Liver CirrhosisNCT05057572
Efficacy and Safety of Carvedilol in Cirrhosis Patients With Uncomplicated Ascites Without High Risk Esophageal Varices
A study testing Carvedilol and Standard Medical Treatment in people with Liver Cirrhosis, run by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
The cumulative risk of refractory ascites is in the order of 20% within five years of the development of ascites. An elevated sinusoidal pressure is essential for the development of ascites, as fluid accumulation does not develop at portal pressure gradient below 8 mm Hg, and rising corrected sinusoidal pressure… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Cirrhosis
- What is being tested?
- Carvedilol and Standard Medical Treatment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 104 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2021to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-65 years
- Liver cirrhosis
- Grade II-III high SAAG ascites
- Small low risk or no esophageal varices
- CTP 7-12
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years
- AKI at enrollement (Prior transient volume responsive AKI stage I included)
- Post renal or liver transplantation
- History of CAD, PVD, ventricular arrythmia, Bronchial asthma
- SBP at diagnosis
- Severe Hyponatremia (Na <125 MEq/L)
Show all 17Show fewer
- Grade II/III/IV HE
- Advanced HCC (BCLC C,D), PVTT, Pregnancy or Lactating mother
- High risk varices (Large varices or small high risk varices)
- CTP >12
- ACLF
- Mixed / TB ascites
- Bilirubin >5 mg/dl
- Known CKD, obstructive uropathy
- Patient on MV, NIV, systemic sepsis and shock
- Lack of informed consent
- Prior intolerance or S/E to carvedilol or diuretics
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
India1 site
Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110070
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Carvedilol in Cirrhosis Patients With Uncomplicated Ascites Without High Risk Esophageal Varices- A Randomised Controlled Trial"
The cumulative risk of refractory ascites is in the order of 20% within five years of the development of ascites. An elevated sinusoidal pressure is essential for the development of ascites, as fluid accumulation does not develop at portal pressure gradient below 8 mm Hg, and rising corrected sinusoidal pressure correlates with decreased 24-hour urinary excretion of sodium.More recently, it has been hypothesised that bacterial translocation associated with portal hypertension in cirrhosis and related pathogen-associated, molecular pattern activated innate immune responses lead to systemic inflammation.This is associated with vasodilatation as well as release of proinflammatory cytokines, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, contributing to organ dysfunction.This activates sympathetic nervous system stimulating reabsorption of sodium in proximal,distal tubules, loop of Henle and collecting duct as well as the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, leading to sodium absorption from distal tubule and collecting duct.[5]Renal sodium retention and eventual free water clearance due to non-osmoticrelease of arginine-vasopressin and its action on V2 receptor in the collectingduct underlie the fluid retention associated with oedema and ascites in cirrhosis.The lowering of portal pressure using non selective beta blocker has also been shown to reduce the development of ascites, refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome.Furthermore, the effect of non slective beta blocker on intestinal permeability, bacterial translocation and inflammatory response has been proposed to mitigate the risk of developing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
Read the detailed description
AIM-To compare the safety and efficacy of addition of carvedilol to SMT (diuretics +/- albumin) compared to SMT alone in the prevention of complicated ascites (refractory ascites, AKI-HRS, SBP or severe hyponatremia) at 1year.
Methodology:
Study population: Patient of liver cirrhosis presenting with uncomplicated ascites and without high risk esophageal varices.
Study design:
- A prospective, randomized, single center open label study.
- The study will be conducted on the consecutive patients presenting with uncomplicated ascites and low risk esophageal varices seen at the outpatient clinics/wards of Department of Hepatology, ILBS, New Delhi from July 2021 to June 2023.
Study period: 2years from the date of ethics approval
Sample size with justification:
- Assuming that the complication rate in carvedilol group is 8% and placebo 30% so the complication free rate of 92% and 70 % further assuming alpha -5%, power 80%.
- Investigator need to enrol 108 cases in two groups further with 10% drop out rate it was decided to enroll 120 cases
- Randomisation into two groups by block randomisation method,taking block size 8
Intervention:
- Patients will be randomized into two Arms A \& B.
- Arm A will receive carvedilol plus standard medical therpy,Carvedilol: will be started with initial dose of 3.125 mg BD then After 3 days, increase the dose to 6.25 mg BD, Maximum dose would be 12.5 mg BD, the same shall be switch to Maximum tollrated dose if SBP >90, HR >55.
- Arm B will receive standard medical therapy.SMT (as described) that is
- Grade II ascites - Lasilactone (20/50) OD then Change after 1 week as per response, monitor diuretic intolerance.
- Grade III ascites will undergo large volume paracentesis, lasilactone (20/50) OD Both groups will receive albumin as indicated (LT references as per protocol will be send for eligible patients)
- For Diuretic intolerance -Na, K, urea, creatnine will be monitred first weekly then once monthly then SOS as per need
- For Carvedilol heart rate will be monitored first weekly then monthly then SOS as per need
- Dose of carvedilol will be adjusted as per protocol.
- Other treatments given: Alumbin infusion to both group, lasilactone.
- Complications / Organ failures (3m, 6m, 1y or detected during tele/online consult or on opd basis
- Data to be collected
- Baseline -
- Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, IL-6, CRP,TNF Alpha
- Imaging : USG upper abdomen and doppler for renal blood flow,
- 2D ECHO
- Urine : Urine R/E, Urine Na,AFP
- A/F analysis - for SBP
- HVPG, UGIE
- At 3 months, 6 months.
- Blood : LFT, KFT, INR,AFP
- At 1 year
- Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, TNF alpha,IL-6, CRP,AFP
- Imaging : USG upper abdomen
- Urine : Urine Na
- HVPG, UGIE
Statistical Analysis:
Data will be reported as mean + SD. Categorical variables will be compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Normal continuous variables will be compared using the Student's t testNon normal continuous variables will be compared using the Mann Whitney rank-sum test (unpaired data) or the Wilcoxon test (paired data). The actuarial probability of survival will be calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.A Cox regression analysis will be performed to identify independent prognostic factors for survival.Univariate and multivariate analysis will be used whenever applicable.
Adverse effects:
Hypotension (2.6-17.6%) with minor side effets as fainting, shortness of breath, weight gain, swelling of the arms, hands, feet, ankles, or lower legs, chest pain, slow or irregular heartbeat, rash, itching, difficulty breathing and swallowing tiredness, weakness, lightheadedness, dizziness, headache, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, vision change, joint pain difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep, cough dry eyes, numbness, burning, or tingling in the arms or legs.
Stopping rule of study:
- Severe complications requiring discontinuation of therapy severe Respiratory distress, severe bradycardia heart block not responding to dose reduction.
- Patient refusal to further participate in study.
- Conditions
- Liver Cirrhosis
- Being tested
- Carvedilol, Standard Medical Treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Liver Cirrhosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CarvedilolDrug
- Arm A will receive carvedilol plus standard medical therpy,Carvedilol: will be started with initial dose of 3.125 mg BD then After 3 days, increase the dose to 6.25 mg BD, Maximum dose would be 12.5 mg BD, the same shall be switch to Maximum tollrated dose if SBP>90, HR >55.
Standard Medical TreatmentDrug
- Arm B will receive standard medical therapy.SMT (as described) that is Grade II ascites - Lasilactone (20/50) OD then Change after 1 week as per response, monitor diuretic intolerance.
- Grade III ascites will undergo large volume paracentesis, lasilactone (20/50) OD Both groups will receive albumin as indicated (LT references as per protocol will be send for eligible patients)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Carvedilol with Standard Medical Treatment | Experimental | Arm A will receive carvedilol plus standard medical therpy,Carvedilol: will be started with initial dose of 3.125 mg BD then After 3 days, increase the dose to 6.25 mg BD, Maximum dose would be 12.5 mg BD, the same shall be switch to Maximum tollrated dose if SBP >90, HR >55. Receives: Drug: Carvedilol; Drug: Standard Medical Treatment |
| Standard Medical Treatment | Active comparator | - Arm B will receive standard medical therapy.SMT (as described) that is Grade II ascites - Lasilactone (20/50) OD then Change after 1 week as per response, monitor diuretic intolerance. Receives: Drug: Standard Medical Treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complicated ascites (any of refractory ascites, SBP, AKI-HRS)
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (28)
Ascites resolution in both groups
Ascites well controlled with appropriate medical treatment, i.e, the minimum diuretic dose necessary to control weight gain and ascites formation that did not lead to diuretic-induced complications, such as renal impairment, hyponatremia, hypokalemia or hyperkalemia, or HE
Measured: 3 Months
Ascites resolution in both groups
Ascites well controlled with appropriate medical treatment, i.e, the minimum diuretic dose necessary to control weight gain and ascites formation that did not lead to diuretic-induced complications, such as renal impairment, hyponatremia, hypokalemia or hyperkalemia, or HE
Measured: 6 Months
Ascites resolution in both groups
Ascites well controlled with appropriate medical treatment, i.e, the minimum diuretic dose necessary to control weight gain and ascites formation that did not lead to diuretic-induced complications, such as renal impairment, hyponatremia, hypokalemia or hyperkalemia, or HE
Measured: 1 year
Need and frequency of Large Volume Paracentesis
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of PICD in 1 year
Measured: 1 year
Mortality
Measured: 1 year
Change in grade of varices in both groups
Change is defined as from garde I to garde II/ grade III
Measured: 1 year
Reduction in HVPG in both groups
Measured: 1 year
Change in MELD score in both groups
Minimum MELD=6 Maximum MELD=40
Measured: 3 months
Change in MELD score in both groups
Minimum MELD=6 Maximum MELD=40
Measured: 6 months
Change in MELD score in both groups
Minimum MELD=6 Maximum MELD=40
Measured: 1 year
Change in CTP score in both groups
CTP Change is CTP- C to CTP- B \& CTP- B to CTP- A
Measured: 3 months
Change in CTP score in both groups
CTP Change is CTP- C to CTP- B \& CTP- B to CTP- A
Measured: 6 months
Change in CTP score in both groups
CTP Change is CTP- C to CTP- B \& CTP- B to CTP- A
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of HE in both groups
Measured: 6 months
Incidence of HE in both groups.
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of variceal bleed in both groups
Measured: 6 months
Incidence of variceal bleed in both groups
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of AKI in both groups
Measured: 6 months
Incidence of AKI in both groups
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of SBP in both groups
Measured: 6 months
Incidence of SBP in both groups
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of severe hyponatremia in both groups
Measured: 6 months
Incidence of severe hyponatremia in both groups
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of refractory ascites in both groups
Measured: 6 months
Incidence of refractory ascites in both groups
Measured: 1 year
Maximum tolerated dose of carvedilol
Measured: 1 year
Tretament (carvedilol) related adverse events and their grades
Adverse Events are defined as incidence of Bradycardia,Hypotension,Breathlessness
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2021
- Study start1 Oct 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023
- Study completion31 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Liver CirrhosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, IndiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05057572
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ILBS-Cirrhosis-44
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Khajuria R, Jindal A, Sharma MK, Arora V, Vyas AK, Kumar G, Sarin SK. Efficacy and Safety of Carvedilol in Cirrhosis Patients With New-Onset Uncomplicated Ascites Without High-Risk Esophageal Varices (CARVE-AS Trial). Am J Gastroenterol. 2026 Jun 1;121(6):1372-1381. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003650. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
PubMed 40689908
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Carvedilol in Cirrhosis Patients With Uncomplicated Ascites Without High Risk Esophageal Varices- A Randomised Controlled Trial"
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05057572
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ILBS-Cirrhosis-44
- Conditions
- Liver Cirrhosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, IndiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The cumulative risk of refractory ascites is in the order of 20% within five years of the development of ascites. An elevated sinusoidal pressure is essential for the development of ascites, as fluid accumulation does not develop at portal pressure gradient below 8 mm Hg, and rising corrected sinusoidal pressure correlates with decreased 24-hour urinary excretion of sodium.More recently, it has been hypothesised that bacterial translocation associated with portal hypertension in cirrhosis and related pathogen-associated, molecular pattern activated innate immune responses lead to systemic inflammation.This is associated with vasodilatation as well as release of proinflammatory cytokines, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, contributing to organ dysfunction.This activates sympathetic nervous system stimulating reabsorption of sodium in proximal,distal tubules, loop of Henle and collecting duct as well as the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, leading to sodium absorption from distal tubule and collecting duct.[5]Renal sodium retention and eventual free water clearance due to non-osmoticrelease of arginine-vasopressin and its action on V2 receptor in the collectingduct underlie the fluid retention associated with oedema and ascites in cirrhosis.The lowering of portal pressure using non selective beta blocker has also been shown to reduce the development of ascites, refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome.Furthermore, the effect of non slective beta blocker on intestinal permeability, bacterial translocation and inflammatory response has been proposed to mitigate the risk of developing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
Detailed description
AIM-To compare the safety and efficacy of addition of carvedilol to SMT (diuretics +/- albumin) compared to SMT alone in the prevention of complicated ascites (refractory ascites, AKI-HRS, SBP or severe hyponatremia) at 1year.
Methodology:
Study population: Patient of liver cirrhosis presenting with uncomplicated ascites and without high risk esophageal varices.
Study design:
- A prospective, randomized, single center open label study.
- The study will be conducted on the consecutive patients presenting with uncomplicated ascites and low risk esophageal varices seen at the outpatient clinics/wards of Department of Hepatology, ILBS, New Delhi from July 2021 to June 2023.
Study period: 2years from the date of ethics approval
Sample size with justification:
- Assuming that the complication rate in carvedilol group is 8% and placebo 30% so the complication free rate of 92% and 70 % further assuming alpha -5%, power 80%.
- Investigator need to enrol 108 cases in two groups further with 10% drop out rate it was decided to enroll 120 cases
- Randomisation into two groups by block randomisation method,taking block size 8
Intervention:
- Patients will be randomized into two Arms A \& B.
- Arm A will receive carvedilol plus standard medical therpy,Carvedilol: will be started with initial dose of 3.125 mg BD then After 3 days, increase the dose to 6.25 mg BD, Maximum dose would be 12.5 mg BD, the same shall be switch to Maximum tollrated dose if SBP >90, HR >55.
- Arm B will receive standard medical therapy.SMT (as described) that is
- Grade II ascites - Lasilactone (20/50) OD then Change after 1 week as per response, monitor diuretic intolerance.
- Grade III ascites will undergo large volume paracentesis, lasilactone (20/50) OD Both groups will receive albumin as indicated (LT references as per protocol will be send for eligible patients)
- For Diuretic intolerance -Na, K, urea, creatnine will be monitred first weekly then once monthly then SOS as per need
- For Carvedilol heart rate will be monitored first weekly then monthly then SOS as per need
- Dose of carvedilol will be adjusted as per protocol.
- Other treatments given: Alumbin infusion to both group, lasilactone.
- Complications / Organ failures (3m, 6m, 1y or detected during tele/online consult or on opd basis
- Data to be collected
- Baseline -
- Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, IL-6, CRP,TNF Alpha
- Imaging : USG upper abdomen and doppler for renal blood flow,
- 2D ECHO
- Urine : Urine R/E, Urine Na,AFP
- A/F analysis - for SBP
- HVPG, UGIE
- At 3 months, 6 months.
- Blood : LFT, KFT, INR,AFP
- At 1 year
- Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, TNF alpha,IL-6, CRP,AFP
- Imaging : USG upper abdomen
- Urine : Urine Na
- HVPG, UGIE
Statistical Analysis:
Data will be reported as mean + SD. Categorical variables will be compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Normal continuous variables will be compared using the Student's t testNon normal continuous variables will be compared using the Mann Whitney rank-sum test (unpaired data) or the Wilcoxon test (paired data). The actuarial probability of survival will be calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.A Cox regression analysis will be performed to identify independent prognostic factors for survival.Univariate and multivariate analysis will be used whenever applicable.
Adverse effects:
Hypotension (2.6-17.6%) with minor side effets as fainting, shortness of breath, weight gain, swelling of the arms, hands, feet, ankles, or lower legs, chest pain, slow or irregular heartbeat, rash, itching, difficulty breathing and swallowing tiredness, weakness, lightheadedness, dizziness, headache, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, vision change, joint pain difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep, cough dry eyes, numbness, burning, or tingling in the arms or legs.
Stopping rule of study:
- Severe complications requiring discontinuation of therapy severe Respiratory distress, severe bradycardia heart block not responding to dose reduction.
- Patient refusal to further participate in study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Carvedilol with Standard Medical Treatment | Experimental | Drug: Carvedilol, Drug: Standard Medical TreatmentArm A will receive carvedilol plus standard medical therpy,Carvedilol: will be started with initial dose of 3.125 mg BD then After 3 days, increase the dose to 6.25 mg BD, Maximum dose would be 12.5 mg BD, the same shall be switch to Maximum tollrated dose if SBP >90, HR >55. |
| Standard Medical Treatment | Active comparator | Drug: Standard Medical Treatment- Arm B will receive standard medical therapy.SMT (as described) that is Grade II ascites - Lasilactone (20/50) OD then Change after 1 week as per response, monitor diuretic intolerance. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 18-65 years
- Liver cirrhosis
- Grade II-III high SAAG ascites
- Small low risk or no esophageal varices
- CTP 7-12
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Age <18 years
- AKI at enrollement (Prior transient volume responsive AKI stage I included)
- Post renal or liver transplantation
- History of CAD, PVD, ventricular arrythmia, Bronchial asthma
- SBP at diagnosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Carvedilol- Arm A will receive carvedilol plus standard medical therpy,Carvedilol: will be started with initial dose of 3.125 mg BD then After 3 days, increase the dose to 6.25 mg BD, Maximum dose would be 12.5 mg BD, the same shall be switch to Maximum tollrated dose if SBP>90, HR >55. | Drug | Carvedilol with Standard Medical Treatment |
| Standard Medical Treatment* Arm B will receive standard medical therapy.SMT (as described) that is Grade II ascites - Lasilactone (20/50) OD then Change after 1 week as per response, monitor diuretic intolerance. * Grade III ascites will undergo large volume paracentesis, lasilactone (20/50) OD Both groups will receive albumin as indicated (LT references as per protocol will be send for eligible patients) | Drug | Carvedilol with Standard Medical Treatment, Standard Medical Treatment |
Primary outcome
Complicated ascites (any of refractory ascites, SBP, AKI-HRS)
Time frame: 1 year
28 secondary outcomes
Ascites resolution in both groups
Time frame: 3 Months
Ascites resolution in both groups
Time frame: 6 Months
Ascites resolution in both groups
Time frame: 1 year
Need and frequency of Large Volume Paracentesis
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of PICD in 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
Mortality
Time frame: 1 year
Change in grade of varices in both groups
Time frame: 1 year
Reduction in HVPG in both groups
Time frame: 1 year
Change in MELD score in both groups
Time frame: 3 months
Change in MELD score in both groups
Time frame: 6 months
Change in MELD score in both groups
Time frame: 1 year
Change in CTP score in both groups
Time frame: 3 months
Change in CTP score in both groups
Time frame: 6 months
Change in CTP score in both groups
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of HE in both groups
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of HE in both groups.
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of variceal bleed in both groups
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of variceal bleed in both groups
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of AKI in both groups
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of AKI in both groups
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of SBP in both groups
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of SBP in both groups
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of severe hyponatremia in both groups
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of severe hyponatremia in both groups
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of refractory ascites in both groups
Time frame: 6 months
Incidence of refractory ascites in both groups
Time frame: 1 year
Maximum tolerated dose of carvedilol
Time frame: 1 year
Tretament (carvedilol) related adverse events and their grades
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40689908Khajuria R, Jindal A, Sharma MK, Arora V, Vyas AK, Kumar G, Sarin SK. Efficacy and Safety of Carvedilol in Cirrhosis Patients With New-Onset Uncomplicated Ascites Without High-Risk Esophageal Varices (CARVE-AS Trial). Am J Gastroenterol. 2026 Jun 1;121(6):1372-1381. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003650. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Liver Cirrhosis
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Long-term Bulevirtide Monotherapy in Patients With HDV-related Compensated Cirrhosis
Hepatitis D
Recruiting
Optimal Treatment Strategy for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis, Paracentesis
RecruitingObservational study
The Value of Spleen Thickness and Spleen Diameter for Gastroesophageal Varices Diagnosis in Compensated Cirrhosis
Liver Cirrhosis, Gastroesophageal Varices
Recruiting
CirrhosisRx CDS System
Cirrhosis, Decision Support Systems, Clinical
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial to Evaluate ALN-CIDEB in Adults With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, MASLD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Carvedilol and Standard Medical Treatment in people with Liver Cirrhosis, run by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complicated ascites (any of refractory ascites, SBP, AKI-HRS) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05057572, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2025.