions (e.g., bilateral anterior circulation, anterior/posterior circulation, tandem occlusions)
- Angiographic evidence of known or suspected underlying intracranial vasculopathy or atherosclerotic lesions responsible for the target occlusion
- Angiographic evidence or suspicion of aortic dissection
- Angiographic evidence of an aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in the territory of the target lesion
Trial locations and contacts
30 sites in 2 countries.
30 sites in 2 countries
United States29 sites
Tufts
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Cooper Health System
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Mercy San Juan Medical Center
Carmichael, California, 95608
Advocate Aurora Health
Chicago, Illinois, 60657
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Ohio Health
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Geisinger Clinic
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822
Wright State University
Dayton, Ohio, 45409
Valley Baptist
Harlingen, Texas, 78550
Baptist Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
University of Kansas
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Saint Luke's
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Fort Sanders Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37902
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Banner Health
Mesa, Arizona, 85202
Baptist Hospital of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33176
West Virginia University
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Christiana Care
Newark, Delaware, 19718
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Rutgers
Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854
UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Medical City Plano
Plano, Texas, 75075
OHSU
Portland, Oregon, 97219
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84123
Stony Brook University Hospital
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Mercy Health St. Vincent
Toledo, Ohio, 43608
University of Massachusetts
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Interventional Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Route 92 Medical MonoPoint® Reperfusion System for Aspiration Embolectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients (SUMMIT MAX)
The SUMMIT MAX study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Route 92 Medical MonoPoint® Reperfusion System with the Hi Point 88 and HiPoint 70 Reperfusion Catheters for aspiration thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of the SUMMIT MAX study is to obtain the safety and effectiveness data necessary to demonstrate substantial equivalence of the Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System with a predicate aspiration device to support a 510(k) application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the classification product code, NRY.
- Conditions
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Being tested
- Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Route 92 Medical Reperfusion SystemDevice
Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions will be performed with direct aspiration consisting of navigating a large-bore catheter up to the face of the clot and initiating vacuum suction.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Route 92 Medical Monopoint Reperfusion System | Experimental | Aspiration thrombectomy with the Route 92 Medical HiPoint 88 and HiPoint 70 Reperfusion Catheters as part of the Monopoint Reperfusion System to treat acute ischemic stroke Receives: Device: Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System |
| Aspiration Predicate | Active comparator | Aspiration thrombectomy with a predicate aspiration device to treat acute ischemic stroke Receives: Device: Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of subjects with successful arterial revascularization defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebrovascular Infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or greater
mTICI of 2b or greater indicates successful reperfusion following blood clot removal
Measured: During procedure
Incidence of all symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH)
Evaluation of sICH per von Kummer et al
Measured: within 24 hours post-procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Aug 2021
- Study start21 Dec 2021
- Primary completion19 Feb 2024
- Study completion22 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Ischemic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Route 92 Medical, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Guilherme Dabus, MD, Principal investigator, Baptist Health - MiamiAjit Puri, MD, Principal investigator, University of Massachusetts, WorcesterThanh Nguyen, MD, Principal investigator, Boston Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05018650
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIP 0974
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Nguyen TN, Dabus G, McGuinness B, Caldwell J, Priest R, Rai AT, Zaidat OO, Gross BA, Hanel R, Lee S, Hussain S, Shaikh H, Abdalkader M, Budzik R, Kilburg C, Woodward K, Colasurdo M, Liu J, Yoo AJ, Khandelwal P, Boo S, Vu P, Lin E, Almajali M, Singh J, Al-Bayati A, Lang MJ, Abraham M, Hassan AE, Pema P, Martin C, Grandhi R, Tonetti DA, Hixson HR, Aghaebrahim A, Sauvageau E, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Yavagal DR, Cheng-Ching E, Khalife J, Linfante I, Vulkanov V, Soomro J, Fifi JT, Maidan L, Copelan A, Schirmer CM, Bain M, Toth G, Jayaraman M, Novakovic-White R, Satti S, Villelli N, Jabbour P, Page M, McAllister DJ, Araujo Contreras R, Samaniego EA, Liebeskind DS, Hetts SW, Nogueira RG, English J, Puri AS. SUMMIT MAX: A Randomized Trial of the Super Large Bore HiPoint Reperfusion System Versus Vecta System for Aspiration Thrombectomy. Stroke. 2025 Aug;56(8):1980-1990. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051742. Epub 2025 May 21.
PubMed 40395106
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Interventional Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Route 92 Medical MonoPoint® Reperfusion System for Aspiration Embolectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients (SUMMIT MAX)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05018650
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIP 0974
- Conditions
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Route 92 Medical, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The SUMMIT MAX study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Route 92 Medical MonoPoint® Reperfusion System with the Hi Point 88 and HiPoint 70 Reperfusion Catheters for aspiration thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Detailed description
The purpose of the SUMMIT MAX study is to obtain the safety and effectiveness data necessary to demonstrate substantial equivalence of the Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System with a predicate aspiration device to support a 510(k) application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the classification product code, NRY.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Route 92 Medical Monopoint Reperfusion System | Experimental | Device: Route 92 Medical Reperfusion SystemAspiration thrombectomy with the Route 92 Medical HiPoint 88 and HiPoint 70 Reperfusion Catheters as part of the Monopoint Reperfusion System to treat acute ischemic stroke |
| Aspiration Predicate | Active comparator | Device: Route 92 Medical Reperfusion SystemAspiration thrombectomy with a predicate aspiration device to treat acute ischemic stroke |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- The consent process has been completed and documented according to applicable country regulations and as approved by the IRB / Ethics Committee
- Age >=18 years
- Patient presenting with clinical signs consistent with an acute ischemic stroke
- Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >= 6
- Pre-stroke modified Rankin Score (mRS) <= 2
Key exclusion criteria (34 listed)
- Known pregnancy or breast feeding
- In the Investigator's opinion, any known comorbidity (including COVID-19 positivity) that may complicate treatment or prevent improvement or follow-up
- Known serious, advanced, or terminal illness with anticipated life expectancy < 12 months
- Known history of severe allergy to contrast medium
- Known to have suffered a stroke in the past 90 days
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Route 92 Medical Reperfusion SystemMechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusions will be performed with direct aspiration consisting of navigating a large-bore catheter up to the face of the clot and initiating vacuum suction. | Device | Aspiration Predicate, Route 92 Medical Monopoint Reperfusion System |
Primary outcome
Proportion of subjects with successful arterial revascularization defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebrovascular Infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or greater
Time frame: During procedure
mTICI of 2b or greater indicates successful reperfusion following blood clot removal
Incidence of all symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH)
Time frame: within 24 hours post-procedure
Evaluation of sICH per von Kummer et al
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40395106Nguyen TN, Dabus G, McGuinness B, Caldwell J, Priest R, Rai AT, Zaidat OO, Gross BA, Hanel R, Lee S, Hussain S, Shaikh H, Abdalkader M, Budzik R, Kilburg C, Woodward K, Colasurdo M, Liu J, Yoo AJ, Khandelwal P, Boo S, Vu P, Lin E, Almajali M, Singh J, Al-Bayati A, Lang MJ, Abraham M, Hassan AE, Pema P, Martin C, Grandhi R, Tonetti DA, Hixson HR, Aghaebrahim A, Sauvageau E, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Yavagal DR, Cheng-Ching E, Khalife J, Linfante I, Vulkanov V, Soomro J, Fifi JT, Maidan L, Copelan A, Schirmer CM, Bain M, Toth G, Jayaraman M, Novakovic-White R, Satti S, Villelli N, Jabbour P, Page M, McAllister DJ, Araujo Contreras R, Samaniego EA, Liebeskind DS, Hetts SW, Nogueira RG, English J, Puri AS. SUMMIT MAX: A Randomized Trial of the Super Large Bore HiPoint Reperfusion System Versus Vecta System for Aspiration Thrombectomy. Stroke. 2025 Aug;56(8):1980-1990. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051742. Epub 2025 May 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Recruiting
Delay AvoIding Primary Evaluation for ThRombectomy of Acute StrokE Patients With Large Vessel OCclusion in the Angiography SuiTe
Stroke, Acute
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Stroke: Cause and Development
Brain Disease, Ischemic Attack, Transient
Not yet recruiting
Prehospital Response and Emergency Stroke Transport Optimisation
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Intracranial Arterial Recanalization With Multiple Doses of LT3001 Drug Product in AIS Participant
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Recanalization for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion With Extended Time Window (ANGEL-BAO)
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guilherme Dabus, MD principal investigator
Baptist Health - Miami
Ajit Puri, MD principal investigator
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Thanh Nguyen, MD principal investigator
Boston Medical Center
30 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Route 92 Medical Reperfusion System in people with Acute Ischemic Stroke, run by Route 92 Medical, Inc. at 30 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 34 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 30 sites in United States, New Zealand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of subjects with successful arterial revascularization defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebrovascular Infarction (mTICI) score of 2b or greater (time frame: During procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05018650, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2025.