Artificial LimbsNCT05041998
Quantitatively-informed Socket Design Process
A study testing Trans-femoral prosthetic socket in people with Artificial Limbs, run by University of Pittsburgh at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will investigate the effects of specific standardized modifications to trans-femoral prosthetic sockets in a randomized within-subject design. This is in preparation for a subsequently planned clinical trial to validate the findings by implementing them into a fitting method for individual sockets. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Artificial Limbs
- What is being tested?
- Trans-femoral prosthetic socket
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2021to 12 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Transfemoral prosthesis user
- 18-80 years of age
- Body weight less than 125 kg
- Able to walk unassisted on a treadmill
Who cannot join
- Pregnant females
- Clinically diagnosed osteoporosis
- Previous high exposure to radiation
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15206
Delatorre Orthotics & Prosthetics
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15328
About this study
Official title: Improving Physical Function and Patient-reported Outcomes Through a Quantitatively-informed Socket Design Process
This study will investigate the effects of specific standardized modifications to trans-femoral prosthetic sockets in a randomized within-subject design. This is in preparation for a subsequently planned clinical trial to validate the findings by implementing them into a fitting method for individual sockets.
Read the detailed description
Background: Lower limb amputees experience chronic health challenges such as residual limb skin problems, low back pain, and osteoarthritis. These problems are exacerbated by high physical activity levels and by poor prosthetic socket fit. Prosthetists believe that limiting residual femur and skin motion will improve force coupling and thereby address these problems. However, there are no data demonstrating how changes in socket design affect residual femur and skin motion, and, by extension, lead to improved patient-reported outcomes.
Objective/Hypothesis: Goal of this research is to improve the current socket design optimization process that involves trial and error and relies heavily on the prosthetist's experience and intuition by using a quantitatively informed optimization process. The hypothesis is that modifiable in-socket mechanics, i.e. residual femur motion, skin strain, and pressure within the socket, are related to socket design and patient outcomes, and can be estimated using readily available clinical measurements.
Specific Aims: First aim is to identify the key characteristics of in-socket mechanics that are related to physical function and patient-reported comfort and function. The second aim is to identify readily available clinical measurements that are associated with the in-socket mechanical characteristics that are related to outcomes. The purpose of this aim is to correlate our laboratory findings from Aim 1 with more conventional modalities for clinical assessment.
Research Strategy: Preliminary data demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed research plan and will progress to a pilot clinical trial. The two aims will involve 30 transfemoral amputees. A highspeed biplane radiography system is used to image the residual limb while participants walk on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill both in their current socket and in sockets with purposely altered volume, brim height, cross-sectional geometry, and stiffness. Three-dimensional (3D) skin motion within the socket will be determined by tracking the motion of 40 to 50 small metal beads placed in a grid pattern on the skin of the residual limb before donning the socket. Residual femur motion within the socket will be determined with submillimeter accuracy using a validated tracking process that matches subject-specific bone models obtained from CT to the biplane radiographs. Discrete in-socket pressure will be recorded at four locations using pressure sensing pads. Readily available clinical measurements will be collected as well, including gait analysis, foot loading patterns, ground reaction forces, residual limb tissue stiffness, and hip range of motion hip strength. Each participant will complete clinical questionnaires to qualitatively evaluate comfort, fit, and overall satisfaction after wearing each socket. The different socket modifications are intended to affect the in-socket mechanics of the residual limb, physical function and patient-reported outcomes (Aim 1). These relationships will be assessed using a generalized linear model. Correlation between the research grade measurements and accessible clinical measures (Aim 2) will be evaluated using bivariate correlation analyses. The information gained in Aims 1 and 2 will be used to develop a quantitatively-informed socket optimization process, wherein the clinical measurements associated with in-socket mechanics will be used to inform socket design optimizations.
- Conditions
- Artificial Limbs
- Being tested
- Trans-femoral prosthetic socket
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Trans-femoral prosthetic socketDevice
Unmodified) A custom-made check socket serving as the interface between residual limb and prosthesis
- Soft socket (Socket made from softer material than unmodified original)
- Stiff socket (Socket made from stiffer material than unmodified original)
- moderately lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 10% of socket length compared to unmodified original)
- slightly lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 5% of socket length compared to unmodified original)
- Oversized socket (The socket volume is 6% larger than the unmodified original)
- Undersized socket (The socket volume is 6% smaller than the unmodified original)
- CAT-CAM influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the contoured adducted trochanteric-controlled alignment method (CAT-CAM))
- MAS influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the Marlo Anatomic Socket (MAS) template)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Unmodified Socket + 8 Socket Modifications in Random Order | Experimental | The sequence of the 9 different interventions (original socket and 8 versions derived from it) is randomized for each participant. The number of participants is smaller than the number of possible permutations. Therefore the enacted ordering is randomly selected from the pool of possible orderings. Participants walk for less than 10 minutes with every socket type while data is being collected. Receives: Device: Trans-femoral prosthetic socket |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Residual Femur motion
medial-lateral and superior-inferior translation of the distal femur relative to the socket from late swing through midstance
Measured: 1 second
Skin strain
average and peak skin strain within each of four regions, expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle
Measured: 1 second
Socket pressure
measure peak pressure and area under the pressure versus time curve, expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle
Measured: 20 seconds
Secondary outcomes (8)
Gait symmetry
average of the peak trunk lean, and the average peak hip flexion and extension, measured by motion capture system
Measured: 20 seconds
Plantar pressure
peak plantar pressure from foot strike to midstance
Measured: 20 seconds
Static displacement
distance from the most distal point of the residual femur to the inside surface of the socket under weightbearing
Measured: 1 second
Tissue Stiffness
Average tissue stiffness for four regions of the residual limb
Measured: 3 seconds
Trunk lean
Body angles based on markers placed on the shoulders and spine
Measured: 20 seconds
Hip flexion/extension
Based on markers at greater trochanters, knee, ankle and foot.
Measured: 20 seconds
Hip strength
Manual muscle testing of hip flexors and extensors
Measured: 20 seconds
Hip Range of Motion
Manually measured using goniometer
Measured: 20 seconds
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2021
- Study start1 Sep 2021
- Primary completion1 Mar 2024
- Study completion12 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Artificial LimbsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PittsburghThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Participants will perform study activities with nine different versions (including the original unmodified) of their prosthetic socket in a randomized sequence.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Defense
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, William Anderst, University of Pittsburgh
- Investigators
- William Anderst, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Pittsburgh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05041998
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY20070123
- Other IDs
- W81XWH2010914
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified data may be shared with other researchers at Pitt in the future
Publications
Paulus P, Gale T, Shetty R, Yatsenko Y, Elder J, Mroz K, McKernan G, Buffat D, Fiedler G, Anderst W. Residual femur motion during the stance phase of gait is associated with dynamic stability in individuals with transfemoral amputations. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2026 Aug 15;139:106947. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106947. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42612312Anderst W, Fiedler G, Onishi K, McKernan G, Gale T, Paulus P. Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes. Trials. 2022 Apr 12;23(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06205-z.
PubMed 35413866
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Physical Function and Patient-reported Outcomes Through a Quantitatively-informed Socket Design Process
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05041998
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY20070123
- Conditions
- Artificial Limbs
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PittsburghUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Defense
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will investigate the effects of specific standardized modifications to trans-femoral prosthetic sockets in a randomized within-subject design. This is in preparation for a subsequently planned clinical trial to validate the findings by implementing them into a fitting method for individual sockets.
Detailed description
Background: Lower limb amputees experience chronic health challenges such as residual limb skin problems, low back pain, and osteoarthritis. These problems are exacerbated by high physical activity levels and by poor prosthetic socket fit. Prosthetists believe that limiting residual femur and skin motion will improve force coupling and thereby address these problems. However, there are no data demonstrating how changes in socket design affect residual femur and skin motion, and, by extension, lead to improved patient-reported outcomes.
Objective/Hypothesis: Goal of this research is to improve the current socket design optimization process that involves trial and error and relies heavily on the prosthetist's experience and intuition by using a quantitatively informed optimization process. The hypothesis is that modifiable in-socket mechanics, i.e. residual femur motion, skin strain, and pressure within the socket, are related to socket design and patient outcomes, and can be estimated using readily available clinical measurements.
Specific Aims: First aim is to identify the key characteristics of in-socket mechanics that are related to physical function and patient-reported comfort and function. The second aim is to identify readily available clinical measurements that are associated with the in-socket mechanical characteristics that are related to outcomes. The purpose of this aim is to correlate our laboratory findings from Aim 1 with more conventional modalities for clinical assessment.
Research Strategy: Preliminary data demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed research plan and will progress to a pilot clinical trial. The two aims will involve 30 transfemoral amputees. A highspeed biplane radiography system is used to image the residual limb while participants walk on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill both in their current socket and in sockets with purposely altered volume, brim height, cross-sectional geometry, and stiffness. Three-dimensional (3D) skin motion within the socket will be determined by tracking the motion of 40 to 50 small metal beads placed in a grid pattern on the skin of the residual limb before donning the socket. Residual femur motion within the socket will be determined with submillimeter accuracy using a validated tracking process that matches subject-specific bone models obtained from CT to the biplane radiographs. Discrete in-socket pressure will be recorded at four locations using pressure sensing pads. Readily available clinical measurements will be collected as well, including gait analysis, foot loading patterns, ground reaction forces, residual limb tissue stiffness, and hip range of motion hip strength. Each participant will complete clinical questionnaires to qualitatively evaluate comfort, fit, and overall satisfaction after wearing each socket. The different socket modifications are intended to affect the in-socket mechanics of the residual limb, physical function and patient-reported outcomes (Aim 1). These relationships will be assessed using a generalized linear model. Correlation between the research grade measurements and accessible clinical measures (Aim 2) will be evaluated using bivariate correlation analyses. The information gained in Aims 1 and 2 will be used to develop a quantitatively-informed socket optimization process, wherein the clinical measurements associated with in-socket mechanics will be used to inform socket design optimizations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Participants will perform study activities with nine different versions (including the original unmodified) of their prosthetic socket in a randomized sequence.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Unmodified Socket + 8 Socket Modifications in Random Order | Experimental | Device: Trans-femoral prosthetic socketThe sequence of the 9 different interventions (original socket and 8 versions derived from it) is randomized for each participant. The number of participants is smaller than the number of possible permutations. Therefore the enacted ordering is randomly selected from the pool of possible orderings. Participants walk for less than 10 minutes with every socket type while data is being collected. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Transfemoral prosthesis user
- 18-80 years of age
- Body weight less than 125 kg
- Able to walk unassisted on a treadmill
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnant females
- Clinically diagnosed osteoporosis
- Previous high exposure to radiation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Trans-femoral prosthetic socketUnmodified) A custom-made check socket serving as the interface between residual limb and prosthesis 1. Soft socket (Socket made from softer material than unmodified original) 2. Stiff socket (Socket made from stiffer material than unmodified original) 3. moderately lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 10% of socket length compared to unmodified original) 4. slightly lower brim height (Brim of the socket is lowered by 5% of socket length compared to unmodified original) 5. Oversized socket (The socket volume is 6% larger than the unmodified original) 6. Undersized socket (The socket volume is 6% smaller than the unmodified original) 7. CAT-CAM influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the contoured adducted trochanteric-controlled alignment method (CAT-CAM)) 8. MAS influenced geometry (The cross sectional geometry of the socket is modelled following the Marlo Anatomic Socket (MAS) template) | Device | Unmodified Socket + 8 Socket Modifications in Random Order |
Primary outcome
Residual Femur motion
Time frame: 1 second
medial-lateral and superior-inferior translation of the distal femur relative to the socket from late swing through midstance
Skin strain
Time frame: 1 second
average and peak skin strain within each of four regions, expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle
Socket pressure
Time frame: 20 seconds
measure peak pressure and area under the pressure versus time curve, expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle
8 secondary outcomes
Gait symmetry
Time frame: 20 seconds
Plantar pressure
Time frame: 20 seconds
Static displacement
Time frame: 1 second
Tissue Stiffness
Time frame: 3 seconds
Trunk lean
Time frame: 20 seconds
Hip flexion/extension
Time frame: 20 seconds
Hip strength
Time frame: 20 seconds
Hip Range of Motion
Time frame: 20 seconds
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Aug 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42612312Paulus P, Gale T, Shetty R, Yatsenko Y, Elder J, Mroz K, McKernan G, Buffat D, Fiedler G, Anderst W. Residual femur motion during the stance phase of gait is associated with dynamic stability in individuals with transfemoral amputations. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2026 Aug 15;139:106947. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106947. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35413866Anderst W, Fiedler G, Onishi K, McKernan G, Gale T, Paulus P. Within-subject effects of standardized prosthetic socket modifications on physical function and patient-reported outcomes. Trials. 2022 Apr 12;23(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06205-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified data may be shared with other researchers at Pitt in the future
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
William Anderst, PhD principal investigator
University of Pittsburgh
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Trans-femoral prosthetic socket in people with Artificial Limbs, run by University of Pittsburgh at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Residual Femur motion (time frame: 1 second). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05041998, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 5 Nov 2026.