AzTrials
AzTrials

Stress ReactionBPSMNCT05037318

Breaking Bad News - Optimizing Stress Response and Communication Performance in Medical Students

A study testing Stress arousal reappraisal and Worked examples in people with Stress Reaction, run by University of Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Breaking bad news (e.g., telling patients that they have cancer) is not only very stressful for the patients concerned, but also for the physicians delivering the diagnosis. It is unclear how this burden and the associated communication performance can be optimized. The project contributes to this goal. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stress Reaction
What is being tested?
Stress arousal reappraisal and Worked examples
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
229 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
21 Apr 2022to 29 Feb 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Being currently enrolled as a third-year medical student
  • Being German speaker
  • Signed consent form

Who cannot join

  • Cardiovascular diseases known to affect the variables under investigation
  • Neuroendocrine conditions known to affect the variables under investigation
  • Use of psychotropic drugs or any medication known to affect the variables under investigation (e.g., corticosteroids, cardioactive medication)
  • Wearing a pacemaker
  • Pregnancy/Breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Institute for Medical Education

    Bern, 3012

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: From Threat to Challenge - Improving Medical Students' Stress Response and Communication Skills Performance Through the Combination of Stress Arousal Reappraisal and Preparatory Worked Example-based Learning When Breaking Bad News to Simulated Patients

Breaking bad news (e.g., telling patients that they have cancer) is not only very stressful for the patients concerned, but also for the physicians delivering the diagnosis. It is unclear how this burden and the associated communication performance can be optimized. The project contributes to this goal.

The main goal of the project is to scientifically analyze to what extent the stress reaction and communication performance of medical students can be optimized when breaking bad news. Two strategies will be employed and tested for their effectiveness: First, "stress arousal reappraisal", which consists in reinterpreting physiological arousal (e.g., increased heart rate) as adaptive and beneficial for task performance. Second, medical students can be well prepared for breaking bad news by learning from worked examples (step-by-step demonstrations of how to break bad news).

Read more

The investigators hypothesize that both strategies will shift the interpretation of breaking bad news from a threat to a challenge state. This will lead to better communication performance during the task.

To test the hypothesis, about 200 medical students' communication performance, cardiovascular activity, stress hormone release, and subjective stress perception when communicating a serious cancer diagnosis to a simulated patient (actor) will be measured.

The results of the study provide a first comprehensive picture of the psychophysiological stress patterns of medical students who are entrusted with a stressful communication task. Ultimately, this may promote stress management and communication skills in future physicians.

Read the detailed description

Breaking bad news (BBN; e.g., telling patients that they have cancer) is a frequent task in the medical field. Appropriate communication when BBN is crucial for patient-related outcomes. For many physicians, BBN is a very demanding task often associated with high levels of stress, which can negatively impact their communication skills and health. It is thus important to provide future physicians with effective tools that enable them to cope successfully with their stress response and to perform the BBN task at their best. The planned project aims to contribute to this important goal in novel ways. One promising approach to improve people's stress response to demanding tasks is stress arousal reappraisal, which consists in reinterpreting physiological arousal as adaptive and beneficial for task performance. Recent work suggests that medical students can be well prepared for BBN by learning from worked examples (step-by-step demonstrations of how to break bad news).

Overall objectives: The study adopts the biopsychosocial model (BPSM) of challenge and threat as organizing theoretical framework to investigate the effects of stress arousal reappraisal and preparatory worked example-based BBN learning on the psychophysiological responses and communication skills performance of medical students tasked with BBN to simulated patients (SPs). The BPSM of challenge and threat holds that individuals are in a threat state when perceived resources fall short of perceived demands in a motivated performance situation, whereas they are in a challenge state when evaluated resources outweigh perceived demands. These states are primarily assessed with a self-reported resources-demands differential (perceived resources minus perceived demands) and a cardiovascular index (sum of cardiac output and reverse scored total peripheral resistance), with larger scores reflecting greater challenge. Secondarily, as suggested by recent research, they are also associated with salivary indices of the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone) and of the sympatho-adrenal-medullary system (alpha-amylase). Compared to threats, challenge-type responses are associated with better task performance and better health outcomes.

Specific aims: The idea guiding the planned research is that both stress arousal reappraisal and preparatory worked example-based BBN learning will shift medical students' psychophysiological state from threat to challenge and by doing so their task performance will improve.

The hypotheses are: 1) students receiving stress arousal reappraisal instructions will show (i) more challenge-type psychophysiological responses and (ii) better BBN skills performance than students receiving no stress arousal reappraisal instructions; 2) students learning from a BBN-related worked example will show (iii) more challenge-type psychophysiological responses and (iv) better BBN skills performance than students not learning from a BBN-related worked example; 3) the challenge-threat resources-demands differential and cardiovascular index will be mediators of the effects of the interventions on BBN skills performance.

Method: A randomized controlled trial with a 2 (stress arousal reappraisal vs. no stress arousal reappraisal) x 2 (preparatory BBN learning with worked example vs. without worked example) between-subjects design with N = 200 Swiss medical students is envisioned. The investigators will assess participants' perceived task demands and coping resources, record their cardiovascular activity and collect their saliva before, during and after a videotaped BBN encounter with an SP. Three assessors will independently rate participants' BBN skills performance from the recordings.

Implications and relevance: Findings will support determining to what extent medical students' BBN-related stress responses and communication performance can be examined and understood from the challenge and threat perspective. Stress arousal reappraisal and preparatory worked example-based learning could be easily incorporated into the curriculum of medical students to help promote more adaptive challenge-type responses when facing BBN situations and potentially other stress-inducing communications with patients. This would ultimately have beneficial effects for both physicians and patients.

Conditions
Stress Reaction
Being tested
Stress arousal reappraisal, Worked examples
Keywords
Breaking bad news, Stress, Stress arousal reappraisal, Stressful communication, Communication skills, Worked example, Biopsychosocial model
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Stress

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stress arousal reappraisalBehavioural

    Participants will watch a video explaining that stress arousal is not harmful but rather functional and adaptive for performance in stressful situations.

  • Worked examplesBehavioural

    The worked example will be in form of brief video sequences showing a physician (played by an actor) delivering the bad diagnosis of lung cancer to an SP following the SPIKES protocol.

Study groups in NCT05037318
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Stress arousal reappraisalExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Stress arousal reappraisal
Worked examplesExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Worked examples
Stress arousal reappraisal + Worked examplesExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Stress arousal reappraisal; Behavioral: Worked examples
ControlNo interventionNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Breaking bad news performance

    SPIKES (6 items) and global Bad News Assessment Scale (glBAS; 5 items); both five-point ratings ranging from 1 to 5, glBAS is scored in reverse to match SPIKES scale, the higher the score, the better the performance

    Measured: After 2 hours. Duration: 12 minutes

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change in self-reported mood

    Multidimensional Mood State Questionnaire Short-scale; three dimensions, (8 items in total); 8-point scale; items have bipolar anchors (e.g., for valence, 1 = bad \& 8 = good; calmness, 1 = tense, 8 = calm; energetic arousal, 1 = tired, 8 = awake)

    Measured: During 3 hours, multiple pre and post intervention measures

  2. Change in heart rate

    Heart beats per minute

    Measured: During 3 hours, multiple pre and post intervention measures

  3. Change in pre-ejection period

    Defined as the time in ms from the initiation of left-ventricle contraction to aortic-valve opening

    Measured: During 3 hours, multiple pre and post intervention measures

  4. Change in challenge-threat cardiovascular index

    Sum of cardiac output and reverse scored total peripheral resistance, z-Score

    Measured: During 3 hours, multiple pre and post intervention measures

  5. Change in anabolic balance

    Ratio of salivary cortisol to salivary dehydroepiandrosterone

    Measured: During 3 hours, multiple pre and post intervention measures

  6. Change in salivary alpha-amylase

    Concentration

    Measured: During 3 hours, multiple pre and post intervention measures

  7. Change in self-reported task resources-demands differential

    2 items; "How demanding do you expect the task to be / was the task?", "How able are you / were you to cope with the demands of BBN task?"; 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 "not at all" to 6 "extremely", score of first item is subtracted from the score of the second item, the higher the score, the more so is the task evaluated as a challenge, and less as a threat

    Measured: 3 minutes before the intervention, 3 minutes before the BBN task, and 3 minutes after the BBN task

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Sep 2021
  2. Study start21 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion29 Feb 2024
  4. Study completion29 Feb 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Model description
Two interventions are used, participants either receive only a stress reappraisal, only worked examples on breaking bad news, both interventions together, or none of the interventions.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
229 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05037318
Sponsor's protocol ID
BBN BPSM
Other IDs
100019_200831
Acronym
BPSM
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
31 Aug 2021
Last updated
5 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared.

Publications

  • Bosshard M, Schmitz FM, Guttormsen S, Nater UM, Gomez P, Berendonk C. From threat to challenge-Improving medical students' stress response and communication skills performance through the combination of stress arousal reappraisal and preparatory worked example-based learning when breaking bad news to simulated patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychol. 2023 May 10;11(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01167-6.

    PubMed 37165406

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stress arousal reappraisal and Worked examples in people with Stress Reaction, run by University of Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Breaking bad news performance (time frame: After 2 hours. Duration: 12 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05037318, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in