Ophthalmopathy , Lacrimal SystemPhase 4NCT05028907
Evaluation of Lacrimal Punctal Changes by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography AS-OCT After Topical Combined Antibiotics and Steroids Treatment in Cases of Inflammatory Punctual Stenosis
A Phase 4 study testing 5 mg chloramphenicol, 1 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 0.25 mg tetryzoline hydrochloride, 2 mg Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose, 10 mg α-tocopherol acetate and 8 mg macrogol 400). and sodium hyaluronate, polyethylene and propylene glycol based) three times daily for three months in people with Ophthalmopathy , Lacrimal System, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Punctal stenosis is an important etiological factor that should be considered when assessing patients with epiphora. Anatomically, acquired punctal stenosis is a condition in which the external opening of the lacrimal canaliculus is narrowed or occluded and also can be accompanied by canalicular ductal stenosis.1,2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Ophthalmopathy , Lacrimal System
- What is being tested?
- 5 mg chloramphenicol, 1 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 0.25 mg tetryzoline hydrochloride, 2 mg Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose, 10 mg α-tocopherol acetate and 8 mg macrogol 400). and sodium hyaluronate, polyethylene and propylene glycol based) three times daily for three months
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2020to 15 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients included aged 21 years or more who developed acquired inflammatory punctal edema and were complaining of epiphora. Epiphora of the included groups was grade2 according to Kashkoli's classification and grade 1:5 according to Munk's classification.
Who cannot join
- Patients excluded who had history of previous ocular and lacrimal surgery, trauma, lower lid margin malposition or laxity, dry eye (for control group), glaucoma, corneal abnormalities (abrasions, keratitis), congenital punctal anomalies, nasolacrimal duct obstruction, mucocele, pyocele were excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Punctal stenosis is an important etiological factor that should be considered when assessing patients with epiphora. Anatomically, acquired punctal stenosis is a condition in which the external opening of the lacrimal canaliculus is narrowed or occluded and also can be accompanied by canalicular ductal stenosis.1,2. Defining an anatomical clear cut-off value for punctal stenosis is difficult due to wide variations in patients' demographics. Clinically, punctal stenosis is defined as a punctum size restricting tear drainage in the absence of distal tear drainage abnormalities.2 Acquired punctal stenosis can be involutional, inflammatory, infectious or idiopathic.3,4 Inflammatory endogenous causes include chronic blepharitis, dry eye disease and ocular cicatricial pemphigoid.3 Exogenous noxious stimuli may be chemical such as topical or systemic medications, or physical as irradiation or mechanical. The harmful effect of topical medications such as antiglaucomatous drops, dexamesathone, mitomycin-C and the systemic medications such 5-Fluorouracil or paclitaxel may be related to the medication themselves, the preservatives as benzalkonium chloride in the commercial preparations, or duration of treatment with those medications.3,5-9 The basic ultra-structure response to those various noxious stimuli is early punctal occlusion by edema which is followed by conjunctival overgrowth, keratinization of punctal walls and cicatricial punctal stenosis.
Although spectral-domain OCT is still being widely used on the retina, its anterior segment module is considered a new modality for imaging of proximal lacrimal excretory passage and tears meniscus height (TMH).
Recent studies showed the ability of using AS-OCT to differentiate between various punctal causes of epiphora and improve the understanding of the lacrimal punctal structure in vivo.10-12 The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of AS-OCT in evaluation the punctal changes after treatment by antibiotics and steroids.
Read the detailed description
Punctal stenosis is an important etiological factor that should be considered when assessing patients with epiphora. Anatomically, acquired punctal stenosis is a condition in which the external opening of the lacrimal canaliculus is narrowed or occluded and also can be accompanied by canalicular ductal stenosis.1,2. Defining an anatomical clear cut-off value for punctal stenosis is difficult due to wide variations in patients' demographics. Clinically, punctal stenosis is defined as a punctum size restricting tear drainage in the absence of distal tear drainage abnormalities.2 Acquired punctal stenosis can be involutional, inflammatory, infectious or idiopathic.3,4 Inflammatory endogenous causes include chronic blepharitis, dry eye disease and ocular cicatricial pemphigoid.3 Exogenous noxious stimuli may be chemical such as topical or systemic medications, or physical as irradiation or mechanical. The harmful effect of topical medications such as antiglaucomatous drops, dexamesathone, mitomycin-C and the systemic medications such 5-Fluorouracil or paclitaxel may be related to the medication themselves, the preservatives as benzalkonium chloride in the commercial preparations, or duration of treatment with those medications.3,5-9 The basic ultra-structure response to those various noxious stimuli is early punctal occlusion by edema which is followed by conjunctival overgrowth, keratinization of punctal walls and cicatricial punctal stenosis.
Although spectral-domain OCT is still being widely used on the retina, its anterior segment module is considered a new modality for imaging of proximal lacrimal excretory passage and tears meniscus height (TMH).
Recent studies showed the ability of using AS-OCT to differentiate between various punctal causes of epiphora and improve the understanding of the lacrimal punctal structure in vivo.10-12 The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of AS-OCT in evaluation the punctal changes after treatment by antibiotics and steroids.
- Conditions
- Ophthalmopathy , Lacrimal System
- Being tested
- 5 mg chloramphenicol, 1 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 0.25 mg tetryzoline hydrochloride, 2 mg Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose, 10 mg α-tocopherol acetate and 8 mg macrogol 400)., sodium hyaluronate, polyethylene and propylene glycol based) three times daily for three months
- Medical subject headings
- Eye Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
5 mg chloramphenicol, 1 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 0.25 mg tetryzoline hydrochloride, 2 mg Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose, 10 mg α-tocopherol acetate and 8 mg macrogol 400).Drug
The patients were advised to apply the drops 5 times daily for the first week, three times daily for the next two weeks and one time daily for another one week. The patients were examined before treatment, one week, one month and three months later.
sodium hyaluronate, polyethylene and propylene glycol based) three times daily for three monthsDrug
The patients were advised to apply the drops 5 times daily for the first week, three times daily for the next two weeks and one time daily for another one week. The patients were examined before treatment, one week, one month and three months later.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| group one (cases with inflamatory punctal stenosis treated with steroids and antibiotics) | Experimental | patients with inflammatory punctal stenosis were treated by steroids and antibiotics and evaluated by anterior segment optical coherence tomography before and after treatment Receives: Drug: 5 mg chloramphenicol, 1 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 0.25 mg tetryzoline hydrochloride, 2 mg Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose, 10 mg α-tocopherol acetate and 8 mg macrogol 400). |
| control group | Placebo comparator | patients with inflammatory punctal stenosis received only preservative free tear substitutes Receives: Drug: sodium hyaluronate, polyethylene and propylene glycol based) three times daily for three months |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
widening of the punctum
the widening in the punctum after treatment which could be identified by anterior sehment optical coherence tomography
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2021
- Study start15 Nov 2020
- Primary completion15 May 2021
- Study completion15 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ophthalmopathy , Lacrimal SystemStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sohag UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sohag University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hany Mahmoud, Sohag University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05028907
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S20-159
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 30 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Lacrimal Punctal Changes by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography AS-OCT After Topical Combined Antibiotics and Steroids Treatment in Cases of Inflammatory Punctual Stenosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05028907
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- S20-159
- Conditions
- Ophthalmopathy , Lacrimal System
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sohag UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Punctal stenosis is an important etiological factor that should be considered when assessing patients with epiphora. Anatomically, acquired punctal stenosis is a condition in which the external opening of the lacrimal canaliculus is narrowed or occluded and also can be accompanied by canalicular ductal stenosis.1,2. Defining an anatomical clear cut-off value for punctal stenosis is difficult due to wide variations in patients' demographics. Clinically, punctal stenosis is defined as a punctum size restricting tear drainage in the absence of distal tear drainage abnormalities.2 Acquired punctal stenosis can be involutional, inflammatory, infectious or idiopathic.3,4 Inflammatory endogenous causes include chronic blepharitis, dry eye disease and ocular cicatricial pemphigoid.3 Exogenous noxious stimuli may be chemical such as topical or systemic medications, or physical as irradiation or mechanical. The harmful effect of topical medications such as antiglaucomatous drops, dexamesathone, mitomycin-C and the systemic medications such 5-Fluorouracil or paclitaxel may be related to the medication themselves, the preservatives as benzalkonium chloride in the commercial preparations, or duration of treatment with those medications.3,5-9 The basic ultra-structure response to those various noxious stimuli is early punctal occlusion by edema which is followed by conjunctival overgrowth, keratinization of punctal walls and cicatricial punctal stenosis.
Although spectral-domain OCT is still being widely used on the retina, its anterior segment module is considered a new modality for imaging of proximal lacrimal excretory passage and tears meniscus height (TMH).
Recent studies showed the ability of using AS-OCT to differentiate between various punctal causes of epiphora and improve the understanding of the lacrimal punctal structure in vivo.10-12 The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of AS-OCT in evaluation the punctal changes after treatment by antibiotics and steroids.
Detailed description
Punctal stenosis is an important etiological factor that should be considered when assessing patients with epiphora. Anatomically, acquired punctal stenosis is a condition in which the external opening of the lacrimal canaliculus is narrowed or occluded and also can be accompanied by canalicular ductal stenosis.1,2. Defining an anatomical clear cut-off value for punctal stenosis is difficult due to wide variations in patients' demographics. Clinically, punctal stenosis is defined as a punctum size restricting tear drainage in the absence of distal tear drainage abnormalities.2 Acquired punctal stenosis can be involutional, inflammatory, infectious or idiopathic.3,4 Inflammatory endogenous causes include chronic blepharitis, dry eye disease and ocular cicatricial pemphigoid.3 Exogenous noxious stimuli may be chemical such as topical or systemic medications, or physical as irradiation or mechanical. The harmful effect of topical medications such as antiglaucomatous drops, dexamesathone, mitomycin-C and the systemic medications such 5-Fluorouracil or paclitaxel may be related to the medication themselves, the preservatives as benzalkonium chloride in the commercial preparations, or duration of treatment with those medications.3,5-9 The basic ultra-structure response to those various noxious stimuli is early punctal occlusion by edema which is followed by conjunctival overgrowth, keratinization of punctal walls and cicatricial punctal stenosis.
Although spectral-domain OCT is still being widely used on the retina, its anterior segment module is considered a new modality for imaging of proximal lacrimal excretory passage and tears meniscus height (TMH).
Recent studies showed the ability of using AS-OCT to differentiate between various punctal causes of epiphora and improve the understanding of the lacrimal punctal structure in vivo.10-12 The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of AS-OCT in evaluation the punctal changes after treatment by antibiotics and steroids.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| group one (cases with inflamatory punctal stenosis treated with steroids and antibiotics) | Experimental | Drug: 5 mg chloramphenicol, 1 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 0.25 mg tetryzoline hydrochloride, 2 mg Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose, 10 mg α-tocopherol acetate and 8 mg macrogol 400).patients with inflammatory punctal stenosis were treated by steroids and antibiotics and evaluated by anterior segment optical coherence tomography before and after treatment |
| control group | Placebo comparator | Drug: sodium hyaluronate, polyethylene and propylene glycol based) three times daily for three monthspatients with inflammatory punctal stenosis received only preservative free tear substitutes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients included aged 21 years or more who developed acquired inflammatory punctal edema and were complaining of epiphora. Epiphora of the included groups was grade2 according to Kashkoli's classification and grade 1:5 according to Munk's classification.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients excluded who had history of previous ocular and lacrimal surgery, trauma, lower lid margin malposition or laxity, dry eye (for control group), glaucoma, corneal abnormalities (abrasions, keratitis), congenital punctal anomalies, nasolacrimal duct obstruction, mucocele, pyocele were excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 5 mg chloramphenicol, 1 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 0.25 mg tetryzoline hydrochloride, 2 mg Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose, 10 mg α-tocopherol acetate and 8 mg macrogol 400).The patients were advised to apply the drops 5 times daily for the first week, three times daily for the next two weeks and one time daily for another one week. The patients were examined before treatment, one week, one month and three months later. | Drug | group one (cases with inflamatory punctal stenosis treated with steroids and antibiotics) |
| sodium hyaluronate, polyethylene and propylene glycol based) three times daily for three monthsThe patients were advised to apply the drops 5 times daily for the first week, three times daily for the next two weeks and one time daily for another one week. The patients were examined before treatment, one week, one month and three months later. | Drug | control group |
Primary outcome
widening of the punctum
Time frame: 3 months
the widening in the punctum after treatment which could be identified by anterior sehment optical coherence tomography
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification
Related trials for Ophthalmopathy , Lacrimal System
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Evaluation of Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) Injection Therapy for Refractory Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Unresponsive to Conventional Treatments
Dry Eye Disease (DED), Graft-Versus-Host Disease(GVHD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing 5 mg chloramphenicol, 1 mg dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 0.25 mg tetryzoline hydrochloride, 2 mg Hydroxypropyl Methyl Cellulose, 10 mg α-tocopherol acetate and 8 mg macrogol 400). and sodium hyaluronate, polyethylene and propylene glycol based) three times daily for three months in people with Ophthalmopathy , Lacrimal System, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
widening of the punctum (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2021.