CancerPREDiCTlNCT05057234
PRecision Oncology Evidence Development in Cancer Treatment - Liquid
A study testing FoundationOne liquid CDx and Quality of life questionnaires in people with Cancer, run by British Columbia Cancer Agency at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The current standard of care for molecular characterization of tumors is tissue based next generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Liquid biopsies (ie blood) are of increasing interest and have been implemented as a diagnostic tool in some countries. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- What is being tested?
- FoundationOne liquid CDx and Quality of life questionnaires
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 18 Jun 2021to 1 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18
- Patients with metastatic malignancy
- Patients undergoing tissue based molecular characterization by tissue based NGS panel
- Part A - Simultaneous
- Tissue based NGS panel requested or reported within 4 weeks of enrolment
- Patients receiving treatment at BC Cancer
Show all 9Show fewer
- Part B - Sequential
- Tissue based NGS oncopanel does NOT identify a somatic tier 1 variant of strong clinical significance OR fails/not feasible due to insufficient tissue
- BC Cancer - Provincial (not including Vancouver Centre)
Who cannot join
- Patients not available for follow up
- Patients who are not willing to consider systemic treatment options
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: PRecision Oncology Evidence Development in Cancer Treatment - Liquid AKA the Real World Clinical Utility of ctDNA Analysis for Decision Making and Access to Precision Therapy for Advanced Cancer Patients in BC: The RAPTor Sub-study
The current standard of care for molecular characterization of tumors is tissue based next generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Liquid biopsies (ie blood) are of increasing interest and have been implemented as a diagnostic tool in some countries. This study compares tissue based and liquid based testing to evaluate the detection rate and cost consequence of using this new tool in BC.
Read the detailed description
Part A - Simultaneous - Patients will be randomized 1:1 to FoundationOne liquid CDx or no additional testing simultaneously at initiation of request for standard based tissue based next generation sequencing (NGS) panel testing. The objective of Part A is to evaluate the cost-consequence of the liquid ctDNA biopsy technology, FoundationOne liquid CDx, for first line molecular characterization of advanced colorectal cancer, melanoma, non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ovarian cancer, prostate cancer and triple negative breast cancer with simultaneous molecular characterization by tissue based NGS panel
Part B - Sequential - Patients will undergo standard tissue based NGS panel testing and if there are no somatic tier 1 variant of strong clinical significance identified the patients will then be eligible for FoundationOne liquid CDx. The objective of Part B is to determine the benefit of a sequential approach with molecular characterization by tissue based NGS panel testing followed by liquid based FoundationOne liquid CDx for patients who do not have an actionable tissue based oncogenic driver, across British Columbia.
The development and access to next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies on tumour tissue and blood allows the ability to profile the genomic landscape of the tumour within reasonable turn-around times and costs. The promise of precision oncology is the ability to 'match the right drug to the right patient at the right time'. Despite considerable excitement at the prospect of genome-informed therapy to improve oncologic outcomes, there has been little empirical assessment of its benefit from an overall population perspective and its true impact on cancer care delivery in 'real-world' scenarios.
While the enthusiasm for liquid biopsies has increased, the understanding of the cost implications lags behind. We propose to assess the true clinical impact on both individual patients and on a population-based cancer system of precision oncology via ctDNA analyses in metastatic solid tumors in a real-world scenario.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- FoundationOne liquid CDx, Quality of life questionnaires
- Keywords
- next generation sequencing panel, cost consequence, liquid biopsy, ctDNA
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FoundationOne liquid CDxDiagnostic test
FoundationOne liquid CDx testing
Quality of life questionnairesBehavioural
Quality of life questionnaire - EQ5D
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Simultaneous - FoundationOne liquid CDx | Experimental | Patients undergoing FoundationOne liquid CDx while tissued-based NGS panel is in progress or reported within 4 weeks of enrollment Receives: Diagnostic Test: FoundationOne liquid CDx; Behavioral: Quality of life questionnaires |
| Simultaneous - no additional testing | Experimental | Patients undergoing no additional testing while tissue-based NGS panel is in progress or reported within 4 weeks of enrolment Receives: Behavioral: Quality of life questionnaires |
| Sequential - FoundationOne liquid CDx | Experimental | Patients undergoing FoundationOne liquid CDx if standard tissue based NGS oncopanel testing identifies no somatic tier 1 variant of strong clinical significance Receives: Diagnostic Test: FoundationOne liquid CDx; Behavioral: Quality of life questionnaires |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Simultaneous: 12-month health resource utilization
To compare health resource utilization of tissue based NGS panel alone, versus NGS panel and FoundationOne liquid CDx measured in Canadian dollars
Measured: 12 months
Sequential: Proportion of patients with an actionable sequencing result following uninformative standard care oncopanel results, treated at BC Cancer, outside Vancouver Centre.
To evaluate the ability of FoundationOne liquid CDx to detect actionable mutations that were not identified on the tissue based NGS oncopanel.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Simultaneous: 18 and 24-month health resource utilization
To evaluate the health resource utilization of tissue based NGS panel alone, versus panel and FoundationOne liquid CDx measured in Canadian dollars
Measured: 24 months
Simultaneous: Clinical utility
To evaluate the clinical utility of tissue based NGS oncopanel +/- FoundationOne liquid CDx as measured by concordance/discordance of findings and subsequent treatment
Measured: 24 months
Simultaneous: Diagnostic pathway impact
To assess the impact of FoundationOne liquid CDx on the diagnostic patient pathway by comparing the number of patients who require repeat biopsies for molecular characterization.
Measured: 24 months
Simultaneous: Quality of Life
To compare the quality of life impact of FoundationOne liquid CDx using the validated instrument, EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ5D) (Scale of 0-100 where 0 is worst health and 100 is best health)
Measured: 24 months
Sequential: Clinical utility
To evaluate the clinical utility of tissue based NGS oncopanel followed by FoundationOne liquid CDx as measured by concordance/discordance of findings and subsequent treatment
Measured: 24 months
Sequential: Proportion of patients with insufficient tissue for molecular characterization
To determine the proportion of tissue based NGS oncopanel completed for which results are not available due to insufficient tissue. To be calculated by assessing number of patients with insufficient tissue for molecular characterization over the number of patients who have molecular characterization performed
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2021
- Study start18 Jun 2021
- Primary completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by British Columbia Cancer AgencyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- British Columbia Cancer Agency
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Roche Pharma AG
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Cheryl Ho, MD, Principal investigator, BC Cancer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05057234
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PREDiCTl
- Acronym
- PREDiCTl
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 19 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PRecision Oncology Evidence Development in Cancer Treatment - Liquid AKA the Real World Clinical Utility of ctDNA Analysis for Decision Making and Access to Precision Therapy for Advanced Cancer Patients in BC: The RAPTor Sub-study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05057234
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREDiCTl / PREDiCTl
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Keywords
- next generation sequencing panel, cost consequence, liquid biopsy, ctDNA
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- British Columbia Cancer AgencyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Roche Pharma AG
- Study start
- 18 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The current standard of care for molecular characterization of tumors is tissue based next generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Liquid biopsies (ie blood) are of increasing interest and have been implemented as a diagnostic tool in some countries. This study compares tissue based and liquid based testing to evaluate the detection rate and cost consequence of using this new tool in BC.
Detailed description
Part A - Simultaneous - Patients will be randomized 1:1 to FoundationOne liquid CDx or no additional testing simultaneously at initiation of request for standard based tissue based next generation sequencing (NGS) panel testing. The objective of Part A is to evaluate the cost-consequence of the liquid ctDNA biopsy technology, FoundationOne liquid CDx, for first line molecular characterization of advanced colorectal cancer, melanoma, non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ovarian cancer, prostate cancer and triple negative breast cancer with simultaneous molecular characterization by tissue based NGS panel
Part B - Sequential - Patients will undergo standard tissue based NGS panel testing and if there are no somatic tier 1 variant of strong clinical significance identified the patients will then be eligible for FoundationOne liquid CDx. The objective of Part B is to determine the benefit of a sequential approach with molecular characterization by tissue based NGS panel testing followed by liquid based FoundationOne liquid CDx for patients who do not have an actionable tissue based oncogenic driver, across British Columbia.
The development and access to next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies on tumour tissue and blood allows the ability to profile the genomic landscape of the tumour within reasonable turn-around times and costs. The promise of precision oncology is the ability to 'match the right drug to the right patient at the right time'. Despite considerable excitement at the prospect of genome-informed therapy to improve oncologic outcomes, there has been little empirical assessment of its benefit from an overall population perspective and its true impact on cancer care delivery in 'real-world' scenarios.
While the enthusiasm for liquid biopsies has increased, the understanding of the cost implications lags behind. We propose to assess the true clinical impact on both individual patients and on a population-based cancer system of precision oncology via ctDNA analyses in metastatic solid tumors in a real-world scenario.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Simultaneous - FoundationOne liquid CDx | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: FoundationOne liquid CDx, Behavioral: Quality of life questionnairesPatients undergoing FoundationOne liquid CDx while tissued-based NGS panel is in progress or reported within 4 weeks of enrollment |
| Simultaneous - no additional testing | Experimental | Behavioral: Quality of life questionnairesPatients undergoing no additional testing while tissue-based NGS panel is in progress or reported within 4 weeks of enrolment |
| Sequential - FoundationOne liquid CDx | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: FoundationOne liquid CDx, Behavioral: Quality of life questionnairesPatients undergoing FoundationOne liquid CDx if standard tissue based NGS oncopanel testing identifies no somatic tier 1 variant of strong clinical significance |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age > 18
- Patients with metastatic malignancy
- Patients undergoing tissue based molecular characterization by tissue based NGS panel
- Part A - Simultaneous
- Tissue based NGS panel requested or reported within 4 weeks of enrolment
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients not available for follow up
- Patients who are not willing to consider systemic treatment options
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FoundationOne liquid CDxFoundationOne liquid CDx testing | Diagnostic test | Sequential - FoundationOne liquid CDx, Simultaneous - FoundationOne liquid CDx |
| Quality of life questionnairesQuality of life questionnaire - EQ5D | Behavioural | Sequential - FoundationOne liquid CDx, Simultaneous - FoundationOne liquid CDx, Simultaneous - no additional testing |
Primary outcome
Simultaneous: 12-month health resource utilization
Time frame: 12 months
To compare health resource utilization of tissue based NGS panel alone, versus NGS panel and FoundationOne liquid CDx measured in Canadian dollars
Sequential: Proportion of patients with an actionable sequencing result following uninformative standard care oncopanel results, treated at BC Cancer, outside Vancouver Centre.
Time frame: 24 months
To evaluate the ability of FoundationOne liquid CDx to detect actionable mutations that were not identified on the tissue based NGS oncopanel.
6 secondary outcomes
Simultaneous: 18 and 24-month health resource utilization
Time frame: 24 months
Simultaneous: Clinical utility
Time frame: 24 months
Simultaneous: Diagnostic pathway impact
Time frame: 24 months
Simultaneous: Quality of Life
Time frame: 24 months
Sequential: Clinical utility
Time frame: 24 months
Sequential: Proportion of patients with insufficient tissue for molecular characterization
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Oct 2026.
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cheryl Ho, MD principal investigator
BC Cancer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing FoundationOne liquid CDx and Quality of life questionnaires in people with Cancer, run by British Columbia Cancer Agency at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Simultaneous: 12-month health resource utilization (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.