Moderate-to-severe Atopic DermatitisPhase 3NCT05056779
Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis With Inadequate Response to or for Whom Cyclosporine A is Not Medically Advisable
A Phase 3 study testing Nemolizumab in people with Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis, run by Galderma R&D.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of nemolizumab administered in combination with topical background therapy (topical corticosteroids [TCS] with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors [TCI]) in adult participants with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are not adequately… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Nemolizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2023to Jul 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic AD for at least 2 years before the screening visit and confirmed according to American Academy of Dermatology Consensus at the time of the screening visit.
- EASI score ≥ 20 at both the screening and baseline visits. Participant with an EASI score of 18-19 at the screening visit only may be reevaluated once within 48 hours.
- IGA score ≥ 3 (based on the IGA scale ranging from 0 to 4, in which 3 is moderate and 4 is severe) at both the screening and baseline visits.
- AD involvement ≥ 10% of BSA at both the screening and baseline visits.
- Documented history by a physician (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to topical medications or use of systemic therapies for control of the disease.
- Agree to apply a moisturizer throughout the study from the screening visit; agree to apply an authorized TCS, with or without TCI, from the screening visit and throughout the study as determined appropriate by the investigator.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Documented history of one of the following, where CsA treatment should not be continued/restarted or participant is not currently a candidate for CsA treatment:
- Inadequate response to CsA with previous exposure (defined as flare of AD during CsA tapering from a maximum of 6 weeks of high dose [5 mg/kg/day] to maintenance dose [2 to 3 mg/kg/day] or a flare after a minimum of 3 months on maintenance dose). Flare is defined as increase in signs and/or symptoms leading to escalation of therapy (ie, increase in dose, switch to a higher-potency topical corticosteroids [TCS] or start of another systemic nonsteroidal immunosuppressive drug), or
- Previous requirement for CsA at doses > 5 mg/kg/day, or duration beyond those specified in the prescribing information (> 1 year)
- Intolerance and/or unacceptable toxicity (eg, elevated creatinine, elevated liver function tests, uncontrolled hypertension, paresthesia, headache, nausea, hypertrichosis) with previous CsA exposure
- CsA is medically inadvisable due to medical contraindication, use of prohibited medications, risk of AEs (eg, serious infection) or toxicity (eg, renal or liver damage), or hypersensitivity to CsA or excipients, in the opinion of the investigator
- Acceptable documentation includes patient records with information on CsA prescription and treatment outcome, other prohibitive medications/medical history, or written documentation of the conversation with the participant's treating physician, if different than the investigator, as applicable.
- Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply.
Who cannot join
- Body weight < 30 kg.
- One or more of the following criteria at screening or baseline:
- Exacerbation of asthma requiring hospitalization in the preceding 12 months.
- Asthma that has not been well controlled (i.e, symptoms occurring on > 2 days per week, nighttime awakenings 2 or more times per week, or some interference with normal activities) during the preceding 3 months.
- Asthma Control Test (ACT) ≤ 19 (only for subjects with a history of asthma).
- Peak expiratory flow (PEF) < 80% of the predicted value.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Current medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or chronic bronchitis.
- Positive serology results (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] or hepatitis B core antibody [HBcAb], hepatitis C [HCV] antibody with positive HCV RNA, or human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] antibody) at the screening visit.
- Presence of confounding skin conditions that may interfere with study assessments.
- Planned or expected major surgical procedure during the clinical study.
- Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis With Inadequate Response to or for Whom Cyclosporine A is Not Medically Advisable
The primary objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of nemolizumab administered in combination with topical background therapy (topical corticosteroids [TCS] with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors [TCI]) in adult participants with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are not adequately controlled with or are not advised to use oral cyclosporine A (CsA) for medical reasons. The secondary objective is to investigate the safety of nemolizumab in adult participants with moderate-to-severe AD who are not adequately controlled with or are not advised to use oral CsA for medical reasons.
The study will be carried out in up to 70 different locations across Europe.
- Conditions
- Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Nemolizumab, CD14152 placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NemolizumabDrug
Also called CD14152
Participants will receive loading dose of 60 milligram (2×30 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection of nemolizumab at baseline. Thereafter 30 mg nemolizumab will be administered via single SC injection once in 4 week (Q4W) up to week 12.
CD14152 placeboDrug
Participants will receive loading dose of 60 mg (2×30 mg) SC injection of placebo at baseline. Thereafter 30 mg placebo will be administered via single SC injection Q4W up to week 12.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nemolizumab | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Nemolizumab |
| Placebo | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: CD14152 placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Participants with Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥ 75% Improvement in EASI from Baseline) at Week 16
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity will be assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
Measured: Week 16
Proportion of Participants with an Improvement of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) ≥ 4 at Week 16
Pruritus NRS is a scale that will be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores are provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (26)
Percent Change from Baseline in EASI at Each Visit Through Week 16
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity will be assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with at Least 50%, 75%, or 90% Improvement from Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-90) at Each Visit Through Week 16
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity will be assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis. EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90 responders will be the participants who achieved >=50%, >=75% and >=90% overall improvement in EASI score respectively from baseline to Week 16.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) at Each Visit Through Week 16
Pruritus NRS is a scale that will be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores are provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with an Improvement of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) ≥ 4 at Week 1, Week 2, and Each Visit Through Week 16
Pruritus NRS is a scale that will be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores are provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: From Week 1 to Week 16
Proportion of Participants with Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) < 2 at each Visit Through Week 16
Pruritus NRS is a scale that will be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores are provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success (Defined as an IGA of 0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost clear] and a ≥ 2-Point Reduction from Baseline) at Each Visit Through Week 16
IGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) used to evaluate the global severity of AD. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with EASI-75 and improvement of PP NRS ≥ 4 at Each Visit Through Week 16
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity will be assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with IGA Success and Improvement of PP NRS ≥ 4 at each Visit Through Week 16
IGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe) used to evaluate the global severity of AD. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Pruritus NRS is a scale that will be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores are provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with an Improvement of Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) ≥ 4 at Each Visit Through Week 16
The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants will be asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Percent Change from Baseline in Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) at Each Visit Through Week 16
The sleep disturbance NRS is a scale used by the participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to AD. Participants will be asked the following questions in their local language: how would you rate your sleep last night? On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to signs/symptoms of AD' and 10 being 'I cannot sleep at all due to the signs/symptoms of AD'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Percent Change from Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and It's Components at Each Visit Through Week 16
SCORAD is a clinical tool for assessing the severity and the extent of AD signs and symptoms. Extent and intensity of eczema as well as subjective signs (insomnia, etc.) are assessed and scored. Total score ranges from 0 (absent disease) to 103 (severe disease).
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Percent of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Each Visit Through Week 16
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with Prior Cyclosporine A (CsA) Use Achieving EASI-75 at Each Visit Through Week 16
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity will be assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Individual Components of the EASI (Averaged Across Body Regions) at Each Visit Through Week 16
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity will be assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis (AD)-Associated Pain Frequency Through Week 16
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis (AD)-Associated Pain Intensity Through Week 16
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Incidence of Rescue Therapy Use Through Week 16
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Percentage of Itch-Free Days (Based on PP NRS = 0/1) Through Week 16
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Each Visit Through Week 16
The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire covering domains including symptoms/feelings, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment. The participant will rate each question ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) and score ranges from 0 to 30. A higher total score indicates a poorer quality of life (QoL).
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Total Score at Each Visit Through Week 16
The POEM is a 7-item questionnaire that assessed disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) with a scoring system of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease) (high score indicative of poor quality of life [QOL]).
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Number of Days Free of Topical Atopic Dermatitis (AD) Therapy From Baseline to Week 16
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Change from baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for each subscale (ie, depression and anxiety) at each visit through Week 16
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14-question validated questionnaire completed by the participant for each subscale (i.e. depression and anxiety). Each question has a multiple choice answer which is scored between 0 and 3. Questions are identified as relating to anxiety (A) or depression (D) and a summation for each area is performed leading to a total score of 0 to 21 for each area. Scores of 0 to 7 are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and >= 11 indicates clinical effects.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants Reporting Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety Scores < 8 for those Reporting Scores ≥ 8 at Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 16
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14-question validated questionnaire completed by the participant for each subscale (i.e. depression and anxiety). Each question has a multiple choice answer which is scored between 0 and 3. Questions are identified as relating to anxiety (A) or depression (D) and a summation for each area is performed leading to a total score of 0 to 21 for each area. Scores of 0 to 7 are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and >= 11 indicates clinical effects.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants Reporting HADS depression Scores < 8 for Those Reporting Scores ≥ 8 at Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 16
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14-question validated questionnaire completed by the participant for each subscale (i.e. depression and anxiety). Each question has a multiple choice answer which is scored between 0 and 3. Questions are identified as relating to anxiety (A) or depression (D) and a summation for each area is performed leading to a total score of 0 to 21 for each area. Scores of 0 to 7 are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and >= 11 indicates clinical effects.
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in EuroQoL 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) at each visit through Week 16
The EQ-5D instrument is a validated questionnaire, completed by the participant that consists of 2 parts. The first part consists of 5 multiple choice QoL questions and the second is a 100 point visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 being "Worst imaginable health state" and 100 being "Best imaginable health state".
Measured: Baseline through week 16
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs), Including Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), Treatment Emergent AEs (TEAEs), and serious AEs (SAEs)
Measured: Baseline through week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2021
- Study startJan 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2023 (estimated)
Why it stopped: The study data will not be utilized in the IND and is only being conducted in EU.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Moderate-to-severe Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Galderma R&DThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Galderma R&D
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05056779
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RD.06.SPR.201591
- Other IDs
- 2021-002166-40
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 15 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis With Inadequate Response to or for Whom Cyclosporine A is Not Medically Advisable
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05056779
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RD.06.SPR.201591
- Conditions
- Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: The study data will not be utilized in the IND and is only being conducted in EU.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Galderma R&DIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of nemolizumab administered in combination with topical background therapy (topical corticosteroids [TCS] with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors [TCI]) in adult participants with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are not adequately controlled with or are not advised to use oral cyclosporine A (CsA) for medical reasons. The secondary objective is to investigate the safety of nemolizumab in adult participants with moderate-to-severe AD who are not adequately controlled with or are not advised to use oral CsA for medical reasons.
The study will be carried out in up to 70 different locations across Europe.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nemolizumab | Experimental | Drug: Nemolizumab |
| Placebo | Experimental | Drug: CD14152 placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Chronic AD for at least 2 years before the screening visit and confirmed according to American Academy of Dermatology Consensus at the time of the screening visit.
- EASI score ≥ 20 at both the screening and baseline visits. Participant with an EASI score of 18-19 at the screening visit only may be reevaluated once within 48 hours.
- IGA score ≥ 3 (based on the IGA scale ranging from 0 to 4, in which 3 is moderate and 4 is severe) at both the screening and baseline visits.
- AD involvement ≥ 10% of BSA at both the screening and baseline visits.
- Documented history by a physician (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to topical medications or use of systemic therapies for control of the disease.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Body weight < 30 kg.
- One or more of the following criteria at screening or baseline:
- Current medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or chronic bronchitis.
- Positive serology results (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] or hepatitis B core antibody [HBcAb], hepatitis C [HCV] antibody with positive HCV RNA, or human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] antibody) at the screening visit.
- Presence of confounding skin conditions that may interfere with study assessments.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NemolizumabAlso: CD14152Participants will receive loading dose of 60 milligram (2×30 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection of nemolizumab at baseline. Thereafter 30 mg nemolizumab will be administered via single SC injection once in 4 week (Q4W) up to week 12. | Drug | Nemolizumab |
| CD14152 placeboParticipants will receive loading dose of 60 mg (2×30 mg) SC injection of placebo at baseline. Thereafter 30 mg placebo will be administered via single SC injection Q4W up to week 12. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Participants with Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥ 75% Improvement in EASI from Baseline) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
EASI assesses severity and extent of AD signs through a composite score of erythema, induration/population, excoriation, and lichenification. The severity will be assessed on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) for each of the 4 body areas: head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, with half points allowed. The EASI score can range from 0 to 72 with higher scores representing greater severity of atopic dermatitis.
Proportion of Participants with an Improvement of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) ≥ 4 at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Pruritus NRS is a scale that will be used by the participants to report the intensity of their pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. For maximum itch intensity: the scores are provided on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being 'worst itch imaginable'. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
26 secondary outcomes
Percent Change from Baseline in EASI at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with at Least 50%, 75%, or 90% Improvement from Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-90) at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with an Improvement of Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) ≥ 4 at Week 1, Week 2, and Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: From Week 1 to Week 16
Proportion of Participants with Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP NRS) < 2 at each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Success (Defined as an IGA of 0 [Clear] or 1 [Almost clear] and a ≥ 2-Point Reduction from Baseline) at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with EASI-75 and improvement of PP NRS ≥ 4 at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with IGA Success and Improvement of PP NRS ≥ 4 at each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with an Improvement of Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) ≥ 4 at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Percent Change from Baseline in Sleep Disturbance Numeric Rating Scale (SD NRS) at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Percent Change from Baseline in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and It's Components at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Percent of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected by Atopic Dermatitis (AD) at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants with Prior Cyclosporine A (CsA) Use Achieving EASI-75 at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Individual Components of the EASI (Averaged Across Body Regions) at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis (AD)-Associated Pain Frequency Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis (AD)-Associated Pain Intensity Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Incidence of Rescue Therapy Use Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Percentage of Itch-Free Days (Based on PP NRS = 0/1) Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Total Score at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Number of Days Free of Topical Atopic Dermatitis (AD) Therapy From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Change from baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for each subscale (ie, depression and anxiety) at each visit through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants Reporting Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety Scores < 8 for those Reporting Scores ≥ 8 at Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Proportion of Participants Reporting HADS depression Scores < 8 for Those Reporting Scores ≥ 8 at Baseline at Each Visit Through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Change from Baseline in EuroQoL 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) at each visit through Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through week 16
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs), Including Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs), Treatment Emergent AEs (TEAEs), and serious AEs (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline through week 24
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2023.
Related trials for Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Roflumilast Cream 0.3% for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis, Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Long-term Study of the Medicine Called Abrocitinib in Children Aged 2 Years and Older With Moderate to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About Study Medicine Called PF-08049820 in People With Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema, Atopic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Nemolizumab in people with Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis, run by Galderma R&D.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Participants with Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 (EASI-75) (≥ 75% Improvement in EASI from Baseline) at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2023.