Acute Ischemic StrokePhase 3NCT05073159
Head-of-Bed Positioning in Large Artery Acute Ischemic Stroke
A Phase 3 study testing Allocating head-of-bed position in people with Acute Ischemic Stroke, run by National University of Singapore at 2 sites in Singapore.
Trial summary
Positioning of the patient with hyperacute large artery ischemic stroke (IS) is an important, yet understudied aspect of care that could impact the course of treatment and ultimately clinical outcome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Allocating head-of-bed position
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 182 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSingapore
- Study dates
- 11 Feb 2020to 30 Apr 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- • Ischemic stroke symptoms consistent with large artery occlusion
- Baseline non-contrast head CT (or MRI) negative for hemorrhage or mass- effect
- Evidence of arterial occlusion on standard of care CT angiography or MR angiography or NIHSS 10 or more points
- Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score [ASPECTS] >6
- Patients treated with IV-tPA, mechanical thrombectomy or both
- Pre-stroke baseline modified Rankin Score (mRS) <1
- Ability to enrol, randomize and begin the intervention within the Emergency Department
Who cannot join
- • Pregnancy or suspicion of pregnancy
- Evidence or suspicion of vomiting any time prior to consent which could predispose to aspiration pneumonia and therefore confound determination of protocol safety
- Evidence of evolving malignant infarction on admission noncontrast CT (or MRI)
- Need for intubation with mechanical ventilation, or non-invasive ventilatory support with either bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
- Inability to tolerate zero-degree positioning due to congestive heart failure, preexisting pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or other medical condition
- Admission chest radiograph positive for pleural effusion, pulmonary edema, pneumonia, or other pulmonary condition that may confound determination of protocol safety
- Abnormal breath sounds on that may confound determination of protocol safety
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Singapore2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Division of Neurology, National University Hospital
Singapore, 119074
Vijay K Sharma, MD, 67795555 ext. 6190, mdcvks@nus.edu.sg
Lily Wong, RN, 67795555 ext. 2517, lily_wong@nuhs.edu.sg
- Recruiting
National University Hospital
Singapore, 119228
Lily YH Wong, RN, 67722517, lily_wong@nuhs.edu.sg
About this study
Positioning of the patient with hyperacute large artery ischemic stroke (IS) is an important, yet understudied aspect of care that could impact the course of treatment and ultimately clinical outcome. Positioning with the head of bed (HOB) at 0-degree has been shown in small studies to increase cerebral blood flow across arterial occlusion in hyperacute large artery IS, leading to clinical improvement in stroke symptoms. However, this position is believed to increase the risk of aspiration pneumonia. In this randomised clinical trial, the investigators aim to evaluate whether use of 0-degree HOB positioning is associated with clinical stability in hyperacute IS. Investigators hypothesise that patients with large artery occlusions placed in a 0-degree HOB position will experience less early neurologic deterioration within the first 24 hours, than those in the 30-degree or more HOB elevation group. The study aims to confirm the safety of 0-degree-HOB positioning in a large, generalizable sample of hyperacute large artery IS patients. In this randomised trial, patients presenting to the study centers and eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, with (if presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom-onset) or without (presenting between 4.5 to 16 hours of symptom-onset) mechanical thrombectomy. Eligible patients would be randomised to either a zero-degree HOB or an HOB of 30-degree or more. Impact of HOB position on neurological status would be evaluated with serial NIHSS scores. Cerebral hemodynamics would be monitored by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Validated criteria would be used to diagnose pneumonia. Functional outcome would be measured by modified Rankin scale (mRS) where the score of 0-2 describe good functional recovery. SPSS version 20 would be used to analyse the data. The trial would provide clinical and hemodynamic data to determine the optimal HOB position in patients with large artery acute ischemic stroke.
Read the detailed description
Positioning of the patient with hyperacute IS is an important, yet understudied aspect of care that could impact the course of treatment and ultimately clinical outcome. Positioning with the head of bed (HOB) at 0-degree has been shown in small studies to increase cerebral blood flow across arterial occlusion in hyperacute large artery IS, leading to clinical improvement in stroke symptoms. On the other hand, small studies have also documented clinical symptom worsening in IS patients when the HOB was elevated to 30-degree or higher.
A recent large cluster randomized trial (HeadPoST) attempted to determine the optimal head position in acute IS, but failed to enrol the patient cohort for which 0-degree head positioning may be beneficial. Findings from HeadPoST have been debated by the stroke neurologists due to some design flaws and enrolment of inappropriate patients to answer this question. In fact, HeadPoST has become a catalyst for conducting a high quality head positioning research in hyperacute large artery IS to definitively answer the question of how best to manage these highly vulnerable patients to ensure stability and prevent symptom worsening.
Mechanisms proposed for clinical improvement at 0-degree-HOB include favorable gravitational arterial flow conditions, recruitment of collateral vessels, and in the case of intravenous thrombolysis, improved clot-lytic interactions augmenting arterial recanalization. Collectively, these mechanisms may support the argument that 0-degree-HOB positioning should be among the first steps taken in large artery hyperacute IS patient management.
This efficacy study aims to determine if 0 degree-HOB positioning in hyperacute IS prevents neurological symptom worsening in large artery occlusion patients. The study will achieve these goals through use of a novel protocol enabling enrolment of consecutive large artery occlusion patients while maintaining compliance with management specified by the guidelines.
This phase III study will utilize a prospective randomized outcome-blinded evaluation (PROBE) approach enrolling consecutive hyperacute large artery IS patients to determine if use of 0-degreeHOB positioning is associated with greater clinical stability.
Suspected acute IS patients admitted to the study center(s) will undergo guideline-supported standard of care stroke team emergency response procedures, including assessment/ stabilization of airway, breathing, circulation with immediate transport for imaging. Continuous portable ECG monitoring and nasal canula oxygen will be established in CT (or MRI), and IV access will be obtained with STAT blood draw; point of care testing will be conducted immediately before STAT non-contrast CT (or MRI) with CTA (or MRA). The NIHSS will then be scored by the stroke team, followed by standard of care placement of a continuous pulse oximetry sensor, and completion of a rapid/detailed history/physical exam. Patients eligible for treatment with IV-tPA will have drug administered, and standard of care admission upright chest x-ray (CXR) will then be performed. Subjects meeting inclusions without exclusions will then be consented, randomized, and placed in the assigned HOB position, signaling the beginning of the monitoring phase of the intervention.
Patients will be transferred to the catheterization lab for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) once the team is ready for the procedure. Thrombectomy requires transfer from the ED to catheterization lab, with 0-degree-HOB positioning commencing immediately prior to groin puncture constituting the end of the head positioning phase of the protocol. Thrombectomy patients are extremely likely to benefit from 0-degree-HOB positioning because the procedure is only performed in patients without evidence of completed infarction. This novel protocol will capture serial NIHSS over the period before thrombectomy begins, allowing us to better understand how to maintain stability in this high risk vulnerable population.
Enrolled patients will be randomized to either 0-degree-HOB or 30-degree (or more) HOB positioning, and will undergo serial NIHSS assessments every 15mins +/- 5 mins while awaiting start of the thrombectomy. The patients will also undergo 24-hour ± 6hrs, 72hrs ± 12hrs discharge/7day, and 90-day +/- 14 days outcome monitoring, but these will be collected for exploratory purposes only. The NIHSS and mRS will be performed by credentialed members of the team. In addition to the chest X-Ray, blood will be drawn after obtaining the consent for HSCRP and Procalcitonin levels, primarily to substantiate the diagnosis of pre-hospital arrival chest infection, if any.
To assure balance in the treatment group throughout the course of enrolment, the investigators will use block randomization with a block size of 4 and an allocation ratio of 1:1. This scheme only shows the random assignment for a single given participant. Future assignments cannot be predicted by study personnel, and this effectively mitigates the risk for selection bias.
- Conditions
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Being tested
- Allocating head-of-bed position
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Allocating head-of-bed positionBiological
Patients would be randomized 1:1 to elevated head of bed (30-degrees or more) or flat (0-degree) position
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 0 degree Head-of-Bed (HOB) position | Active comparator | Patients would be randomized 1:1 to elevated head of bed (30-degrees or more) or flat (0-degree) position Receives: Biological: Allocating head-of-bed position |
| Elevated (30-degree or more) head-of-bed | Active comparator | Patients would be randomized 1:1 to elevated head of bed (30-degrees or more) or flat (0-degree) position Receives: Biological: Allocating head-of-bed position |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) change (higher change means more improvement) at day-7 and modified Rankin Score (mRS) at day-7
Investigators will analyze the data by dichotomized modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-2 (good functional outcome) versus 3-6 (poor outcome) as well as mrs 0-1 (excellent outcome) versus mRS 2-6 (unfavorable outcome) as well as ordinal shift across the range of mRS 0-6
Measured: day-7
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) change (higher value indicate more improvement) at day-90 and modified Rankin Score (mRS) at day-90
Investigators will analyze the data by dichotomized mRS (0-2 as good functional outcome versus 3-6 as poor outcome), mRS (0-1 as excellent functional outcome versus 2-6 as unfavorable outcome) as well as ordinal shift across entire range of mRS 0-6.
Measured: day-90
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2021
- Study start11 Feb 2020
- Primary completion30 Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Ischemic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National University of SingaporeThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized Controlled study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National University of Singapore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA, National University of Singapore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05073159
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NMRC/CIRG/18nov-0012
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD would be shared after completion of the study upon reasonable request
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Head-of-Bed Positioning in Large Artery Acute Ischemic Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05073159
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NMRC/CIRG/18nov-0012
- Conditions
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 182 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National University of SingaporeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Positioning of the patient with hyperacute large artery ischemic stroke (IS) is an important, yet understudied aspect of care that could impact the course of treatment and ultimately clinical outcome. Positioning with the head of bed (HOB) at 0-degree has been shown in small studies to increase cerebral blood flow across arterial occlusion in hyperacute large artery IS, leading to clinical improvement in stroke symptoms. However, this position is believed to increase the risk of aspiration pneumonia. In this randomised clinical trial, the investigators aim to evaluate whether use of 0-degree HOB positioning is associated with clinical stability in hyperacute IS. Investigators hypothesise that patients with large artery occlusions placed in a 0-degree HOB position will experience less early neurologic deterioration within the first 24 hours, than those in the 30-degree or more HOB elevation group. The study aims to confirm the safety of 0-degree-HOB positioning in a large, generalizable sample of hyperacute large artery IS patients. In this randomised trial, patients presenting to the study centers and eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, with (if presenting within 4.5 hours of symptom-onset) or without (presenting between 4.5 to 16 hours of symptom-onset) mechanical thrombectomy. Eligible patients would be randomised to either a zero-degree HOB or an HOB of 30-degree or more. Impact of HOB position on neurological status would be evaluated with serial NIHSS scores. Cerebral hemodynamics would be monitored by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Validated criteria would be used to diagnose pneumonia. Functional outcome would be measured by modified Rankin scale (mRS) where the score of 0-2 describe good functional recovery. SPSS version 20 would be used to analyse the data. The trial would provide clinical and hemodynamic data to determine the optimal HOB position in patients with large artery acute ischemic stroke.
Detailed description
Positioning of the patient with hyperacute IS is an important, yet understudied aspect of care that could impact the course of treatment and ultimately clinical outcome. Positioning with the head of bed (HOB) at 0-degree has been shown in small studies to increase cerebral blood flow across arterial occlusion in hyperacute large artery IS, leading to clinical improvement in stroke symptoms. On the other hand, small studies have also documented clinical symptom worsening in IS patients when the HOB was elevated to 30-degree or higher.
A recent large cluster randomized trial (HeadPoST) attempted to determine the optimal head position in acute IS, but failed to enrol the patient cohort for which 0-degree head positioning may be beneficial. Findings from HeadPoST have been debated by the stroke neurologists due to some design flaws and enrolment of inappropriate patients to answer this question. In fact, HeadPoST has become a catalyst for conducting a high quality head positioning research in hyperacute large artery IS to definitively answer the question of how best to manage these highly vulnerable patients to ensure stability and prevent symptom worsening.
Mechanisms proposed for clinical improvement at 0-degree-HOB include favorable gravitational arterial flow conditions, recruitment of collateral vessels, and in the case of intravenous thrombolysis, improved clot-lytic interactions augmenting arterial recanalization. Collectively, these mechanisms may support the argument that 0-degree-HOB positioning should be among the first steps taken in large artery hyperacute IS patient management.
This efficacy study aims to determine if 0 degree-HOB positioning in hyperacute IS prevents neurological symptom worsening in large artery occlusion patients. The study will achieve these goals through use of a novel protocol enabling enrolment of consecutive large artery occlusion patients while maintaining compliance with management specified by the guidelines.
This phase III study will utilize a prospective randomized outcome-blinded evaluation (PROBE) approach enrolling consecutive hyperacute large artery IS patients to determine if use of 0-degreeHOB positioning is associated with greater clinical stability.
Suspected acute IS patients admitted to the study center(s) will undergo guideline-supported standard of care stroke team emergency response procedures, including assessment/ stabilization of airway, breathing, circulation with immediate transport for imaging. Continuous portable ECG monitoring and nasal canula oxygen will be established in CT (or MRI), and IV access will be obtained with STAT blood draw; point of care testing will be conducted immediately before STAT non-contrast CT (or MRI) with CTA (or MRA). The NIHSS will then be scored by the stroke team, followed by standard of care placement of a continuous pulse oximetry sensor, and completion of a rapid/detailed history/physical exam. Patients eligible for treatment with IV-tPA will have drug administered, and standard of care admission upright chest x-ray (CXR) will then be performed. Subjects meeting inclusions without exclusions will then be consented, randomized, and placed in the assigned HOB position, signaling the beginning of the monitoring phase of the intervention.
Patients will be transferred to the catheterization lab for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) once the team is ready for the procedure. Thrombectomy requires transfer from the ED to catheterization lab, with 0-degree-HOB positioning commencing immediately prior to groin puncture constituting the end of the head positioning phase of the protocol. Thrombectomy patients are extremely likely to benefit from 0-degree-HOB positioning because the procedure is only performed in patients without evidence of completed infarction. This novel protocol will capture serial NIHSS over the period before thrombectomy begins, allowing us to better understand how to maintain stability in this high risk vulnerable population.
Enrolled patients will be randomized to either 0-degree-HOB or 30-degree (or more) HOB positioning, and will undergo serial NIHSS assessments every 15mins +/- 5 mins while awaiting start of the thrombectomy. The patients will also undergo 24-hour ± 6hrs, 72hrs ± 12hrs discharge/7day, and 90-day +/- 14 days outcome monitoring, but these will be collected for exploratory purposes only. The NIHSS and mRS will be performed by credentialed members of the team. In addition to the chest X-Ray, blood will be drawn after obtaining the consent for HSCRP and Procalcitonin levels, primarily to substantiate the diagnosis of pre-hospital arrival chest infection, if any.
To assure balance in the treatment group throughout the course of enrolment, the investigators will use block randomization with a block size of 4 and an allocation ratio of 1:1. This scheme only shows the random assignment for a single given participant. Future assignments cannot be predicted by study personnel, and this effectively mitigates the risk for selection bias.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized Controlled study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 0 degree Head-of-Bed (HOB) position | Active comparator | Biological: Allocating head-of-bed positionPatients would be randomized 1:1 to elevated head of bed (30-degrees or more) or flat (0-degree) position |
| Elevated (30-degree or more) head-of-bed | Active comparator | Biological: Allocating head-of-bed positionPatients would be randomized 1:1 to elevated head of bed (30-degrees or more) or flat (0-degree) position |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- • Ischemic stroke symptoms consistent with large artery occlusion
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- • Pregnancy or suspicion of pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Allocating head-of-bed positionPatients would be randomized 1:1 to elevated head of bed (30-degrees or more) or flat (0-degree) position | Biological | 0 degree Head-of-Bed (HOB) position, Elevated (30-degree or more) head-of-bed |
Primary outcome
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) change (higher change means more improvement) at day-7 and modified Rankin Score (mRS) at day-7
Time frame: day-7
Investigators will analyze the data by dichotomized modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-2 (good functional outcome) versus 3-6 (poor outcome) as well as mrs 0-1 (excellent outcome) versus mRS 2-6 (unfavorable outcome) as well as ordinal shift across the range of mRS 0-6
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) change (higher value indicate more improvement) at day-90 and modified Rankin Score (mRS) at day-90
Time frame: day-90
Investigators will analyze the data by dichotomized mRS (0-2 as good functional outcome versus 3-6 as poor outcome), mRS (0-1 as excellent functional outcome versus 2-6 as unfavorable outcome) as well as ordinal shift across entire range of mRS 0-6.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Nov 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD would be shared after completion of the study upon reasonable request
Related trials for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
RecruitingObservational study
Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke
Ischemic Stroke, Acute Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial With Blinded Endpoint Assessment of Early Tirofiban After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Allocating head-of-bed position in people with Acute Ischemic Stroke, run by National University of Singapore at 2 sites in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact VIJAY K SHARMA, MD (91389555, mdcvks@nus.edu.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) change (higher change means more improvement) at day-7 and modified Rankin Score (mRS) at day-7 (time frame: day-7). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.