AzTrials
AzTrials

BoneAMICOSNCT05034848

Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) : Its Effects on Bone

A study testing Assessment of BMD by DXA and HRpQCT in people with Bone and Peripheral Artery Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans at 1 site in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prevalence of PAD and osteoporosis (OP) both get higher with age. Clinical and epidemiologic evidence have showed an increased cardiovascular risk in OP and bone loss and fragility fractures in patient with cardiovascular disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bone, Peripheral Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Assessment of BMD by DXA and HRpQCT
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
31 Mar 2021to 19 May 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • PAD patients defined by an Ankle brachial index < 0.9
  • Written consent
  • Patient affiliated with a social security organism

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy or risk of pregnancy
  • Patients Under guardianship
  • Patient with known PAD who had been previously treated by surgery or endovascular pathway

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHR d'ORLEANS

    Orléans, 45067

Other trials in France

About this study

Prevalence of PAD and osteoporosis (OP) both get higher with age. Clinical and epidemiologic evidence have showed an increased cardiovascular risk in OP and bone loss and fragility fractures in patient with cardiovascular disease.

This study will examine the relationship between vascular disease in legs and sBMD and vBMD at trabecular and cortical sites and bone microarchitecture.

Read the detailed description

The primary goal of our study is to determinate if presence of PAD is associated with lower sBMD and vBMD values at the tibias, assuming that BMD should be more alterate in the predominant vascular impairement site.

Our secondary objectives are to :

  • determine if severity of PAD quantified by ankle brachial index ABI is associated to a decrease of BMD values defined by T-Score at the left hip, spine and legs, but also with volumetric values, assessed by HRpQCT at the non dominant radius and at both tibias.
  • determine the prevalence of osteoporosis in our population
  • To evaluate the relationships between ;
  • lipids and bone parameters
  • vit D and parathormone with PAD severity
  • levels of physical activity and both vascular and bone impairments
Being tested
Assessment of BMD by DXA and HRpQCT
Keywords
bone, osteoporosis, peripheral artery disease, HRpQCT
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Arterial Disease, Osteoporosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Assessment of BMD by DXA and HRpQCTProcedure or surgery

    • DXA : BMD assessment at the left hip, rachis and both legs
    • HRpQCT : Volumic Bone mineral density, cortical and trabecular parameters, at the non dominant radius and legs
    • Biological samples
Study groups in NCT05034848
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PAD groupOtherPAD patients, diagnosis after undergoing an echo-doppler in the Vascular Medicine Department of Orleans regional Hospital
Receives: Procedure: Assessment of BMD by DXA and HRpQCT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) volumic values at the tibias of PAD (Peripheral Artery Disease) patients

    BMD volumic values are BMD volumetric bone mineral density (mg HA/cm3)

    Measured: Day 0

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measurement by DXA

    Relations between areal BMD results (DXA) at the hip and lumbar spine and the ankle brachial index measured at the two legs.

    Measured: Day 0

  2. Correlation between microstructural parameters and ankle brachial index results

    The following micro structural parameters assessed by HRpQCT at both tibias will be :

    • Dtrab : volumetric trabecular bone mineral density (mg HA/ cm3),
    • Dinn : inner trabecular bone density (mg HA/cm3),
    • Dmeta: metatrabecular bone density (mg HA/cm3),
    • Dcort: volumetric cortical bone mineral density (mg HA/cm3),
    • D100: total volumetric bone mineral density (mg HA/cm3),
    • Tb.Th: trabecular thickness (mm),
    • Tb.N: trabecular number (mm-1);
    • Tb.Sp: trabecular separation (mm),
    • Ct.Th: cortical thickness (mm);
    • Tb1.NSD: intra-distribution individual separation (mm),
    • BV / TV: trabecular bone volume (%).

    Measured: Day 0

  3. Comparison between microstructural parameters at tibias

    comparison between bone microarchitecture parameters at the tibia: the parameters will be compared between the most severely limb and the contralateral one.

    Measured: Day 0

  4. Correlation between Lipid and bone parameters

    We will study the relation between lipidic and bone parameters. Potential correlations between on the one hand (lipid parameters: total and HDL-cholesterol, triglyceridemia, LDL-cholesterol calculation) and on the other hand bone parameters: vBMD volumetric bone mineral density (mg HA/cm3) Ct.BMD: cortical volumetric bone mineral density (mg/cm3); Tb.BMD: trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (mg HA/cm3)

    Measured: Day 0

  5. Percentage of densitometric osteoporotic patients

    percentage of densitometric osteoporotic patients in the population

    Measured: Day 0

  6. Evaluation of risk of fracture

    The risk of fracture at 10 years will be evaluate by the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) survey.

    The FRAX® tool was developed by the then WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases (1991-2010) at the University of Sheffield. It was launched in 2008 following approximately 10 years of meta-analyses of a variety of risk factors for osteoporotic fracture. Although not the only fracture prediction tool available, FRAX® is the only risk calculator which has been calibrated to rates of fracture and mortality per individual country and has been shown to identify a risk amenable to available treatments.

    Measured: Day 0

  7. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk

    Cardiovascular risk assessment using the SCORE tool (Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation).

    Four levels of risk are defined:

    • Very high cardiovascular risk ≥ 10%;
    • High risk, which includes subjects with major or particularly high risk factors (familial hypercholesterolemia, severe hypertension, etc.) and those with a score between 5 and 10%;
    • Moderate risk, which concerns patients with a score between 1 and 5%;
    • Low risk, which includes subjects with a score < 1%;

    Measured: Day 0

  8. Correlation between microstructural parameters at tibias and radius

    comparison between bone microarchitecture at the tibia and of the radius.

    The following micro structural parameters assessed by HRpQCT at tibias and radius will be :

    • Dtrab : volumetric trabecular bone mineral density (mg HA/ cm3),
    • Dinn : inner trabecular bone density (mg HA/cm3),
    • Dmeta: metatrabecular bone density (mg HA/cm3),
    • Dcort: volumetric cortical bone mineral density (mg HA/cm3),
    • D100: total volumetric bone mineral density (mg HA/cm3),
    • Tb.Th: trabecular thickness (mm),
    • Tb.N: trabecular number (mm-1);
    • Tb.Sp: trabecular separation (mm),
    • Ct.Th: cortical thickness (mm);
    • Tb1.NSD: intra-distribution individual separation (mm),
    • BV / TV: trabecular bone volume (%).

    Measured: Day 0

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Sep 2021
  2. Study start31 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion19 May 2021
  4. Study completion19 May 2021

Why it stopped: no practitionner

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
observational, interventional, non comparative, prospective, monocentric open study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05034848
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHRO-2018-13
Acronym
AMICOS
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
19 Feb 2020
Last updated
29 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Breban S, Benhamou CL, Chappard C. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment of tibial mid-third bone mineral density in young athletes. J Clin Densitom. 2009 Jan-Mar;12(1):22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Dec 25.

    PubMed 19111489
  • Collins TC, Ewing SK, Diem SJ, Taylor BC, Orwoll ES, Cummings SR, Strotmeyer ES, Ensrud KE; Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Group. Peripheral arterial disease is associated with higher rates of hip bone loss and increased fracture risk in older men. Circulation. 2009 May 5;119(17):2305-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.820993. Epub 2009 Apr 20.

    PubMed 19380619
  • Fehervari M, Sarkadi H, Krepuska M, Sotonyi P, Acsady G, Entz L, Lakatos P, Szeberin Z. Bone mineral density is associated with site-specific atherosclerosis in patients with severe peripheral artery disease. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013 Jul;93(1):55-61. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9727-5. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

    PubMed 23564349
  • Gaudio A, Muratore F, Fiore V, Rapisarda R, Signorelli SS, Fiore CE. Decreased bone cortical density at the forearm in subjects with subclinical peripheral arterial disease. Osteoporos Int. 2015 Jun;26(6):1747-53. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3057-6. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

    PubMed 25672808

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Assessment of BMD by DXA and HRpQCT in people with Bone and Peripheral Artery Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: no practitionner). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Bone Mineral Density (BMD) volumic values at the tibias of PAD (Peripheral Artery Disease) patients (time frame: Day 0). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05034848, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in