Sacroiliac DisorderNCT05052762
Effects of Weighted and Elastic Resistance Training of Gluteus Maximus in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
A study testing Group A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength and Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength in people with Sacroiliac Disorder, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
This research aims to compare the effect of weighted and elastic resistance training of gluteus maximus in subjects with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Randomized clinical trials were done. The sample size was 54. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sacroiliac Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Group A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength and Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2021to 2 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- pain in the SI region for at least 12 weeks (chronic) and had no previous physical therapy treatment
- SIJ dysfunction confirmed by tests described by McGrath et al.
- These tests included the SI compression, SI distraction, Squish, and Gaenslen.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with clinical and imaging evidence of any other spinal or pelvic co-morbidity potentially responsible for pain radiating through the sacroiliac region.
- True leg length discrepancy [measured from the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to the medial malleolus.
- Back, pelvis, hip, or knee fracture history or surgery.
- Having a systemic pathology including inflammatory joint disease
- Having a musculoskeletal or neurological disease
- Having taken anti-inflammatory medication
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Effect of Weighted and Elastic Resistance Training of Gluteus Maximus in Subjects With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
This research aims to compare the effect of weighted and elastic resistance training of gluteus maximus in subjects with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Randomized clinical trials were done. The sample size was 54. The subjects were divided into two groups, 27 subjects in the weighted resistance training group and 27 in the elastic resisted training group. The study duration was of 1 year. The sampling technique applied was the non-probability connivance sampling technique. Only 20-40 years of symptomatic subjects with pain in the SI region for at least 12 weeks (chronic) and had no previous physical therapy treatment were included. Tools used in the study are numeric pain scale, dynamometer, and Oswestry disability index. Data was be analyzed through SPSS 21.
Read the detailed description
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction or sacroiliitis are common terms used to describe the pain of the sacroiliac joint. It is usually caused by abnormal motion (i.e. hyper- or hypo-mobile) or mal-alignment of the sacroiliac joint. Sacroiliac joint (SI) dysfunction is a well-documented clinical entity that can cause pain and loss of function, The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) has been implicated as the primary pain source in 10% to 25% of the patients with low back pain. During pregnancy, 20% to 80% of the women experience low back or posterior pelvic pain frequently arising from the SIJ.
The Gluteus maximus is inserted proximally into the sacrum, the dorsal sacral ligaments, the posterior portion of the crest of the ilium, and the sacrotuberous ligament. The muscle fibers run inferiorly and laterally to the distal insertion, where it splits into two components. The upper half of the muscle inserts into the iliotibial tract of the fascia and the lower half into the gluteal tuberosity of the femur. Due to its attachments, the gluteus maximus is primarily involved in hip extension and lateral rotation.
Fischer \& Houtz found in electromyography (EMG) study that the strongest contractions of gluteus maximus occurred with muscle setting by isometric contraction, external rotation, abduction with resistance, and vigorous hyperextension exercises of the thigh and trunk in an erect posture. Weakness of gluteal muscles causes decreased sacroiliac (SI) joint stability in patients with sacroiliac disorders. gluteus maximus muscle, due to its attachments to the sacrum, iliac bones, and sacrotuberous ligament, plays a significant role in the stability of the SI joint. The stabilizing forces applied to the SI joint, therefore, could be compromised with gluteal muscle weakness. In patients with gluteal weakness, shortening of the hamstring muscles, through their common attachments to the ischial tuberosity and sacrotuberous ligament, could compensate for gluteal muscle weakness and contribute to the SI joint stability.
A relationship between the gluteus maximus and the SI joint has been investigated in particular. Anatomical studies suggest that the gluteus maximus, with muscle fibers perpendicular to the joint surfaces, can help to stabilize the SI joint. Furthermore, it was discovered that activating the gluteus maximus increased compressive force across the SI joint. Individuals with SI joint dysfunction have abnormal gluteus maximus recruitment during weight-bearing exercises. As a result, it is hypothesized that gluteus maximus weakness can be linked to incorrect loading of the SI joint and be a cause of the impairments associated with SI joint dysfunction.
Hip extension exercise is the general clinical method for improving the weakened muscle strength of the hip extensors. These exercises are often used to strengthen the gluteus maximus and is also recommended for patients with pain in the lower back, pelvis, or hip. The gluteus maximus contributes to the postural alignments, core stability, and functional abilities that are important for normal gait. A weakness of the gluteus maximus can cause an abnormal gait cycle that can affect the gait mechanics at both hip and knee joints. In particular, gluteus maximus exercise is important for patients who have low back pain and lower extremity injuries. Patients with low back pain show reduced activity of the gluteus maximus. Early activation of the hamstring muscles and spinal erector, as well as delayed or decreased activation of the gluteal muscles, are considered indications of faulty muscle activation.
Studies have assessed methods for selective strengthening of the gluteus maximus. Prone hip extension (PHE) exercise is generally used to activate and strengthen the gluteus maximus selectively. Active prone hip extension with knee flexion is a common exercise employed to optimize gluteus maximus activation because this position causes active insufficiency of the hamstring. A previous study reported that PHE exercise is the most effective method for activating the gluteal muscles when subjects extend their hip with 30° abduction. Other studies have suggested that an abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) with prone hip extension is useful for the selective activation of the gluteus maximus from the erector spinae and hamstring.
A correction of the abnormal pattern is recommended to reduce the stress on the spine and hip joint. In a clinical setting, the ADIM is used during hip extension to prevent abnormal motion of the pelvis and lumbar., and the degree of knee extension affects the gluteus maximus activity. When the level of knee extension is increased, the activity of the gluteus maximus decreases, and the hamstring activity increases. Previous studies compared the muscle activities of the hamstring and gluteus maximus during prone hip extension with ADIM. The following were applied during active prone hip extension exercises: knee flexion, knee extension, hip external rotation with knee flexion, and hip external rotation with knee extension. In addition, eleven different exercises of the gluteus maximus used in therapeutic exercises were compared.
Although a wide variety of different exercises are advocated train and condition gluteus maximus and surrounding musculature, there are no specific guidelines for gluteus maximus strengthening with SI joint dysfunction using best evidence-based practice. This study aims to find out whether the weighted and elastic resistance training of gluteus maximus provides better results in subjects with SIJ dysfunction.
- Conditions
- Sacroiliac Disorder
- Being tested
- Group A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength, Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength
- Keywords
- gluteus maximus, Elastic resistance training, weighted resistance training
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strengthOther
Subjects attended physical therapy two times per week for a total of 10 visits. In the first five sessions, subjects performed the following exercises to strengthen the gluteus maximus: bilateral bridge, unilateral bridge, and non-weight-bearing hip extension in prone with the knee flexed at 90 degrees. In the next five sessions, abduction and external rotation in a quadruped ("fire hydrant" exercise) and weight-bearing hip extension (known as "deadlift" exercise) are added. Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions. Elastic resistance was Added to the fire hydrant, hip extension in prone and deadlift exercises to allow each subject to perform at a 10-repetition maximum. The resistance for each subject was adjusted weekly as needed. The exercise program was performed under direct supervision only during the physical therapy sessions.
Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strengthOther
Subjects attended p two times per week for a total of 10 visits. The participants performed PHEKF in 90° knee flexion with 30° hip abduction and 10° hip extension to increase the muscle activity of the gluteus maximus. In the prone position, the participant performed 10° hip extension until the posterior knee reached the horizontal bar. The participants maintained 90° knee flexion with 30° hip abduction and 10° hip extension in the prone position against the resistance. Sandbags (3 kg) will be used to provide resistance on the ankle through a rope and pulley. Each subject performed three sets with three repetitions of five seconds each. 1-minute break is allowed between each set.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength. | Experimental | bilateral bridge, unilateral bridge, and non-weight-bearing hip extension in prone with the knee flexed at 90 degrees. In the next five sessions, abduction and external rotation in a quadruped and weight-bearing hip extension are added. Receives: Other: Group A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength |
| Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength | Experimental | Prone hip extension with knee flexion against weighted resistance Receives: Other: Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gluteus maximus strength with a dynamometer
hand held dynamometer is placed over gluteus maximus in position of hip extension ad knee flexion and asked the patient to contract for three seconds against resistance nad record reading.
Measured: 5th week
Oswestry disability index
This questionnaire consists of 10 sections describing the pain and its impact. Each section scores from 0 to 5, 0 being no pain and 5 being severe pain. The domains include pain intensity, personal care, lifting, sitting, walking, standing, sleeping, travel, social life, and change in the degree of pain.
Measured: 5th week
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
this is scale for measuring pain. it is 11 point scale with 0 at no pain and 10 at max pain
Measured: 5th week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2021
- Study start1 Aug 2021
- Primary completion30 Jun 2022
- Study completion2 Jul 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sacroiliac DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Riphah International UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aisha Razzaq, MSPT-OMPT, Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05052762
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC/01070 Aiman Mazhar
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 11 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lingutla KK, Pollock R, Ahuja S. Sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1924-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4490-8. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
PubMed 26957096Selkowitz DM, Beneck GJ, Powers CM. Comparison of Electromyographic Activity of the Superior and Inferior Portions of the Gluteus Maximus Muscle During Common Therapeutic Exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;46(9):794-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6493. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
PubMed 27494053Added MAN, de Freitas DG, Kasawara KT, Martin RL, Fukuda TY. STRENGTHENING THE GLUTEUS MAXIMUS IN SUBJECTS WITH SACROILIAC DYSFUNCTION. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Feb;13(1):114-120.
PubMed 29484248Bae C-H, Choe Y-W, Kim M-K. Effects of Different External Loads on the Activities of the Gluteus Maximus and Biceps Femoris during Prone Hip Extension in Healthy Young Men. Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2020;15(2):1-9.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Effect of Weighted and Elastic Resistance Training of Gluteus Maximus in Subjects With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05052762
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC/01070 Aiman Mazhar
- Conditions
- Sacroiliac Disorder
- Keywords
- gluteus maximus, Elastic resistance training, weighted resistance training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research aims to compare the effect of weighted and elastic resistance training of gluteus maximus in subjects with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Randomized clinical trials were done. The sample size was 54. The subjects were divided into two groups, 27 subjects in the weighted resistance training group and 27 in the elastic resisted training group. The study duration was of 1 year. The sampling technique applied was the non-probability connivance sampling technique. Only 20-40 years of symptomatic subjects with pain in the SI region for at least 12 weeks (chronic) and had no previous physical therapy treatment were included. Tools used in the study are numeric pain scale, dynamometer, and Oswestry disability index. Data was be analyzed through SPSS 21.
Detailed description
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction or sacroiliitis are common terms used to describe the pain of the sacroiliac joint. It is usually caused by abnormal motion (i.e. hyper- or hypo-mobile) or mal-alignment of the sacroiliac joint. Sacroiliac joint (SI) dysfunction is a well-documented clinical entity that can cause pain and loss of function, The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) has been implicated as the primary pain source in 10% to 25% of the patients with low back pain. During pregnancy, 20% to 80% of the women experience low back or posterior pelvic pain frequently arising from the SIJ.
The Gluteus maximus is inserted proximally into the sacrum, the dorsal sacral ligaments, the posterior portion of the crest of the ilium, and the sacrotuberous ligament. The muscle fibers run inferiorly and laterally to the distal insertion, where it splits into two components. The upper half of the muscle inserts into the iliotibial tract of the fascia and the lower half into the gluteal tuberosity of the femur. Due to its attachments, the gluteus maximus is primarily involved in hip extension and lateral rotation.
Fischer \& Houtz found in electromyography (EMG) study that the strongest contractions of gluteus maximus occurred with muscle setting by isometric contraction, external rotation, abduction with resistance, and vigorous hyperextension exercises of the thigh and trunk in an erect posture. Weakness of gluteal muscles causes decreased sacroiliac (SI) joint stability in patients with sacroiliac disorders. gluteus maximus muscle, due to its attachments to the sacrum, iliac bones, and sacrotuberous ligament, plays a significant role in the stability of the SI joint. The stabilizing forces applied to the SI joint, therefore, could be compromised with gluteal muscle weakness. In patients with gluteal weakness, shortening of the hamstring muscles, through their common attachments to the ischial tuberosity and sacrotuberous ligament, could compensate for gluteal muscle weakness and contribute to the SI joint stability.
A relationship between the gluteus maximus and the SI joint has been investigated in particular. Anatomical studies suggest that the gluteus maximus, with muscle fibers perpendicular to the joint surfaces, can help to stabilize the SI joint. Furthermore, it was discovered that activating the gluteus maximus increased compressive force across the SI joint. Individuals with SI joint dysfunction have abnormal gluteus maximus recruitment during weight-bearing exercises. As a result, it is hypothesized that gluteus maximus weakness can be linked to incorrect loading of the SI joint and be a cause of the impairments associated with SI joint dysfunction.
Hip extension exercise is the general clinical method for improving the weakened muscle strength of the hip extensors. These exercises are often used to strengthen the gluteus maximus and is also recommended for patients with pain in the lower back, pelvis, or hip. The gluteus maximus contributes to the postural alignments, core stability, and functional abilities that are important for normal gait. A weakness of the gluteus maximus can cause an abnormal gait cycle that can affect the gait mechanics at both hip and knee joints. In particular, gluteus maximus exercise is important for patients who have low back pain and lower extremity injuries. Patients with low back pain show reduced activity of the gluteus maximus. Early activation of the hamstring muscles and spinal erector, as well as delayed or decreased activation of the gluteal muscles, are considered indications of faulty muscle activation.
Studies have assessed methods for selective strengthening of the gluteus maximus. Prone hip extension (PHE) exercise is generally used to activate and strengthen the gluteus maximus selectively. Active prone hip extension with knee flexion is a common exercise employed to optimize gluteus maximus activation because this position causes active insufficiency of the hamstring. A previous study reported that PHE exercise is the most effective method for activating the gluteal muscles when subjects extend their hip with 30° abduction. Other studies have suggested that an abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) with prone hip extension is useful for the selective activation of the gluteus maximus from the erector spinae and hamstring.
A correction of the abnormal pattern is recommended to reduce the stress on the spine and hip joint. In a clinical setting, the ADIM is used during hip extension to prevent abnormal motion of the pelvis and lumbar., and the degree of knee extension affects the gluteus maximus activity. When the level of knee extension is increased, the activity of the gluteus maximus decreases, and the hamstring activity increases. Previous studies compared the muscle activities of the hamstring and gluteus maximus during prone hip extension with ADIM. The following were applied during active prone hip extension exercises: knee flexion, knee extension, hip external rotation with knee flexion, and hip external rotation with knee extension. In addition, eleven different exercises of the gluteus maximus used in therapeutic exercises were compared.
Although a wide variety of different exercises are advocated train and condition gluteus maximus and surrounding musculature, there are no specific guidelines for gluteus maximus strengthening with SI joint dysfunction using best evidence-based practice. This study aims to find out whether the weighted and elastic resistance training of gluteus maximus provides better results in subjects with SIJ dysfunction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength. | Experimental | Other: Group A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strengthbilateral bridge, unilateral bridge, and non-weight-bearing hip extension in prone with the knee flexed at 90 degrees. In the next five sessions, abduction and external rotation in a quadruped and weight-bearing hip extension are added. |
| Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength | Experimental | Other: Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strengthProne hip extension with knee flexion against weighted resistance |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- pain in the SI region for at least 12 weeks (chronic) and had no previous physical therapy treatment
- SIJ dysfunction confirmed by tests described by McGrath et al.
- These tests included the SI compression, SI distraction, Squish, and Gaenslen.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subjects with clinical and imaging evidence of any other spinal or pelvic co-morbidity potentially responsible for pain radiating through the sacroiliac region.
- True leg length discrepancy [measured from the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to the medial malleolus.
- Back, pelvis, hip, or knee fracture history or surgery.
- Having a systemic pathology including inflammatory joint disease
- Having a musculoskeletal or neurological disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strengthSubjects attended physical therapy two times per week for a total of 10 visits. In the first five sessions, subjects performed the following exercises to strengthen the gluteus maximus: bilateral bridge, unilateral bridge, and non-weight-bearing hip extension in prone with the knee flexed at 90 degrees. In the next five sessions, abduction and external rotation in a quadruped ("fire hydrant" exercise) and weight-bearing hip extension (known as "deadlift" exercise) are added. Each exercise was performed for 10 repetitions. Elastic resistance was Added to the fire hydrant, hip extension in prone and deadlift exercises to allow each subject to perform at a 10-repetition maximum. The resistance for each subject was adjusted weekly as needed. The exercise program was performed under direct supervision only during the physical therapy sessions. | Other | Group A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength. |
| Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strengthSubjects attended p two times per week for a total of 10 visits. The participants performed PHEKF in 90° knee flexion with 30° hip abduction and 10° hip extension to increase the muscle activity of the gluteus maximus. In the prone position, the participant performed 10° hip extension until the posterior knee reached the horizontal bar. The participants maintained 90° knee flexion with 30° hip abduction and 10° hip extension in the prone position against the resistance. Sandbags (3 kg) will be used to provide resistance on the ankle through a rope and pulley. Each subject performed three sets with three repetitions of five seconds each. 1-minute break is allowed between each set. | Other | Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength |
Primary outcome
Gluteus maximus strength with a dynamometer
Time frame: 5th week
hand held dynamometer is placed over gluteus maximus in position of hip extension ad knee flexion and asked the patient to contract for three seconds against resistance nad record reading.
Oswestry disability index
Time frame: 5th week
This questionnaire consists of 10 sections describing the pain and its impact. Each section scores from 0 to 5, 0 being no pain and 5 being severe pain. The domains include pain intensity, personal care, lifting, sitting, walking, standing, sleeping, travel, social life, and change in the degree of pain.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Time frame: 5th week
this is scale for measuring pain. it is 11 point scale with 0 at no pain and 10 at max pain
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Aug 2022.
- Background: PubMed 26957096Lingutla KK, Pollock R, Ahuja S. Sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1924-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4490-8. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
- Background: PubMed 27494053Selkowitz DM, Beneck GJ, Powers CM. Comparison of Electromyographic Activity of the Superior and Inferior Portions of the Gluteus Maximus Muscle During Common Therapeutic Exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Sep;46(9):794-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6493. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
- Background: PubMed 29484248Added MAN, de Freitas DG, Kasawara KT, Martin RL, Fukuda TY. STRENGTHENING THE GLUTEUS MAXIMUS IN SUBJECTS WITH SACROILIAC DYSFUNCTION. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Feb;13(1):114-120.
- BackgroundBae C-H, Choe Y-W, Kim M-K. Effects of Different External Loads on the Activities of the Gluteus Maximus and Biceps Femoris during Prone Hip Extension in Healthy Young Men. Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2020;15(2):1-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sacroiliac Disorder
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Intervention For Mobility, Pain Relief, and Lasting Improvement in Functional Recovery "SIMPLIFY"
Degenerative Sacroiliitis, Sacroiliac Disorder
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
iFuse TORQ for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction, Sacroiliac; Fusion
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Posterior-Inferior Intra-articular Cortical Piercing Titanium Implant for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes
Sacro Iliac Joint Pain, Sacro-iliac Joints
RecruitingObservational study
Chronic Pelvic Pain in Females and Males
Pelvic Pain Syndrome, Sacroiliac Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aisha Razzaq, MSPT-OMPT principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Group A: Elastic resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength and Group B: Weight resisted training for Gluteus Maximus strength in people with Sacroiliac Disorder, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gluteus maximus strength with a dynamometer (time frame: 5th week). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05052762, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.