Coronary Artery DiseaseINTERCLIMANCT05027984
Interventional Strategy for Non-culprit Lesions With Major Vulnerability Criteria at OCT in Patients With ACS
A study testing Optical coherence tomography and iFR/FFR/RFR in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Disease, run by Centro per la Lotta Contro l'Infarto - Fondazione Onlus at 34 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The INTERCLIMA (Interventional Strategy for Non-culprit Lesions With Major Vulnerability Criteria Identified by Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) is a multi-center, prospective, randomized trial of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based versus physiology-based (i.e. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
- What is being tested?
- Optical coherence tomography and iFR/FFR/RFR
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,425 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2021to 31 Mar 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age of at least 18 years.
- Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome.
- Single or multiple intermediate lesions in intervention-naïve major coronary segments (diameter ≥2.5 mm) determining a 40-70% diameter stenosis by visual assessment with no other significant stenosis (>70%) in the same vessel.
- Patient informed of the nature of the study, agreeing to it, and providing written informed consent as approved by the Ethics Committee of the respective clinical study site.
- Life expectancy >3 years.
Who cannot join
- Female with childbearing potential or lactating.
- Acute or chronic renal dysfunction (defined as creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl).
- Advanced heart failure (NYHA III-IV)
- Stroke within the previous 6 months or spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage at any time.
- Severe valvular disease or valvular disease likely to require surgery or percutaneous valve replacement during the trial.
- Coronary anatomy preventing complete imaging of the segment of interest (including at least 5 mm at both stenosis edges).
Show all 13Show fewer
- Lesions located in the left main coronary artery
- Diffusely diseased coronary artery segment or presence of ≥1 significant untreated non-culprit lesions (preventing correct adverse event attribution) in the coronary arteries.
- Prior myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] or PCI revascularization in the target coronary vessel.
- Coronary anatomy unsuitable for PCI.
- Comorbidities that might interfere with completion of the study procedures.
- Planned major surgery necessitating interruption of dual antiplatelet.
- Participating in another investigational drug or device trial that has not completed the primary endpoint or would interfere with the endpoints of this study.
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 4 countries.
34 sites in 4 countries
Italy29 sites
Ente ecclesiastico Ospedale Regionale Generale "F. Miulli"
Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, 70021
Ospedale C. e G. Mazzoni
Ascoli Piceno, AP, 63100
P.O. San Giuseppe Moscati
Aversa, CE, 81031
Policlinico University Hospital
Bari, BA, 70120
Di Venere Hospital
Bari, BA, 70131
Azienda Ospedaliera San Pio
Benevento, BN, 82100
ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII
Bergamo, BG, 24127
Azienda Ospedaliero_Universitaria IRCCS Policlinico di St.Orsola
Bologna, BO, 40138
ARNAS Brotzu
Cagliari, CA, 09047
Azienda Ospedaliera "Policlinico "G. Rodolico- San Marco"
Catania, CT, 95123
Azienda Ospedaliera Per L'emergenza Cannizzaro
Catania, CT, 95126
Ospedale Conegliano
Conegliano, TV, 31015
IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
Genova, GE, 16132
Misericordia Hospital
Grosseto, GR, 58100
Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Latina
Latina, LT, 04100
Ospedale Vito Fazzi
Lecce, LE, 73100
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G. Martino", Messina
Messina, ME, 98124
Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS
Milan, MI, 20138
IRCCS Galeazzi- Sant'Ambrogio
Milan, MI, 20157
Federico II di Napoli
Naples, 80138
Rivoli Hospital
Rivoli, TO, 10098
San Camillo Hospital
Roma, RM, 00152
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Roma, RM, 00168
San Giovanni Hospital
Rome, Rome, 00184
IRCCS Casa sollievo della sofferenza
San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, 71013
Struttura Complessa di Cardiologia Clinica e Interventistica
Sassari, SS, 07100
UOSA Cardiologia Interventistica
Siena, SI, 53100
P.O. Umberto I
Syracuse, SR, 96100
Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale - Udine University Hospital
Udine, UD, 33100
Spain3 sites
Hospital universitario La Princesa, Madrid
Madrid, M, 28006
Hospital Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga, MA, 29010
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, 33011
Switzerland1 site
Inselspital, Bern University Hospital
Bern, Canton of Bern, 3010
About this study
Official title: An Interventional Strategy for Non-culprit Lesions With Major Vulnerability Criteria Identified by Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome (the INTER-CLIMA Trial)
The INTERCLIMA (Interventional Strategy for Non-culprit Lesions With Major Vulnerability Criteria Identified by Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) is a multi-center, prospective, randomized trial of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based versus physiology-based (i.e. fractional flow reserve[FFR]/instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio[iFR]/resting full-cycle ratio[RFR]) treatment of intermediate (40-70% diameter stenosis), non-culprit coronary lesions in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing coronary angiography. About 1420 patients with ACS will be randomized into the study at approximately 40 sites worldwide.
Read the detailed description
The optimal strategy in patients with intermediate stenosis (40-70% diameter stenosis) at coronary angiography is currently under debate. Pure angiographic stenosis evaluation is often inadequate and alternative assessments of coronary plaques entered the clinical practice, such as functional assessment (FFR/iFR/RFR) and intravascular imaging (OCT and intravascular ultrasound [IVUS]). Based on preliminary data, current American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) revascularization guidelines recommend the use of flow fractional reserve (FFR, class IIa of evidence) to assess angiographic intermediate coronary lesions in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and guide intervention. However, controversial data has recently emerged on the role of functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions in both acute and chronic settings. On the other hand, in recent studies, the presence of coronary plaques with vulnerability criteria at OCT identified patients at high risk of cardiac mortality and target vessel MI. This study aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of an OCT-based strategy to guide revascularization in non-culprit intermediate coronary stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), on the basis of the presence of morphological markers of plaque vulnerability. Patients with intermediate coronary lesions in non-culprit intervention-naïve major coronary segments (diameter ≥2.5 mm) and fulfilling all inclusion/exclusion criteria will be eligible. Enrolled patients will be randomized 1:1 to either OCT or FFR/RFR/iFR based treatment. In the OCT-guided arm, non-culprit intermediate lesions will be treated with PCI with implantation of a second-generation drug eluting stent (DES) when a FCT <75 µm plus at least 2 of 3 other OCT criteria of plaque vulnerability (i.e., MLA <3.5 mm2, lipid arc with circumferential extension >180°, and the presence of clusters of macrophages) and/or an MLA <2 mm2 are detected by OCT. In the absence of the above-mentioned 4 vulnerability criteria, interventional procedures will be performed at discretion of the operator if a luminal thrombus is detected by OCT. In the physiology-guided arm, non-culprit intermediate lesions will be treated with PCI with implantation of a second-generation DES when an iFR or RFR ≤0.89 or an FFR ≤0.80 are measured, otherwise interventional procedures will be deferred. The primary endpoint, a composite of cardiac death and target vessel spontaneous myocardial infarction, will be assessed at a median follow-up of 3 years, with extended follow-up through 5 years for all patients for secondary long-term analyses.
- Being tested
- Optical coherence tomography, iFR/FFR/RFR
- Keywords
- Coronary artery disease, Optical coherence tomography, Vulnerable plaque
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Disease, Myocardial Ischemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Optical coherence tomographyDevice
OCT images will be acquired by means of the FD C7 XR system or the OPTIS system (both St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) with a non-occlusive technique.(33) The acquired OCT coronary images will be analyzed on-line using a proprietary OCT console (St Jude Medical, Inc., USA). Definitions and cut-offs for OCT vulnerability parameters derived from available consensus documents and from main IVUS/OCT studies.
iFR/FFR/RFRDevice
The iFR and FFR measurements will be obtained using a coronary-pressure guidewire (Pressure Wire / Certus or Aeris for FFR assessment and PressureWire™ X Guidewire/QUANTIEM™ for the RFR assessment by Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois, U.S.A; Comet by Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), OptoWire by Opsens, Quebec, Canada, or Verrata by Philips, San Diego, CA, USA.).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intermediate lesion OCT-based management | Experimental | At OCT analysis, lesion features prompting intervention instead of conservative approach will be the following:
1. FCT <75 µm, plus at least 2 of 3 other OCT criteria of plaque vulnerability (i.e., MLA <3.5 mm2, lipid arc with circumferential extension >180°, and the presence of macrophages).
2. The presence of intracoronary thrombus at a non-culprit site, irrespective of the presence of other vulnerability criteria, may prompt treatment with DES, at the operator's discretion.
All lesions fulfilling these interventional criteria will be treated with an OCT guided DES implantation in order to achieve an optimal stent implantation.
In presence of a MLA <2.0 mm2, best cut-off showing correlation with fractional-flow reserve positive functional (FFR) assessment, clinical decision whether to treat the lesion will be based on FFR assessment irrespective of the presence of other criteria of vulnerability. Alternatively authors will have the option to treat the lesion with a DES. Receives: Device: Optical coherence tomography |
| Intermediate lesion physiology-based management | Active comparator | The iFR/FFR/RFR measurements will be obtained using a coronary-pressure guidewire. For FFR, hyperemia will be induced with the administration of intravenous adenosine, in accordance with the clinical practice at each participating center. Lesion features prompting intervention instead of conservative medical approach will be the following: iFR ≤0.89, or FFR ≤0.80.(32) All lesions fulfilling these interventional criteria will be treated with an FFR guided DES implantation. PCI will be performed with the aim of achieving a post-stenting FFR ≥0.90 (i.e. optimal FFR result). If post-stenting FFR was <0.90 a further post-dilation of the stent could be performed and if FFR remained at <0.90, a pullback of the wire to identify another possible pressure drop and/or a subsequent stent implantation at least 5 mm from the stent will be performed according to physician's preference. Receives: Device: iFR/FFR/RFR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients with cardiac death or non-fatal spontaneous target-vessel myocardial infarction
Composite outcome. Cardiac death will be defined as any death due to heart disease, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and sudden unexpected death.
Any spontaneous myocardial infarction will be attributed to the randomized intermediate lesion if not clearly attributable to the non-target vessels.
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (6)
Number of patients with cardiac death
Cardiac death will be defined as any death due to heart disease, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and sudden unexpected death.
Measured: 3 years
Number of patients with non-fatal spontaneous target-vessel Myocardial infarction (excluding peri-procedural MI)
Any spontaneous myocardial infarction will be attributed to the randomized intermediate lesion if not clearly attributable to the non-target vessels.
Measured: 3 years
Number of patients with target lesion revascularization (either percutaneous or surgical)
Repeated lesion revascularization will be considered in case of repeated percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting the enrolled lesions.
Measured: 3 years
Number of patients with composite of cardiac death and any myocardial infarction
Composite outcome. Cardiac death will be defined as any death due to heart disease, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and sudden unexpected death.
Any spontaneous myocardial infarction will be collected regardless of the culprit vessel involved.
Measured: 3 years
Number of patients with target vessel failure
Composite endpoint including cardiac death, non-fatal target-vessel MI, ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization.
Measured: 3 years
Number of patients with composite endpoint of peri-procedural complications
- contrast-induced nephropathy: a 25% increase in serum creatinine (SCr) from baseline or a 0.5 mg/dL (44 µmol/L) increase in absolute SCr value-within 48-72 hours after intravenous contrast administration.
- dissection requiring bail-out stenting.
- post-procedural MI: an increase within 48 hours after the index procedure of creatine kinase[CK]-MB (U/L) >5 times or Troponin (ng/L) >35 times above the normal value along with at least one of the followings: 1) symptoms of ischemia; 2) new or presumed new significant ST or T changes or new left bundle branch block; 3) new pathologic Q waves on an electrocardiogram; 4) new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality; 5) reduced flow or major dissection in the coronary at angiography; or 6) intracoronary thrombus by angiography or autopsy.
A stand-alone biomarker definition will be accepted in case of increase in the cardiac biomarker CK-MB >10 times or Troponin >70 times above the upper normal values.
Measured: Peri-procedural
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2021
- Study start30 Jun 2021
- Primary completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two groups: one group receiving functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions and the other group undergoing OCT assessment.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,425 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centro per la Lotta Contro l'Infarto - Fondazione Onlus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Francesco Prati, Centro per la Lotta Contro l'Infarto - Fondazione Onlus
- Investigators
- Francesco Prati, MD, Principal investigator, Centro per la Lotta con l'Infarto - CLI Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05027984
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLI-01-2020
- Acronym
- INTERCLIMA
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: After the publication of the main paper, anonymized data will be shared upon reasonable request after discussion by the Steering Committee.
Publications
Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, Maccarthy PA, Van't Veer M, Pijls NH. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 22;55(25):2816-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096.
PubMed 20579537Toth G, Hamilos M, Pyxaras S, Mangiacapra F, Nelis O, De Vroey F, Di Serafino L, Muller O, Van Mieghem C, Wyffels E, Heyndrickx GR, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Barbato E, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2831-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu094. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
PubMed 24644308Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087. Epub 2007 May 17.
PubMed 17531660Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
PubMed 19144937Burzotta F, Leone AM, Aurigemma C, Zambrano A, Zimbardo G, Arioti M, Vergallo R, De Maria GL, Cerracchio E, Romagnoli E, Trani C, Crea F. Fractional Flow Reserve or Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Management of Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: A Single-Center Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan 13;13(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.034.
PubMed 31918942Waksman R, Legutko J, Singh J, Orlando Q, Marso S, Schloss T, Tugaoen J, DeVries J, Palmer N, Haude M, Swymelar S, Torguson R. FIRST: Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Relationship Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 5;61(9):917-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
PubMed 23352786Cho YK, Nam CW, Han JK, Koo BK, Doh JH, Ben-Dor I, Waksman R, Pichard A, Murata N, Tanaka N, Lee CH, Gonzalo N, Escaned J, Costa MA, Kubo T, Akasaka T, Hu X, Wang JA, Yang HM, Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, Yoon HJ, Chung IS, Hur SH, Kim KB. Usefulness of combined intravascular ultrasound parameters to predict functional significance of coronary artery stenosis and determinants of mismatch. EuroIntervention. 2015 Jun;11(2):163-70. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I2A30.
PubMed 26093837Usui E, Yonetsu T, Kanaji Y, Hoshino M, Yamaguchi M, Hada M, Hamaya R, Kanno Y, Murai T, Lee T, Kakuta T. Efficacy of Optical Coherence Tomography-derived Morphometric Assessment in Predicting the Physiological Significance of Coronary Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison with Intravascular Ultrasound. EuroIntervention. 2018 Apr 6;13(18):e2210-e2218. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00613.
PubMed 29155383D'Ascenzo F, Barbero U, Cerrato E, Lipinski MJ, Omede P, Montefusco A, Taha S, Naganuma T, Reith S, Voros S, Latib A, Gonzalo N, Quadri G, Colombo A, Biondi-Zoccai G, Escaned J, Moretti C, Gaita F. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions. Am Heart J. 2015 May;169(5):663-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
PubMed 25965714Prati F, Romagnoli E, Gatto L, La Manna A, Burzotta F, Ozaki Y, Marco V, Boi A, Fineschi M, Fabbiocchi F, Taglieri N, Niccoli G, Trani C, Versaci F, Calligaris G, Ruscica G, Di Giorgio A, Vergallo R, Albertucci M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Tamburino C, Crea F, Alfonso F, Arbustini E. Relationship between coronary plaque morphology of the left anterior descending artery and 12 months clinical outcome: the CLIMA study. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):383-391. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz520.
PubMed 31504405Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, Mehran R, McPherson J, Farhat N, Marso SP, Parise H, Templin B, White R, Zhang Z, Serruys PW; PROSPECT Investigators. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 20;364(3):226-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002358.
PubMed 21247313Di Vito L, Agozzino M, Marco V, Ricciardi A, Concardi M, Romagnoli E, Gatto L, Calogero G, Tavazzi L, Arbustini E, Prati F. Identification and quantification of macrophage presence in coronary atherosclerotic plaques by optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jul;16(7):807-13. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu307. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
PubMed 25588802
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Interventional Strategy for Non-culprit Lesions With Major Vulnerability Criteria Identified by Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome (the INTER-CLIMA Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05027984
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INTERCLIMA / CLI-01-2020
- Keywords
- Coronary artery disease, Optical coherence tomography, Vulnerable plaque
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,425 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centro per la Lotta Contro l'Infarto - Fondazione OnlusUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The INTERCLIMA (Interventional Strategy for Non-culprit Lesions With Major Vulnerability Criteria Identified by Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) is a multi-center, prospective, randomized trial of optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based versus physiology-based (i.e. fractional flow reserve[FFR]/instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio[iFR]/resting full-cycle ratio[RFR]) treatment of intermediate (40-70% diameter stenosis), non-culprit coronary lesions in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing coronary angiography. About 1420 patients with ACS will be randomized into the study at approximately 40 sites worldwide.
Detailed description
The optimal strategy in patients with intermediate stenosis (40-70% diameter stenosis) at coronary angiography is currently under debate. Pure angiographic stenosis evaluation is often inadequate and alternative assessments of coronary plaques entered the clinical practice, such as functional assessment (FFR/iFR/RFR) and intravascular imaging (OCT and intravascular ultrasound [IVUS]). Based on preliminary data, current American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) revascularization guidelines recommend the use of flow fractional reserve (FFR, class IIa of evidence) to assess angiographic intermediate coronary lesions in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and guide intervention. However, controversial data has recently emerged on the role of functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions in both acute and chronic settings. On the other hand, in recent studies, the presence of coronary plaques with vulnerability criteria at OCT identified patients at high risk of cardiac mortality and target vessel MI. This study aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of an OCT-based strategy to guide revascularization in non-culprit intermediate coronary stenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), on the basis of the presence of morphological markers of plaque vulnerability. Patients with intermediate coronary lesions in non-culprit intervention-naïve major coronary segments (diameter ≥2.5 mm) and fulfilling all inclusion/exclusion criteria will be eligible. Enrolled patients will be randomized 1:1 to either OCT or FFR/RFR/iFR based treatment. In the OCT-guided arm, non-culprit intermediate lesions will be treated with PCI with implantation of a second-generation drug eluting stent (DES) when a FCT <75 µm plus at least 2 of 3 other OCT criteria of plaque vulnerability (i.e., MLA <3.5 mm2, lipid arc with circumferential extension >180°, and the presence of clusters of macrophages) and/or an MLA <2 mm2 are detected by OCT. In the absence of the above-mentioned 4 vulnerability criteria, interventional procedures will be performed at discretion of the operator if a luminal thrombus is detected by OCT. In the physiology-guided arm, non-culprit intermediate lesions will be treated with PCI with implantation of a second-generation DES when an iFR or RFR ≤0.89 or an FFR ≤0.80 are measured, otherwise interventional procedures will be deferred. The primary endpoint, a composite of cardiac death and target vessel spontaneous myocardial infarction, will be assessed at a median follow-up of 3 years, with extended follow-up through 5 years for all patients for secondary long-term analyses.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two groups: one group receiving functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions and the other group undergoing OCT assessment.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intermediate lesion OCT-based management | Experimental | Device: Optical coherence tomographyAt OCT analysis, lesion features prompting intervention instead of conservative approach will be the following: 1. FCT <75 µm, plus at least 2 of 3 other OCT criteria of plaque vulnerability (i.e., MLA <3.5 mm2, lipid arc with circumferential extension >180°, and the presence of macrophages). 2. The presence of intracoronary thrombus at a non-culprit site, irrespective of the presence of other vulnerability criteria, may prompt treatment with DES, at the operator's discretion. All lesions fulfilling these interventional criteria will be treated with an OCT guided DES implantation in order to achieve an optimal stent implantation. In presence of a MLA <2.0 mm2, best cut-off showing correlation with fractional-flow reserve positive functional (FFR) assessment, clinical decision whether to treat the lesion will be based on FFR assessment irrespective of the presence of other criteria of vulnerability. Alternatively authors will have the option to treat the lesion with a DES. |
| Intermediate lesion physiology-based management | Active comparator | Device: iFR/FFR/RFRThe iFR/FFR/RFR measurements will be obtained using a coronary-pressure guidewire. For FFR, hyperemia will be induced with the administration of intravenous adenosine, in accordance with the clinical practice at each participating center. Lesion features prompting intervention instead of conservative medical approach will be the following: iFR ≤0.89, or FFR ≤0.80.(32) All lesions fulfilling these interventional criteria will be treated with an FFR guided DES implantation. PCI will be performed with the aim of achieving a post-stenting FFR ≥0.90 (i.e. optimal FFR result). If post-stenting FFR was <0.90 a further post-dilation of the stent could be performed and if FFR remained at <0.90, a pullback of the wire to identify another possible pressure drop and/or a subsequent stent implantation at least 5 mm from the stent will be performed according to physician's preference. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age of at least 18 years.
- Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome.
- Single or multiple intermediate lesions in intervention-naïve major coronary segments (diameter ≥2.5 mm) determining a 40-70% diameter stenosis by visual assessment with no other significant stenosis (>70%) in the same vessel.
- Patient informed of the nature of the study, agreeing to it, and providing written informed consent as approved by the Ethics Committee of the respective clinical study site.
- Life expectancy >3 years.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Female with childbearing potential or lactating.
- Acute or chronic renal dysfunction (defined as creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl).
- Advanced heart failure (NYHA III-IV)
- Stroke within the previous 6 months or spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage at any time.
- Severe valvular disease or valvular disease likely to require surgery or percutaneous valve replacement during the trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Optical coherence tomographyOCT images will be acquired by means of the FD C7 XR system or the OPTIS system (both St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) with a non-occlusive technique.(33) The acquired OCT coronary images will be analyzed on-line using a proprietary OCT console (St Jude Medical, Inc., USA). Definitions and cut-offs for OCT vulnerability parameters derived from available consensus documents and from main IVUS/OCT studies. | Device | Intermediate lesion OCT-based management |
| iFR/FFR/RFRThe iFR and FFR measurements will be obtained using a coronary-pressure guidewire (Pressure Wire / Certus or Aeris for FFR assessment and PressureWire™ X Guidewire/QUANTIEM™ for the RFR assessment by Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois, U.S.A; Comet by Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), OptoWire by Opsens, Quebec, Canada, or Verrata by Philips, San Diego, CA, USA.). | Device | Intermediate lesion physiology-based management |
Primary outcome
Number of patients with cardiac death or non-fatal spontaneous target-vessel myocardial infarction
Time frame: 3 years
Composite outcome. Cardiac death will be defined as any death due to heart disease, including heart failure, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and sudden unexpected death. Any spontaneous myocardial infarction will be attributed to the randomized intermediate lesion if not clearly attributable to the non-target vessels.
6 secondary outcomes
Number of patients with cardiac death
Time frame: 3 years
Number of patients with non-fatal spontaneous target-vessel Myocardial infarction (excluding peri-procedural MI)
Time frame: 3 years
Number of patients with target lesion revascularization (either percutaneous or surgical)
Time frame: 3 years
Number of patients with composite of cardiac death and any myocardial infarction
Time frame: 3 years
Number of patients with target vessel failure
Time frame: 3 years
Number of patients with composite endpoint of peri-procedural complications
Time frame: Peri-procedural
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 20579537Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA, Ver Lee PN, Maccarthy PA, Van't Veer M, Pijls NH. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 22;55(25):2816-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096.
- Background: PubMed 24644308Toth G, Hamilos M, Pyxaras S, Mangiacapra F, Nelis O, De Vroey F, Di Serafino L, Muller O, Van Mieghem C, Wyffels E, Heyndrickx GR, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Barbato E, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2831-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu094. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 17531660Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087. Epub 2007 May 17.
- Background: PubMed 19144937Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
- Background: PubMed 31918942Burzotta F, Leone AM, Aurigemma C, Zambrano A, Zimbardo G, Arioti M, Vergallo R, De Maria GL, Cerracchio E, Romagnoli E, Trani C, Crea F. Fractional Flow Reserve or Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Management of Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: A Single-Center Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan 13;13(1):49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.034.
- Background: PubMed 23352786Waksman R, Legutko J, Singh J, Orlando Q, Marso S, Schloss T, Tugaoen J, DeVries J, Palmer N, Haude M, Swymelar S, Torguson R. FIRST: Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Relationship Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 5;61(9):917-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
- Background: PubMed 26093837Cho YK, Nam CW, Han JK, Koo BK, Doh JH, Ben-Dor I, Waksman R, Pichard A, Murata N, Tanaka N, Lee CH, Gonzalo N, Escaned J, Costa MA, Kubo T, Akasaka T, Hu X, Wang JA, Yang HM, Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, Yoon HJ, Chung IS, Hur SH, Kim KB. Usefulness of combined intravascular ultrasound parameters to predict functional significance of coronary artery stenosis and determinants of mismatch. EuroIntervention. 2015 Jun;11(2):163-70. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I2A30.
- Background: PubMed 29155383Usui E, Yonetsu T, Kanaji Y, Hoshino M, Yamaguchi M, Hada M, Hamaya R, Kanno Y, Murai T, Lee T, Kakuta T. Efficacy of Optical Coherence Tomography-derived Morphometric Assessment in Predicting the Physiological Significance of Coronary Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison with Intravascular Ultrasound. EuroIntervention. 2018 Apr 6;13(18):e2210-e2218. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00613.
- Background: PubMed 25965714D'Ascenzo F, Barbero U, Cerrato E, Lipinski MJ, Omede P, Montefusco A, Taha S, Naganuma T, Reith S, Voros S, Latib A, Gonzalo N, Quadri G, Colombo A, Biondi-Zoccai G, Escaned J, Moretti C, Gaita F. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions. Am Heart J. 2015 May;169(5):663-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
- Background: PubMed 31504405Prati F, Romagnoli E, Gatto L, La Manna A, Burzotta F, Ozaki Y, Marco V, Boi A, Fineschi M, Fabbiocchi F, Taglieri N, Niccoli G, Trani C, Versaci F, Calligaris G, Ruscica G, Di Giorgio A, Vergallo R, Albertucci M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Tamburino C, Crea F, Alfonso F, Arbustini E. Relationship between coronary plaque morphology of the left anterior descending artery and 12 months clinical outcome: the CLIMA study. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):383-391. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz520.
- Background: PubMed 21247313Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, Mehran R, McPherson J, Farhat N, Marso SP, Parise H, Templin B, White R, Zhang Z, Serruys PW; PROSPECT Investigators. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 20;364(3):226-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002358.
- Background: PubMed 25588802Di Vito L, Agozzino M, Marco V, Ricciardi A, Concardi M, Romagnoli E, Gatto L, Calogero G, Tavazzi L, Arbustini E, Prati F. Identification and quantification of macrophage presence in coronary atherosclerotic plaques by optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jul;16(7):807-13. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu307. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. After the publication of the main paper, anonymized data will be shared upon reasonable request after discussion by the Steering Committee.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Blood Collection for Research Related to Certain Diseases Involving Blood Vessels
Sickle Cell Disease
Active, not recruiting
Troponin in Acute Chest Pain to Risk Stratify and Guide EffecTive Use of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Coronary Computed Tomography Study to Assess the Effect of Inclisiran in Addition to Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy on Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression in Participants With a Diagnosis of Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Without Previous Cardiovascular Events
Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Needle Free Assessment of Myocardial Oxygenation in Healthy Subjects
Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Moderate-Intensity Statin Plus Ezetimibe vs. High-Intensity Statin for Coronary Plaque Stabilization
Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerosis of Coronary Artery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francesco Prati, MD principal investigator
Centro per la Lotta con l'Infarto - CLI Foundation
34 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Optical coherence tomography and iFR/FFR/RFR in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Disease, run by Centro per la Lotta Contro l'Infarto - Fondazione Onlus at 34 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in Italy, Spain, Greece, Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients with cardiac death or non-fatal spontaneous target-vessel myocardial infarction (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05027984, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.