CalculiNCT05034705
A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial on the Use of a Dental Aerosol Box to Prevent Microbial Transmission During Dental Procedure
A study testing Conventional suction system and Dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation system in people with Calculi, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.
Trial summary
The study compares the use of a dental aerosol box in preventing microbial transmission during dental procedure. Subjects requiring scaling treatment (BPE 2) will be recruited. Subjects will be allocated either into the control group (conventional suction method) or interventional group (dental aerosol box) Treatment… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Calculi
- What is being tested?
- Conventional suction system and Dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation system
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalaysia
- Study dates
- 6 Sep 2021to 27 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- BPE score of 2
Who cannot join
- BPE score of 1, 3 or 4
- Smoker
- Systemic disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Malaysia1 site
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Malaya
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 50603
About this study
The study compares the use of a dental aerosol box in preventing microbial transmission during dental procedure. Subjects requiring scaling treatment (BPE 2) will be recruited. Subjects will be allocated either into the control group (conventional suction method) or interventional group (dental aerosol box) Treatment will involve scaling of two quadrants, where data collection of the microbes will be taken. Secondary outcome will involve a self-administered questionnaire on patients acceptance over the scaling procedure either with conventional suction or using the dental aerosol box to contain the aerosol generated during the scaling procedure.
Read the detailed description
A closed operation room, with the facility to fumigate the room is chosen for all treatment procedures. Patients would be treated with time separations that would be reasonable to prevent microbial detection of the previous patient.
Sample size calculated based on Sadun et al (2020) to compare two groups would require 15 subjects per group for a 90% power and 0.05 significance.
Inclusion criteria: BPE 2 on at least 2 quadrants. Exclusion criteria: Smoker and systemic disease.
Patients will be randomised using randomiser.org. The list will be placed in a sealed envelop by an individual not involved in subject recruitment. Patient grouping will be determined after recruitment and consent. The envelop will be opened and patient allocated to the group.
Interventional group:
- Conventional suction (control)
- Dental aerosol box with modified high-volume evacuation system (interventional)
The procedure will involve scaling of two quadrants, where data collection of the microbes will be taken.
Before each appointment, at the start of study all operatory surfaces were cleaned and disinfected with Ethyl alcohol (70%). Between each treatment and at start of treatment, ultrasonic scaler units will be flushed with water for 2 minutes. Use of 0.5% Sodium Hypochlorite will be done for flushing the tubing of dental chair waterline and the same solution would be allowed to stay in tubing for 10 minutes followed by water flushing to remove the unwanted biofilm from the tubing surfaces. This procedure would be done at the end of each treatment.
Then operatory will fumigated at the end of all procedures to allow the room to be free of aerosol before it is allowed for use for the subsequent subject. Dental unit would use distilled water in self-contained system, for the study.
- Primary outcome: microbial colony forming unit Passive sampling will be conducted to assess the index of microbial air contamination as described in other studies (Pasquarella C, et al 2000, Napoli C, et al 2012, Saha R, et al 2017). The method quantifies the microbial flow directly related to the contamination of surfaces coming from microbes that reach critical points by falling on to them. The index of microbial air contamination is based on the count of the microbial fallout on to Petri dishes left open to the air according to the 1/1/1 scheme (for 1h, 1m from the floor, at least 1m away from walls or any obstacle). This index corresponds to the values of CFU calculated from the culture plates of 9 cm diameter. Sealed petri dishes will be transported to where the procedures will be done. Gravity settle plates using tryptic soy agar in 9cm Petri dishes will be used to assess the colony count for passive sampling. The index of microbial air contamination will be assessed at rest (in the early morning before the beginning of dental procedures) and in operational of procedures (during procedures) to determine changes in bacterial count due to dental treatment. Five resting and five in operational samples will be taken from each room. Plates will be incubated overnight at 37°C and colony counts will be documented. ii) Secondary outcome: patient acceptance Patient will complete a self-administered questionnaire to determine their acceptance over the experience to undergo the scaling procedure.
- Conditions
- Calculi
- Being tested
- Conventional suction system, Dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation system
- Medical subject headings
- Calculi
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional suction systemDevice
This is the conventional method of using the dental high volume suction to contain the aerosol generated during dental procedure. The saliva ejector will also be used.
Dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation systemDevice
The dental aerosol box will be equipped with an exit for the high volume suction to be attached to contain the aerosol generated during dental procedure. The saliva ejector will also be used.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active comparator: Conventional suction system | Active comparator | This is the conventional method of using the dental high volume suction to contain the aerosol generated during dental procedure. The saliva ejector will also be used. Receives: Device: Conventional suction system |
| Experimental: Dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation system | Experimental | The dental aerosol box will be equipped with an exit for the high volume suction to be attached to contain the aerosol generated during dental procedure. The saliva ejector will also be used. Receives: Device: Dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation system |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total bacterial count
The index of microbial air contamination is based on the count of the microbial fallout on to Petri dishes left open to the air according to the 1/1/1 scheme (for 1h, 1m from the floor, at least 1m away from walls or any obstacle). This index corresponds to the values of CFU calculated from the culture plates of 9 cm diameter. The index of microbial air contamination will be assessed at rest (before the beginning of dental procedures) and in operational of procedures (during procedures) to determine changes in bacterial count due to dental treatment.
Measured: 30 mins
Secondary outcomes (1)
Patient acceptance of dental procedure
The patient will be given a questionnaire after the treatment to assess their acceptance over the treatment procedure i.e. having scaling procedure by the method (control or interventional). The perception will assessed using Likert scale.
Measured: 1 treatment session, which is about 30 mins
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Sep 2021
- Study start6 Sep 2021
- Primary completion27 Sep 2021
- Study completion27 Sep 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CalculiStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MalayaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Control - conventional suction system Interventional - dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation suction system
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Malaya
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Wan Nurazreena Wan Hassan, University of Malaya
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05034705
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CSRG001-2020ST
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial on the Use of a Dental Aerosol Box to Prevent Microbial Transmission During Dental Procedure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05034705
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CSRG001-2020ST
- Conditions
- Calculi
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MalayaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study compares the use of a dental aerosol box in preventing microbial transmission during dental procedure. Subjects requiring scaling treatment (BPE 2) will be recruited. Subjects will be allocated either into the control group (conventional suction method) or interventional group (dental aerosol box) Treatment will involve scaling of two quadrants, where data collection of the microbes will be taken. Secondary outcome will involve a self-administered questionnaire on patients acceptance over the scaling procedure either with conventional suction or using the dental aerosol box to contain the aerosol generated during the scaling procedure.
Detailed description
A closed operation room, with the facility to fumigate the room is chosen for all treatment procedures. Patients would be treated with time separations that would be reasonable to prevent microbial detection of the previous patient.
Sample size calculated based on Sadun et al (2020) to compare two groups would require 15 subjects per group for a 90% power and 0.05 significance.
Inclusion criteria: BPE 2 on at least 2 quadrants. Exclusion criteria: Smoker and systemic disease.
Patients will be randomised using randomiser.org. The list will be placed in a sealed envelop by an individual not involved in subject recruitment. Patient grouping will be determined after recruitment and consent. The envelop will be opened and patient allocated to the group.
Interventional group:
- Conventional suction (control)
- Dental aerosol box with modified high-volume evacuation system (interventional)
The procedure will involve scaling of two quadrants, where data collection of the microbes will be taken.
Before each appointment, at the start of study all operatory surfaces were cleaned and disinfected with Ethyl alcohol (70%). Between each treatment and at start of treatment, ultrasonic scaler units will be flushed with water for 2 minutes. Use of 0.5% Sodium Hypochlorite will be done for flushing the tubing of dental chair waterline and the same solution would be allowed to stay in tubing for 10 minutes followed by water flushing to remove the unwanted biofilm from the tubing surfaces. This procedure would be done at the end of each treatment.
Then operatory will fumigated at the end of all procedures to allow the room to be free of aerosol before it is allowed for use for the subsequent subject. Dental unit would use distilled water in self-contained system, for the study.
- Primary outcome: microbial colony forming unit Passive sampling will be conducted to assess the index of microbial air contamination as described in other studies (Pasquarella C, et al 2000, Napoli C, et al 2012, Saha R, et al 2017). The method quantifies the microbial flow directly related to the contamination of surfaces coming from microbes that reach critical points by falling on to them. The index of microbial air contamination is based on the count of the microbial fallout on to Petri dishes left open to the air according to the 1/1/1 scheme (for 1h, 1m from the floor, at least 1m away from walls or any obstacle). This index corresponds to the values of CFU calculated from the culture plates of 9 cm diameter. Sealed petri dishes will be transported to where the procedures will be done. Gravity settle plates using tryptic soy agar in 9cm Petri dishes will be used to assess the colony count for passive sampling. The index of microbial air contamination will be assessed at rest (in the early morning before the beginning of dental procedures) and in operational of procedures (during procedures) to determine changes in bacterial count due to dental treatment. Five resting and five in operational samples will be taken from each room. Plates will be incubated overnight at 37°C and colony counts will be documented. ii) Secondary outcome: patient acceptance Patient will complete a self-administered questionnaire to determine their acceptance over the experience to undergo the scaling procedure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Control - conventional suction system Interventional - dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation suction system
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active comparator: Conventional suction system | Active comparator | Device: Conventional suction systemThis is the conventional method of using the dental high volume suction to contain the aerosol generated during dental procedure. The saliva ejector will also be used. |
| Experimental: Dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation system | Experimental | Device: Dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation systemThe dental aerosol box will be equipped with an exit for the high volume suction to be attached to contain the aerosol generated during dental procedure. The saliva ejector will also be used. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- BPE score of 2
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- BPE score of 1, 3 or 4
- Smoker
- Systemic disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional suction systemThis is the conventional method of using the dental high volume suction to contain the aerosol generated during dental procedure. The saliva ejector will also be used. | Device | Active comparator: Conventional suction system |
| Dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation systemThe dental aerosol box will be equipped with an exit for the high volume suction to be attached to contain the aerosol generated during dental procedure. The saliva ejector will also be used. | Device | Experimental: Dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation system |
Primary outcome
Total bacterial count
Time frame: 30 mins
The index of microbial air contamination is based on the count of the microbial fallout on to Petri dishes left open to the air according to the 1/1/1 scheme (for 1h, 1m from the floor, at least 1m away from walls or any obstacle). This index corresponds to the values of CFU calculated from the culture plates of 9 cm diameter. The index of microbial air contamination will be assessed at rest (before the beginning of dental procedures) and in operational of procedures (during procedures) to determine changes in bacterial count due to dental treatment.
1 secondary outcome
Patient acceptance of dental procedure
Time frame: 1 treatment session, which is about 30 mins
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Calculi
Not yet recruiting
Automated Versus Manual Irrigation During Flexible Ureteroscopy
Renal Stone Disease
Not yet recruiting
Optimal Intrarenal Pressure During Flexible Ureteroscopy
Renal Stone Disease
Recruiting
STEpwise Research Program to Promote INGeniouS ONline Supportive Solutions in the Relief of Cancer-related Fatigue
Cancer Diagnosis, Moderate or Severe Score of Cancer-related Fatigue (CRF)
RecruitingPhase 3
THE ROLE OF PANCREATIC STONE PROTEIN (PSP) AND PSP-GUIDED EARLY MEROPENEM TREATMENT TO MITIGATE SEPSIS RISK AT THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: THE PROMISE DOUBLE BLIND, PHASE III, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL
Sepsis
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
A Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Ningmitai Capsules in Treating Patients With Upper Urinary Tract Stones After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Calculus of Upper Urinary Tract
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventional suction system and Dental aerosol box with modified high volume evacuation system in people with Calculi, run by University of Malaya at 1 site in Malaysia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total bacterial count (time frame: 30 mins). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2021.