OsteoporosisPhase 3NCT05067335
A Study to Test the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Chinese Women With Osteoporosis
A Phase 3 study testing Romosozumab in people with Osteoporosis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 30 sites in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of treatment with romosozumab for 6 months compared with placebo on the percent changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, at the total hip and femoral neck in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 90 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporosis
- What is being tested?
- Romosozumab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 327 participants
- Where
- 30 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 21 Oct 2021to 9 Nov 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 90 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is considered reliable and capable of adhering to the protocol, visit schedule, and medication intake according to the judgment of the investigator
- Subject is an ambulatory postmenopausal Chinese women, 55 to 90 years of age (inclusive) at the time of Screening. Postmenopause is defined as no spontaneous vaginal bleeding or spotting for 12 or more consecutive months prior to Screening
- Subject has a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≤-2.50 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of Screening based on DXA scans, and using data for Caucasian women from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES, 1998)
- Subject must have at least 1 of following independent risk factors for fracture:
- History of fragility fracture (except hip fracture, a severe vertebral fracture or more than 2 moderate vertebral fractures)
- Parental history of hip fracture
Show all 10Show fewer
- Low body weight (body mass index ≤19kg/m2)
- Elderly (age ≥ 65 years)
- Current smoker
- Subject has at least 2 vertebrae in the L1 to L4 region and at least 1 hip that are evaluable by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), as assessed by the central imaging vendor
Who cannot join
- Subject has a BMD T-score of ≤-3.50 at the total hip or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of Screening based on DXA scans, and using data for Caucasian women from NHANES 1998
- Subject has a known history of hip fracture
- Subject has any severe (SQ3) or more than 2 moderate (SQ2) vertebral fractures, as assessed by the central imaging vendor based on the lateral spine x-ray at Screening
- Subject has a history of myocardial infarction (MI)
- Subject has a history of stroke
- Subject has a vitamin D insufficiency, defined as 25 (OH) vitamin D levels <20 ng/mL, as assessed by the central laboratory at Screening. Vitamin D repletion will be permitted and the subject may be retested once within the Screening Period
Show all 38Show fewer
- Subject has used oral bisphosphonates:
- Any doses received within 3 months prior to randomization
- More than 1 month of cumulative use between 3 and 12 months prior to randomization
- More than 3 years of cumulative use, unless the last dose was received ≥5 years prior to randomization
- Subject has used intravenous (iv) bisphosphonates:
- zoledronic acid
- Any doses received within 3 years prior to randomization
- More than 1 dose received within 5 years prior to randomization
- iv ibandronate, iv pamidronate, or iv alendronate (ALN)
- Any doses received within 12 months prior to randomization
- More than 3 years of cumulative use, unless the last dose was received ≥5 years prior to randomization
- Subject has used denosumab or any cathepsin K inhibitor:
- ● Any doses received within 18 months prior to randomization
- Subject has used tibolone, cinacalcet, or calcitonin:
- Any doses received within 3 months prior to randomization
- Subject has used teriparatide (TPTD) or any parathyroid hormone (PTH) derivative:
- Any doses received within 3 months prior to randomization
- More than 1 month of cumulative use between 3 and 12 months prior to randomization
- Subject has used systemic oral or transdermal estrogen or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs):
- ● More than 1 month of cumulative use within 6 months prior to randomization
- Subject has used strontium ranelate or fluoride:
- ● More than 1 month of cumulative use within 5 years prior to randomization
- Subject has used hormonal ablation therapy:
- ● More than 1 month of cumulative use within 6 months prior to randomization
- Subject has used systemic glucocorticosteroids:
- ● ≥5mg prednisone equivalent per day for more than 14 days within 3 months prior to randomization
- Subject has a history of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) or atypical femoral fracture (AFF)
- Subject has evidence of any of the following:
- Current, uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism. Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism is defined as thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroxine (T4) outside of the normal range. Uncontrolled hypothyroidism is defined as TSH >10
- Current, uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism or history of hypoparathyroidism. Uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism is defined as PTH outside the normal range in subjects with concurrent hypercalcemia or PTH values >20 % above upper limit of normal (ULN) in normocalcemic subjects
- Current hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia, defined as albumin-adjusted serum calcium outside the normal range, as assessed by the central laboratory at the time of Screening. Albumin-adjusted serum calcium levels may be retested once in case of an elevated albumin-adjusted serum calcium level within 1.1xULN of the laboratory's reference ranges
- Subject has ≥3xULN of any of the following: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), or >ULN total bilirubin (≥1.5xULN total bilirubin if known Gilbert's syndrome). If subject has elevations only in total bilirubin that are >ULN and <1.5xULN, fractionate bilirubin to identify possible undiagnosed Gilbert's syndrome (ie, direct bilirubin <35 %)
Trial locations and contacts
30 sites in 1 country.
30 sites in 1 country
China30 sites
Op0002 20040
Beijing
Op0002 20115
Beijing
Op0002 20125
Beijing
Op0002 20127
Beijing
Op0002 20128
Beijing
Op0002 20130
Beijing
Op0002 20131
Beijing
Op0002 20157
Beijing
Op0002 20021
Chengdu
Op0002 20133
Chengdu
Op0002 20137
Chengdu
Op0002 20205
Foshan
Op0002 20117
Guangzhou
Op0002 20124
Guangzhou
Op0002 20209
Nanchang
Op0002 20135
Nanjing
Op0002 20202
Pingxiang
Op0002 20199
Rui’an
Op0002 20116
Shanghai
Op0002 20118
Shanghai
Op0002 20121
Shanghai
Op0002 20123
Shanghai
Op0002 20129
Shanghai
Op0002 20119
Suzhou
Op0002 20204
Suzhou
Op0002 20122
Tianjin
Op0002 20136
Tianjin
Op0002 20120
Wuhan
Op0002 20134
Yueyang
Op0002 20132
Zhengzhou
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Chinese Women With Osteoporosis
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of treatment with romosozumab for 6 months compared with placebo on the percent changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, at the total hip and femoral neck in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis.
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Being tested
- Romosozumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Phase 3, Chinese Patients, Romosozumab
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RomosozumabDrug
Subjects will receive romosozumab in a specified sequence during the treatment Period.
PlaceboDrug
Subjects will receive Placebo in a specified sequence during the treatment Period.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Romosozumab | Experimental | Subjects randomized to this arm will receive romosozumab during all treatment Periods. Receives: Drug: Romosozumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Subjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo during the Double-Blind-Placebo controlled Period and romosozumab during the Open-Label treatment Period Receives: Drug: Romosozumab; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Lumbar Spine to the End of Double-Blind Period
Percent change from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at 6 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach. LSM = least square mean.
Measured: From Baseline (Day 1) to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Double-Blind Period
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a IMP, whether or not related to the IMP. TEAEs are defined as all AEs started on or worsened in severity on or after the date of receiving first dose of IMP and before or on the end of study (EOS) date.
Measured: From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events for Romosozumab During Overall Period
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a IMP, whether or not related to IMP. TEAEs are defined as all AEs started on or worsened in severity on or after date of receiving first dose of IMP and before or on EOS date except lipid-type AEs starting on date of first dose of IMP and not worsening (and not deemed IMP related by the investigator). As pre-specified in Protocol and SAP, TEAEs were assessed and reported for 6 months for participants in placebo/romosozumab arm (Open-label Period) and for a total of 12 months for participants in romosozumab/romosozumab arm (Double-blind Period + Open-label Period combined) + 3 months of Safety follow-up for both arms (Up to Month 15) during overall period.
Measured: From Month 7 up to Month 12 (Placebo/Romo) and From Day 1 up to Month 12 (Romo/Romo) + 3-month SFU (up to Month 15)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Total Hip to the End of Double-Blind Period
Percent change from baseline in BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at 6 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach.
Measured: From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck to the End of the Double-Blind Period
Percent change from baseline in BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at 6 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach.
Measured: From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine at Month 12
Percent change from Baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine was assessed by DXA at 12 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach. For Placebo/Romosozumab Treatment group, only the post Month 6 value was used for imputation for Open-label Period, the values in the Double-blind Period were not carried forward into the Open-label Period.
Measured: Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Total Hip at Month 12
Percent change from Baseline in BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at 12 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach. For Placebo/Romosozumab Treatment group, only the post Month 6 value was used for imputation for Open-label Period, the values in the Double-blind Period were not carried forward into the Open-label Period.
Measured: Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck at Month 12
Percent change from Baseline in BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at 12 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the LOCF approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach. For Placebo/Romosozumab Treatment group, only the post Month 6 value was used for imputation for Open-label Period, the values in the Double-blind Period were not carried forward into the Open-label Period.
Measured: Baseline, Month 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Oct 2021
- Study start21 Oct 2021
- Primary completion9 Nov 2023
- Study completion9 Nov 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UCB Biopharma SRLThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 327 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRL
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- UCB Cares, Study director, 001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05067335
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OP0002
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.
Publications
Zhenlin Z, Qingyun X, Decai C, Aijun C, Yanan H, Mei Z, Xu C, Hua L, Youjia X, Qun C, Huilin Y, Xiaoyan X, Yujie L, Xuan D, Jun J, LingLing G, Theresa RJ, Lars B, Weibo X. Romosozumab increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis: A randomised phase three study. J Orthop Translat. 2026 Jun 3;59:101135. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2026.101135. eCollection 2026 Jul.
PubMed 42282279
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Chinese Women With Osteoporosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05067335
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OP0002
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis
- Keywords
- Osteoporosis, Phase 3, Chinese Patients, Romosozumab
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 327 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UCB Biopharma SRLIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Nov 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 5 Dec 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of treatment with romosozumab for 6 months compared with placebo on the percent changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, at the total hip and femoral neck in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Romosozumab | Experimental | Drug: RomosozumabSubjects randomized to this arm will receive romosozumab during all treatment Periods. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Romosozumab, Drug: PlaceboSubjects randomized to this arm will receive placebo during the Double-Blind-Placebo controlled Period and romosozumab during the Open-Label treatment Period |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 90 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Subject is considered reliable and capable of adhering to the protocol, visit schedule, and medication intake according to the judgment of the investigator
- Subject is an ambulatory postmenopausal Chinese women, 55 to 90 years of age (inclusive) at the time of Screening. Postmenopause is defined as no spontaneous vaginal bleeding or spotting for 12 or more consecutive months prior to Screening
- Subject has a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≤-2.50 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of Screening based on DXA scans, and using data for Caucasian women from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES, 1998)
- Subject must have at least 1 of following independent risk factors for fracture:
- Subject has at least 2 vertebrae in the L1 to L4 region and at least 1 hip that are evaluable by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), as assessed by the central imaging vendor
Key exclusion criteria (38 listed)
- Subject has a BMD T-score of ≤-3.50 at the total hip or femoral neck, as assessed by the central imaging vendor at the time of Screening based on DXA scans, and using data for Caucasian women from NHANES 1998
- Subject has a known history of hip fracture
- Subject has any severe (SQ3) or more than 2 moderate (SQ2) vertebral fractures, as assessed by the central imaging vendor based on the lateral spine x-ray at Screening
- Subject has a history of myocardial infarction (MI)
- Subject has a history of stroke
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RomosozumabSubjects will receive romosozumab in a specified sequence during the treatment Period. | Drug | Placebo, Romosozumab |
| PlaceboSubjects will receive Placebo in a specified sequence during the treatment Period. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Lumbar Spine to the End of Double-Blind Period
Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percent change from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at 6 months. Missing postbaseline BMD other than due to COVID-19 were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. Missing or out of window (exceed 70 days since previous IMP) post-baseline DXA BMD due to COVID-19 were set to missing and imputed by multiple imputation under missing at random approach. LSM = least square mean.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Double-Blind Period
Time frame: From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a IMP, whether or not related to the IMP. TEAEs are defined as all AEs started on or worsened in severity on or after the date of receiving first dose of IMP and before or on the end of study (EOS) date.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events for Romosozumab During Overall Period
Time frame: From Month 7 up to Month 12 (Placebo/Romo) and From Day 1 up to Month 12 (Romo/Romo) + 3-month SFU (up to Month 15)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of a IMP, whether or not related to IMP. TEAEs are defined as all AEs started on or worsened in severity on or after date of receiving first dose of IMP and before or on EOS date except lipid-type AEs starting on date of first dose of IMP and not worsening (and not deemed IMP related by the investigator). As pre-specified in Protocol and SAP, TEAEs were assessed and reported for 6 months for participants in placebo/romosozumab arm (Open-label Period) and for a total of 12 months for participants in romosozumab/romosozumab arm (Double-blind Period + Open-label Period combined) + 3 months of Safety follow-up for both arms (Up to Month 15) during overall period.
5 secondary outcomes
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Total Hip to the End of Double-Blind Period
Time frame: From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck to the End of the Double-Blind Period
Time frame: From Baseline to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Total Hip at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Femoral Neck at Month 12
Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 42282279Zhenlin Z, Qingyun X, Decai C, Aijun C, Yanan H, Mei Z, Xu C, Hua L, Youjia X, Qun C, Huilin Y, Xiaoyan X, Yujie L, Xuan D, Jun J, LingLing G, Theresa RJ, Lars B, Weibo X. Romosozumab increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal Chinese women with osteoporosis: A randomised phase three study. J Orthop Translat. 2026 Jun 3;59:101135. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2026.101135. eCollection 2026 Jul.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data from this trial may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data and redacted trial documents which may include: analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.Vivli.org and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a prespecified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if the risk of re-identifying trial participants is determined to be too high after the trial is completed; in this case and to protect participants, individual patient-level data would not be made available.
Related trials for Osteoporosis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
GRACE II (General Retrospective Analysis of Commercial Experience With AGN1 LOEP)
Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases or Psoriasis
Osteoporosis, Inflammatory Rheumatism
Not yet recruiting
Exercise and Fall Prevention for Fracture Reduction
Osteopenia, Osteoporosis
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Screening and Multicomponent Exercise on Fall Rates, Fractures, and Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes, Osteoporosis
Recruiting
Surgeon-Initiated Bone Health Referral Pathway in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Arthroplasty
Osteoporosis, Arthroplasty Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
UCB Cares study director
001 844 599 2273 (UCB)
30 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Romosozumab in people with Osteoporosis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 30 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 38 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 30 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Dec 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the Lumbar Spine to the End of Double-Blind Period (time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) to the end of the Double-blind Period (Month 6)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05067335, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2026.