Conscious SedationNCT05068700
Integrated Pulmonary Index for Nurse-administered Procedural Sedation
A study testing Integrated Pulmonary Index and Standard capnography monitoring in people with Conscious Sedation and Nursing, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Implementing capnography into practice for respiratory monitoring during sedation is considered a high priority by leading authorities in Canada and internationally. The Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society's position statement recommends that capnography should be available wherever moderate or deep sedation is used. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Conscious Sedation, Nursing, Anaesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Integrated Pulmonary Index and Standard capnography monitoring
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 401 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 22 Apr 2022to 15 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients who are scheduled to undergo elective procedures with sedation administered by the nursing staff will be eligible for inclusion in the study.
Who cannot join
- Procedures performed without sedation or capnogrpahy monitoring
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Parallel Cluster-randomized Trial of the Integrated Pulmonary Index for Nurse-administered Procedural Sedation
Implementing capnography into practice for respiratory monitoring during sedation is considered a high priority by leading authorities in Canada and internationally. The Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society's position statement recommends that capnography should be available wherever moderate or deep sedation is used. The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (UK) Standard and Guidance report on Safe Sedation Practice for Healthcare Procedures noted that while capnography is not a mandated practice, providers should consider implementing capnography as a long term goal. These recommendations are in place because sedated patients who are not monitored with capnography have frequent undetected, and therefore untreated, respiratory depression. Of note, though, these guidelines do not provide specific recommendations for how capnography should be implemented for nurse-administered sedation. The aim of this study is to determine if smart alarm guided treatment of respiratory depression using the Integrated Pulmonary Index is an effective way to implement capnography during nurse-administered sedation. The primary outcome is the number of seconds in an alert condition state without an intervention being applied. The IPI is intended to reduce the cognitive burden of synthesizing multiple sources of physiological monitoring input and hence lowering the threshold for triggering intervention by clinicians to support respiration. The primary outcome directly measures this concept by quantifying the time taken for an alert to trigger an intervention.
Higher values of the primary outcome will result from either a problem state that should have triggered an intervention but did not, or an 'inappropriate' alert (i.e. an alert that was not important enough to warrant immediate intervention.)
Read the detailed description
A hybrid effectiveness-implementation design will be used for this study, incorporating a parallel cluster randomized trial. Capnography monitoring will be implemented as standard practice for all patients undergoing procedures with nurse-administered sedation in the four departments participating in the study, as per recommendations for procedural sedation in Canada. Nurses working in the four departments will be invited to choose to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of the study. If they choose to participate, they will be randomized to use capnography either with or without the Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) enabled.
There will be establishment and stability phases where the implementation of capnography (with or without IPI enabled) into practice commences and is optimized through an audit and feedback process. Data collection for the primary outcome will be undertaken during the evaluation period. This design was chosen for two main reasons. First, it allows for the establishment phase, which will provide the time required for the research team to meaningfully engage with staff at each department and recruit nurses to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of the study. Second, the stability period will involve sustained engagement with clinicians in the department, regardless of assignment, in order to optimize the implementation of capnography monitoring (with or without the IPI enabled) into practice using a facilitated audit and feedback process.
Sedation management and monitoring
Medication
There will be no restrictions on sedation dosing for this study. It is typical for a bolus dose of 25-50mcg of fentanyl followed by 1-2mg of midazolam to be administered approximately two to five minutes prior to procedure commencement. Further doses of 1mg midazolam and 25mcg fentanyl are usually administered at the discretion of the proceduralist to maintain sedation.
Supplemental oxygen
Supplemental oxygen is routinely applied for patients unless contraindicated by pre-existing conditions, such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The oxygen flow rate will be adjusted as per direction from the proceduralist.
Physiological monitoring
As part of usual practice in these departments, all patients receive all aspects of standard physiological monitoring including electrocardiography for heart rate and rhythm, non-invasive blood pressure measurements taken at regular 5-10 minute intervals (or more frequently if deemed required by nursing or medical staff) and continuous pulse oximetry. Assessments of respiratory rate and depth, as well as level of consciousness, are taken at regular intervals.
Additionally in this study, the standalone Capnostream 35p monitor (Medtronic) will be used. It displays a capnography waveform as well as end-tidal CO2 and respiratory rate. A nasal cannula or facemask that allows oral and nasal sampling of exhaled air as well as the delivery of supplemental oxygen will be used (Medtronic). The nasal cannula or facemask will be connected to the capnography monitoring device (Capnostream 35P, Medtronic). Nurses who choose to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of this hybrid effectiveness-implementation study, will be randomized to use capnography with or without the Integrated Pulmonary Index enabled. The IPI is a feature, which can be enabled in the Capnostream 35p devices. Nurses who are *not* participating in the randomized controlled trial component of the study will use capnography with or without the IPI feature enabled, at their own discretion. The Capnostream 35p monitor also collects SpO2 and heart rate measurements via pulse oximetry using a finger probe.
Establishment period
The establishment and stability periods will be guided by recommendations for improving the quality of clinical alarms from The Society for Critical Care Medicine Alarm and Alert Fatigue Task Force.
During the establishment period, each department will be provided with 2 Capnostream 35p monitors so that capnography monitoring can become part of routine practice for nurse-administered sedation. At this time, the research team will assist with providing education to nursing staff for capnography monitoring and the Integrated Pulmonary Index. The principal investigator will provide an overview of the Capnostream 35p device and how to use it, including the functionality of the Integrated Pulmonary Index. All nursing staff will be provided with printed information about how to access a standardized education program designed by Medtronic, which is certified for accreditation with the American Nurses Credentialing Centre and American Association for Respiratory Care (https://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en-us/clinical-education/catalog/healthstream-capnography-standard-of-care-for-procedural-sedation-monitoring.html). Specifically, in this course nurses will have access to education material covering topics including how to detect common capnographic waveform abnormalities, which indicate sedation-induced alveolar hypoventilation, and implement an appropriate intervention if indicated according to the alert conditions.
Stability period
The goal of the stability period is to optimize the alarm conditions set for the Capnostream 35p devices prior to the evaluation period. We will undertake an audit and feedback process for nurses choosing to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of the study. The audit and feedback process will evaluate the performance characteristics of the alerts triggered by the Capnostream 35p monitor (with or without IPI enabled depending on randomization). Alert performance characteristics to be audited include:
- Alarm burden (total number of alarms triggered by the Capnostream 35p).
- Number of appropriate alarms (defined as an alarm that triggered an intervention).
- Number of inappropriate alarms (defined as alarms that were triggered but manually dismissed by silencing the alarm).
- Duration of alert conditions (defined as the total time that an alert condition was active).
The Research Assistant will need to be present during procedures to observe and record the type of interventions implemented in response to capnography monitor alarms, as well as the time that the intervention was observed. A web-based data collection tool has been designed for this purpose (more detail is provided in the data collection section below).
The feedback of data collected during the audits for nurses who choose to participate in the randomized controlled trial will take an aggregated summary form per department. It will further delineate alarm performance characteristics depending on whether or not the IPI was enabled. The feedback will be presented on a webpage created for each department so that it can be updated approximately weekly as new audits are performed. The link to the webpage will be provided to nurses at the time of randomization. Access to the webpage will be restricted to users through an email address with an organizational domain (i.e. uhn.ca). The webpage will contain tabulated and other visual summaries of the audit data to highlight alarm performance characteristics, such as the number and duration of appropriate and inappropriate alarms, total alarms etc. In addition to the webpage, the Principal Investigator and/or Research Assistant will present summary findings from the audits at departmental meetings at least once per month to facilitate discussion amongst staff as to the appropriateness of current alarm settings and if changes are indicated.
The alarm conditions set for the Capnostream 35p monitor can be revised at any time throughout the study period at the discretion of the nurses based on insights from this audit of performance characteristics. This is an implementation study, employing an audit and feedback process to assist departmental staff to optimize capnography alarm settings (with or without the IPI enabled).
Evaluation period
Alarm performance for the Capnostream 35p monitor, now optimized for each capnography monitoring condition through the establishment and stability periods, will be compared between nurses randomized to use capnography alone or with the Integrated Pulmonary Index enabled.
Procedures
Participant selection and enrollment
Due to the hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to be used, all patients undergoing procedures in the departments included in this study will receive capnography monitoring. We anticipate that approximately 1200 patients will undergo procedures with capnography monitoring across the departments during the study overall. The target sample size for the evaluation period is 400 patient participants (sample size calculation presented in a section below).
This study involves only routinely collected clinical data and direct observation of nursing responses to capnography monitor alarms. As such, consent from patients will not be sought. The Tri-Council Policy Statement requires a study to fulfill conditions for waiver of consent, including that the alteration to consent requirement is necessary to address the research question. The integration of capnography monitoring with or without the IPI enabled is planned to be optimized in this implementation study through an audit and feedback process. As such, it will be impossible for individual patients to provide consent for participation in this study prior to the initiation of implementation and optimization of capnography into nurses routine care of sedated patients. In the 'evaluation' period specifically, a Research Assistant will observe procedures being performed with nurses who have chosen to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of the study on randomly selected days of the week until the target sample size is reached. The Research Assistant will be blinded to allocation status, as this is essential for studies that use clustered randomized trial designs to reduce risk of selection bias.
Data collection
This study involves only routinely collected clinical data and direct observation of nursing responses to capnography monitor alarms. During all phases ('establishment', 'stability' and 'evaluation'), we will retrospectively retrieve data recorded on the Capnostream 35p monitors using the USB port. Specifically, the 'Real-time Full Continuous Transfer' report will be downloaded. This report contains the real-time CO2 waveform plus real-time values of parameters (EtCO2, SpO2, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and IPI) with 1-second resolution by repeating numerical values for every 50ms along with the waveform. Other fields include the patient type (adult), report generation date and time, alarm occurrences, equipment advisory messages (eg. waveform not available, battery low, etc) and events entered into the monitor by a clinician (medication administrations etc).
During the 'stability' and 'evaluation' periods, a Research Assistant will be present during procedures to observe and record the type of interventions used, as well as the time that it was observed. A web-based data collection tool has been designed for this purpose, which will be accessed using an iPad. The times will be synced with the capnography monitoring device (Capnostream 35p).
During the 'stability and 'evaluation' periods, standard demographic and clinical characteristics will be collected by a Research Assistant. Procedural characteristics (type and duration) and sedation characteristics (medication type and dosages) will be collected for the purposes of the audit and feedback process in the 'stability' periods and for the purposes of describing the participant characteristics in the evaluation period.
- Conditions
- Conscious Sedation, Nursing, Anaesthesia
- Being tested
- Integrated Pulmonary Index, Standard capnography monitoring
- Keywords
- capnography, sedation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Integrated Pulmonary IndexDevice
Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitoring parameter
Standard capnography monitoringDevice
Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitoring parameter
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Pulmonary Index disabled | Active comparator | Nurses randomized to the experimental arm will be asked to disable the Integrated Pulmonary Index feature of the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor when monitoring sedated patients with capnography. Receives: Device: Standard capnography monitoring |
| Integrated Pulmonary Index enabled | Experimental | Nurses randomized to the experimental arm will be asked to enable the Integrated Pulmonary Index feature of the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor when monitoring sedated patients with capnography. Receives: Device: Integrated Pulmonary Index |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of seconds in an alert condition state from the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor without an intervention being applied.
Continuous capnography measurements will be recorded using the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor.
Measured: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Total number of Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor alarms
Continuous capnography measurements will be recorded using the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor.
Measured: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Number of appropriate alarms (defined as an alarm that triggered an intervention
Continuous capnography measurements will be recorded using the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor.
Measured: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Number of inappropriate alarms (defined as alarms that were triggered but manually dismissed by silencing the alarm)
Continuous capnography measurements will be recorded using the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor.
Measured: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Duration of alert conditions (defined as the total time that an alert condition was active)
Continuous capnography measurements will be recorded using the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor.
Measured: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Adverse sedation events
A Research Assistant will complete the Tracking and reporting outcomes of procedural sedation (TROOPS) tool at the end of procedures. Completion of the tool requires identification and description of the adverse event, the intervention, the outcome and the overall severity of the adverse event.
Measured: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Area under the curve of oxygen desaturation
Percentage of hemoglobin saturated with oxygen (SpO2) will be measured continuously throughout procedures as part of routine clinical practice through the anaesthetic machine. This is a composite measure comprising the incidence, depth, and duration of oxygen desaturation events. Area under SpO2 90% oxygen desaturation curve is calculated as the difference between the threshold (90%) and actual oxygen saturation (SpO2) summed every second during which oxygen saturation was below threshold.
Measured: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Oct 2021
- Study start22 Apr 2022
- Primary completion15 Jun 2023
- Study completion15 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Conscious SedationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Health Network, TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a cluster-randomized trial. Nurses working in the four departments will be invited to choose to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of the study. If they choose to participate, they will be randomized to use capnography either with or without the Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) enabled.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 401 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Aaron Conway, University Health Network, Toronto
- Investigators
- Aaron Conway, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Toronto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05068700
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAPCR-21-5249.0
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 24 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 18 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Study data, participant-level data sets (without identifying information) and code for statistical analyses will be shared in a publicly accessible repository at the time of publication.
Publications
Conway A, Goudarzi Rad M, Chang K, Parotto M, Mafeld S. Integrated pulmonary index during procedural sedation and analgesia: A cluster-randomized trial. J Adv Nurs. 2025 Sep;81(9):5563-5572. doi: 10.1111/jan.16286. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
PubMed 38924169Conway A, Chang K, Goudarzi Rad M, Mafeld S, Parotto M. Integrated Pulmonary Index during nurse-administered procedural sedation: Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial. J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jul;78(7):2245-2254. doi: 10.1111/jan.15243. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
PubMed 35485238
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Parallel Cluster-randomized Trial of the Integrated Pulmonary Index for Nurse-administered Procedural Sedation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05068700
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAPCR-21-5249.0
- Conditions
- Conscious Sedation, Nursing, Anaesthesia
- Keywords
- capnography, sedation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 401 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Implementing capnography into practice for respiratory monitoring during sedation is considered a high priority by leading authorities in Canada and internationally. The Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society's position statement recommends that capnography should be available wherever moderate or deep sedation is used. The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (UK) Standard and Guidance report on Safe Sedation Practice for Healthcare Procedures noted that while capnography is not a mandated practice, providers should consider implementing capnography as a long term goal. These recommendations are in place because sedated patients who are not monitored with capnography have frequent undetected, and therefore untreated, respiratory depression. Of note, though, these guidelines do not provide specific recommendations for how capnography should be implemented for nurse-administered sedation. The aim of this study is to determine if smart alarm guided treatment of respiratory depression using the Integrated Pulmonary Index is an effective way to implement capnography during nurse-administered sedation. The primary outcome is the number of seconds in an alert condition state without an intervention being applied. The IPI is intended to reduce the cognitive burden of synthesizing multiple sources of physiological monitoring input and hence lowering the threshold for triggering intervention by clinicians to support respiration. The primary outcome directly measures this concept by quantifying the time taken for an alert to trigger an intervention.
Higher values of the primary outcome will result from either a problem state that should have triggered an intervention but did not, or an 'inappropriate' alert (i.e. an alert that was not important enough to warrant immediate intervention.)
Detailed description
A hybrid effectiveness-implementation design will be used for this study, incorporating a parallel cluster randomized trial. Capnography monitoring will be implemented as standard practice for all patients undergoing procedures with nurse-administered sedation in the four departments participating in the study, as per recommendations for procedural sedation in Canada. Nurses working in the four departments will be invited to choose to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of the study. If they choose to participate, they will be randomized to use capnography either with or without the Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) enabled.
There will be establishment and stability phases where the implementation of capnography (with or without IPI enabled) into practice commences and is optimized through an audit and feedback process. Data collection for the primary outcome will be undertaken during the evaluation period. This design was chosen for two main reasons. First, it allows for the establishment phase, which will provide the time required for the research team to meaningfully engage with staff at each department and recruit nurses to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of the study. Second, the stability period will involve sustained engagement with clinicians in the department, regardless of assignment, in order to optimize the implementation of capnography monitoring (with or without the IPI enabled) into practice using a facilitated audit and feedback process.
Sedation management and monitoring
Medication
There will be no restrictions on sedation dosing for this study. It is typical for a bolus dose of 25-50mcg of fentanyl followed by 1-2mg of midazolam to be administered approximately two to five minutes prior to procedure commencement. Further doses of 1mg midazolam and 25mcg fentanyl are usually administered at the discretion of the proceduralist to maintain sedation.
Supplemental oxygen
Supplemental oxygen is routinely applied for patients unless contraindicated by pre-existing conditions, such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The oxygen flow rate will be adjusted as per direction from the proceduralist.
Physiological monitoring
As part of usual practice in these departments, all patients receive all aspects of standard physiological monitoring including electrocardiography for heart rate and rhythm, non-invasive blood pressure measurements taken at regular 5-10 minute intervals (or more frequently if deemed required by nursing or medical staff) and continuous pulse oximetry. Assessments of respiratory rate and depth, as well as level of consciousness, are taken at regular intervals.
Additionally in this study, the standalone Capnostream 35p monitor (Medtronic) will be used. It displays a capnography waveform as well as end-tidal CO2 and respiratory rate. A nasal cannula or facemask that allows oral and nasal sampling of exhaled air as well as the delivery of supplemental oxygen will be used (Medtronic). The nasal cannula or facemask will be connected to the capnography monitoring device (Capnostream 35P, Medtronic). Nurses who choose to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of this hybrid effectiveness-implementation study, will be randomized to use capnography with or without the Integrated Pulmonary Index enabled. The IPI is a feature, which can be enabled in the Capnostream 35p devices. Nurses who are *not* participating in the randomized controlled trial component of the study will use capnography with or without the IPI feature enabled, at their own discretion. The Capnostream 35p monitor also collects SpO2 and heart rate measurements via pulse oximetry using a finger probe.
Establishment period
The establishment and stability periods will be guided by recommendations for improving the quality of clinical alarms from The Society for Critical Care Medicine Alarm and Alert Fatigue Task Force.
During the establishment period, each department will be provided with 2 Capnostream 35p monitors so that capnography monitoring can become part of routine practice for nurse-administered sedation. At this time, the research team will assist with providing education to nursing staff for capnography monitoring and the Integrated Pulmonary Index. The principal investigator will provide an overview of the Capnostream 35p device and how to use it, including the functionality of the Integrated Pulmonary Index. All nursing staff will be provided with printed information about how to access a standardized education program designed by Medtronic, which is certified for accreditation with the American Nurses Credentialing Centre and American Association for Respiratory Care (https://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en-us/clinical-education/catalog/healthstream-capnography-standard-of-care-for-procedural-sedation-monitoring.html). Specifically, in this course nurses will have access to education material covering topics including how to detect common capnographic waveform abnormalities, which indicate sedation-induced alveolar hypoventilation, and implement an appropriate intervention if indicated according to the alert conditions.
Stability period
The goal of the stability period is to optimize the alarm conditions set for the Capnostream 35p devices prior to the evaluation period. We will undertake an audit and feedback process for nurses choosing to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of the study. The audit and feedback process will evaluate the performance characteristics of the alerts triggered by the Capnostream 35p monitor (with or without IPI enabled depending on randomization). Alert performance characteristics to be audited include:
- Alarm burden (total number of alarms triggered by the Capnostream 35p).
- Number of appropriate alarms (defined as an alarm that triggered an intervention).
- Number of inappropriate alarms (defined as alarms that were triggered but manually dismissed by silencing the alarm).
- Duration of alert conditions (defined as the total time that an alert condition was active).
The Research Assistant will need to be present during procedures to observe and record the type of interventions implemented in response to capnography monitor alarms, as well as the time that the intervention was observed. A web-based data collection tool has been designed for this purpose (more detail is provided in the data collection section below).
The feedback of data collected during the audits for nurses who choose to participate in the randomized controlled trial will take an aggregated summary form per department. It will further delineate alarm performance characteristics depending on whether or not the IPI was enabled. The feedback will be presented on a webpage created for each department so that it can be updated approximately weekly as new audits are performed. The link to the webpage will be provided to nurses at the time of randomization. Access to the webpage will be restricted to users through an email address with an organizational domain (i.e. uhn.ca). The webpage will contain tabulated and other visual summaries of the audit data to highlight alarm performance characteristics, such as the number and duration of appropriate and inappropriate alarms, total alarms etc. In addition to the webpage, the Principal Investigator and/or Research Assistant will present summary findings from the audits at departmental meetings at least once per month to facilitate discussion amongst staff as to the appropriateness of current alarm settings and if changes are indicated.
The alarm conditions set for the Capnostream 35p monitor can be revised at any time throughout the study period at the discretion of the nurses based on insights from this audit of performance characteristics. This is an implementation study, employing an audit and feedback process to assist departmental staff to optimize capnography alarm settings (with or without the IPI enabled).
Evaluation period
Alarm performance for the Capnostream 35p monitor, now optimized for each capnography monitoring condition through the establishment and stability periods, will be compared between nurses randomized to use capnography alone or with the Integrated Pulmonary Index enabled.
Procedures
Participant selection and enrollment
Due to the hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to be used, all patients undergoing procedures in the departments included in this study will receive capnography monitoring. We anticipate that approximately 1200 patients will undergo procedures with capnography monitoring across the departments during the study overall. The target sample size for the evaluation period is 400 patient participants (sample size calculation presented in a section below).
This study involves only routinely collected clinical data and direct observation of nursing responses to capnography monitor alarms. As such, consent from patients will not be sought. The Tri-Council Policy Statement requires a study to fulfill conditions for waiver of consent, including that the alteration to consent requirement is necessary to address the research question. The integration of capnography monitoring with or without the IPI enabled is planned to be optimized in this implementation study through an audit and feedback process. As such, it will be impossible for individual patients to provide consent for participation in this study prior to the initiation of implementation and optimization of capnography into nurses routine care of sedated patients. In the 'evaluation' period specifically, a Research Assistant will observe procedures being performed with nurses who have chosen to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of the study on randomly selected days of the week until the target sample size is reached. The Research Assistant will be blinded to allocation status, as this is essential for studies that use clustered randomized trial designs to reduce risk of selection bias.
Data collection
This study involves only routinely collected clinical data and direct observation of nursing responses to capnography monitor alarms. During all phases ('establishment', 'stability' and 'evaluation'), we will retrospectively retrieve data recorded on the Capnostream 35p monitors using the USB port. Specifically, the 'Real-time Full Continuous Transfer' report will be downloaded. This report contains the real-time CO2 waveform plus real-time values of parameters (EtCO2, SpO2, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and IPI) with 1-second resolution by repeating numerical values for every 50ms along with the waveform. Other fields include the patient type (adult), report generation date and time, alarm occurrences, equipment advisory messages (eg. waveform not available, battery low, etc) and events entered into the monitor by a clinician (medication administrations etc).
During the 'stability' and 'evaluation' periods, a Research Assistant will be present during procedures to observe and record the type of interventions used, as well as the time that it was observed. A web-based data collection tool has been designed for this purpose, which will be accessed using an iPad. The times will be synced with the capnography monitoring device (Capnostream 35p).
During the 'stability and 'evaluation' periods, standard demographic and clinical characteristics will be collected by a Research Assistant. Procedural characteristics (type and duration) and sedation characteristics (medication type and dosages) will be collected for the purposes of the audit and feedback process in the 'stability' periods and for the purposes of describing the participant characteristics in the evaluation period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a cluster-randomized trial. Nurses working in the four departments will be invited to choose to participate in the randomized controlled trial component of the study. If they choose to participate, they will be randomized to use capnography either with or without the Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) enabled.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Pulmonary Index disabled | Active comparator | Device: Standard capnography monitoringNurses randomized to the experimental arm will be asked to disable the Integrated Pulmonary Index feature of the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor when monitoring sedated patients with capnography. |
| Integrated Pulmonary Index enabled | Experimental | Device: Integrated Pulmonary IndexNurses randomized to the experimental arm will be asked to enable the Integrated Pulmonary Index feature of the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor when monitoring sedated patients with capnography. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients who are scheduled to undergo elective procedures with sedation administered by the nursing staff will be eligible for inclusion in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Procedures performed without sedation or capnogrpahy monitoring
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated Pulmonary IndexMedtronic Capnostream 35p monitoring parameter | Device | Integrated Pulmonary Index enabled |
| Standard capnography monitoringMedtronic Capnostream 35p monitoring parameter | Device | Integrated Pulmonary Index disabled |
Primary outcome
Number of seconds in an alert condition state from the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor without an intervention being applied.
Time frame: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Continuous capnography measurements will be recorded using the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor.
6 secondary outcomes
Total number of Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor alarms
Time frame: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Number of appropriate alarms (defined as an alarm that triggered an intervention
Time frame: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Number of inappropriate alarms (defined as alarms that were triggered but manually dismissed by silencing the alarm)
Time frame: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Duration of alert conditions (defined as the total time that an alert condition was active)
Time frame: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Adverse sedation events
Time frame: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Area under the curve of oxygen desaturation
Time frame: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Nov 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38924169Conway A, Goudarzi Rad M, Chang K, Parotto M, Mafeld S. Integrated pulmonary index during procedural sedation and analgesia: A cluster-randomized trial. J Adv Nurs. 2025 Sep;81(9):5563-5572. doi: 10.1111/jan.16286. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35485238Conway A, Chang K, Goudarzi Rad M, Mafeld S, Parotto M. Integrated Pulmonary Index during nurse-administered procedural sedation: Study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial. J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jul;78(7):2245-2254. doi: 10.1111/jan.15243. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Study data, participant-level data sets (without identifying information) and code for statistical analyses will be shared in a publicly accessible repository at the time of publication.
Related trials for Conscious Sedation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation During Chronic Subdural Hematoma Surgery Under Local Anesthesia
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Active, not recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia in Pulsed-Field Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal)
Recruiting
Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Pulsed Field Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Minimal Sedation Versus Standard Continuous Sedation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Restoration of Consciousness With Ultrasonic Deep Brain Stimulation During Anesthetic Sedation
Mental Function
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aaron Conway, PhD principal investigator
University of Toronto
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Integrated Pulmonary Index and Standard capnography monitoring in people with Conscious Sedation and Nursing, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of seconds in an alert condition state from the Medtronic Capnostream 35p monitor without an intervention being applied. (time frame: From the time between first sedative medication administration to the end of the procedure. Estimated duration of procedures is 30 minutes to 120 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05068700, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2023.