AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerPhase 2NCT05020574

Microbiome and Association With Implant Infections

A Phase 2 study testing Cephalexin in people with Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Female, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The most common tissue expander-related infections are from Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas species. In addition, from breast tissue microbiome studies, Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas show variable abundance across samples. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Cephalexin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
28 Sep 2021to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must have histologically confirmed breast malignancy OR genetic predisposition to breast cancer.
  • Age >= 18 years
  • Scheduled to undergo mastectomy with the immediate placement of tissue expanders or implant placement
  • Ability to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it
  • At least 4 weeks post-completion of chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

Who cannot join

  • Any significant medical condition or laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Patients who have taken antibiotics within 90 days of the consent date
  • Patients who have taken probiotics within 90 days of the consent date
  • Patients who have a documented or reported allergic reaction to the outlined antibiotics to be used in this study
  • Male patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Laura Barnes, MD contact

(415) 502-1259

Laura.Barnes@ucsf.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of California, San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94143

    Laura Barnes, MD, 415-502-1259, Laura.Barnes@ucsf.edu

    877-827-3222, cancertrials@ucsf.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Microbiome and Association With Implant Infections: Investigating the Impact of Antibiotics on the Gut and Breast Microbiomes Post-mastectomy With Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

The most common tissue expander-related infections are from Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas species. In addition, from breast tissue microbiome studies, Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas show variable abundance across samples. The investigator hypothesizes that participants undergoing mastectomy with high initial abundance of Staphylococcus and/or Pseudomonas are more likely to develop subsequent tissue expander-related infections from these respective organisms.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  1. To determine the feasibility of breast microbiome sampling using the study techniques

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. To define the differences in the gut and breast microbiomes between participants undergoing mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction who develop post-operative implant infection and those who do not.

II. To determine the effects of post-operative antibiotics on the gut and breast microbiomes after mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction.

OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 cohorts.

COHORT A: Participants receive postoperative antibiotics to take for at least 7 days post-operatively.

COHORT B: Participants receive no antibiotics post-operatively in the absence of clinical evidence of infection.

Participants are followed up for 90 days.

Being tested
Cephalexin
Keywords
Post-Surgical Antibiotics, Breast Implant Infections, Breast Microbiome, Breast Reconstruction, Mastectomy
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CephalexinDrug

    Also called Keflex

    Given orally (PO)

Study groups in NCT05020574
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort A: Standard antibioticsExperimentalReceive standard pre-incision antibiotics and 24-hour perioperative antibiotics - Prescribed standard postoperative antibiotics to take for at least 7 days post-operatively
Receives: Drug: Cephalexin
Cohort B: No antibioticsNo interventionReceive standard pre-incision antibiotics and 24-hour perioperative antibiotics - No antibiotics post-operatively, unless patient develops clinical evidence of infection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of tissue samples obtained successfully over time

    The feasibility of success in obtaining samples from breast tissue will be measured as a binary outcome (successful or not successful) over time (intra-operatively, week 1, week 2, week 3, and week 4). The investigators will assess and document success in obtaining a tissue sample immediately at the time of sampling of each participant.

    Measured: 90 days

  2. Proportion of aspirate samples obtained successfully overall

    The feasibility of success in obtaining samples from the tissue expander aspiration ports will be measured as a binary outcome (successful or not successful) over time (intra-operatively, week 1, week 2, week 3, and week 4). The investigators will assess and document success in obtaining a aspirate sample immediately at the time of sampling of each participant.

    Measured: 90 days

  3. Proportion of tissue samples successfully producing microbiome data

    Feasibility based off of the success rates in producing microbiome data from tissue samples in each patient will be measured as a binary outcome (successful or not successful) and will be reported.

    Measured: 90 days

  4. Proportion of aspirate samples successfully producing microbiome data

    Feasibility based off of the success rates in producing microbiome data from tissue samples in each patient will be measured as a binary outcome (successful or not successful) and will be reported.

    Measured: 90 days

  5. Proportion of any samples successfully producing microbiome data

    Feasibility based off of the success rates in producing microbiome data from tissue or aspirate samples in each patient will be measured as a binary outcome (successful or not successful) and will be reported.

    Measured: 90 days

  6. Correlation of the change in breast microbiome over time with total duration of antibiotics (Cohort A only)

    The investigators will analyze the microbiomes between groups, between microbiome environments (gut v. breast, inter-individual). The correlate of change in breast microbiome over time will be compared to the total duration of antibiotics for Cohort A only. The measure of association ranges from +1 to -1, with a value of zero equal to no association.

    Measured: 90 days

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Proportion of participants with post-operative infection

    Safety will be assessed by clinically assessing for signs of post-operative infection in each patient at each clinic visit. A post-operative infection is defined by clinical assessment of findings of surgical site erythema, tenderness, edema, and/or purulent drainage +/- fever. Proportion of participants with clinically diagnosed infection will be reported for each group and final diagnosis for analyses will be binary; a participant will either have a post-operative infection in the 90 day post-operative period or not have a post-operative infection in the 90 day post-operative period.

    Measured: 90 days

  2. Shannon Diversity Index Score for species of microbiome

    Alpha diversity will be evaluated for species richness by number of operational taxonomic units and for evenness using the Shannon Index. The Shannon diversity index (H) is an index that is commonly used to characterize species diversity in a community and accounts for both abundance and evenness of the species present. The proportion of species (i) relative to the total number of species (pi) is calculated, and then multiplied by the natural logarithm of this proportion (lnpi). The resulting product is summed across species, and multiplied by -1. Shannon's equitability (EH) can be calculated by dividing H by Hmax (here Hmax = lnS). Equitability assumes a value between 0 and 1 with 1 being complete evenness and the overall index score is represented by a percentage of the species.

    Measured: 90 days

  3. Number of overall identified microbes

    The investigators will evaluate microbial composition by grouping identified microbes into operational taxonomic units at the species, genera and phyla levels and will compare the relative abundances of these microbes between groups at the species, gene

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Aug 2021
  2. Study start28 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05020574
Sponsor's protocol ID
217510
Other IDs
NCI-2021-08985
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
20 Aug 2021
Last updated
18 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Cephalexin in people with Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Female, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Laura Barnes, MD ((415) 502-1259, Laura.Barnes@ucsf.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of tissue samples obtained successfully over time (time frame: 90 days). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in