Lung CancerRESISTYRNCT05020275
Resistance to the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Osimertinib and Pharmacokinetics in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
An observational study of Lung Cancer, run by Rennes University Hospital at 4 sites in France.
Trial summary
Osimertinib is a tyrosine kinase (TKI) inhibitor targeting EGF-R (epidermal growth factor receptor) and used in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic drug addiction to EGF-R. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Blood Samples
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 29 Dec 2021to 16 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patient naïve to any treatment for the metastatic stage, treated with osimertinib as first line treatment (Prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, are authorized) with a Diagnosis of locally advanced non-small cell bronchial adenocarcinoma, and followed in one of the investigationnal centers.
Who may be able to join
- Age> 18 years old
- Man or woman
- Diagnosis of locally advanced non-small cell bronchial adenocarcinoma (not eligible for locoregional treatment) or metastatic
- Tumor with an activating mutation of EGF-R (deletion of exon 19 or L858R, L861x, or G719x mutation)
- No one opposed to his participation in the research
- Dated and signed consent form
- Patient in good general condition according to WHO (PS: 0 or 1)
Who cannot join
- Previous treatment of NSCLC with an EGF-R tyrosine kinase inhibitor
- Adult persons subject to legal protection (safeguard of justice, curatorship, guardianship), persons deprived of their liberty.
- Treatment with Osimertinib on going
- Co-treatments with a potent enzyme inducing or inhibitor compound within 2 weeks before starting treatment with Osimertinib
- Participation in intervention research on a drug
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
France4 sites
CH Bretagne Sud (Site du Scorff)
Lorient, 56322
Chu de Rennes (Service Pneumologie)
Rennes, 35000
CH Saint Malo (Service de Pneumologie)
St-Malo, 3500
CH Bretagne Atlantique
Vannes, 56017
About this study
Official title: Relationship Between Resistance to the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Osimertinib and Pharmacokinetics in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Toward an Individualization of the Treatment (RESISTYR)
Osimertinib is a tyrosine kinase (TKI) inhibitor targeting EGF-R (epidermal growth factor receptor) and used in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic drug addiction to EGF-R. The results of the FLAURA study justifies this 3rd generation TKI as the first line TKI of choice since an increase in overall survival of several months has been observed compared to TKIs of previous generations (erlotinib, gefitinib). However, the response to osimertinib is heterogeneous and some patients are poor responder. In addition, even when an initial response to ITK is observed, the natural history of the disease inevitably leads to the appearance of resistance mutations and loss of efficacy of osimertinib after a few months of treatment.In the hypothesis of a concentration-effect relationship, an underexposure (an insufficient plasma concentration) to osimertinib could lead to a suboptimal response by favoring the appearance of molecular resistance. By analogy with the mechanisms of resistance to anti-infectives, the systemic concentration of TKI may have to be maintained above a certain value throughout the treatment to reach an effective concentration in the tumor, in order to to prevent the selection of resistant clones. The value of this approach for optimizing treatment with TKI has been shown for this therapeutic class. This mechanistic hypothesis has been suggested several TKIs.
In addition, the association between pharmacokinetics of TKIs and the development of resistance has been reported in several pilot studies for dasatinib, erlotinib. Furthermore, a link between TKI concentration and ctDNA concentration was demonstrated in a pilot study by Garlan et al. in 11 patients treated for melanoma with vemurafenib.
The impact of the results of this study is important since the aims are to identify preemptive and predictive biomarkers of drug response and to increase mechanistic knowledge regarding risk factor of resistance to osimertinib. Finally, if the hypotheses evaluated in this translational research study are verified, therapeutic drug monitoring of TKI (and ctDNA analysis) would be immediately applicable in clinical practice since the technical tools are already available in the laboratories of most hospitals centers.
Read the detailed description
Osimertinib is a tyrosine kinase (TKI) inhibitor targeting EGF-R (epidermal growth factor receptor) and used in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic drug addiction to EGF-R. The results of the FLAURA study justifies this 3rd generation TKI as the first line TKI of choice since an increase in overall survival of several months has been observed compared to TKIs of previous generations (erlotinib, gefitinib). However, the response to osimertinib is heterogeneous and some patients are poor responder. In addition, even when an initial response to ITK is observed, the natural history of the disease inevitably leads to the appearance of resistance mutations and loss of efficacy of osimertinib after a few months of treatment.
The occurrence of resistances is a major problem since they lead to treatment failure. Identifying biomarkers predictive of the response and / or the emergence of these mutations of resistance is therefore a research challenge. Indeed, knowing risk factors molecular resistance could help to optimize the treatment.
A first approach to monitor the disease is the measurment of residual disease circulating tumor DNA in the blood of patients (ctDNA). These minimally invasive "liquid biopsies" can be performed iteratively, unlike tissue biopsies. It is a dynamic biomarker with several advantages. On the one hand, it would be a biomarker for monitoring residual disease during treatment. The ctDNA concentration and its kinetics under treatment have also been associated with the clinical outcome. Better overall survival has thus been observed with the first generation molecules in patients with low baseline ctDNA concentration or a rapid decrease in the ctDNA concentration at the start of treatment. On the other hand, the analysis of ctDNA makes it possible to characterize the nature of the acquired resistance mutations appearing during treatment.
In addition, TKI are good candidates for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The objective of TDM is to assess exposure by measuring plasma concentration. TKIs are characterized by interindividual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. Indeed, taking into account their route of administration (per os) and their metabolism (substrate for CYP450 enzymes), plasma exposure is variable from one patient to another. Thus, at the same dosage, depending on absorption and metabolic capacity, patients are not likely to be exposed to the same plasma concentrations. This PK variability is also observed for osimertinib since interindividual coefficients of variation of plasma exposure of 50 to 60% have been reported.
In the hypothesis of a concentration-effect relationship, an underexposure (an insufficient plasma concentration) to osimertinib could lead to a suboptimal response by favoring the appearance of molecular resistance. By analogy with the mechanisms of resistance to anti-infectives, the systemic concentration of TKI may have to be maintained above a certain value throughout the treatment to reach an effective concentration in the tumor, in order to to prevent the selection of resistant clones. The value of this approach for optimizing treatment with TKI has been shown for this therapeutic class. This mechanistic hypothesis has been suggested several TKIs.
In addition, the association between pharmacokinetics of TKIs and the development of resistance has been reported in several pilot studies for dasatinib, erlotinib.
Furthermore, a link between TKI concentration and ctDNA concentration was demonstrated in a pilot study by Garlan et al. in 11 patients treated for melanoma with vemurafenib.
In NSCLC, it therefore appears relevant and innovative to study the relationship between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the efficacy of the treatment. In addition, it would be relevant to investigate the correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and ctDNA in order to assess whether osimertinib plasma exposure could be a risk factor of emergence of resistance to anti-EGF treatment. These two minimally invasive biomarkers could be integrated into a dynamic monitoring of the treatment response in a personalized medicine approach.
Results expected, perspectives As this is an observational study, there is no need to add invasive procedure compared to the usual follow-up of patients with NSCLC , the benefit / risk balance is favorable for the participants.
The expected benefit is collective since if the interest of a therapeutic follow-up by pharmacological (and oncogenetic) approach is demonstrated, the clinicians will have at their disposal minimally invasive, longitudinal and follow-up biomarkers, allowing to prevent the emergence of resistance to osimertinib to maintain its effectiveness as longer as possible. It should allow to individualize the dosages for each patient, taking into account their pharmacokinetic profile and the molecular profile of the tumor. This personalized medicine in "2-dimensions" would help to delay tumor progression and would preserve a valuable line of treatment with TKI by optimizing its effectiveness.
The impact of the results of this study is important since the aims are to identify preemptive and predictive biomarkers of drug response and to increase mechanistic knowledge regarding risk factor of resistance to osimertinib. Finally, if the hypotheses evaluated in this translational research study are verified, therapeutic drug monitoring of TKI (and ctDNA analysis) would be immediately applicable in clinical practice since the technical tools are already available in the laboratories of most hospitals centers.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Blood Samples
- Keywords
- Non-small Cell Lung cancer, Osimertinib, Resistance, Pharmacokinetics
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood SamplesDiagnostic test
- Samples for ctDNA blood concentration and osimertinib plasma concentration
- Sample for genetic polymorphisms
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Blood samples | Blood samples for further assays Receives: Diagnostic Test: Blood Samples |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
relationship between plasma exposure to osimertinib and response to treatment assessed by progression-free survival
patients who have not progressed during the first 18 months and those who have progressed during the first 18 months.
Measured: at 18 months follow-up
Secondary outcomes (35)
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
ctDNA blood concentration and osimertinib plasma concentration
Measured: Days 15
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
ctDNA blood concentration and osimertinib plasma concentration
Measured: Month 1
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
ctDNA blood concentration and osimertinib plasma concentration
Measured: Month 2
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
ctDNA blood concentration and osimertinib plasma concentration
Measured: Month 3
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
ctDNA blood concentration and osimertinib plasma concentration
Measured: Month 6
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
ctDNA blood concentration and osimertinib plasma concentration
Measured: Month 9
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
ctDNA blood concentration and osimertinib plasma concentration
Measured: Month12
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
ctDNA blood concentration and osimertinib plasma concentration
Measured: Month 15
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
ctDNA blood concentration and osimertinib plasma concentration
Measured: Month18
Correlation between the trough plasma concentration of osimertinib and the time to onset of acquired molecular resistance mutations to osimertinib (identified on ctDNA)
Trough osimertinib plasma concentration and emergence of resistance mutation not present at baseline and / or re-appearance of the of EGF-R baseline mutation on ctDNA
Measured: Days 15
Correlation between the trough plasma concentration of osimertinib and the time to onset of acquired molecular resistance mutations to osimertinib (identified on ctDNA)
Trough osimertinib plasma concentration and emergence of resistance mutation not present at baseline and / or re-appearance of the of EGF-R baseline mutation on ctDNA
Measured: At desease progression
Correlation between the trough plasma concentration of osimertinib and the acquired clinical resistance
Acquired "clinical" resistance (expressed in months) defined as tumor progression (according to RECIST criteria) diagnosed after an initial response period in a patient treated without interruption of osimertinib
Measured: Days 15
Correlation between the trough plasma concentration of osimertinib and the acquired clinical resistance
Acquired "clinical" resistance (expressed in months) defined as tumor progression (according to RECIST criteria) diagnosed after an initial response period in a patient treated without interruption of osimertinib
Measured: At desease progression
Correlation between the concentration of ctDNA and acquired clinical resistance
Acquired "clinical" resistance (expressed in months) and evolution of the blood ctDNA concentration
Measured: Days 15
Correlation between the concentration of ctDNA and acquired clinical resistance
Acquired "clinical" resistance (expressed in months) and evolution of the blood ctDNA concentration
Measured: At desease progression
Study the concentration-toxicity correlation of osimertinib
Type and number of grade II to IV adverse events observed under treatment with osimertinib (according to CTCAE V5.0)
Measured: untill Month 18
Influence of genetic polymorphisms on the plasma concentration of osimertinib (CYP3A4 and ABCB1)
Concentrations of osimertinib in the groups of patients carrying an allelic variant modifying the activity of CYP3A4/5 and / or ABCB1 versus concentrations in the group of patients of wild-type genotype
Measured: Days 0
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib between subjects
Measured: Days 15
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib between subjects
Measured: Month 1
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib between subjects
Measured: Month 2
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib between subjects
Measured: Month 3
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib between subjects
Measured: Month 6
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib between subjects
Measured: Month 9
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib between subjects
Measured: Month 12
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib between subjects
Measured: Month 15
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib between subjects
Measured: Month 18
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib for the same subject during the follow-up period
Measured: Days 15
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib for the same subject during the follow-up period
Measured: Month 1
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib for the same subject during the follow-up period
Measured: Month 2
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib for the same subject during the follow-up period
Measured: Month 3
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib for the same subject during the follow-up period
Measured: Month 6
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib for the same subject during the follow-up period
Measured: Month 9
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib for the same subject during the follow-up period
Measured: Month 12
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib for the same subject during the follow-up period
Measured: Month 15
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Coefficient of variation of trough plasma concentrations of osimertinib for the same subject during the follow-up period
Measured: Month 18
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2021
- Study start29 Dec 2021
- Primary completion16 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion16 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Rennes University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rennes University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Camille TRON, MD, Principal investigator, Rennes University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05020275
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 35RC20_8892_RESISTYR
- Acronym
- RESISTYR
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 15 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Relationship Between Resistance to the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Osimertinib and Pharmacokinetics in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Toward an Individualization of the Treatment (RESISTYR)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05020275
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RESISTYR / 35RC20_8892_RESISTYR
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- Non-small Cell Lung cancer, Osimertinib, Resistance, Pharmacokinetics
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rennes University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 16 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Osimertinib is a tyrosine kinase (TKI) inhibitor targeting EGF-R (epidermal growth factor receptor) and used in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic drug addiction to EGF-R. The results of the FLAURA study justifies this 3rd generation TKI as the first line TKI of choice since an increase in overall survival of several months has been observed compared to TKIs of previous generations (erlotinib, gefitinib). However, the response to osimertinib is heterogeneous and some patients are poor responder. In addition, even when an initial response to ITK is observed, the natural history of the disease inevitably leads to the appearance of resistance mutations and loss of efficacy of osimertinib after a few months of treatment.In the hypothesis of a concentration-effect relationship, an underexposure (an insufficient plasma concentration) to osimertinib could lead to a suboptimal response by favoring the appearance of molecular resistance. By analogy with the mechanisms of resistance to anti-infectives, the systemic concentration of TKI may have to be maintained above a certain value throughout the treatment to reach an effective concentration in the tumor, in order to to prevent the selection of resistant clones. The value of this approach for optimizing treatment with TKI has been shown for this therapeutic class. This mechanistic hypothesis has been suggested several TKIs.
In addition, the association between pharmacokinetics of TKIs and the development of resistance has been reported in several pilot studies for dasatinib, erlotinib. Furthermore, a link between TKI concentration and ctDNA concentration was demonstrated in a pilot study by Garlan et al. in 11 patients treated for melanoma with vemurafenib.
The impact of the results of this study is important since the aims are to identify preemptive and predictive biomarkers of drug response and to increase mechanistic knowledge regarding risk factor of resistance to osimertinib. Finally, if the hypotheses evaluated in this translational research study are verified, therapeutic drug monitoring of TKI (and ctDNA analysis) would be immediately applicable in clinical practice since the technical tools are already available in the laboratories of most hospitals centers.
Detailed description
Osimertinib is a tyrosine kinase (TKI) inhibitor targeting EGF-R (epidermal growth factor receptor) and used in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic drug addiction to EGF-R. The results of the FLAURA study justifies this 3rd generation TKI as the first line TKI of choice since an increase in overall survival of several months has been observed compared to TKIs of previous generations (erlotinib, gefitinib). However, the response to osimertinib is heterogeneous and some patients are poor responder. In addition, even when an initial response to ITK is observed, the natural history of the disease inevitably leads to the appearance of resistance mutations and loss of efficacy of osimertinib after a few months of treatment.
The occurrence of resistances is a major problem since they lead to treatment failure. Identifying biomarkers predictive of the response and / or the emergence of these mutations of resistance is therefore a research challenge. Indeed, knowing risk factors molecular resistance could help to optimize the treatment.
A first approach to monitor the disease is the measurment of residual disease circulating tumor DNA in the blood of patients (ctDNA). These minimally invasive "liquid biopsies" can be performed iteratively, unlike tissue biopsies. It is a dynamic biomarker with several advantages. On the one hand, it would be a biomarker for monitoring residual disease during treatment. The ctDNA concentration and its kinetics under treatment have also been associated with the clinical outcome. Better overall survival has thus been observed with the first generation molecules in patients with low baseline ctDNA concentration or a rapid decrease in the ctDNA concentration at the start of treatment. On the other hand, the analysis of ctDNA makes it possible to characterize the nature of the acquired resistance mutations appearing during treatment.
In addition, TKI are good candidates for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The objective of TDM is to assess exposure by measuring plasma concentration. TKIs are characterized by interindividual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. Indeed, taking into account their route of administration (per os) and their metabolism (substrate for CYP450 enzymes), plasma exposure is variable from one patient to another. Thus, at the same dosage, depending on absorption and metabolic capacity, patients are not likely to be exposed to the same plasma concentrations. This PK variability is also observed for osimertinib since interindividual coefficients of variation of plasma exposure of 50 to 60% have been reported.
In the hypothesis of a concentration-effect relationship, an underexposure (an insufficient plasma concentration) to osimertinib could lead to a suboptimal response by favoring the appearance of molecular resistance. By analogy with the mechanisms of resistance to anti-infectives, the systemic concentration of TKI may have to be maintained above a certain value throughout the treatment to reach an effective concentration in the tumor, in order to to prevent the selection of resistant clones. The value of this approach for optimizing treatment with TKI has been shown for this therapeutic class. This mechanistic hypothesis has been suggested several TKIs.
In addition, the association between pharmacokinetics of TKIs and the development of resistance has been reported in several pilot studies for dasatinib, erlotinib.
Furthermore, a link between TKI concentration and ctDNA concentration was demonstrated in a pilot study by Garlan et al. in 11 patients treated for melanoma with vemurafenib.
In NSCLC, it therefore appears relevant and innovative to study the relationship between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the efficacy of the treatment. In addition, it would be relevant to investigate the correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and ctDNA in order to assess whether osimertinib plasma exposure could be a risk factor of emergence of resistance to anti-EGF treatment. These two minimally invasive biomarkers could be integrated into a dynamic monitoring of the treatment response in a personalized medicine approach.
Results expected, perspectives As this is an observational study, there is no need to add invasive procedure compared to the usual follow-up of patients with NSCLC , the benefit / risk balance is favorable for the participants.
The expected benefit is collective since if the interest of a therapeutic follow-up by pharmacological (and oncogenetic) approach is demonstrated, the clinicians will have at their disposal minimally invasive, longitudinal and follow-up biomarkers, allowing to prevent the emergence of resistance to osimertinib to maintain its effectiveness as longer as possible. It should allow to individualize the dosages for each patient, taking into account their pharmacokinetic profile and the molecular profile of the tumor. This personalized medicine in "2-dimensions" would help to delay tumor progression and would preserve a valuable line of treatment with TKI by optimizing its effectiveness.
The impact of the results of this study is important since the aims are to identify preemptive and predictive biomarkers of drug response and to increase mechanistic knowledge regarding risk factor of resistance to osimertinib. Finally, if the hypotheses evaluated in this translational research study are verified, therapeutic drug monitoring of TKI (and ctDNA analysis) would be immediately applicable in clinical practice since the technical tools are already available in the laboratories of most hospitals centers.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Blood samples | – | Diagnostic Test: Blood SamplesBlood samples for further assays |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patient naïve to any treatment for the metastatic stage, treated with osimertinib as first line treatment (Prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, are authorized) with a Diagnosis of locally advanced non-small cell bronchial adenocarcinoma, and followed in one of the investigationnal centers.
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age> 18 years old
- Man or woman
- Diagnosis of locally advanced non-small cell bronchial adenocarcinoma (not eligible for locoregional treatment) or metastatic
- Tumor with an activating mutation of EGF-R (deletion of exon 19 or L858R, L861x, or G719x mutation)
- No one opposed to his participation in the research
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Previous treatment of NSCLC with an EGF-R tyrosine kinase inhibitor
- Adult persons subject to legal protection (safeguard of justice, curatorship, guardianship), persons deprived of their liberty.
- Treatment with Osimertinib on going
- Co-treatments with a potent enzyme inducing or inhibitor compound within 2 weeks before starting treatment with Osimertinib
- Participation in intervention research on a drug
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood Samples* Samples for ctDNA blood concentration and osimertinib plasma concentration * Sample for genetic polymorphisms | Diagnostic test | Blood samples |
Primary outcome
relationship between plasma exposure to osimertinib and response to treatment assessed by progression-free survival
Time frame: at 18 months follow-up
patients who have not progressed during the first 18 months and those who have progressed during the first 18 months.
35 secondary outcomes
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
Time frame: Days 15
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
Time frame: Month 1
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
Time frame: Month 2
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
Time frame: Month 3
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
Time frame: Month 6
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
Time frame: Month 9
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
Time frame: Month12
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
Time frame: Month 15
Longitudinal correlation between the plasma concentration of osimertinib and the concentration of ctDNA (liquid biopsy)
Time frame: Month18
Correlation between the trough plasma concentration of osimertinib and the time to onset of acquired molecular resistance mutations to osimertinib (identified on ctDNA)
Time frame: Days 15
Correlation between the trough plasma concentration of osimertinib and the time to onset of acquired molecular resistance mutations to osimertinib (identified on ctDNA)
Time frame: At desease progression
Correlation between the trough plasma concentration of osimertinib and the acquired clinical resistance
Time frame: Days 15
Correlation between the trough plasma concentration of osimertinib and the acquired clinical resistance
Time frame: At desease progression
Correlation between the concentration of ctDNA and acquired clinical resistance
Time frame: Days 15
Correlation between the concentration of ctDNA and acquired clinical resistance
Time frame: At desease progression
Study the concentration-toxicity correlation of osimertinib
Time frame: untill Month 18
Influence of genetic polymorphisms on the plasma concentration of osimertinib (CYP3A4 and ABCB1)
Time frame: Days 0
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Days 15
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 1
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 2
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 3
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 6
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 9
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 12
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 15
the inter-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 18
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Days 15
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 1
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 2
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 3
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 6
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 9
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 12
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 15
the intra-individual variability of osimertinib plasma concentration
Time frame: Month 18
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Aug 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Camille TRON, MD principal investigator
Rennes University Hospital
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Cancer, run by Rennes University Hospital at 4 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
relationship between plasma exposure to osimertinib and response to treatment assessed by progression-free survival (time frame: at 18 months follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2025.