Refractive SurgeryNCT05037370
CONTOURA vs WFO Ablation PRK & LASIK
A study testing Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation in people with Refractive Surgery, run by 59th Medical Wing at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective randomized contralateral double-masked study. Each patient will be randomized as to which eye undergoes wave-front optimized (WFO) vs. wave-front guided (WFG) during Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery to determine which ablation profile… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Refractive Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Apr 2021to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Meet requirements for PRK or LASIK i.e., Stable <= .5 D change MRSE)
- DOD beneficiaries age 21-50 years
- Local pts (w/i 60 mi) who will be in the area for at least 6 months post surgery
- Willing to complete all required follow-up visits
Who cannot join
- No meeting requirements for PRK or LASIK
- Desiring monovision treatment
- Anisometropia >2D spherical equivalent
- Prior ocular surgeries / trauma / problem
- History of dry eyes
- Hyperopia
Show all 11Show fewer
- Mixed astigmatism
- Inability to capture VARIO topolyzer scans
- Pregnant (or who plans to be within 6 months after surgery)
- Breastfeeding any time during the study
- History of herpetic disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Joint Warfighter Refractive Surgery Center at WHASC
San Antonio, Texas, 78236
JOSE E CAPO-APONTE, OD, PhD, 210-292-2554, jose.e.capoaponte.ctr@health.mil
AMBER MARTIN, 210-292-2483, amber.l.martin38.ctr@Health.mil
About this study
Official title: Topography-guided vs. Wavefront Optimized Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Prospective Contralateral Randomized Double-masked Study
This is a prospective randomized contralateral double-masked study. Each patient will be randomized as to which eye undergoes wave-front optimized (WFO) vs. wave-front guided (WFG) during Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery to determine which ablation profile provides the best visual outcome.
Read the detailed description
In 2015, the FDA approved a new laser ablation profile for performing laser corneal refractive surgery. Multiple sophisticated profiles have been developed in an attempt to optimize visual outcomes and reduce post-operative lower and higher-order optical aberrations. Among these include wave-front optimized (WFO) and wave-front guided (WFG) ablation profiles. The former compensated for corneal curvature to reduce spherical aberration and the latter, a more complicated ablation profile, was designed to minimize specific aberrations in an individual eye. Topographic profiles have also been used for over 17 years. These profiles consider the shape of the anterior corneal surface. The newest such topographic ablation profile, Contoura Vision, is a topography guided (TG) profile that, based on over 22,000 curvature data points captured using the VARIO Topolyzer, individualizes the ablation pattern. For comparison, WFO uses a patient's estimated average corneal curvature alone to create an ablation pattern. The addition of the VARIO Topolyzer adds a significant increase of pre-operative patient preparation. Anecdotally, between 1-3hrs of additional technician hours are required to prepare a patient for the Contoura Vision TG ablation profile.
This will be a prospective randomized contralateral double-masked study. Patients will undergo the same standard of care preoperative evaluation and education as any other patient not enrolled in the study. The physician performing surgery will choose either LASIK or PRK, taking into account patient preference, preoperative data and overall clinical picture, ultimately choosing which is best for the patient. If a patient qualifies for both, the patient may choose either LASIK or PRK. Each patient will be randomized as to which eye undergoes a WFO treatment vs Contoura. At the time of surgery the patient will be blinded as to which eye receives which treatment, but the surgical team will not be blinded as to which procedure is performed. Post-operatively, the ophthalmic technicians and optometrists responsible for postoperative examinations (measurement of visual acuity, refractions, transcription of PRO's) will be blinded as to which eye underwent Contoura vs WFO. While treatments will vary, both have the same safety profile. Both involve sophisticated lasers to change the shape of the cornea to achieve the desired outcome. The variance comes in the type of pattern the laser uses to treat each individual. All post-operative care will be standard of care with medications being the same as if the patient were not enrolled in the study. Post-operative evaluations will take place at postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6.
All data collected will be standard pre- and post-operative ophthalmic refractive surgery measurements. This includes a standard medical history, especially to include prior eye surgeries or diseases. Pre-operative measurements include vision assessments, contrast sensitivity, pre- and post-dilation as well as keratometry and axial length measurements. The Contoura requires a separate set of data collection via the VARIO topolyzer. Intraoperative data collected will include variables such as actual treatment outcomes and laser settings. Post-operative measurements will consist of many of the same measurements as those obtained preoperatively including uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, and refractive measurements. A symptoms-based questionnaire specific to corrective eye surgery (PROWL) will be given to patients before and after surgery during routine follow-ups. Each PROWL is specific to an individual eye, not specific to the surgery performed in each eye (i.e. the same PROWL questionnaire will be used regardless of whether the patient underwent PRK or LASIK). All PROWL data will be compared pre- and post-operatively and will be stratified based on surgery.
- Conditions
- Refractive Surgery
- Being tested
- Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation
- Keywords
- Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK), Wave-Front Optimized (WFO), Topography guided ablation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablationDevice
Patient will undergo PRK or LASIK using WFO ablation in one eye and TG ablation on contralateral eye
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LASIK refractive surgery | Experimental | Contralateral Randomize Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided ablation Receives: Device: Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation |
| PRK refractive surgery | Experimental | Contralateral Randomize Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided ablation Receives: Device: Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post-operative refractive error
The Post-Operative sphere equivalent refractive error for eyes undergoing Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided ablation
Measured: 6 months post-surgery
Secondary outcomes (1)
Post-operative Uncorrected Visual Acuity
The Post-Operative visual acuity for eyes undergoing Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided ablation
Measured: 6 months post-surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2021
- Study start22 Apr 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Refractive SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized contralateral double-masked study
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- 59th Medical Wing
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- CHARISMA B EVANGELISTA, MD, Principal investigator, 59th Medical Wing
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05037370
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FWH20200077H
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Topography-guided vs. Wavefront Optimized Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Prospective Contralateral Randomized Double-masked Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05037370
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FWH20200077H
- Conditions
- Refractive Surgery
- Keywords
- Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK), Wave-Front Optimized (WFO), Topography guided ablation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- 59th Medical WingUS federal agency
- Study start
- 22 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective randomized contralateral double-masked study. Each patient will be randomized as to which eye undergoes wave-front optimized (WFO) vs. wave-front guided (WFG) during Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or Laser-assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery to determine which ablation profile provides the best visual outcome.
Detailed description
In 2015, the FDA approved a new laser ablation profile for performing laser corneal refractive surgery. Multiple sophisticated profiles have been developed in an attempt to optimize visual outcomes and reduce post-operative lower and higher-order optical aberrations. Among these include wave-front optimized (WFO) and wave-front guided (WFG) ablation profiles. The former compensated for corneal curvature to reduce spherical aberration and the latter, a more complicated ablation profile, was designed to minimize specific aberrations in an individual eye. Topographic profiles have also been used for over 17 years. These profiles consider the shape of the anterior corneal surface. The newest such topographic ablation profile, Contoura Vision, is a topography guided (TG) profile that, based on over 22,000 curvature data points captured using the VARIO Topolyzer, individualizes the ablation pattern. For comparison, WFO uses a patient's estimated average corneal curvature alone to create an ablation pattern. The addition of the VARIO Topolyzer adds a significant increase of pre-operative patient preparation. Anecdotally, between 1-3hrs of additional technician hours are required to prepare a patient for the Contoura Vision TG ablation profile.
This will be a prospective randomized contralateral double-masked study. Patients will undergo the same standard of care preoperative evaluation and education as any other patient not enrolled in the study. The physician performing surgery will choose either LASIK or PRK, taking into account patient preference, preoperative data and overall clinical picture, ultimately choosing which is best for the patient. If a patient qualifies for both, the patient may choose either LASIK or PRK. Each patient will be randomized as to which eye undergoes a WFO treatment vs Contoura. At the time of surgery the patient will be blinded as to which eye receives which treatment, but the surgical team will not be blinded as to which procedure is performed. Post-operatively, the ophthalmic technicians and optometrists responsible for postoperative examinations (measurement of visual acuity, refractions, transcription of PRO's) will be blinded as to which eye underwent Contoura vs WFO. While treatments will vary, both have the same safety profile. Both involve sophisticated lasers to change the shape of the cornea to achieve the desired outcome. The variance comes in the type of pattern the laser uses to treat each individual. All post-operative care will be standard of care with medications being the same as if the patient were not enrolled in the study. Post-operative evaluations will take place at postoperative day 1, week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6.
All data collected will be standard pre- and post-operative ophthalmic refractive surgery measurements. This includes a standard medical history, especially to include prior eye surgeries or diseases. Pre-operative measurements include vision assessments, contrast sensitivity, pre- and post-dilation as well as keratometry and axial length measurements. The Contoura requires a separate set of data collection via the VARIO topolyzer. Intraoperative data collected will include variables such as actual treatment outcomes and laser settings. Post-operative measurements will consist of many of the same measurements as those obtained preoperatively including uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, and refractive measurements. A symptoms-based questionnaire specific to corrective eye surgery (PROWL) will be given to patients before and after surgery during routine follow-ups. Each PROWL is specific to an individual eye, not specific to the surgery performed in each eye (i.e. the same PROWL questionnaire will be used regardless of whether the patient underwent PRK or LASIK). All PROWL data will be compared pre- and post-operatively and will be stratified based on surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized contralateral double-masked study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LASIK refractive surgery | Experimental | Device: Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablationContralateral Randomize Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided ablation |
| PRK refractive surgery | Experimental | Device: Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablationContralateral Randomize Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided ablation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Meet requirements for PRK or LASIK i.e., Stable <= .5 D change MRSE)
- DOD beneficiaries age 21-50 years
- Local pts (w/i 60 mi) who will be in the area for at least 6 months post surgery
- Willing to complete all required follow-up visits
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- No meeting requirements for PRK or LASIK
- Desiring monovision treatment
- Anisometropia >2D spherical equivalent
- Prior ocular surgeries / trauma / problem
- History of dry eyes
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablationPatient will undergo PRK or LASIK using WFO ablation in one eye and TG ablation on contralateral eye | Device | LASIK refractive surgery, PRK refractive surgery |
Primary outcome
Post-operative refractive error
Time frame: 6 months post-surgery
The Post-Operative sphere equivalent refractive error for eyes undergoing Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided ablation
1 secondary outcome
Post-operative Uncorrected Visual Acuity
Time frame: 6 months post-surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Aug 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Refractive Surgery
RecruitingObservational study
UNITY DX Cornea Study
Tomography
RecruitingPhase 4
Arcuate Incisions With Light Adjustable Lens for Astigmatism Correction in Lens Surgery
Astigmatism
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postoperative Outcome Verification of Discrepant Toric IOL Calculator Recommendations After Cataract Surgery
Cataract
Active, not recruiting
Ocular Hypotony and Refractive Predictability in RRD Surgery
Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment, Hypotony Ocular
Active, not recruiting
Contralateral Claims Study of Clareon Vivity Pro
Aphakia, Presbyopia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
CHARISMA B EVANGELISTA, MD principal investigator
59th Medical Wing
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Wave-Front Optimized (WFO) ablation vs Topography-guided (TG) ablation in people with Refractive Surgery, run by 59th Medical Wing at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact JOSE E CAPO-APONTE, OD, PhD (210-292-2554, Jose.E.CapoAponte.ctr@health.mil), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post-operative refractive error (time frame: 6 months post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2025.