AzTrials
AzTrials

Myocarditis AcuteNCT05062395

Positron Emission Tomography for the Diagnosis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Myocarditis

An observational study of Myocarditis Acute, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising results in various malignancies however, several immune related adverse events have been described of which myocarditis carries the highest reported… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Myocarditis Acute
What is being tested?
Computed Tomography, Fludeoxyglucose F-18 and Low Carbohydrate High Fat Diet
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
13 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
30 Mar 2021to 4 Apr 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients being treated with ICI and presenting to the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) with suspected ICI-related myocarditis

Who may be able to join

  • Patients of age >= 18 years
  • Patients must be able to understand and be willing to sign a written informed consent document. Surrogate decision-makers of patients will be allowed to consent patients for this study
  • Patients must be receiving or have a history of receiving any ICI therapy in monotherapy or combination therapy
  • Patients must have a suspicion of ICI-related myocarditis either by clinical presentation, biomarkers, or other diagnostic modalities

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or lactating patients will be excluded

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • M D Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study evaluates positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising results in various malignancies however, several immune related adverse events have been described of which myocarditis carries the highest reported mortality. Diagnostic procedures, such as positron emission tomography, help find and diagnose myocarditis and provide functional or disease activity information as opposed to the largely structural/anatomic information.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

  1. To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of fludeoxyglucose F-18 (18 fluorodeoxyglucose) positive emission tomography computed tomography (PET CT) for the diagnosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) related myocarditis.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. To explore the clinical presentation and disease course of ICI-related myocarditis which include presenting symptoms (chest pain, dyspnea, fatigue), time from ICI initiation to symptom onset, hospitalization duration, time to peak troponin levels, and peak troponin levels.

II. To evaluate biomarkers, including peak troponin, peak no probnp, admission troponin level, and admission nt probnp level, and imaging modalities of ICI-related myocarditis which include sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

III. To determine the response to various treatments of ICI-related myocarditis which include time to resolution of symptoms, hospitalization duration, and peak troponin value stratified by treatment.

IV. To observe the long-term outcomes, including late decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to < 50%, and survival after ICI related myocarditis, and monitoring of ICI-related myocarditis.

  1. To assess differences in PET CT imaging results between patients on steroid therapy versus not on steroid therapy for myocarditis.

OUTLINE:

Patients receive a low carbohydrate and high fat diet for 48-72 hours. Patients receive 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) then undergo PET CT.

Being tested
Computed Tomography, Fludeoxyglucose F-18, Low Carbohydrate High Fat Diet, Positron Emission Tomography

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Computed TomographyProcedure or surgery

    Also called CAT, CAT Scan, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized Tomography

    Undergo FDG PET CT

  • Fludeoxyglucose F-18Other

    Also called 18FDG, FDG, Fludeoxyglucose (18F), fludeoxyglucose F 18

    Undergo FDG PET CT

  • Low Carbohydrate High Fat DietOther

    low carbohydrate and high fat diet for 48-72 hours

  • Positron Emission TomographyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron Emission Tomography Scan

    Undergo FDG PET CT

Study groups in NCT05062395
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Observational (diet, FDG PET CT)Patients receive a low carbohydrate and high fat diet for 48-72 hours. Patients receive FDG then undergo PET CT.
Receives: Procedure: Computed Tomography; Other: Fludeoxyglucose F-18; Other: Low Carbohydrate High Fat Diet; Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value

    Calculations of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value and their 90% exact confidence intervals will be performed for the evaluation of positron emission tomography computed tomography considering endomyocardial biopsy as the gold standard. Secondary analysis of these parameters will be used considering the Bonaca et al diagnoses of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related myocarditis as a new gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the AUC value (area under the ROC curve) will be evaluated.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of a year.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Sep 2021
  2. Study start30 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion4 Apr 2023
  4. Study completion4 Apr 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
13 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05062395
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020-0206
Other IDs
NCI-2021-00838, 2020-0206
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
25 Feb 2021
Last updated
10 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Myocarditis Acute, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (time frame: through study completion, an average of a year.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in