AzTrials
AzTrials

Refractive SurgeryNCT05037370

CONTOURA vs WFO Ablation PRK & LASIK

A study testing Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation in people with Refractive Surgery, run by 59th Medical Wing at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective randomized contralateral double-masked study. Each patient will be randomized as to which eye undergoes wave-front optimized (WFO) vs. wave-front guided (WFG) during Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery to determine which ablation profile… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Refractive Surgery
What is being tested?
Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
400 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
22 Apr 2021to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Meet requirements for PRK or LASIK i.e., Stable <= .5 D change MRSE)
  • DOD beneficiaries age 21-50 years
  • Local pts (w/i 60 mi) who will be in the area for at least 6 months post surgery
  • Willing to complete all required follow-up visits

Who cannot join

  • No meeting requirements for PRK or LASIK
  • Desiring monovision treatment
  • Anisometropia >2D spherical equivalent
  • Prior ocular surgeries / trauma / problem
  • History of dry eyes
  • Hyperopia
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Mixed astigmatism
  • Inability to capture VARIO topolyzer scans
  • Pregnant (or who plans to be within 6 months after surgery)
  • Breastfeeding any time during the study
  • History of herpetic disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Joint Warfighter Refractive Surgery Center at WHASC

    San Antonio, Texas, 78236

    JOSE E CAPO-APONTE, OD, PhD, 210-292-2554, jose.e.capoaponte.ctr@health.mil

    AMBER MARTIN, 210-292-2483, amber.l.martin38.ctr@Health.mil

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Topography-guided vs. Wavefront Optimized Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Prospective Contralateral Randomized Double-masked Study

This is a prospective randomized contralateral double-masked study. Each patient will be randomized as to which eye undergoes wave-front optimized (WFO) vs. wave-front guided (WFG) during Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery to determine which ablation profile provides the best visual outcome.

Read the detailed description

In 2015, the FDA approved a new laser ablation profile for performing laser corneal refractive surgery. Multiple sophisticated profiles have been developed in an attempt to optimize visual outcomes and reduce post-operative lower and higher-order optical aberrations. Among these include wave-front optimized (WFO) and wave-front guided (WFG) ablation profiles. The former compensated for corneal curvature to reduce spherical aberration and the latter, a more complicated ablation profile, was designed to minimize specific aberrations in an individual eye. Topographic profiles have also been used for over 17 years. These profiles consider the shape of the anterior corneal surface. The newest such topographic ablation profile, Contoura Vision, is a topography guided (TG) profile that, based on over 22,000 curvature data points captured using the VARIO Topolyzer, individualizes the ablation pattern. For comparison, WFO uses a patient's estimated average corneal curvature alone to create an ablation pattern. The addition of the VARIO Topolyzer adds a significant increase of pre-operative patient preparation. Anecdotally, between 1-3hrs of additional technician hours are required to prepare a patient for the Contoura Vision TG ablation profile.

This will be a prospective randomized contralateral double-masked study. Patients will undergo the same standard of care preoperative evaluation and education as any other patient not enrolled in the study. The physician performing surgery will choose either LASIK or PRK, taking into account patient preference, preoperative data and overall clinical picture, ultimately choosing which is best for the patient. If a patient qualifies for both, the patient may choose either LASIK or PRK. Each patient will be randomized as to which eye undergoes a WFO treatment vs Contoura. At the time of surgery the patient will be blinded as to which eye receives which treatment, but the surgical team will not be blinded as to which procedure is performed. Post-operatively, the ophthalmic technicians and optometrists responsible for postoperative examinations (measurement of visual acuity, refractions, transcription of PRO's) will be blinded as to which eye underwent Contoura vs WFO. While treatments will vary, both have the same safety profile. Both involve sophisticated lasers to change the shape of the cornea to achieve the desired outcome. The variance comes in the type of pattern the laser uses to treat each individual. All post-operative care will be standard of care with medications being the same as if the patient were not enrolled in the study. Post-operative evaluations will take place at postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6.

All data collected will be standard pre- and post-operative ophthalmic refractive surgery measurements. This includes a standard medical history, especially to include prior eye surgeries or diseases. Pre-operative measurements include vision assessments, contrast sensitivity, pre- and post-dilation as well as keratometry and axial length measurements. The Contoura requires a separate set of data collection via the VARIO topolyzer. Intraoperative data collected will include variables such as actual treatment outcomes and laser settings. Post-operative measurements will consist of many of the same measurements as those obtained preoperatively including uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, and refractive measurements. A symptoms-based questionnaire specific to corrective eye surgery (PROWL) will be given to patients before and after surgery during routine follow-ups. Each PROWL is specific to an individual eye, not specific to the surgery performed in each eye (i.e. the same PROWL questionnaire will be used regardless of whether the patient underwent PRK or LASIK). All PROWL data will be compared pre- and post-operatively and will be stratified based on surgery.

Being tested
Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation
Keywords
Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK), Wave-Front Optimized (WFO), Topography guided ablation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablationDevice

    Patient will undergo PRK or LASIK using WFO ablation in one eye and TG ablation on contralateral eye

Study groups in NCT05037370
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LASIK refractive surgeryExperimentalContralateral Randomize Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided ablation
Receives: Device: Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation
PRK refractive surgeryExperimentalContralateral Randomize Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided ablation
Receives: Device: Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Post-operative refractive error

    The Post-Operative sphere equivalent refractive error for eyes undergoing Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided ablation

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Post-operative Uncorrected Visual Acuity

    The Post-Operative visual acuity for eyes undergoing Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided ablation

    Measured: 6 months post-surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Sep 2021
  2. Study start22 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized contralateral double-masked study
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
400 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05037370
Sponsor's protocol ID
FWH20200077H
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
31 Aug 2021
Last updated
14 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation in people with Refractive Surgery, run by 59th Medical Wing at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact JOSE E CAPO-APONTE, OD, PhD (210-292-2554, Jose.E.CapoAponte.ctr@health.mil), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Post-operative refractive error (time frame: 6 months post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in