Gastric CancerNCT05051670
da Vinci SP Robotic Gastrectomy
A study testing da vinc SP gastrectomy in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
Laparoscopic surgery revolutionized the surgical treatment of gastric cancer saving large incsion and associated pain. Robotic surgical system was introduced to enhance the minimally invasive surgery using articulating robotic arm. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer
- What is being tested?
- da vinc SP gastrectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 16 Dec 2021to 11 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma of stomach scheduled to undergo radical gastrectomy
- Between 20-80
- ASA score (American society of anesthesiology) class: I - III
- Signed to informed consent after through explanation about the study
Who cannot join
- distant metastasis
- EMR/ESD canddiate
- complicated gastric cancer (obstruction or perforation)
- Active other primary tumor
- Vulerable subject (illiterate, pregnant)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul
About this study
Official title: The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using da Vinci SP for Early Gastric Cancer
Laparoscopic surgery revolutionized the surgical treatment of gastric cancer saving large incsion and associated pain. Robotic surgical system was introduced to enhance the minimally invasive surgery using articulating robotic arm. The da vinci SP system, which enables single-port surgery, can allow surgeon to provide radical gastrectomy with minimal scar and associated pain.
Read the detailed description
This study is a phase 1/2, single-arm surgical clinical trial. The primary endpoint is the safety of da vinci robotic gastrectomy. The secondary endpoint is operative time, bleeding, bowel recovery, and hospital stay. In the clinic, informed consent is received from patient who is scheduled to undergo radical gastrectomy. After the general anesthesia, low midline transverse incision is made at suprapubic area. After inserting SP port into the peritoneal cavity, additional port is inserted via right flank that would be used for assistant's energy device and suction devices. Radical subtotal gastrectomy is perfromed using cardiere-forceps, monopolar scissors, and maryland forceps. Reconstruction after gastrectomy is decided according to surgeon's preference. three days after gastrectomy, if the diet build up is complete and the patients has no evidence of complication, the patient is discharged from the hospital. Four weeks after gastrectomy, the patient will be followed up at the clinic. Major complication event within 30days after gastrectomy will be analyzed as primary endpoint as well as other secondary endpoints.
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Being tested
- da vinc SP gastrectomy
- Keywords
- da vinci SP, robotic surgery, gastrectomy, gastric cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
da vinc SP gastrectomyProcedure or surgery
radical subtotal gastrectomy performed by da vinci SP
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SP group | Experimental | patients group underwent gastrectomy using da vinci SP Receives: Procedure: da vinc SP gastrectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
major complication
Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3 or more
Measured: 30 days after gastrectomy
Secondary outcomes (4)
Operation time
duation of operation in minutes
Measured: 30 days after gastrectomy
bleeding
amount of bleeding shed during the operation in ml
Measured: 30 days after gastrectomy
bowel recovery
gas passing day after the surgery
Measured: 30 days after gastrectomy
Hospital stay
days between the opeation day to discharge day
Measured: 30 days after gastrectomy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2021
- Study start16 Dec 2021
- Primary completion11 Nov 2022
- Study completion11 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yonsei UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05051670
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4-2021-0881
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 27 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(2):69-77. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
PubMed 22076206Lee JH, Kim KM, Cheong JH, Noh SH. Current management and future strategies of gastric cancer. Yonsei Med J. 2012 Mar;53(2):248-57. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.248.
PubMed 22318810Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Apr;4(2):146-8.
PubMed 8180768Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.
PubMed 20160637Zeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182583e2e.
PubMed 22664559Kim YM, Baek SE, Lim JS, Hyung WJ. Clinical application of image-enhanced minimally invasive robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a prospective observational study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):304-12. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2094-0. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
PubMed 23207683Cruz CJ, Huynh F, Kang I, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Initial experiences of robotic SP cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis with robotic Si single-site cholecystectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Jan;100(1):1-7. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.1.1. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
PubMed 33457391Kang SK, Jang WS, Kim SW, Kim SH, Han SW, Lee YS. Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP(R) system: initial experience with a pediatric patient. J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Oct;15(5):576-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
PubMed 31570233Gomes MTV, Machado AMN, Podgaec S, Barison GAS. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct-Dec;15(4):476-480. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082017AO4134.
PubMed 29364368Tokunaga M, Sugisawa N, Kondo J, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Early phase II study of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(3):542-7. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0293-3. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
PubMed 24005955Lee S, Kim JK, Kim YN, Jang DS, Kim YM, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4002-4009. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5435-y. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
PubMed 28205030Park JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH, Kim Y, Eom BW, Yoon HM, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Lee JH. Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg. 2012 Nov;99(11):1554-61. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8887.
PubMed 23027072Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Song KY, Ryu SY. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):627-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
PubMed 24470012Tokunaga M, Kondo J, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Postoperative intra-abdominal complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification following open and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Oct;16(10):1854-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1981-8. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
PubMed 22847575Kim SM, Ha MH, Seo JE, Kim JE, Choi MG, Sohn TS, Bae JM, Kim S, Lee JH. Comparison of Reduced Port Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (Duet TLDG) and Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;22(8):2567-72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4333-y. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
PubMed 25564174
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using da Vinci SP for Early Gastric Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05051670
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4-2021-0881
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Keywords
- da vinci SP, robotic surgery, gastrectomy, gastric cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Laparoscopic surgery revolutionized the surgical treatment of gastric cancer saving large incsion and associated pain. Robotic surgical system was introduced to enhance the minimally invasive surgery using articulating robotic arm. The da vinci SP system, which enables single-port surgery, can allow surgeon to provide radical gastrectomy with minimal scar and associated pain.
Detailed description
This study is a phase 1/2, single-arm surgical clinical trial. The primary endpoint is the safety of da vinci robotic gastrectomy. The secondary endpoint is operative time, bleeding, bowel recovery, and hospital stay. In the clinic, informed consent is received from patient who is scheduled to undergo radical gastrectomy. After the general anesthesia, low midline transverse incision is made at suprapubic area. After inserting SP port into the peritoneal cavity, additional port is inserted via right flank that would be used for assistant's energy device and suction devices. Radical subtotal gastrectomy is perfromed using cardiere-forceps, monopolar scissors, and maryland forceps. Reconstruction after gastrectomy is decided according to surgeon's preference. three days after gastrectomy, if the diet build up is complete and the patients has no evidence of complication, the patient is discharged from the hospital. Four weeks after gastrectomy, the patient will be followed up at the clinic. Major complication event within 30days after gastrectomy will be analyzed as primary endpoint as well as other secondary endpoints.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SP group | Experimental | Procedure: da vinc SP gastrectomypatients group underwent gastrectomy using da vinci SP |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma of stomach scheduled to undergo radical gastrectomy
- Between 20-80
- ASA score (American society of anesthesiology) class: I - III
- Signed to informed consent after through explanation about the study
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- distant metastasis
- EMR/ESD canddiate
- complicated gastric cancer (obstruction or perforation)
- Active other primary tumor
- Vulerable subject (illiterate, pregnant)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| da vinc SP gastrectomyradical subtotal gastrectomy performed by da vinci SP | Procedure or surgery | SP group |
Primary outcome
major complication
Time frame: 30 days after gastrectomy
Clavien-Dindo classification grade 3 or more
4 secondary outcomes
Operation time
Time frame: 30 days after gastrectomy
bleeding
Time frame: 30 days after gastrectomy
bowel recovery
Time frame: 30 days after gastrectomy
Hospital stay
Time frame: 30 days after gastrectomy
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jun 2023.
- Background: PubMed 22076206Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(2):69-77. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
- Background: PubMed 22318810Lee JH, Kim KM, Cheong JH, Noh SH. Current management and future strategies of gastric cancer. Yonsei Med J. 2012 Mar;53(2):248-57. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.248.
- Background: PubMed 8180768Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Apr;4(2):146-8.
- Background: PubMed 20160637Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.
- Background: PubMed 22664559Zeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182583e2e.
- Background: PubMed 23207683Kim YM, Baek SE, Lim JS, Hyung WJ. Clinical application of image-enhanced minimally invasive robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a prospective observational study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):304-12. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2094-0. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
- Background: PubMed 33457391Cruz CJ, Huynh F, Kang I, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Initial experiences of robotic SP cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis with robotic Si single-site cholecystectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Jan;100(1):1-7. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.1.1. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
- Background: PubMed 31570233Kang SK, Jang WS, Kim SW, Kim SH, Han SW, Lee YS. Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP(R) system: initial experience with a pediatric patient. J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Oct;15(5):576-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
- Background: PubMed 29364368Gomes MTV, Machado AMN, Podgaec S, Barison GAS. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct-Dec;15(4):476-480. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082017AO4134.
- Background: PubMed 24005955Tokunaga M, Sugisawa N, Kondo J, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Early phase II study of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(3):542-7. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0293-3. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
- Background: PubMed 28205030Lee S, Kim JK, Kim YN, Jang DS, Kim YM, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4002-4009. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5435-y. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
- Background: PubMed 23027072Park JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH, Kim Y, Eom BW, Yoon HM, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Lee JH. Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg. 2012 Nov;99(11):1554-61. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8887.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Adding Nivolumab to Usual Treatment for People With Advanced Stomach or Esophageal Cancer, PARAMUNE Trial
Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study With NKT3964 for Adults With Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors
Solid Tumor, Advanced Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1/2
EIK1005-002: A Clinical Research Study Evaluating EIK1005, a Werner Helicase Inhibitor, as Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors Including Microsatellite Instability High (MSI-H) Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, MSI-H or dMMR Advanced Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Safety,Pharmacokinetics,Pharmacodynamics,and Efficacy of TJ037130 in Adult Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Solid Tumor, Metastatic Ovary Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing da vinc SP gastrectomy in people with Gastric Cancer, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
major complication (time frame: 30 days after gastrectomy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05051670, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.