Lung CancerREACTNCT05030207
Respiratory Adaptive Computed Tomography: Feasibility Study on Real-Time Gated 4DCT for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy
A study testing Real-time Gated 4DCT and Conventional 4DCT in people with Lung Cancer, run by University of Sydney at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
This study does not involve a therapeutic intervention as standard radiation therapy treatment will be prescribed. This study involves one additional 4DCT scan (i.e. the Real-Time Gated 4DCT scan) acquired immediately before or following the conventional 4DCT scan. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Real-time Gated 4DCT and Conventional 4DCT
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- 15 May 2024to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years or older
- Have the ability to give informed consent
- A diagnosis of lung cancer with an indication for radiation therapy
- Radiation therapy treatment involving the acquisition of a 4DCT scan for treatment planning
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women
- Patients <18 years
- Patients who in the opinion of the treating physician could not tolerate the extra time on the CT couch for an extra scan
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Australia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Blacktown Hospital
Blacktown, New South Wales, 2148
Eric Hau, eric.hau@health.nsw.gov.au
About this study
Official title: Respiratory Adaptive Computed Tomography: A Pilot Feasibility Study on the Use of Real-Time Gated 4DCT for Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy
This study does not involve a therapeutic intervention as standard radiation therapy treatment will be prescribed. This study involves one additional 4DCT scan (i.e. the Real-Time Gated 4DCT scan) acquired immediately before or following the conventional 4DCT scan. This will take place on the day of the patient's treatment simulation, as per the current standard of care. The scanning sequence (i.e. conventional first versus gated first) will be randomised.
The Real-Time Gated 4DCT is anticipated to take longer than the conventional 4DCT scan, due to its gated (beam-pause) nature. However, upper limits for timing will be implemented in the software, and the scan aborted for highly erratic breathing traces that would not benefit from a Real-Time Gated 4DCT scan.
Read the detailed description
Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is considered the standard of care for modern high-precision stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) techniques. Clinical 4DCT works by acquiring CT slices and breathing data synchronously as the patient moves through the rotating X-ray imager. The CT slices are sorted into 5-10 'phase images' (mid-exhale, peak-exhale, mid-inhale, peak-inhale, etc.) and stitched together to form a 3D+breathing induced tumour/organ motion or '4D' representation of the breathing anatomy. Current best practice in radiation therapy is for clinicians to perform manual delineation or 'contouring' of lung tumours on one or more 4DCT phase images to ensure proper coverage by the treatment beam despite breathing motion. In the presence of irregular breathing, mismatches arise between CT slices that are in the same breathing phase but imaged at different couch positions. As a result, the images produced suffer from various kinds of discontinuities including truncation, duplication or overlap. Yamamoto found that irregular breathing caused at least one error >4mm in 90% (45 out of 50) abdominal and thoracic patient scans. The main consequence of 4DCT image errors is that they can introduce tumour volume and position uncertainties as large as 30% between different 4D phase bins or different observers.
This can potentially reduce the likelihood of tumour control by up to one-third and lead to unnecessary irradiation of healthy lung tissue, contributing to major dose-limiting side effects like radiation pneumonitis, which is symptomatic in up to 30% of patients and fatal in 2%. The proposed solution is Real-Time Gated 4DCT using prospective regularity gating, which will be implemented for the first time on lung cancer patients.
The Real-Time Gated 4DCT method detects and then pauses the CT beam during irregular breathing events. We will analyse the patient's breathing pattern to prospectively gate acquisition in real-time. Real-time gated 4DCT ensures that the X-ray imager is switched on only when the breathing is regular; the scan gets paused otherwise. The benefits for the patient of gating a 4DCT scan have been demonstrated in previous studies:
- a reduction of breathing motion errors by 50%
- a reduction of imaging dose. Delineation of tumours and organs in CT scans is the first step in a lung cancer patient's radiation therapy journey. Accurate delineation is pivotal to patient outcomes because errors propagate throughout treatment and can lead to radiation dose missing parts of the tumour or unnecessarily irradiating healthy tissue or organs. Unfortunately, the most important imaging modality used for the delineation of lung cancers, 4DCT, is error prone. Radiation Oncologists (ROs) are faced with an enormous challenge and are required to delineate tumours when 90% of clinical scans suffer severe imaging errors. These errors obfuscate the true tumour position/shape and reduce the chance of tumour control by up to one third.
The main culprit for imaging errors is irregular breathing: i.e. natural breathing variations, which are heightened for lung cancer patients but not accounted for by clinical scanners. A solution to this problem was proposed, which is to gate the CT scanner (i.e. pausing the beam) whenever a breathing condition occurs that is likely to produce an imaging artefact.
Research Question The primary endpoint is that the number of image artifacts using the Real-time gated scan will produce fewer artefacts than the conventional scan.
Secondary endpoints involve examining image quality and the impact on treatment planning with the benefits to the patient being:
- Consistent/predictable image quality: Consistent image quality will assist radiation oncologists in identifying tumour and organ interfaces and therefore reduce delineation errors.
- Improvements in treatment plans: More accurate delineation will lead to improved treatment plans and therefore improved patient outcomes.
This clinical trial is a first-in-humans pilot feasibility study and the aim is therefore to prove feasibility of Real-Time Gated 4DCT, with the aim of leading to an efficacy trial. As such, patient scans will be acquired across a broad range of patient breathing conditions to optimise the Real-Time Gated technique and to plan a larger, hypothesis-driven phase II clinical trial to follow. Automatic cut-offs for these erratic breathing traces will be built into the Real-Time Gated 4DCT software.
Rationale for Current Study In-silico studies suggest that the Real-Time Gated 4DCT approach, can reduce imaging errors by up to 50% whilst also reducing imaging dose by >20%. It has been estimated that the current rate of artifacts using conventional 4DCT is at least 60% and possibly up to 95%. A reduction to at most 35% (25% of images with fewer artifacts) would be clinically worthwhile.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Real-time Gated 4DCT, Conventional 4DCT
- Keywords
- Radiotherapy, 4DCT, Real-time gated 4DCT, Imaging artifacts, Computed tomography
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Real-time Gated 4DCTDiagnostic test
Real-time gated four-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (4DCT) will be conducted at the simulation session. The Real-Time Gated 4DCT will be conducted while the patient moves through the rotating X-ray imager. This method detects and then pauses the CT beam during irregular breathing events.
Conventional 4DCTDiagnostic test
Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), the standard of care for modern high-precision stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR), will be conducted at the simulation session. It will run continuously while the patient moves through the rotating X-ray imager.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Real-Time Gated 4DCT and Conventional 4DCT | Experimental | During the simulation (radiotherapy planning) session, the participant will undergo both the experimental 'Real-Time Gated 4DCT' and standard 'Conventional 4DCT'. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Real-time Gated 4DCT; Diagnostic Test: Conventional 4DCT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The feasibility of using Real-Time Gated 4DCT instead of Conventional 4DCT for planning radiotherapy for lung cancer.
A change in the anticipated rate of image artifacts in images acquired from Conventional of 60% to 35% or less in images acquired from Real-Time Gated 4DCT.
Measured: 30 minutes
Secondary outcomes (6)
Patient tolerance to the experimental scan (Real-Time Gated 4DCT)
The radiation therapist conducting the radiation therapy study scan will complete a survey consisting of two yes/no questions after the planning session to assess patient tolerance (1. whether the patient finishes the scan without getting off the couch. 2. If the patient voiced any complaints during the scan and seem uncomfortable.)
Measured: 1 minute at end of planning session
clinician confidence in acquiring a Real-Time Gated 4DCT scan
The radiation therapist conducting the radiation therapy study scan will complete an in-house survey of 10 questions after the treatment session to evaluate their experience with REACT software and its usability.
Measured: 5 minutes at end of planning session
clinician confidence in delineation on a Real-Time Gated 4DCT scan
The radiation oncologist performing the delineation on the radiation therapy planning scan images and study scan images will complete an in-house survey of 10 questions to evaluate his experience with REACT and his confidence with using REACT for delineation.
Measured: 5-10 minutes, following delineation of standard care and study scans.
Effect on Real-Time Gated 4DCT image quality of patient characteristics: breathing type, breathing period, BMI, tumour location, breathing amplitude, breathing regularity, pulmonary function, ECOG status.
Correlation between image quality (the number of artifacts greater than 4mm in the images acquired from Real-Time Gated 4DCT) and participant characteristics known to affect image quality in conventional scans: Breathing period ( seconds) and breathing amplitude will be measured using the Varian real-time position management system; body mass index (weight(kg) x height(m)2); tumour location;, breathing regularity (root mean square error (RMSE) of 6 breaths/min was obtained), pulmonary function, Performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale).
Measured: 40 minutes, prior to and during the planning session
Difference in scanning time between Real-Time Gated 4DCT compared with Conventional 4DCT for planning of radiotherapy for lung cancer
Time in minutes from start to end of scan.
Measured: 30 minutes
Quality of treatment plan using images acquired during Real-Time Gated 4DCT compared with images acquired during Conventional 4DCT
Contouring and planning using the Real-Time Gated 4DCT image set to develop a treatment plan of prescribed radiation therapy. Treatment plans will be assessed using the 3%/3mm and 2%/2mm gamma pass index.
Measured: 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Sep 2021
- Study start15 May 2024
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Single site, 1 arm unblinded, pilot feasibility clinical trial to investigate the feasibility of acquiring Real-Time Gated 4DCT scans for lung cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy and to determine the incidence of imaging artifacts in comparison to conventional 4DCT
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sydney
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Western Sydney Local Health District
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ricky O'Brien, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Sydney
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05030207
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REACT
- Acronym
- REACT
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2021
- Last updated
- 19 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Respiratory Adaptive Computed Tomography: A Pilot Feasibility Study on the Use of Real-Time Gated 4DCT for Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05030207
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REACT / REACT
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- Radiotherapy, 4DCT, Real-time gated 4DCT, Imaging artifacts, Computed tomography
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SydneyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Western Sydney Local Health District
- Study start
- 15 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study does not involve a therapeutic intervention as standard radiation therapy treatment will be prescribed. This study involves one additional 4DCT scan (i.e. the Real-Time Gated 4DCT scan) acquired immediately before or following the conventional 4DCT scan. This will take place on the day of the patient's treatment simulation, as per the current standard of care. The scanning sequence (i.e. conventional first versus gated first) will be randomised.
The Real-Time Gated 4DCT is anticipated to take longer than the conventional 4DCT scan, due to its gated (beam-pause) nature. However, upper limits for timing will be implemented in the software, and the scan aborted for highly erratic breathing traces that would not benefit from a Real-Time Gated 4DCT scan.
Detailed description
Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is considered the standard of care for modern high-precision stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) techniques. Clinical 4DCT works by acquiring CT slices and breathing data synchronously as the patient moves through the rotating X-ray imager. The CT slices are sorted into 5-10 'phase images' (mid-exhale, peak-exhale, mid-inhale, peak-inhale, etc.) and stitched together to form a 3D+breathing induced tumour/organ motion or '4D' representation of the breathing anatomy. Current best practice in radiation therapy is for clinicians to perform manual delineation or 'contouring' of lung tumours on one or more 4DCT phase images to ensure proper coverage by the treatment beam despite breathing motion. In the presence of irregular breathing, mismatches arise between CT slices that are in the same breathing phase but imaged at different couch positions. As a result, the images produced suffer from various kinds of discontinuities including truncation, duplication or overlap. Yamamoto found that irregular breathing caused at least one error >4mm in 90% (45 out of 50) abdominal and thoracic patient scans. The main consequence of 4DCT image errors is that they can introduce tumour volume and position uncertainties as large as 30% between different 4D phase bins or different observers.
This can potentially reduce the likelihood of tumour control by up to one-third and lead to unnecessary irradiation of healthy lung tissue, contributing to major dose-limiting side effects like radiation pneumonitis, which is symptomatic in up to 30% of patients and fatal in 2%. The proposed solution is Real-Time Gated 4DCT using prospective regularity gating, which will be implemented for the first time on lung cancer patients.
The Real-Time Gated 4DCT method detects and then pauses the CT beam during irregular breathing events. We will analyse the patient's breathing pattern to prospectively gate acquisition in real-time. Real-time gated 4DCT ensures that the X-ray imager is switched on only when the breathing is regular; the scan gets paused otherwise. The benefits for the patient of gating a 4DCT scan have been demonstrated in previous studies:
- a reduction of breathing motion errors by 50%
- a reduction of imaging dose. Delineation of tumours and organs in CT scans is the first step in a lung cancer patient's radiation therapy journey. Accurate delineation is pivotal to patient outcomes because errors propagate throughout treatment and can lead to radiation dose missing parts of the tumour or unnecessarily irradiating healthy tissue or organs. Unfortunately, the most important imaging modality used for the delineation of lung cancers, 4DCT, is error prone. Radiation Oncologists (ROs) are faced with an enormous challenge and are required to delineate tumours when 90% of clinical scans suffer severe imaging errors. These errors obfuscate the true tumour position/shape and reduce the chance of tumour control by up to one third.
The main culprit for imaging errors is irregular breathing: i.e. natural breathing variations, which are heightened for lung cancer patients but not accounted for by clinical scanners. A solution to this problem was proposed, which is to gate the CT scanner (i.e. pausing the beam) whenever a breathing condition occurs that is likely to produce an imaging artefact.
Research Question The primary endpoint is that the number of image artifacts using the Real-time gated scan will produce fewer artefacts than the conventional scan.
Secondary endpoints involve examining image quality and the impact on treatment planning with the benefits to the patient being:
- Consistent/predictable image quality: Consistent image quality will assist radiation oncologists in identifying tumour and organ interfaces and therefore reduce delineation errors.
- Improvements in treatment plans: More accurate delineation will lead to improved treatment plans and therefore improved patient outcomes.
This clinical trial is a first-in-humans pilot feasibility study and the aim is therefore to prove feasibility of Real-Time Gated 4DCT, with the aim of leading to an efficacy trial. As such, patient scans will be acquired across a broad range of patient breathing conditions to optimise the Real-Time Gated technique and to plan a larger, hypothesis-driven phase II clinical trial to follow. Automatic cut-offs for these erratic breathing traces will be built into the Real-Time Gated 4DCT software.
Rationale for Current Study In-silico studies suggest that the Real-Time Gated 4DCT approach, can reduce imaging errors by up to 50% whilst also reducing imaging dose by >20%. It has been estimated that the current rate of artifacts using conventional 4DCT is at least 60% and possibly up to 95%. A reduction to at most 35% (25% of images with fewer artifacts) would be clinically worthwhile.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Single site, 1 arm unblinded, pilot feasibility clinical trial to investigate the feasibility of acquiring Real-Time Gated 4DCT scans for lung cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy and to determine the incidence of imaging artifacts in comparison to conventional 4DCT
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Real-Time Gated 4DCT and Conventional 4DCT | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Real-time Gated 4DCT, Diagnostic Test: Conventional 4DCTDuring the simulation (radiotherapy planning) session, the participant will undergo both the experimental 'Real-Time Gated 4DCT' and standard 'Conventional 4DCT'. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 18 years or older
- Have the ability to give informed consent
- A diagnosis of lung cancer with an indication for radiation therapy
- Radiation therapy treatment involving the acquisition of a 4DCT scan for treatment planning
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnant women
- Patients <18 years
- Patients who in the opinion of the treating physician could not tolerate the extra time on the CT couch for an extra scan
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time Gated 4DCTReal-time gated four-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (4DCT) will be conducted at the simulation session. The Real-Time Gated 4DCT will be conducted while the patient moves through the rotating X-ray imager. This method detects and then pauses the CT beam during irregular breathing events. | Diagnostic test | Real-Time Gated 4DCT and Conventional 4DCT |
| Conventional 4DCTFour-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), the standard of care for modern high-precision stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR), will be conducted at the simulation session. It will run continuously while the patient moves through the rotating X-ray imager. | Diagnostic test | Real-Time Gated 4DCT and Conventional 4DCT |
Primary outcome
The feasibility of using Real-Time Gated 4DCT instead of Conventional 4DCT for planning radiotherapy for lung cancer.
Time frame: 30 minutes
A change in the anticipated rate of image artifacts in images acquired from Conventional of 60% to 35% or less in images acquired from Real-Time Gated 4DCT.
6 secondary outcomes
Patient tolerance to the experimental scan (Real-Time Gated 4DCT)
Time frame: 1 minute at end of planning session
clinician confidence in acquiring a Real-Time Gated 4DCT scan
Time frame: 5 minutes at end of planning session
clinician confidence in delineation on a Real-Time Gated 4DCT scan
Time frame: 5-10 minutes, following delineation of standard care and study scans.
Effect on Real-Time Gated 4DCT image quality of patient characteristics: breathing type, breathing period, BMI, tumour location, breathing amplitude, breathing regularity, pulmonary function, ECOG status.
Time frame: 40 minutes, prior to and during the planning session
Difference in scanning time between Real-Time Gated 4DCT compared with Conventional 4DCT for planning of radiotherapy for lung cancer
Time frame: 30 minutes
Quality of treatment plan using images acquired during Real-Time Gated 4DCT compared with images acquired during Conventional 4DCT
Time frame: 1 week
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2026.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Phase 2 Trial of Adagrasib Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab and a Phase 3 Trial of Adagrasib in Combination in Patients With a KRAS G12C Mutation KRYSTAL-7
Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of Adjuvant Intismeran (V940) With or Without Pembrolizumab Coformulated With Berahyaluronidase Alfa (MK-3475A) in High-Risk Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (V940-014)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
More Than Just X-Rays - Imaging of Chemotherapy-induced Morphological and Functional Cardiovascular and Lung Changes After Childhood ALL and Other Cancers - a Monocentric Late Effects Study (MaximALL)
Acute Lymphatic Leukemia, Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1
SW-682 in Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumor, Mesothelioma, Malignant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ricky O'Brien, PhD principal investigator
University of Sydney
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Real-time Gated 4DCT and Conventional 4DCT in people with Lung Cancer, run by University of Sydney at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Shona J Silvester, MMedSc (+61286271185, Shona.Silvester@sydney.edu.au), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The feasibility of using Real-Time Gated 4DCT instead of Conventional 4DCT for planning radiotherapy for lung cancer. (time frame: 30 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2026.