AzTrials
AzTrials

Complex Regional Pain SyndromesVECODONNCT05034835

Impact of Compression Garments on Pain in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome of the Upper Limbs.

A study testing usual treatment with compression garments (CERECARE) and usual treatment without compression garments (CERECARE) in people with Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, run by Centre Mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation Fonctionnelles de Kerpape at 1 site in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim is to study another alternative for the treatment of pain in people with CRPS. Indeed, the TRAB / Medullary occupational therapy department of the CMRRF in Kerpape used compression garments to reduce edema when it was present.In the case of CRPS of the upper limbs, gloves or compression sleeves are used to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
What is being tested?
usual treatment with compression garments (CERECARE) and usual treatment without compression garments (CERECARE)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
12 Oct 2021to Oct 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with CRPS of the upper limb with neuropathic pain
  • Diagnosis of CRPS according to the Budapest criteria
  • Diagnosis of neuropathic pain according to DN4
  • CRPS evolving for more than 3 months
  • No phlebitis or open sores on the upper limbs
  • Patient consent to participate in the study
  • No modification of his drug treatment for 1 month
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme

Who cannot join

  • Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice
  • Psychiatric pathology altering the ability to consent
  • Severe cognitive disorders that do not allow the patient to assess his pain
  • Skin pathology preventing the wearing of the compression garment
  • Patient who has previously worn a compression garment
  • History of vascular disorders of the upper limbs, lymph node dissection, or any other pathology that can lead to edema regardless of CRPS
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Known allergy to one of the components of the compression garments of the Cerecare brand
  • Declared pregnancy, breastfeeding woman or woman of childbearing potential without contraception
  • Inability to put on the compression garment alone

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Vincent Detaille, Doctor contact

02 97 82 60 28 ext. +33

vincent.detaille@vyv3.fr

Marie-Caroline Delebecque, CRA contact

02 97 82 62 93 ext. +33

kerpape.arc@vyv3.fr

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CMRRF de Kerpape

    Ploemeur, Brittany Region, 56270

    Marie-Caroline Delebecque, CRA, 02 97 82 62 93 ext. +33, kerpape.arc@vyv3.fr

    Vincent Detaille, Doctor

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Impact of Compression Garments on Neuropathic-looking Pain in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) of the Upper Limbs.

The aim is to study another alternative for the treatment of pain in people with CRPS. Indeed, the TRAB / Medullary occupational therapy department of the CMRRF in Kerpape used compression garments to reduce edema when it was present.In the case of CRPS of the upper limbs, gloves or compression sleeves are used to decrease the edema which is sometimes associated, although they are not supported for this indication. In this context, our clinical experience leads us to believe that there would also be some efficacy in neuropathic pain, this improvement being regularly described by patients.This study is expected to show a notable reduction in neuropathic pain thanks to the wearing of a compression garment.

Being tested
usual treatment with compression garments (CERECARE), usual treatment without compression garments (CERECARE)
Medical subject headings
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • usual treatment with compression garments (CERECARE)Device

    For 3 months, the pain will be assessed every week, tolerance and compliance with compression garments will also be monitored. Participants will be reviewed specifically at a follow-up consultation for the 6-month and 1-year study. Various assessments will be carried out during these visits : assessment of pain, range of motion, muscle strength, sensitivity test, assessment of anxiety, depression and even quality of life.

  • usual treatment without compression garments (CERECARE)Other

    For 3 months, the pain will be assessed every week, tolerance and compliance with compression garments will also be monitored. Participants will be reviewed specifically at a follow-up consultation for the 6-month and 1-year study. Various assessments will be carried out during these visits : assessment of pain, range of motion, muscle strength, sensitivity test, assessment of anxiety, depression and even quality of life.

Study groups in NCT05034835
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
With compression garmentsExperimentalUsual care in day hospitals, i.e. 3 occupational therapy sessions / week for 3 months, with the usual protocol of desensitization by Aquaroll (hydro-massage ball device) and by Vibralgic (device generating electronic transcutaneous vibrations) + wearing a compression garment for 3 months.
Receives: Device: usual treatment with compression garments (CERECARE)
Without compression garmentsOtherUsual care in day hospitals, i.e. 3 occupational therapy sessions / week for 3 months, with the usual protocol of desensitization by Aquaroll (hydro-massage ball device) and by Vibralgic (device generating electronic transcutaneous vibrations).
Receives: Other: usual treatment without compression garments (CERECARE)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The evolution of pain through Visual Analog Scale (VAS), measured every week for 3 months in the last 24 hours and in the last 7 days

    The VAS is a self-rated scale. It comes in the form of a 10 cm plastic ruler graduated in mm. On the face presented to the patient is a cursor which he moves along a straight line, one end of which corresponds to "No pain" and the other to "Maximum pain imaginable". The patient should, along this line, position the cursor where the pain is best located. On the other side, there are millimeter graduations seen only by the caregiver. The position of the cursor mobilized by the patient makes it possible to read the intensity of the pain, which is measured in mm.

    Measured: up to 3 months

Secondary outcomes (54)
  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The VAS is a self-rated scale. It comes in the form of a 10 cm plastic ruler graduated in mm. On the face presented to the patient is a cursor which he moves along a straight line, one end of which corresponds to "No pain" and the other to "Maximum pain imaginable". The patient should, along this line, position the cursor where the pain is best located. On the other side, there are millimeter graduations seen only by the caregiver. The position of the cursor mobilized by the patient makes it possible to read the intensity of the pain, which is measured in mm.

    Measured: At 6 months

  2. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The VAS is a self-rated scale. It comes in the form of a 10 cm plastic ruler graduated in mm. On the face presented to the patient is a cursor which he moves along a straight line, one end of which corresponds to "No pain" and the other to "Maximum pain imaginable". The patient should, along this line, position the cursor where the pain is best located. On the other side, there are millimeter graduations seen only by the caregiver. The position of the cursor mobilized by the patient makes it possible to read the intensity of the pain, which is measured in mm.

    Measured: At 1 year

  3. Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)

    It's a tool developed and validated in French, composed of 12 items. It provides an overall score and 5 sub-scores

    Measured: Day 0

  4. Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)

    It's a tool developed and validated in French, composed of 12 items. It provides an overall score and 5 sub-scores

    Measured: At 1,5 months

  5. Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)

    It's a tool developed and validated in French, composed of 12 items. It provides an overall score and 5 sub-scores

    Measured: At 3 months

  6. Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)

    It's a tool developed and validated in French, composed of 12 items. It provides an overall score and 5 sub-scores

    Measured: At 6 months

  7. Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)

    It's a tool developed and validated in French, composed of 12 items. It provides an overall score and 5 sub-scores

    Measured: At 1 year

  8. Modification of analgesic drug treatment

    The increase or decrease in doses between each visit will be collected by the doctor. He can rely on the booklet filled out by the patient.

    Measured: Day 0

  9. Modification of analgesic drug treatment

    The increase or decrease in doses between each visit will be collected by the doctor. He can rely on the booklet filled out by the patient.

    Measured: At 1,5 months

  10. Modification of analgesic drug treatment

    The increase or decrease in doses between each visit will be collected by the doctor. He can rely on the booklet filled out by the patient.

    Measured: At 3 months

  11. Modification of analgesic drug treatment

    The increase or decrease in doses between each visit will be collected by the doctor. He can rely on the booklet filled out by the patient.

    Measured: At 6 months

  12. Modification of analgesic drug treatment

    The increase or decrease in doses between each visit will be collected by the doctor. He can rely on the booklet filled out by the patient.

    Measured: At 1 year

  13. Measurement of range of motion

    The range of motion is measured exploratory at different levels, for both sides:

    • Wrist range of motion, measured using posture foam and goniometer. This measures the amplitude in flexion, extension, radial tilt, ulnar tilt, and pronation and supination, both passively and actively.
    • Pulp-palm and pulp palmar fold distances of the fingers, measured using wedges of different lengths. One measurement is made per finger
    • Kapandji score, which is a score out of 10 based on achievable opposition for the thumb. 0 being the lowest score and 10 a normal score.

    Measured: Day 0

  14. Measurement of range of motion

    The range of motion is measured exploratory at different levels, for both sides:

    • Wrist range of motion, measured using posture foam and goniometer. This measures the amplitude in flexion, extension, radial tilt, ulnar tilt, and pronation and supination, both passively and actively.
    • Pulp-palm and pulp palmar fold distances of the fingers, measured using wedges of different lengths. One measurement is made per finger
    • Kapandji score, which is a score out of 10 based on achievable opposition for the thumb. 0 being the lowest score and 10 a normal score.

    Measured: At 1,5 months

  15. Measurement of range of motion

    The range of motion is measured exploratory at different levels, for both sides:

    • Wrist range of motion, measured using posture foam and goniometer. This measures the amplitude in flexion, extension, radial tilt, ulnar tilt, and pronation and supination, both passively and actively.
    • Pulp-palm and pulp palmar fold distances of the fingers, measured using wedges of different lengths. One measurement is made per finger
    • Kapandji score, which is a score out of 10 based on achievable opposition for the thumb. 0 being the lowest score and 10 a normal score.

    Measured: At 3 months

  16. Measurement of range of motion

    The range of motion is measured exploratory at different levels, for both sides:

    • Wrist range of motion, measured using posture foam and goniometer. This measures the amplitude in flexion, extension, radial tilt, ulnar tilt, and pronation and supination, both passively and actively.
    • Pulp-palm and pulp palmar fold distances of the fingers, measured using wedges of different lengths. One measurement is made per finger
    • Kapandji score, which is a score out of 10 based on achievable opposition for the thumb. 0 being the lowest score and 10 a normal score.

    Measured: At 6 months

  17. Measurement of range of motion

    The range of motion is measured exploratory at different levels, for both sides:

    • Wrist range of motion, measured using posture foam and goniometer. This measures the amplitude in flexion, extension, radial tilt, ulnar tilt, and pronation and supination, both passively and actively.
    • Pulp-palm and pulp palmar fold distances of the fingers, measured using wedges of different lengths. One measurement is made per finger
    • Kapandji score, which is a score out of 10 based on achievable opposition for the thumb. 0 being the lowest score and 10 a normal score.

    Measured: At 1 year

  18. Measurement of muscle strength in both hands

    • the JAMAR® hydraulic hand dynamometer: measurement of the gripping force in kilograms
    • the PINCH® hydraulic pinch gauge: measures the pinch force in kilograms

    Measured: Day 0

  19. Measurement of muscle strength in both hands

    • the JAMAR® hydraulic hand dynamometer: measurement of the gripping force in kilograms
    • the PINCH® hydraulic pinch gauge: measures the pinch force in kilograms

    Measured: At 1,5 months

  20. Measurement of muscle strength in both hands

    • the JAMAR® hydraulic hand dynamometer: measurement of the gripping force in kilograms
    • the PINCH® hydraulic pinch gauge: measures the pinch force in kilograms

    Measured: At 3 months

  21. Measurement of muscle strength in both hands

    • the JAMAR® hydraulic hand dynamometer: measurement of the gripping force in kilograms
    • the PINCH® hydraulic pinch gauge: measures the pinch force in kilograms

    Measured: At 6 months

  22. Measurement of muscle strength in both hands

    • the JAMAR® hydraulic hand dynamometer: measurement of the gripping force in kilograms
    • the PINCH® hydraulic pinch gauge: measures the pinch force in kilograms

    Measured: At 1 year

  23. Measurement of hand circumference

    The circumference of the hand is measured in different places. A total of 15 measurements are taken. Both hands are measured.

    The analysis will be based on the difference of the sum of the 15 measures for each of the hands.

    Measured: Day 0

  24. Measurement of hand circumference

    The circumference of the hand is measured in different places. A total of 15 measurements are taken. Both hands are measured.

    The analysis will be based on the difference of the sum of the 15 measures for each of the hands.

    Measured: At 1,5 months

  25. Measurement of hand circumference

    The circumference of the hand is measured in different places. A total of 15 measurements are taken. Both hands are measured.

    The analysis will be based on the difference of the sum of the 15 measures for each of the hands.

    Measured: At 3 months

  26. Measurement of hand circumference

    The circumference of the hand is measured in different places. A total of 15 measurements are taken. Both hands are measured.

    The analysis will be based on the difference of the sum of the 15 measures for each of the hands.

    Measured: At 6 months

  27. Measurement of hand circumference

    The circumference of the hand is measured in different places. A total of 15 measurements are taken. Both hands are measured.

    The analysis will be based on the difference of the sum of the 15 measures for each of the hands.

    Measured: At 1 year

  28. Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA)

    Illustrating the different components of pain, the QDSA (French version of the Mac Gill Pain Questionnary-MPQ) essentially allows a qualitative assessment of chronic pain, in particular neuropathic pain. It is a questionnaire of 58 qualifying words divided into subclasses: sensory pain on the one hand, affective and emotional pain on the other. The patient is asked to select the adjectives corresponding to his pain and then to note them from 0 (absent) to 4 (very strong). This self-assessment scale makes it possible in clinical practice to specify the involvement of the sensory and the emotional in pain intensity.

    Measured: Day 0

  29. Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA)

    Illustrating the different components of pain, the QDSA (French version of the Mac Gill Pain Questionnary-MPQ) essentially allows a qualitative assessment of chronic pain, in particular neuropathic pain. It is a questionnaire of 58 qualifying words divided into subclasses: sensory pain on the one hand, affective and emotional pain on the other. The patient is asked to select the adjectives corresponding to his pain and then to note them from 0 (absent) to 4 (very strong). This self-assessment scale makes it possible in clinical practice to specify the involvement of the sensory and the emotional in pain intensity.

    Measured: At 1,5 months

  30. Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA)

    Illustrating the different components of pain, the QDSA (French version of the Mac Gill Pain Questionnary-MPQ) essentially allows a qualitative assessment of chronic pain, in particular neuropathic pain. It is a questionnaire of 58 qualifying words divided into subclasses: sensory pain on the one hand, affective and emotional pain on the other. The patient is asked to select the adjectives corresponding to his pain and then to note them from 0 (absent) to 4 (very strong). This self-assessment scale makes it possible in clinical practice to specify the involvement of the sensory and the emotional in pain intensity.

    Measured: At 3 months

  31. Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA)

    Illustrating the different components of pain, the QDSA (French version of the Mac Gill Pain Questionnary-MPQ) essentially allows a qualitative assessment of chronic pain, in particular neuropathic pain. It is a questionnaire of 58 qualifying words divided into subclasses: sensory pain on the one hand, affective and emotional pain on the other. The patient is asked to select the adjectives corresponding to his pain and then to note them from 0 (absent) to 4 (very strong). This self-assessment scale makes it possible in clinical practice to specify the involvement of the sensory and the emotional in pain intensity.

    Measured: At 6 months

  32. Saint-Antoine Pain Questionnaire (QDSA)

    Illustrating the different components of pain, the QDSA (French version of the Mac Gill Pain Questionnary-MPQ) essentially allows a qualitative assessment of chronic pain, in particular neuropathic pain. It is a questionnaire of 58 qualifying words divided into subclasses: sensory pain on the one hand, affective and emotional pain on the other. The patient is asked to select the adjectives corresponding to his pain and then to note them from 0 (absent) to 4 (very strong). This self-assessment scale makes it possible in clinical practice to specify the involvement of the sensory and the emotional in pain intensity.

    Measured: At 1 year

  33. Cartographic assessment of pain

    The cartographic assessment of pain is carried out following the QDSA. Using schematic representations of the hand (dorsal face and palmar face for each hand), the patient locates and describes his pain.

    Measured: Day 0

  34. Cartographic assessment of pain

    The cartographic assessment of pain is carried out following the QDSA. Using schematic representations of the hand (dorsal face and palmar face for each hand), the patient locates and describes his pain.

    Measured: At 1,5 months

  35. Cartographic assessment of pain

    The cartographic assessment of pain is carried out following the QDSA. Using schematic representations of the hand (dorsal face and palmar face for each hand), the patient locates and describes his pain.

    Measured: At 3 months

  36. Cartographic assessment of pain

    The cartographic assessment of pain is carried out following the QDSA. Using schematic representations of the hand (dorsal face and palmar face for each hand), the patient locates and describes his pain.

    Measured: At 6 months

  37. Cartographic assessment of pain

    The cartographic assessment of pain is carried out following the QDSA. Using schematic representations of the hand (dorsal face and palmar face for each hand), the patient locates and describes his pain.

    Measured: At 1 year

  38. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire

    This is a subjective self-assessment questionnaire of the overall functional capacity of the two upper limbs, composed of 30 items, rated from 1 to 5 depending on the difficulty of the task described, leading to a score out of 100.

    Measured: Day 0

  39. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire

    This is a subjective self-assessment questionnaire of the overall functional capacity of the two upper limbs, composed of 30 items, rated from 1 to 5 depending on the difficulty of the task described, leading to a score out of 100.

    Measured: At 1,5 months

  40. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire

    This is a subjective self-assessment questionnaire of the overall functional capacity of the two upper limbs, composed of 30 items, rated from 1 to 5 depending on the difficulty of the task described, leading to a score out of 100.

    Measured: At 3 months

  41. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire

    This is a subjective self-assessment questionnaire of the overall functional capacity of the two upper limbs, composed of 30 items, rated from 1 to 5 depending on the difficulty of the task described, leading to a score out of 100.

    Measured: At 6 months

  42. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire

    This is a subjective self-assessment questionnaire of the overall functional capacity of the two upper limbs, composed of 30 items, rated from 1 to 5 depending on the difficulty of the task described, leading to a score out of 100.

    Measured: At 1 year

  43. Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale

    It comprises 14 items, allowing the obtaining of 2 scores out of 21 points, corresponding to the dimensions of anxiety and depression

    Measured: Day 0

  44. Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale

    It comprises 14 items, allowing the obtaining of 2 scores out of 21 points, corresponding to the dimensions of anxiety and depression

    Measured: At 1,5 months

  45. Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale

    It comprises 14 items, allowing the obtaining of 2 scores out of 21 points, corresponding to the dimensions of anxiety and depression

    Measured: At 3 months

  46. Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale

    It comprises 14 items, allowing the obtaining of 2 scores out of 21 points, corresponding to the dimensions of anxiety and depression

    Measured: At 6 months

  47. Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale

    It comprises 14 items, allowing the obtaining of 2 scores out of 21 points, corresponding to the dimensions of anxiety and depression

    Measured: At 1 year

  48. The Short Form (36) Health Survey

    This is a standardized test for measuring the quality of life. It includes 36 items divided into 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations related to physical health, physical pain, general health, vitality [energy / fatigue], functioning or social well-being, role limitations related to mental health, Mental Health).

    Measured: Day 0

  49. The Short Form (36) Health Survey

    This is a standardized test for measuring the quality of life. It includes 36 items divided into 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations related to physical health, physical pain, general health, vitality [energy / fatigue], functioning or social well-being, role limitations related to mental health, Mental Health).

    Measured: At 1,5 months

  50. The Short Form (36) Health Survey

    This is a standardized test for measuring the quality of life. It includes 36 items divided into 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations related to physical health, physical pain, general health, vitality [energy / fatigue], functioning or social well-being, role limitations related to mental health, Mental Health).

    Measured: At 3 months

  51. The Short Form (36) Health Survey

    This is a standardized test for measuring the quality of life. It includes 36 items divided into 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations related to physical health, physical pain, general health, vitality [energy / fatigue], functioning or social well-being, role limitations related to mental health, Mental Health).

    Measured: At 6 months

  52. The Short Form (36) Health Survey

    This is a standardized test for measuring the quality of life. It includes 36 items divided into 8 dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations related to physical health, physical pain, general health, vitality [energy / fatigue], functioning or social well-being, role limitations related to mental health, Mental Health).

    Measured: At 1 year

  53. Observance of wearing the compression garment

    Compliance with the wearing of the compression garment will be measured by the average number of hours of wearing the garment per day, which will be evaluated on the patient's statements in the experimental arm during the visits.

    Measured: Every week for 3 months

  54. Tolerance of wearing the compression garment

    The tolerance of wearing the compression garment will be assessed by recording the presence of irritation or surface skin lesion, compression felt as being too unpleasant or even unbearable by the patient in the experimental arm and leading to stopping wearing.

    Measured: Every week for 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Sep 2021
  2. Study start12 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completionMay 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This research is part of a Research Involving the Human Person of the interventional type (RIPH1) and relates to a class I medical device (MD). This is a single-center, controlled, randomized, open-label, superiority study.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05034835
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020-A00657-32
Acronym
VECODON
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
26 Aug 2021
Last updated
6 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing usual treatment with compression garments (CERECARE) and usual treatment without compression garments (CERECARE) in people with Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, run by Centre Mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation Fonctionnelles de Kerpape at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Vincent Detaille, Doctor (02 97 82 60 28 ext. +33, vincent.detaille@vyv3.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The evolution of pain through Visual Analog Scale (VAS), measured every week for 3 months in the last 24 hours and in the last 7 days (time frame: up to 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in