Urologic NeoplasmsNCT05025930
Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Endoscopic Surgical Instrument Control System (SP1000).
A study of Urologic Neoplasms, run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Robot-assisted surgery has been successfully adopted rapidly over the last decade. Robotic technology with tridimensional imaging can improve operating dexterity, visualization of difficult anatomic locations. This is a prospective study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the domestic surgical robot. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Urologic Neoplasms
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2021to 30 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Any male or female age from 18 to 80
- BMI 18-30kg/m2
- Have urological surgery indications (cystectomy, prostatectomy, and nephrectomy)
- Patients with physiologic conditions capable of receiving laparoscopic surgery
- Be able to cooperate and complete the follow-up and related examinations
- Volunteer to participate in this study and sign the informed consen
Who cannot join
- The researchers assess patients with severe cardiovascular or circulatory disease and cannot tolerate the surgery
- History of epilepsy or mental illness
- Pregnant and lactation
- Surgery history at the relevant surgical site, which is considered to influence surgical procedures
- Severe allergic or addiction of drug and alcohol
- Abdominal infection, peritonitis, diaphragmatic hernia, severe systemic infection or metastasis disease
Show all 10Show fewer
- Inability to understand the trial or complete the follow-up
- Participated in other therapeutic clinical trials within 90 days
- Patients who had undergone major operation and major trauma within 28 days prior to enrollment, which the researchers considered to have an impact on the outcome of surgery
- Patients deemed unsuitable to participate in this trial by researchers
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120
About this study
Official title: Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Endoscopic Surgical Instrument Control System (SP1000): a Multi-center, Randomized, Single-blind, Parallel Controlled Clinical Tria
Robot-assisted surgery has been successfully adopted rapidly over the last decade. Robotic technology with tridimensional imaging can improve operating dexterity, visualization of difficult anatomic locations. This is a prospective study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the domestic surgical robot.
Read the detailed description
In this clinical trial, the subjects will be randomly divided into two groups, and the urological typical surgical procedures (prostatectomy, and partial or radical nephrectomy) will be performed with the endoscopic surgical instrument control system SP1000 and IS3000.And the non-inferiorly comparison will be made between the surgical results of two systems to verify the safety and effectiveness of the endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000).
- Conditions
- Urologic Neoplasms
- Being tested
- endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000: single-port laparoscopy), endoscopic surgical instrument control system (IS3000: multi-port laparoscopy)
- Medical subject headings
- Urologic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000: single-port laparoscopy)Device
The system will be used in conjunction with other equipment during endoscopic surgery to accurately control endoscopic surgical instruments and perform delicate surgical procedures such as grasping, cutting, blunt separation, hemostasis, ligation and suture.
endoscopic surgical instrument control system (IS3000: multi-port laparoscopy)Device
The system will be used in conjunction with other equipment during endoscopic surgery to accurately control endoscopic surgical instruments and perform delicate surgical procedures such as grasping, cutting, blunt separation, hemostasis, ligation and suture.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000: single- port laparoscopy) | Experimental | Urological surgery procedures such as prostatectomy, and partial or radical nephrectomy will be performed using endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000) Receives: Device: endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000: single-port laparoscopy) |
| Comparator: endoscopic surgical instrument control system (IS3000: multi-port laparoscopy) | Active comparator | Urological surgery procedures such as prostatectomy, and partial or radical nephrectomy will be performed using endoscopic surgical instrument control system (IS3000) Receives: Device: endoscopic surgical instrument control system (IS3000: multi-port laparoscopy) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Surgical success rate
The surgical success rate was defined as the percentage of patients in the experimental group and the control group who were successfully operated with the systems
Measured: 24 hours
Incidence of serious adverse events during clinical trial
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Perioperative complication rate
Perioperative complication will be graded using the Clavien-Dindo Complication Classification. The proportion and severity of perioperative complications will be analyzed
Measured: 3 months
Changes in serum creatinine
Evaluating renal function by changes in serum creatinine after surgery for partial or radical nephrectomy
Measured: 3 months
Changes in prostate-specific antigen levels
Changes in prostate-specific antigen levels will be measured after surgery for patients who undergone radical prostatectomy
Measured: 3 months
Tumor recurrence rate
Measured: 3 months
Machine installation time
Time from sheeting to complete the installation of surgical instruments
Measured: preoperative
Operative time
Measured: 12 hours
Blood loss during the surgery
Measured: 12 hours
Margin positive rate
Measured: 1 month
Pain after surgery
Visual analogue scale as a monitoring tool for postoperative pain
Measured: 24 hours
Surgeon Satisfaction
NASA-TLX quantification table will be used to evaluate surgeon satisfaction after surgery
Measured: 12 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Aug 2021
- Study start1 Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Urologic NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Edge Medical Robotics CO.,LTD
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tianxin Lin, MD, Principal investigator, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05025930
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SysMU-Robot
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 2 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Endoscopic Surgical Instrument Control System (SP1000): a Multi-center, Randomized, Single-blind, Parallel Controlled Clinical Tria
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05025930
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SysMU-Robot
- Conditions
- Urologic Neoplasms
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chinese PLA General Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Edge Medical Robotics CO.,LTD
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Robot-assisted surgery has been successfully adopted rapidly over the last decade. Robotic technology with tridimensional imaging can improve operating dexterity, visualization of difficult anatomic locations. This is a prospective study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the domestic surgical robot.
Detailed description
In this clinical trial, the subjects will be randomly divided into two groups, and the urological typical surgical procedures (prostatectomy, and partial or radical nephrectomy) will be performed with the endoscopic surgical instrument control system SP1000 and IS3000.And the non-inferiorly comparison will be made between the surgical results of two systems to verify the safety and effectiveness of the endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000: single- port laparoscopy) | Experimental | Device: endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000: single-port laparoscopy)Urological surgery procedures such as prostatectomy, and partial or radical nephrectomy will be performed using endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000) |
| Comparator: endoscopic surgical instrument control system (IS3000: multi-port laparoscopy) | Active comparator | Device: endoscopic surgical instrument control system (IS3000: multi-port laparoscopy)Urological surgery procedures such as prostatectomy, and partial or radical nephrectomy will be performed using endoscopic surgical instrument control system (IS3000) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Any male or female age from 18 to 80
- BMI 18-30kg/m2
- Have urological surgery indications (cystectomy, prostatectomy, and nephrectomy)
- Patients with physiologic conditions capable of receiving laparoscopic surgery
- Be able to cooperate and complete the follow-up and related examinations
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- The researchers assess patients with severe cardiovascular or circulatory disease and cannot tolerate the surgery
- History of epilepsy or mental illness
- Pregnant and lactation
- Surgery history at the relevant surgical site, which is considered to influence surgical procedures
- Severe allergic or addiction of drug and alcohol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000: single-port laparoscopy)The system will be used in conjunction with other equipment during endoscopic surgery to accurately control endoscopic surgical instruments and perform delicate surgical procedures such as grasping, cutting, blunt separation, hemostasis, ligation and suture. | Device | endoscopic surgical instrument control system (SP1000: single- port laparoscopy) |
| endoscopic surgical instrument control system (IS3000: multi-port laparoscopy)The system will be used in conjunction with other equipment during endoscopic surgery to accurately control endoscopic surgical instruments and perform delicate surgical procedures such as grasping, cutting, blunt separation, hemostasis, ligation and suture. | Device | Comparator: endoscopic surgical instrument control system (IS3000: multi-port laparoscopy) |
Primary outcome
Surgical success rate
Time frame: 24 hours
The surgical success rate was defined as the percentage of patients in the experimental group and the control group who were successfully operated with the systems
Incidence of serious adverse events during clinical trial
Time frame: 3 months
10 secondary outcomes
Perioperative complication rate
Time frame: 3 months
Changes in serum creatinine
Time frame: 3 months
Changes in prostate-specific antigen levels
Time frame: 3 months
Tumor recurrence rate
Time frame: 3 months
Machine installation time
Time frame: preoperative
Operative time
Time frame: 12 hours
Blood loss during the surgery
Time frame: 12 hours
Margin positive rate
Time frame: 1 month
Pain after surgery
Time frame: 24 hours
Surgeon Satisfaction
Time frame: 12 hours
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Sep 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Urologic Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Sac-TMT, MK-2870) and Pembrolizumab (MK-3475A) in Participants With Bladder Cancer (MK-2870-055)
Bladder Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Revumenib in Participants With Advanced Cancer and Hepatic or Renal Impairment
Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Hematologic Malignancies, Acute Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tianxin Lin, MD principal investigator
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study of Urologic Neoplasms, run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kaiwen Li, MD (+86-02034078960, likw6@mail.sysu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Surgical success rate (time frame: 24 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Sep 2021.