Child Behavior ProblemSEP+NCT05057728
Effectiveness of the Social-Emotional Prevention Program Enhanced Version
A study testing Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced version in people with Child Behavior Problem, run by Babes-Bolyai University at 1 site in Romania.
Trial summary
The current study is intended to investigate the effectiveness of the Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced version (SEP+) for increasing preschoolers' social-emotional competencies and reducing their risk for behavior problems. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 52 to 72 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Child Behavior Problem
- What is being tested?
- Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced version
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 398 participants
- Where
- 1 siteRomania
- Study dates
- 10 Jan 2022to 10 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 52 to 72 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- all children for whom parental informed consent is provided
- child age between 4.5-6 years at the time of participant recruitment
- children classified at risk for externalizing problems, based on their score (cutoff T > 67) on the Externalizing Problems scale from the CBCL, and C-TRF respectively (for statistical analyses in relation to the indicated intervention)
Who cannot join
- previous child participation in a program designed to enhance social-emotional skills and/or parent participation to another parent training program
- child's age below 4.5 years or over 6 years at the time of participant recruitment
- children classified not at risk based on their score (cutoff T < 67) on the Externalizing Problems scale from the CBCL, and C-TRF respectively (for statistical analyses in relation to the indicated intervention)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Romania1 site
Babes-Bolyai University, Department of Psychology
Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, 400015
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness and Mechanisms of a Multi-Focused Prevention Program Combining Face to Face With Technology-Assisted Intervention for Preschoolers' Behavior Problems
The current study is intended to investigate the effectiveness of the Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced version (SEP+) for increasing preschoolers' social-emotional competencies and reducing their risk for behavior problems.
Hypotheses for the current study are put forward for child- and parent-related outcomes. First, for the SEP+ effects for child-related outcomes, the investigators expect that: 1) intervention group children will be rated significantly higher on measures of social-emotional competencies (social skills and positive emotion regulation strategies (ER)) compared to children from the wait-list control group (primary outcomes); and 2) children assigned to the intervention will be rated significantly lower on externalizing, as well as internalizing problems (primary outcomes). In addition, for parent-related outcomes the hypotheses are: 1) intervention group parents will report significantly more positive parenting practices, and coparenting support, as well as significantly fewer negative parenting practices, coparenting undermining, and parenting stress compared to control group parents (secondary outcomes); and 2) intervention group parents will report significantly more positive coping strategies with children's negative emotions and adaptive ER strategies, as well as fewer negative coping strategies with children's negative emotions and less maladaptive ER strategies in comparison with control group parents (secondary outcomes).
Read more
Additionally, the investigators aim to test potential intervention mechanisms. First, in the case of child-related outcomes, it is expected that children's use of adaptive ER strategies will mediate the intervention's effect on externalizing/internalizing problems; in a similar vein, it is hypothesized that improved social skills will mediate the intervention's effect on children's externalizing/internalizing problems. Furthermore, moderator effects of gender on adaptive emotion regulation strategies and externalizing problems will be tested.
For the parenting intervention, it is expected that program's effect on positive parenting practices and stress will be mediated by the use of positive coping strategies, parental ER and coparenting support. Also, coparenting undermining and parental reported adverse events are hypothesized to moderate the intervention's effectiveness on parenting practices, parental stress, and parent ER/coping.
Read the detailed description
The first step in recruiting participants will require approaching preschool headmasters with a detailed description of the study's aims and the benefits of participating in the SEP+ intervention for both teachers and parents. All recruited schools will further inform parents of enrolled children regarding the study. Parents will be asked to provide informed consent for their children's participation in the study. Also, they will be asked to make a choice regarding their own participation to the parent training component. Afterwards, all classrooms from a particular school will be randomly assigned to either the SEP+ intervention or the wait-list control group. Data on the SEP+ effectiveness will be gathered at pre-intervention (January 2022) and at 4-months post-intervention (June 2022) for both conditions, intervention and control, respectively. Primary outcomes related to children's social-emotional skills and risk of externalizing/internalizing problems will be assessed at both baseline (T1) and immediately after the end of the intervention (T2) based on teacher and parent ratings. A similar approach will be employed for secondary outcomes. More specifically, data on self-reported parental discipline strategies, emotion regulation/coping and stress will be gathered at T1 and T2. Also, parents will be asked to fill out measures of children's social-emotional skills and externalizing/internalizing problems (primary outcomes), as well as measures related to parenting practices, parenting stress and parental ER (secondary outcomes). Both types of outcomes will be assessed at T1 and at T2, whereas parents will report about the number of adverse events only at T2. Any adverse events associated with the exposure to the classroom curriculum and/or parent training such as deterioration of child and/or parent mental health will be monitored by the research team. If such events occur, these will be reported to The Scientific Council of the Babes-Bolyai University.
As the SEP+ is comprised of multiple interventions, monitoring procedures will be employed for all components. First, regarding the implementation of the classroom curriculum, teachers will be required to fill out a self-monitoring implementation form, which will include children's attendance rates, number of implemented classroom activities, and teachers' use of intervention methods. In addition, teachers will be required to provide access to the research team to 25% filmed classroom activities. The quality of implementation for each activity by two independent raters. The teacher training will be conducted with approximately 12-15 participants in each group. Teachers will be required to participate in all 6 training sessions. Fidelity of implementation in accordance with the facilitator's manual will be conducted for half of the sessions (from sessions 2 to 5) by two independent raters based on video recordings of these sessions. Checklists will contain items describing facilitators' ability to implement specific methods of training, as well as their skills regarding group management and ways to support teachers' use of learned strategies in delivering the classroom curriculum. The parent training will also consist of 6 sessions, which will be delivered to groups of 8-10 parents. For each parent training, group fidelity checks will be conducted for 50% of the parent training sessions (sessions 2 to 5) by two independent raters based on videotaped recordings. Similar to the teacher training, facilitators will be assessed on their ability to deliver each training method according to the manual, as well as their interaction and communication skills with parents.
Approximately 30 classrooms will be recruited for the purposes of the current study. Given an expected rate of 15-30% dropout form pre- to post-intervention and that some parents might not provide consent for children to participate, the investigators estimate that the final sample will include a total of approximately 250-300 participants. A GPower a priori sample size estimation for a medium effect size, a significance level of .05 and power of .80 suggests that 41 participants are required in each group.
Data for the current study will be collected online employing Google Forms and all items will be marked mandatory to reduce the likelihood of missing data from each set of parent- and teacher-rated questionnaires. In order to handle missing data an iterative Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMR) method will be employed.
For the purposes of the current study two types of analyses will be conducted: 1) for the effectiveness of the universal intervention (for all children in the sample), and 2) for the indicated intervention levels (children who score above the cutoff (T score > 67) on the Externalizing Problems score on the Child Behavior Checklist and the Caregiver-Teacher Report Form. For the universal intervention multi-level mixed models controlling for clustering effects will be conducted to test the intervention's effectiveness and moderator effects. Additionally, mediator effects will be tested employing multi-level meditation models in MPlus. For the indicated intervention, mixed ANOVAs will be conducted for assessing SEP+ effectiveness. Moderator and mediator effects will be assessed employing Model 1 and Model 4 from the Process add-on for Statistical Package for Social Sciences.
- Conditions
- Child Behavior Problem
- Being tested
- Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced version
- Keywords
- social-emotional competence, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, parenting practices, parent stress
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced versionBehavioural
Also called SEP+
The intervention is provided for all children for whom parental consent is obtained. The intervention includes a classroom curriculum, teacher training and parent training.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group (SEP+) | Experimental | SEP+ is designed as a multi-focused (child, teacher, parent) school-based intervention, which can be employed as either a universal (i.e. targeting all children) or an indicated prevention program (i.e. targeting specifically children at risk for behavior problems). The SEP+ intervention comprises three types of intervention: 1) the classroom-based intervention in the form of a curriculum of 43 activities (2-3 activities/week) delivered over 4-months aimed at developing social-emotional skills; 2) a 6-sessions (2-2.5h/session) teacher training focused on increasing the use of positive discipline strategies and developing coaching skills for supporting children's social-emotional learning; and 3) a 6 sessions parent training (1.5.-2h/session) aiming to teach ways to manage parenting stress, to increase parent-child quality time, support children's emotion regulation and problem-solving, as well as increase positive discipline strategies. Receives: Behavioral: Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced version |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Social Skills Improvement System (SSIS; Gresham & Elliott, 2002)
The Social Skills Scale from the SSIS is a measure of children's social skills for parents and teachers. Both raters are required to assess the frequency of children's behaviors on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (almost always). The scale is comprised of subscales measuring Cooperation, Communication, Assertion, Responsibility,. Empathy, Self-Control, and Engagement. Scores on each scale can be obtained by summing ratings for each item. Also, a total Social Skills score can be obtained by adding scores from each subscale.
Measured: Change from baseline social skills at 4 months.
Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire (ERSQ; Mirabile, 2014)
The ERSQ will be used as a measure of children's use of 13 regulatory strategies in response to negative emotions (sadness, anger, and fear) grouped into scales assessing adaptive (Self-soothing, Comfort-seeking, Support-seeking, Self-Directed Speech, Instrumental Coping, Information Gathering, Verbal Distraction, Self/Object Oriented Distraction) vs. maladaptive (Focus on Distressing Object, Venting, Aggression, Avoidance, Suppression) ER strategies. Parents and teachers rate children on their use of each ER strategy on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (very much). Scores are obtained as the average scores for each regulatory strategy across the 3 emotions.
Measured: Change from baseline emotion regulation at 4 months.
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000)
The CBCL is filled out by parents who are requested to respond on a 3-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (absent) to 2 (occurs often). Responses on the Anxiety/Depression, Emotionally Reactive, Withdrawn, and Somatic Complaints will be employed for obtaining a measure of children's Internalizing Problems, whereas Aggressive Behavior and Attention Problems scores will provide a measure of Externalizing Problems. Scores for the broad-band syndrome scales are computed by adding ratings on each corresponding subscale.
Measured: Change from baseline externalizing/internalizing problems at 4 months.
Caregiver-Teacher Report Form (C-TRF; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000)
The C-TRF evaluates teachers' perception regarding the frequency of children's Anxiety/Depression, Emotionally Reactive, Withdrawn, Somatic Complaints, Aggressive Behaviors and Attention Problems. Responses are coded on a 3-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (absent) to 2 (occurs often). Scores are computed by adding ratings for each type of problems and obtaining a broad-band score for either Internalizing Problems or Externalizing Problems.
Measured: Change from baseline externalizing/internalizing problems at 4 months.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Parenting Young Children (PARYC; McEachern et al., 2012)
PARYC assesses parents' use of positive discipline strategies. It comprised 21 items loading on three subscales: Supporting Positive Behavior, Limit Setting, and Proactive Parenting. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 7 (most of the time). Scores for each scale are obtained as the average ratings for each subscale.
Measured: Change from baseline parental positive discipline at 4 months.
Parenting Scale (PS; Arnold et al., 1993)
The PS aims to assess parenting behaviors in response to children's behaviors by describing on a 7-point scale their reaction, with ratings closer to 1 suggesting more effective ways of responding, whereas ratings closer to 7 suggesting more ineffective ways of responding. Scores for the Over-reactivity and Laxness scales are computed as means.
Measured: Change from baseline over-reactivity and laxness at 4 months.
Parental Stress Scale (PSS; Berry & Jones, 1995)
PSS is an 18-item measure assessing parental stress. Responses are coded on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The Parent Stress score is obtained by summing responses to all items.
Measured: Change from baseline parental stress at 4 months.
Coping with Children's Negative Emotions (CCNES; Fabes et al., 1990; Mirabile, 2015)
CCNES contains 12 scenarios depicting emotion-eliciting situations for which parents are required to rate 7 possible reactions to their child's negative emotions, on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very unlikely) to 7 (very likely). Means are obtained for each of the following scales: Distress Reactions, Punitive Reactions, Expressive Encouragement, Emotion-Focused Reactions, Problem-Focused Reactions, Minimization, and Ignoring.
Measured: Change from baseline coping strategies with children's negative emotions at 4 months.
Revised Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2; Lorber et al., 2017)
PERI-2 contains 23 items which describe ways in which parents respond emotionally when their children misbehave. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (I never do this) to 7 (I very often do this). Means are computed for the following scales: Discipline Reappraisal, Discipline Suppression, Discipline Capitulation, and Discipline Escape.
Measured: Change from baseline parental emotion regulation strategies at 4 months.
The Coparenting Relationship Scale (CRS; Feinberg et al., 2012)
The CRS measures parental perceptions about the extent to which they receive support from the partners on matters related to childrearing. Parents are requested to rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not true of us) to 6 (very true of us). In the current study, the Coparenting Support and Coparenting Undermining will be employed.
Measured: Change from baseline coparenting support and undermining at 4 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2021
- Study start10 Jan 2022
- Primary completion10 Jun 2022
- Study completion10 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Child Behavior ProblemStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Participants in the current study will be assigned to either: 1) the intervention condition, which will receive the SEP+; or 2) the wait-list control group. A partially-randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be employed, in which schools will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group, so that all classrooms within a school will either receive the SEP+ or not. This was done in order to prevent contamination effects, which are more likely to occur when classrooms from the same school participate in the intervention and others do not.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 398 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Babes-Bolyai University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Catrinel Alice Stefan, Babes-Bolyai University
- Investigators
- Catrinel A Stefan, PhD, Principal investigator, Babes-Bolyai University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05057728
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2019-0226
- Acronym
- SEP+
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data collected will be anonymized, so that each participant and each intervention site will receive an identification code. IPD will be shared for each publication and will be accessible from a data repository (i.e. Open Science Framework).
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness and Mechanisms of a Multi-Focused Prevention Program Combining Face to Face With Technology-Assisted Intervention for Preschoolers' Behavior Problems
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05057728
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SEP+ / PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2019-0226
- Conditions
- Child Behavior Problem
- Keywords
- social-emotional competence, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, parenting practices, parent stress
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 398 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Babes-Bolyai UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The current study is intended to investigate the effectiveness of the Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced version (SEP+) for increasing preschoolers' social-emotional competencies and reducing their risk for behavior problems.
Hypotheses for the current study are put forward for child- and parent-related outcomes. First, for the SEP+ effects for child-related outcomes, the investigators expect that: 1) intervention group children will be rated significantly higher on measures of social-emotional competencies (social skills and positive emotion regulation strategies (ER)) compared to children from the wait-list control group (primary outcomes); and 2) children assigned to the intervention will be rated significantly lower on externalizing, as well as internalizing problems (primary outcomes). In addition, for parent-related outcomes the hypotheses are: 1) intervention group parents will report significantly more positive parenting practices, and coparenting support, as well as significantly fewer negative parenting practices, coparenting undermining, and parenting stress compared to control group parents (secondary outcomes); and 2) intervention group parents will report significantly more positive coping strategies with children's negative emotions and adaptive ER strategies, as well as fewer negative coping strategies with children's negative emotions and less maladaptive ER strategies in comparison with control group parents (secondary outcomes).
Additionally, the investigators aim to test potential intervention mechanisms. First, in the case of child-related outcomes, it is expected that children's use of adaptive ER strategies will mediate the intervention's effect on externalizing/internalizing problems; in a similar vein, it is hypothesized that improved social skills will mediate the intervention's effect on children's externalizing/internalizing problems. Furthermore, moderator effects of gender on adaptive emotion regulation strategies and externalizing problems will be tested.
For the parenting intervention, it is expected that program's effect on positive parenting practices and stress will be mediated by the use of positive coping strategies, parental ER and coparenting support. Also, coparenting undermining and parental reported adverse events are hypothesized to moderate the intervention's effectiveness on parenting practices, parental stress, and parent ER/coping.
Detailed description
The first step in recruiting participants will require approaching preschool headmasters with a detailed description of the study's aims and the benefits of participating in the SEP+ intervention for both teachers and parents. All recruited schools will further inform parents of enrolled children regarding the study. Parents will be asked to provide informed consent for their children's participation in the study. Also, they will be asked to make a choice regarding their own participation to the parent training component. Afterwards, all classrooms from a particular school will be randomly assigned to either the SEP+ intervention or the wait-list control group. Data on the SEP+ effectiveness will be gathered at pre-intervention (January 2022) and at 4-months post-intervention (June 2022) for both conditions, intervention and control, respectively. Primary outcomes related to children's social-emotional skills and risk of externalizing/internalizing problems will be assessed at both baseline (T1) and immediately after the end of the intervention (T2) based on teacher and parent ratings. A similar approach will be employed for secondary outcomes. More specifically, data on self-reported parental discipline strategies, emotion regulation/coping and stress will be gathered at T1 and T2. Also, parents will be asked to fill out measures of children's social-emotional skills and externalizing/internalizing problems (primary outcomes), as well as measures related to parenting practices, parenting stress and parental ER (secondary outcomes). Both types of outcomes will be assessed at T1 and at T2, whereas parents will report about the number of adverse events only at T2. Any adverse events associated with the exposure to the classroom curriculum and/or parent training such as deterioration of child and/or parent mental health will be monitored by the research team. If such events occur, these will be reported to The Scientific Council of the Babes-Bolyai University.
As the SEP+ is comprised of multiple interventions, monitoring procedures will be employed for all components. First, regarding the implementation of the classroom curriculum, teachers will be required to fill out a self-monitoring implementation form, which will include children's attendance rates, number of implemented classroom activities, and teachers' use of intervention methods. In addition, teachers will be required to provide access to the research team to 25% filmed classroom activities. The quality of implementation for each activity by two independent raters. The teacher training will be conducted with approximately 12-15 participants in each group. Teachers will be required to participate in all 6 training sessions. Fidelity of implementation in accordance with the facilitator's manual will be conducted for half of the sessions (from sessions 2 to 5) by two independent raters based on video recordings of these sessions. Checklists will contain items describing facilitators' ability to implement specific methods of training, as well as their skills regarding group management and ways to support teachers' use of learned strategies in delivering the classroom curriculum. The parent training will also consist of 6 sessions, which will be delivered to groups of 8-10 parents. For each parent training, group fidelity checks will be conducted for 50% of the parent training sessions (sessions 2 to 5) by two independent raters based on videotaped recordings. Similar to the teacher training, facilitators will be assessed on their ability to deliver each training method according to the manual, as well as their interaction and communication skills with parents.
Approximately 30 classrooms will be recruited for the purposes of the current study. Given an expected rate of 15-30% dropout form pre- to post-intervention and that some parents might not provide consent for children to participate, the investigators estimate that the final sample will include a total of approximately 250-300 participants. A GPower a priori sample size estimation for a medium effect size, a significance level of .05 and power of .80 suggests that 41 participants are required in each group.
Data for the current study will be collected online employing Google Forms and all items will be marked mandatory to reduce the likelihood of missing data from each set of parent- and teacher-rated questionnaires. In order to handle missing data an iterative Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMR) method will be employed.
For the purposes of the current study two types of analyses will be conducted: 1) for the effectiveness of the universal intervention (for all children in the sample), and 2) for the indicated intervention levels (children who score above the cutoff (T score > 67) on the Externalizing Problems score on the Child Behavior Checklist and the Caregiver-Teacher Report Form. For the universal intervention multi-level mixed models controlling for clustering effects will be conducted to test the intervention's effectiveness and moderator effects. Additionally, mediator effects will be tested employing multi-level meditation models in MPlus. For the indicated intervention, mixed ANOVAs will be conducted for assessing SEP+ effectiveness. Moderator and mediator effects will be assessed employing Model 1 and Model 4 from the Process add-on for Statistical Package for Social Sciences.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Participants in the current study will be assigned to either: 1) the intervention condition, which will receive the SEP+; or 2) the wait-list control group. A partially-randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be employed, in which schools will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group, so that all classrooms within a school will either receive the SEP+ or not. This was done in order to prevent contamination effects, which are more likely to occur when classrooms from the same school participate in the intervention and others do not.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group (SEP+) | Experimental | Behavioral: Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced versionSEP+ is designed as a multi-focused (child, teacher, parent) school-based intervention, which can be employed as either a universal (i.e. targeting all children) or an indicated prevention program (i.e. targeting specifically children at risk for behavior problems). The SEP+ intervention comprises three types of intervention: 1) the classroom-based intervention in the form of a curriculum of 43 activities (2-3 activities/week) delivered over 4-months aimed at developing social-emotional skills; 2) a 6-sessions (2-2.5h/session) teacher training focused on increasing the use of positive discipline strategies and developing coaching skills for supporting children's social-emotional learning; and 3) a 6 sessions parent training (1.5.-2h/session) aiming to teach ways to manage parenting stress, to increase parent-child quality time, support children's emotion regulation and problem-solving, as well as increase positive discipline strategies. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 52 to 72 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- all children for whom parental informed consent is provided
- child age between 4.5-6 years at the time of participant recruitment
- children classified at risk for externalizing problems, based on their score (cutoff T > 67) on the Externalizing Problems scale from the CBCL, and C-TRF respectively (for statistical analyses in relation to the indicated intervention)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- previous child participation in a program designed to enhance social-emotional skills and/or parent participation to another parent training program
- child's age below 4.5 years or over 6 years at the time of participant recruitment
- children classified not at risk based on their score (cutoff T < 67) on the Externalizing Problems scale from the CBCL, and C-TRF respectively (for statistical analyses in relation to the indicated intervention)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced versionAlso: SEP+The intervention is provided for all children for whom parental consent is obtained. The intervention includes a classroom curriculum, teacher training and parent training. | Behavioural | Intervention group (SEP+) |
Primary outcome
Social Skills Improvement System (SSIS; Gresham & Elliott, 2002)
Time frame: Change from baseline social skills at 4 months.
The Social Skills Scale from the SSIS is a measure of children's social skills for parents and teachers. Both raters are required to assess the frequency of children's behaviors on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (almost always). The scale is comprised of subscales measuring Cooperation, Communication, Assertion, Responsibility,. Empathy, Self-Control, and Engagement. Scores on each scale can be obtained by summing ratings for each item. Also, a total Social Skills score can be obtained by adding scores from each subscale.
Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire (ERSQ; Mirabile, 2014)
Time frame: Change from baseline emotion regulation at 4 months.
The ERSQ will be used as a measure of children's use of 13 regulatory strategies in response to negative emotions (sadness, anger, and fear) grouped into scales assessing adaptive (Self-soothing, Comfort-seeking, Support-seeking, Self-Directed Speech, Instrumental Coping, Information Gathering, Verbal Distraction, Self/Object Oriented Distraction) vs. maladaptive (Focus on Distressing Object, Venting, Aggression, Avoidance, Suppression) ER strategies. Parents and teachers rate children on their use of each ER strategy on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 3 (very much). Scores are obtained as the average scores for each regulatory strategy across the 3 emotions.
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000)
Time frame: Change from baseline externalizing/internalizing problems at 4 months.
The CBCL is filled out by parents who are requested to respond on a 3-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (absent) to 2 (occurs often). Responses on the Anxiety/Depression, Emotionally Reactive, Withdrawn, and Somatic Complaints will be employed for obtaining a measure of children's Internalizing Problems, whereas Aggressive Behavior and Attention Problems scores will provide a measure of Externalizing Problems. Scores for the broad-band syndrome scales are computed by adding ratings on each corresponding subscale.
Caregiver-Teacher Report Form (C-TRF; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000)
Time frame: Change from baseline externalizing/internalizing problems at 4 months.
The C-TRF evaluates teachers' perception regarding the frequency of children's Anxiety/Depression, Emotionally Reactive, Withdrawn, Somatic Complaints, Aggressive Behaviors and Attention Problems. Responses are coded on a 3-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (absent) to 2 (occurs often). Scores are computed by adding ratings for each type of problems and obtaining a broad-band score for either Internalizing Problems or Externalizing Problems.
6 secondary outcomes
Parenting Young Children (PARYC; McEachern et al., 2012)
Time frame: Change from baseline parental positive discipline at 4 months.
Parenting Scale (PS; Arnold et al., 1993)
Time frame: Change from baseline over-reactivity and laxness at 4 months.
Parental Stress Scale (PSS; Berry & Jones, 1995)
Time frame: Change from baseline parental stress at 4 months.
Coping with Children's Negative Emotions (CCNES; Fabes et al., 1990; Mirabile, 2015)
Time frame: Change from baseline coping strategies with children's negative emotions at 4 months.
Revised Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2; Lorber et al., 2017)
Time frame: Change from baseline parental emotion regulation strategies at 4 months.
The Coparenting Relationship Scale (CRS; Feinberg et al., 2012)
Time frame: Change from baseline coparenting support and undermining at 4 months.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data collected will be anonymized, so that each participant and each intervention site will receive an identification code. IPD will be shared for each publication and will be accessible from a data repository (i.e. Open Science Framework).
Related trials for Child Behavior Problem
RecruitingObservational study
TIDES 2.0: Prevalence and Longitudinal Course of Depression, Anxiety, and Behavior Problems in Children With Cystic Fibrosis Under 12 Years of Age
Cystic Fibrosis (CF)
Active, not recruiting
Tailoring CPP for the Foster Care Setting
Behavior Problem
Active, not recruiting
Improving Student Mental Health Through a Universal Trauma-Informed Intervention
Anxiety Symptoms, Post-traumatic Stress Symptoms
Active, not recruiting
Chicago Parent Program for Foster and Kinship Caregivers
Behavior Problem, Parenting
Recruiting
Online Feeding Education for Fathers of Children With Feeding Problems
Feeding Problems, Parent Training
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Catrinel A Stefan, PhD principal investigator
Babes-Bolyai University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Social-Emotional Prevention Program enhanced version in people with Child Behavior Problem, run by Babes-Bolyai University at 1 site in Romania.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Romania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Social Skills Improvement System (SSIS; Gresham & Elliott, 2002) (time frame: Change from baseline social skills at 4 months.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2023.