AzTrials
AzTrials

Body CompositionCBIANCT05026697

Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Devices

An observational study of Body Composition, run by Texas Tech University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this data collection is to establish the validity and reliability of several different commercially available bioelectrical impedance analysis devices that are used to estimate body composition. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Body Composition
How many people
75 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
9 Jun 2021to 10 Dec 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: The study population consists of generally healthy, weight-stable adults located in or near the community of Lubbock, Texas (or willing to travel to Lubbock, Texas).

Who may be able to join

  • Between the ages of 18 and 50
  • Generally healthy (defined as an absence of any disease or medical condition which could potentially result in abnormal body composition, including but not limited to musculoskeletal or metabolic diseases)
  • Weight-stable (defined as no change in body mass >5 pounds in the past month)

Who cannot join

  • Failing to meet any of the aforementioned inclusion criteria or self-reporting a body composition abnormality (due to medical condition, lifestyle practices, etc.)
  • Height greater than 75.5 inches (due to height limitation of DXA scanner)
  • Weight greater than 330 pounds (due to weight limitation of some of the devices used)
  • Presence of facial hair longer than 1/2 inch (and unwillingness to shave) or self-report of large amounts of body hair due to the impact of hair on Bod Pod body volume estimates
  • Presence of pacemaker or any electrical device (due to electrical currents administered by bioimpedance devices)
  • Amputation of limb, implantation of a meaningful amount metal (e.g., full joint replacement), or physical deformity large enough to invalidate traditional body composition assessments

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Department of Kinesiology & Sport Management

    Lubbock, Texas, 79409

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this data collection is to establish the validity and reliability of several different commercially available bioelectrical impedance analysis devices that are used to estimate body composition.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this data collection is to establish the validity and reliability of several different commercially available bioelectrical impedance analysis devices that are used to estimate body composition.

This study will involve 1-2 total visits: one initial visit followed by an optional follow-up visit 12-16 weeks later. These visits will consist of body composition assessments after an overnight fast. Before the overnight fast, the individual will be asked to drink 1 liter (the equivalent of two 16.9-ounce water bottles) between the final meal of the day and the beginning of the 8-hour fasting period. At the first visit, participants will undergo dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA; GE Lunar Prodigy), air displacement plethysmography (ADP; Cosmed Bod Pod), a 3D body scan (SizeStream SS20), and several multi- and single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) assessments. The BIA assessment methods will be conducted twice. This will allow for test-retest reliability assessment of each of the BIA devices being assessed in our study. At the optional second visit, all assessment methods utilized in our laboratory will be conducted once. By comparing these values to the values from the first visit, we will be able to establish the cumulative error due to technical error and biological error (i.e. random biological differences in the participants between the two assessments). We will collect data in a similar fashion during this second visit in order to compare the changes over time between the measurements provided by the commercially available BIA devices against the changes detected by a validated 4-compartment model of body composition, which uses research-grade devices. Cumulatively, this information will provide essential data to consumers regarding both the immediate and long-term test-retest reliability as well as the validity of commercially available BIA devices such as home body fat scales.

The commercially available BIA devices being examined in the present study includes:

  • Omron HBF-306
  • RENPHO Smart Bathroom Scale (item number: ES-26BB-B)
  • Hawanna Body Fat Scale (UPC: 791555289926)
  • Wyze Scale (SKU: WHSCL1)
  • INEVIFIT Smart Body Fat Scale (UPC: 711841680565; EAN: 0711841680565)
  • WeightWatchers Scale by Conair (model: WW721XF)
  • Tanita UM-081 (model: UM-081; EAN: 0742496801012 and 0885157966993)
  • VitaGoods FormFit Digital Scale and Body Analyzer (model: VG42252-0000)
  • Omron HBF 516 Body Composition Monitor (model: HBF-516B)
  • Seca sensa 804
  • Withings/Nokia BodyCardio Body Composition Digital Scale (model: WBS04b-Black-All-Inter)
  • Tanita BC554 IronMan Body Composition Monitor (model: BC-554)
  • Tanita BC568 InnerScan Segmental Body Composition Monitor (model: BC-568)
  • InBody H2ON Smart Full Body Composition Analyzer

Additionally, several laboratory-grade bioimpedance technologies will be performed, including ImpediMed SFB7 bioimpedance spectroscopy and Seca mBCA 515/514 multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Urine specific gravity will also be assessed using digital refractometry, and height will be assessed via stadiometer. As part of the ADP test, body mass estimates from a calibrated, research-grade scale will be obtained (Modified BWB-627-A, Tanita Corporation).

The test-retest reliability of the commercially available bioelectrical impedance analysis devices will be examined through duplicate assessments. The validity of the commercially available bioelectrical impedance analysis devices will be examined as compared to the criterion laboratory methods, namely the 4-compartment model for total body composition and DXA and/or laboratory-grade segmental bioimpedance technologies for segmental body composition.

Keywords
body composition, fat mass, fat-free mass, body fat percentage

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Body fat percentage

    Percentage of body mass that is attributable to fat mass. This value is provided by each body composition assessment device being tested (see list of devices in Study Description).

    Measured: 1 day

  2. Fat-free mass

    Calculated as body mass minus fat mass. Fat mass is equal to body mass multiplied by body fat percentage. Body fat percentage is provided by each body composition assessment device being tested (see list of devices in Study Description).

    Measured: 1 day

  3. Fat mass

    Body mass multiplied by body fat percentage. Body fat percentage is provided by each body composition assessment device being tested (see list of devices in Study Description).

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Segmental body fat percentage

    Body fat percentage provided for specific body segments (i.e., trunk/torso, arms, and legs). These values are provided by some, but not all, of the body composition assessment devices being tested (see list of devices in Study Description).

    Measured: 1 day

  2. Segmental fat-free mass

    Fat-free mass (i.e., body mass minus fat mass) provided for specific body segments (i.e., trunk/torso, arms, and legs). These values are provided by some, but not all, of the body composition assessment devices being tested (see list of devices in Study Description).

    Measured: 1 day

  3. Segmental fat mass

    Fat mass provided for specific body segments (i.e., trunk/torso, arms, and legs). These values are provided by some, but not all, of the body composition assessment devices being tested (see list of devices in Study Description).

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2021
  2. Study start9 Jun 2021
  3. Primary completion10 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
75 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05026697
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB2021-107
Acronym
CBIA
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
3 Jun 2021
Last updated
9 Aug 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Body Composition, run by Texas Tech University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Body fat percentage (time frame: 1 day). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in