AzTrials
AzTrials

Dental Caries in ChildrenNCT05025163

Cost-effectiveness of Topical Fluoride in Preventing Deciduous Dental Caries in Preschool Children

A study testing 1.23% fluoride foam application and 2.26% fluoride varnish application in people with Dental Caries in Children, run by National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Fluoride foam and fluoride varnish are effectiveness in prevention deciduous dental caries. However, the relative clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these two interventions are uncertain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 to 4 years
Conditions the study is for
Dental Caries in Children
What is being tested?
1.23% fluoride foam application and 2.26% fluoride varnish application
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,083 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jul 2016to 28 Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 to 4 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Children who are unable to cooperate or have a strong vomiting reflex;
  • Children with a history of asthma or allergies;
  • Children with other contraindications specified in the product manual.

About this study

Official title: Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Fluoride Foam and Fluoride Varnish in Preventing Dental Caries in the Primary Teeth of Preschool Children With High Caries Risk

Fluoride foam and fluoride varnish are effectiveness in prevention deciduous dental caries. However, the relative clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these two interventions are uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the relative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of fluoride foam and fluoride varnish in preventing dental caries in the primary teeth of preschool children with high caries risk.

Read the detailed description

This 24-month randomized clinical trial aims to compare the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of topical fluoride application of fluoride foam and fluoride varnish in preventing dental caries in the primary teeth of preschool children with high caries risk in Harbin,Heilongjiang Province,China.

Preschool children (3-4 years) with high caries risk will be invited to participant in this study. An invitation letter will be sent to the parents explaining the purpose and procedures of this study.Parental concent will be sought.

The children will be randomly divided into three groups: the control group-no intervention; the intervention group 1 - applications of 1.23% fluoride foam every 6 months; the intervention group 2- applications of 2.26% fluoride varnish every 6 months.

Dental clinical examination of the children will be performed at the beginning of the study,12 months and 24 months later.The dental examiners will receive unified training and consistency test of dental caries survey.Only when the Kappa value reached 0.8 can oral examiners participate in the oral examination.Dental caries condition will be recorded. Approximately 5% of children will be re-examined to determine the reliability of the results.

The status of any possible side/adverse effects will be recorded in the follow-up examinations.

The data of the study will be analysed by SPSS Statistical Analysis Software.The differences among the groups will be calculated and compared. And p<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Being tested
1.23% fluoride foam application, 2.26% fluoride varnish application
Keywords
cost effectiveness, fluoride foam, fluoride varnish, dental caries, clinical trial
Medical subject headings
Dental Caries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 1.23% fluoride foam applicationDrug

    Also called fluoride foam

    topical application of fluoride foam every 6 months

  • 2.26% fluoride varnish applicationDrug

    Also called Duraphat (Colgate)

    topical application of fluoride varnish every 6 months

Study groups in NCT05025163
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
control groupNo interventionno intervention in the control group
fluoride foam groupExperimentalintervention; fluoride foam application (with 1.23% fluoride foam application on teeth )
Receives: Drug: 1.23% fluoride foam application
fluoride varnish groupExperimentalintervention; fluoride varnish application (with 2.26% fluoride varnish application on teeth)
Receives: Drug: 2.26% fluoride varnish application

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The mean number of decayed,missing and filled teeth at baseline,12 months and 24 months

    The mean number of decayed,missing and filled teeth in fluoride foam group,fluoride varnish group and control group at baseline,12 months and 24 months

    Measured: 24 months

  2. The mean number of decayed,missing and filled teeth surfaces at baseline,12 months and 24 months

    The mean number of decayed,missing and filled teeth surfaces in fluoride foam group,fluoride varnish group and control group at baseline,12 months and 24 months

    Measured: 24 months

  3. The change of mean number of decayed,missing and filled teeth at baseline,12 months and 24 months

    The change of mean number of decayed,missing and filled teeth in fluoride foam group,fluoride varnish group and control group at baseline,12 months and 24 months

    Measured: 24 months

  4. The change of mean number of decayed,missing and filled teeth surfaces at baseline,12 months and 24 months

    The change of mean number of decayed,missing and filled teeth surfaces in fluoride foam group,fluoride varnish group and control group at baseline,12 months and 24 months

    Measured: 24 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. The mean cost per caries avoided after 12 months and 24 months

    The mean cost per caries avoided in fluoride foam group and fluoride varnish group after 12 months and 24 months

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Aug 2021
  2. Study start1 Jul 2016
  3. Primary completion16 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion28 Dec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,083 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05025163
Sponsor's protocol ID
NCNCD
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
23 Aug 2021
Last updated
12 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 1.23% fluoride foam application and 2.26% fluoride varnish application in people with Dental Caries in Children, run by National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, China CDC.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The mean number of decayed,missing and filled teeth at baseline,12 months and 24 months (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in