AzTrials
AzTrials

Diet, Food, and NutritionNCT05074108

Mitigating and Preventing Disordered Eating in Transitioning Service Members

A study testing Pilot study in people with Diet, Food, and Nutrition and Healthy Eating, run by Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Despite documented evidence of disordered eating (DE) among Active Duty (AD) Service Members (SM) and Veterans, DE has not been assessed in SM undergoing the transition from AD to Veterans status (AD-VS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 17 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Pilot study
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2022to Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 17 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Current Active Duty Service Member in the process of transitioning (e.g. separating or retiring) from the military assigned to Naval Support Activity Bethesda
  • Age ≥17 years old
  • Read and write English

Who cannot join

  • Self-reported current or recent (past 5 years) diagnosis of a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual- (DSM-5) eating disorder including: Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, or Binge Eating Disorder AND/OR
  • A score of ≥15 on the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire Short (EDE-QS)

About this study

Official title: Adapted Total Force Kitchen Pilot Intervention to Mitigate and Prevent Disordered Eating in Transitioning Service Members

Despite documented evidence of disordered eating (DE) among Active Duty (AD) Service Members (SM) and Veterans, DE has not been assessed in SM undergoing the transition from AD to Veterans status (AD-VS). The objective of the current study is to explore gender differences and associations between nutrition knowledge, DE attitudes and behaviors, mental health, and military-specific experiences in women and men undergoing the AD-VS transition, and then use this information along with qualitative feedback from focus groups to inform adaptations of an existing nutrition education program for pilot testing in AD-VS women and men.

Read the detailed description

Despite documented evidence of disordered eating (DE) among Active Duty (AD) Service Members (SM) and Veterans, DE has not been assessed in SM undergoing the transition from AD to Veterans status (AD-VS). DE describes psychologically-driven, subclinical, maladaptive eating behaviors that do not meet diagnostic criteria for eating disorders (ED), which are serious psychiatric conditions that require intensive medical intervention and treatment. DE, while less clinically severe than ED, likely affects a much larger proportion of individuals and often goes unreported and/or underdiagnosed, thereby paving the way for chronic DE and development of deleterious outcomes. Mental health is intimately connected with eating behaviors and associations between DE/ED and other mental comorbidities have been described in AD and Veteran populations. By addressing DE during the AD-VS transition time, it may be possible to mitigate the long term clinical consequences that result from chronic DE. The AD-VS time frame is an especially opportune time to intervene with health-focused interventions given the evidence of weight gain and reductions in physical activity that occurs following separation from AD service. The contribution of DE behaviors to weight gain during and immediately following the AD-VS transition has not been explored and could be one factor to target in order to improve healthy lifestyle behaviors during this critical juncture. Interventions that provide SM with resources and strategies to prevent or minimize DE behaviors and improve mental health early in the AD-VS transition process may help to prevent adverse outcomes for Veterans. Based on the available evidence linking DE and mental health in Veterans, interventions that are able to address these issues holistically and prevent downstream clinical outcomes are worthy of investigation in AD-VS women and men. Thus, the objective of the current study is to explore gender differences and associations between nutrition knowledge, DE attitudes and behaviors, mental health, and military-specific experiences in women and men undergoing the AD-VS transition, and then use this information along with qualitative feedback from focus groups to inform adaptations of an existing nutrition education program for pilot testing in AD-VS women and men. Ultimately, this study is the first step in determining a strategy to attenuate the deleterious mental and physical health impacts of poor nutrition and DE in Veterans.

Being tested
Pilot study
Medical subject headings
Feeding Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pilot studyBehavioural

    Aiming for an interaction 6 week course that will discuss many aspects of health and wellness.

Study groups in NCT05074108
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pilot studyExperimentalAdapt and pilot a nutrition-based intervention. The program will take a holistic approach to educate participants about basic nutrition and cooking skills, sleep, and mindfulness strategies to enhance mental health.
Receives: Behavioral: Pilot study

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Nutrition knowledge

    Scores on Abridged Nutrition for Sport Knowledge Questionnaire. Questionnaire is 35 questions long. Answers are scored as either correct or incorrect. Scores range from 0-35, higher scores are more desirable and indicate greater nutrition knowledge.

    Measured: Pre and Post intervention, approximately 6 weeks apart

  2. Eating attitudes / behaviors

    Scores on Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory. The Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) is a self-report questionnaire that includes 45 items covering 8 subscales: Body Dissatisfaction, Binge Eating, Cognitive Restraint, Purging, Restricting, Excessive Exercise, Negative Attitudes toward Obesity, and Muscle Building. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert-style scale (0 = Never; 4= Often) to describe how well each item describes the participant's experiences. Scores are derived by summing responses across the questions included in each subscale. Scores range from 0-180. Lower scores are more desirable.

    Measured: Pre and Post intervention, approximately 6 weeks apart

  3. Eating attitudes / behaviors

    Scores on Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire Short. The Eating Disorder Examination - Questionnaire Short (EDE-QS) was developed as a 12-item version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) with a 4-point response scale that assesses eating disorder (ED) symptoms over the preceding 7 days. Scores range from 0-36. Lower scores are more desirable.

    Measured: Pre and Post intervention, approximately 6 weeks apart

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Oct 2021
  2. Study startJan 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJun 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Not funded

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05074108
Sponsor's protocol ID
MEM-91-12005
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
9 Aug 2021
Last updated
23 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Data generated under the funding award will be provided to the Military Women's Health Research Consortium and the Uniformed Services University, as requested in the Funding Opportunity Announcement. More broadly, data will be shared in an aggregated form through abstracts and presentations submitted to research conferences and manuscripts written for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals. To protect the confidentiality of the participants, no data will ever be identified in publications/presentations.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pilot study in people with Diet, Food, and Nutrition and Healthy Eating, run by Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Nutrition knowledge (time frame: Pre and Post intervention, approximately 6 weeks apart). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in