Urinary Tract Infections in ChildrenINVICTUS PEDNCT05066854
INterest of the Negative Predictive Value of Integrons in Choosing a Narrow-spectrum Empirical anTibiotic Treatment vs Usual Empirical Antibiotic Treatment for Urinary Tract infectionS in the PEDiatric Emergency Department
A study testing integron research and usual practice in people with Urinary Tract Infections in Children, run by University Hospital, Limoges at 4 sites in France.
Trial summary
INVICTUS PED primary objective is to show the non-inferiority of an empirical antibiotic therapeutic management guided by the early detection of integrons in the urine, compared to a usual empirical antibiotic treatment, for the recovery of children admitted to the pediatric emergency department (ED) with a non-severe… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 months to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Tract Infections in Children
- What is being tested?
- integron research and usual practice
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 18 Oct 2022to 17 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 months to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Children above 3 months old and under 18 years old
- Consultation in a participating pediatric emergency department
- Suspicion of UTI with fever (Fever ≥ 38°C and urine dipstick test positive for leukocytes and/or nitrites)
- First episode of UTI with fever
- Written informed consent of the holders of parental authority
- Affiliated to Social Security
Who cannot join
- Criteria of severity:
- Severe infection with severe sepsis or septic shock
- Dehydration ≥ 10%
- Fever ≥ 38°C > 4 days (96h)
- Indication of surgical or interventional drainage
- Complication risk factors:
Show all 20Show fewer
- Any anatomic or functional defect of the urinary tract (other than low-grade VUR and calyceal dilation < 10 mm)
- Repetition of UTI with fever ≤ than 6 months since the previous episode
- Repetition of UTI with fever and anatomic or functional defect of the urinary tract
- Pregnancy
- Severely immunocompromised patient
- Severe chronic renal failure defined as a clearance < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2
- Severe liver failure
- 3GC allergy
- Contra-indication to SXT:
- G6PD deficiency
- Treatment with methotrexate
- Allergy to sulfonamide
- Antibiotic treatment within 48h before admission
- Empirical antibiotic treatment not recommended
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
France4 sites
Bordeaux university Hospital
Bordeaux, 33000
Limoges university Hospital
Limoges, 87042
Montpellier university Hospital
Montpellier, 34000
Toulouse university Hospital
Toulouse, 31000
About this study
INVICTUS PED primary objective is to show the non-inferiority of an empirical antibiotic therapeutic management guided by the early detection of integrons in the urine, compared to a usual empirical antibiotic treatment, for the recovery of children admitted to the pediatric emergency department (ED) with a non-severe urinary tract infection (UTI) with fever
Read the detailed description
Urinary tract infections with fever are common in children and require primary health care management. Because of the risk of immediate evolution to a systemic infection with long-term renal scars, empirical antibiotic treatment is recommended. The French Group for Pediatric Infectious Diseases (GPIP) recommends the use of third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) targeting enterobacteria, which are mainly involved in UTI and increasingly resistant to antibiotics through the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases. However, use of 3GC is a well-known risk factor for resistant germs selection and one of the main guideline to fight antibiotic resistance, which is an important public health issue, is to reduce their use. Integrons are genetic elements involved in the spread of antibiotic resistance in enterobacteria. Preliminary studies showed that integron search using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) directly on urine samples had a great NPV (>98%) for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). The hypothesis is that, in children presenting to the pediatric ED with non-severe UTI with fever, absence of integron in their urine could allow prescribing an empirical antibiotic treatment with SXT without decreasing the chance of recovery, thus decreasing the use of 3GC.
Two strategies is compare: i) In the control group: empirical antibiotic treatment according to the usual practice of each center, in line with the GPIP guidelines, ii) in the experimental group: empirical antibiotic treatment chosen depending on the results of the integron search with PCR. When PCR is positive, treatment according to usual practice; when PCR is negative, treatment with SXT.
Two follow-up visits, by phone, will be planned: at H48 (+ 24h), when the empirical antibiotic treatment is assessed based on the urine culture and antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) results, and on D30 (+/- 2 days) at the end of the follow-up.
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infections in Children
- Being tested
- integron research, usual practice
- Keywords
- empirical antibiotic treatment, biomarker, urinary tract infection, antibiotic resistance, pediatric emergency department
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Tract Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
integron researchProcedure or surgery
Patients with suspected UTI with fever will be screened at their admission to the pediatric ED.
Urine samples will be sent to the laboratory for culture and integron PCR according to routine practice.
Results of the integron search will be given to the investigator. Patients in the experimental group with a positive or uninterpretable PCR will also receive an empirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIP guidelines.
Patients in the experimental group with a negative PCR will receive a treatment with SXT at the recommended dose.
usual practiceProcedure or surgery
Patients with suspected UTI with fever will be screened at their admission to the pediatric ED.
Patients in the control group will receive an empirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIP guidelines.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Integron research | Experimental | Empirical antibiotic treatment chosen based on the results of the integron search:
* when PCR is negative, patients will receive SXT (30 mg/kg/j of sulfamethoxazole and 6 mg/kg/j of trimethoprim)
* when PCR is positive or uninterpretable for integrons, patients will receive an empirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIP guidelines. Receives: Procedure: integron research |
| Usual practice | Other | Empirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIG guidelines. Receives: Procedure: usual practice |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recovery
Recovery defined as, apyrexia obtained within less than 72h and no persistence or repetition of UTI with fever and no change of empirical antibiotic therapy required because of resistance and no treatment interruption for adverse effects
Measured: Day 30
Secondary outcomes (10)
patients treated
Number of patients treated with 3GC in both groups, during the participation of each patient
Measured: Day 30
Duration treatment
Duration of treatment with 3GC in both groups for patient treated, during the participation of each patient
Measured: Day 30
Antibiotic treatment changes
In both groups, description of antibiotic treatment changes based on the AST results, according to 4 criteria:
- Change because of resistance
- Narrowing of the antibiotic spectrum
- Interruption because the diagnosis of UTI was ruled out
- Antibiotics used
Measured: Hour 48
Adaptation of antibiotherapy with the AST result
Proportion of patients in both groups for whom empirical antibiotic treatment was adapted to the AST results and did not require any change (because of resistance, or to narrow the antibiotic spectrum)
Measured: Hour 48
Resistance of enterobacteria
In the study population, percentage of resistance of enterobacteria to the different antibiotic classes
Measured: Hour 48
Predictive values of the integrons
Negative and positive predictive values of the integrons depending on the main antibiotic classes used in the experimental group.
Measured: Hour 48
Apyrexia
Time to apyrexia from the start of the antibiotic therapy compared between both groups.
Measured: Hour 48
Early repetition of urinary tract infection
Proportion of early repetition of urinary tract infection with fever in both groups.
Measured: Day 30
Treatment interruption for adverse effects
Proportion of treatment interruption for adverse effects in both groups.
Measured: Day 30
Time spent in the pediatric emergency department
Time spent in the pediatric emergency department in both groups
Measured: Day 30
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Oct 2021
- Study start18 Oct 2022
- Primary completion17 Nov 2025
- Study completion17 Nov 2025
Why it stopped: Not enough patients
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Urinary Tract Infections in ChildrenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, LimogesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Limoges
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05066854
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 87RI20_0029 (INVICTUS PED)
- Acronym
- INVICTUS PED
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 16 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 26 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- INterest of the Negative Predictive Value of Integrons in Choosing a Narrow-spectrum Empirical anTibiotic Treatment vs Usual Empirical Antibiotic Treatment for Urinary Tract infectionS in the PEDiatric Emergency Department
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05066854
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INVICTUS PED / 87RI20_0029 (INVICTUS PED)
- Conditions
- Urinary Tract Infections in Children
- Keywords
- empirical antibiotic treatment, biomarker, urinary tract infection, antibiotic resistance, pediatric emergency department
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Not enough patients
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, LimogesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Nov 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
INVICTUS PED primary objective is to show the non-inferiority of an empirical antibiotic therapeutic management guided by the early detection of integrons in the urine, compared to a usual empirical antibiotic treatment, for the recovery of children admitted to the pediatric emergency department (ED) with a non-severe urinary tract infection (UTI) with fever
Detailed description
Urinary tract infections with fever are common in children and require primary health care management. Because of the risk of immediate evolution to a systemic infection with long-term renal scars, empirical antibiotic treatment is recommended. The French Group for Pediatric Infectious Diseases (GPIP) recommends the use of third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) targeting enterobacteria, which are mainly involved in UTI and increasingly resistant to antibiotics through the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases. However, use of 3GC is a well-known risk factor for resistant germs selection and one of the main guideline to fight antibiotic resistance, which is an important public health issue, is to reduce their use. Integrons are genetic elements involved in the spread of antibiotic resistance in enterobacteria. Preliminary studies showed that integron search using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) directly on urine samples had a great NPV (>98%) for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). The hypothesis is that, in children presenting to the pediatric ED with non-severe UTI with fever, absence of integron in their urine could allow prescribing an empirical antibiotic treatment with SXT without decreasing the chance of recovery, thus decreasing the use of 3GC.
Two strategies is compare: i) In the control group: empirical antibiotic treatment according to the usual practice of each center, in line with the GPIP guidelines, ii) in the experimental group: empirical antibiotic treatment chosen depending on the results of the integron search with PCR. When PCR is positive, treatment according to usual practice; when PCR is negative, treatment with SXT.
Two follow-up visits, by phone, will be planned: at H48 (+ 24h), when the empirical antibiotic treatment is assessed based on the urine culture and antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) results, and on D30 (+/- 2 days) at the end of the follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Integron research | Experimental | Procedure: integron researchEmpirical antibiotic treatment chosen based on the results of the integron search: * when PCR is negative, patients will receive SXT (30 mg/kg/j of sulfamethoxazole and 6 mg/kg/j of trimethoprim) * when PCR is positive or uninterpretable for integrons, patients will receive an empirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIP guidelines. |
| Usual practice | Other | Procedure: usual practiceEmpirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIG guidelines. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 months to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Children above 3 months old and under 18 years old
- Consultation in a participating pediatric emergency department
- Suspicion of UTI with fever (Fever ≥ 38°C and urine dipstick test positive for leukocytes and/or nitrites)
- First episode of UTI with fever
- Written informed consent of the holders of parental authority
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Criteria of severity:
- Complication risk factors:
- 3GC allergy
- Contra-indication to SXT:
- Antibiotic treatment within 48h before admission
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| integron researchPatients with suspected UTI with fever will be screened at their admission to the pediatric ED. Urine samples will be sent to the laboratory for culture and integron PCR according to routine practice. Results of the integron search will be given to the investigator. Patients in the experimental group with a positive or uninterpretable PCR will also receive an empirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIP guidelines. Patients in the experimental group with a negative PCR will receive a treatment with SXT at the recommended dose. | Procedure or surgery | Integron research |
| usual practicePatients with suspected UTI with fever will be screened at their admission to the pediatric ED. Patients in the control group will receive an empirical antibiotic treatment based on the usual practice of each center according to the GPIP guidelines. | Procedure or surgery | Usual practice |
Primary outcome
Recovery
Time frame: Day 30
Recovery defined as, apyrexia obtained within less than 72h and no persistence or repetition of UTI with fever and no change of empirical antibiotic therapy required because of resistance and no treatment interruption for adverse effects
10 secondary outcomes
patients treated
Time frame: Day 30
Duration treatment
Time frame: Day 30
Antibiotic treatment changes
Time frame: Hour 48
Adaptation of antibiotherapy with the AST result
Time frame: Hour 48
Resistance of enterobacteria
Time frame: Hour 48
Predictive values of the integrons
Time frame: Hour 48
Apyrexia
Time frame: Hour 48
Early repetition of urinary tract infection
Time frame: Day 30
Treatment interruption for adverse effects
Time frame: Day 30
Time spent in the pediatric emergency department
Time frame: Day 30
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Not enough patients). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Nov 2025.
Related trials for Urinary Tract Infections in Children
RecruitingObservational study
Urine Collection and Novel UTI Biomarkers in Children and Older Adults
UTI - Urinary Tract Infection
RecruitingPhase 4
Single Dose Intravenous Antibiotics for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections in Children
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, Infection
Recruiting
Perspectives on Antibiotics and Tracking Symptoms in Children
Urinary Tract Infection, Cellulitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem-Vaborbactam in Children With Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, Including Acute Pyelonephritis
Acute Pyelonephritis, Complicated Urinary Tract Infection
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical Efficacy of Stopping Oral Antibiotics When Symptoms Stop, Compared to 'Finishing the Course'
Urinary Tract Infection, Cellulitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing integron research and usual practice in people with Urinary Tract Infections in Children, run by University Hospital, Limoges at 4 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Not enough patients). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recovery (time frame: Day 30). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Nov 2025.