Infertility, FemaleNCT05076981
Progesterone Levels During Ovulation and Luteal Phase
An observational study of Infertility, Female, run by ART Fertility Clinics LLC at 1 site in United Arab Emirates.
Trial summary
Natural cycles are evaluated during fertility treatments for different therapeutic options, like insemination (IUI), time intercourse (TI) or frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET). Two possible protocols can be used for natural cycles, with or without hCG trigger. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 39 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Infertility, Female
- What is being tested?
- human chorionic gonadotropin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Arab Emirates
- Study dates
- 23 Sep 2021to 30 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 39 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: healthy women with spontaneous ovulation
Who may be able to join
- Healthy women below 40 years
- Regular and Ovulatory cycles
Who cannot join
- Previous adnexal surgery
- Endometriosis
- PCOs
- Using hormonal contraception during the previous 2 months: OCP, progesterone IUD
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Arab Emirates1 site
ART Fertility Clinics LLC
Abu Dhabi, 60202
About this study
Official title: Progesterone Levels During Ovulation and Luteal Phase in Spontaneous Natural Ovulatory Cycles vs Modified Natural Cycle. A Prospective Study
Natural cycles are evaluated during fertility treatments for different therapeutic options, like insemination (IUI), time intercourse (TI) or frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET). Two possible protocols can be used for natural cycles, with or without hCG trigger. Usually, studies including natural cycles consider both options as equivalent, not considering the possible bias that the exogenous hCG (human chorionic gonadotrophin) might have. In this prospective study, Investigators aim to evaluate the differences in the hormonal profile during the ovulation when it occurs spontaneously vs triggered with a bolus of hCG.
Read the detailed description
For the pure natural cycle (PNC), ovulation will be detected by a combination of ultrasound monitoring the follicular growth and serial measurement of luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels, which is recognised to be the most accurate method of correctly identifying ovulation.
For the modified natural cycle (MNC), a bolus of rhCG 6500 IU subcutaneous (sc) will be administered when 1 dominant follicle reaches 17mm or above, after excluding previous LH surge. This is the first prospective study where the differences on the hormonal profile for ovulation will be studied.
HYPOTHESIS:
H0: The hormonal profile is not different between the PNC and the MNC H1: The hormonal profile is different between the PNC and MNC
Administration of hCG is a popular method for triggering ovulation since it may avoid the need to perform IUI or FET at weekends. However, it is an intervention compared with the detection of the spontaneous LH rise. Moreover, due to the presence of hCG receptors in the human endometrium, administration of hCG might interfere with endometrial receptivity. Previous publications evaluating pregnancy rates demonstrated that the use of hCG injection during the natural cycle reduces the pregnancy rates, in FET and IUI. It remains unclear what might be the mechanism to explain the lower pregnancy rates: a possible direct effect of hCG on the hCG receptors of the endometrium or a modification of the hormonal profile after the administration of the hCG, affecting the window of implantation (WOI).
- Conditions
- Infertility, Female
- Being tested
- human chorionic gonadotropin
- Keywords
- luteal phase, natural cycle, human chorionic gonadotropin, progesterone, progesterone rise, ovulation
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility, Female
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
human chorionic gonadotropinDrug
Also called Ovitrelle
once the dominant follicle reaches 17mm or above, a bolus of 6500 rhCG (Ovitrelle, Merck-Serono) will be administered subcutaneously
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pure Natural Cycle | * Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) on day 2/3 of cycle + hormones FSH, LH, E2, P4 (IVF1) * TVUS day 9-10 of cycle to identify dominant follicle. * Blood test for IVF1 every 24h until identification of the LH surge. * The LH surge will be diagnosed when the concentration rises by 180% above the latest serum value available in that patient and continued to rise thereafter (Fatemi et al, 2010). * Once the LH rise is detected, blood test for IVF1 to be performed after 2h, and then every 12h after LH rise for 2 days. * During luteal phase, IVF1 day 7 after LH rise and day 14 after LH rise. | |
| Modified Natural Cycle | * Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) on day 2/3 of cycle + hormones FSH, LH, E2, P4 (IVF1)
* TVUS day 9-10 of cycle to identify dominant follicle.
* Once the dominant follicle reaches 17mm or above, a bolus of 6500 rhCG (Ovitrelle, Merck-Serono) will be administered subcutaneously. IVF1 to be performed just before the rhCG-administration.
* IVF1 2h after rhCG.
* IVF1 every 12h for 2 days after rhCG.
* During luteal phase, IVF1 day 7 after rhCG and day 14 after rhCG. Receives: Drug: human chorionic gonadotropin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in hormone levels
Small sample data will be analyzed with the use of non-parametric test like Wilcoxon test to a paired a test of difference in hormones levels of the patients represented in both cycles (PNC and MNC) (dependent samples). This test will be preferred due to non-independent interval or ratio data in addition not to meet the normality or homogeneity of variances assumptions as paired t-test.
Hormonal pattern over the days (measured for some days during cycle 1 and cycle 2) will be analyzed using trend analysis (line fit).
Measured: 35 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of visits in luteal phase
Number of visits will be analyzed. The differences will be analyzed across PNC and MNC with CI. Fisher's exact test.
Measured: 17 days
Luteal phase length
Luteal phase length will be analyzed. The differences will be analyzed across PNC and MNC with CI. Fisher's exact test.
Measured: 17 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Oct 2021
- Study start23 Sep 2021
- Primary completion30 Dec 2021
- Study completion30 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Infertility, FemaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ART Fertility Clinics LLC
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Laura Melado, ART Fertility Clinics LLC
- Investigators
- LAURA MELADO, PhD, Principal investigator, ART Fertility Clinics LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05076981
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2107-ABU-009-LM
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Licht P, Fluhr H, Neuwinger J, Wallwiener D, Wildt L. Is human chorionic gonadotropin directly involved in the regulation of human implantation? Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007 Apr 15;269(1-2):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2006.09.016. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
PubMed 17367920Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
PubMed 20097333Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Fatemi HM, Grimbizis GF, Theodoridis TD, Camus M, Tournaye H, Tarlatzis BC, Devroey P. Spontaneous triggering of ovulation versus HCG administration in patients undergoing IUI: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Sep;25(3):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 May 23.
PubMed 22796236Connelly LM. Pilot studies. Medsurg Nurs. 2008 Dec;17(6):411-2. No abstract available.
PubMed 19248407Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health. 2008 Apr;31(2):180-91. doi: 10.1002/nur.20247.
PubMed 18183564
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Progesterone Levels During Ovulation and Luteal Phase in Spontaneous Natural Ovulatory Cycles vs Modified Natural Cycle. A Prospective Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05076981
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2107-ABU-009-LM
- Conditions
- Infertility, Female
- Keywords
- luteal phase, natural cycle, human chorionic gonadotropin, progesterone, progesterone rise, ovulation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ART Fertility Clinics LLCUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Natural cycles are evaluated during fertility treatments for different therapeutic options, like insemination (IUI), time intercourse (TI) or frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET). Two possible protocols can be used for natural cycles, with or without hCG trigger. Usually, studies including natural cycles consider both options as equivalent, not considering the possible bias that the exogenous hCG (human chorionic gonadotrophin) might have. In this prospective study, Investigators aim to evaluate the differences in the hormonal profile during the ovulation when it occurs spontaneously vs triggered with a bolus of hCG.
Detailed description
For the pure natural cycle (PNC), ovulation will be detected by a combination of ultrasound monitoring the follicular growth and serial measurement of luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) levels, which is recognised to be the most accurate method of correctly identifying ovulation.
For the modified natural cycle (MNC), a bolus of rhCG 6500 IU subcutaneous (sc) will be administered when 1 dominant follicle reaches 17mm or above, after excluding previous LH surge. This is the first prospective study where the differences on the hormonal profile for ovulation will be studied.
HYPOTHESIS:
H0: The hormonal profile is not different between the PNC and the MNC H1: The hormonal profile is different between the PNC and MNC
Administration of hCG is a popular method for triggering ovulation since it may avoid the need to perform IUI or FET at weekends. However, it is an intervention compared with the detection of the spontaneous LH rise. Moreover, due to the presence of hCG receptors in the human endometrium, administration of hCG might interfere with endometrial receptivity. Previous publications evaluating pregnancy rates demonstrated that the use of hCG injection during the natural cycle reduces the pregnancy rates, in FET and IUI. It remains unclear what might be the mechanism to explain the lower pregnancy rates: a possible direct effect of hCG on the hCG receptors of the endometrium or a modification of the hormonal profile after the administration of the hCG, affecting the window of implantation (WOI).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pure Natural Cycle | – | –* Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) on day 2/3 of cycle + hormones FSH, LH, E2, P4 (IVF1) * TVUS day 9-10 of cycle to identify dominant follicle. * Blood test for IVF1 every 24h until identification of the LH surge. * The LH surge will be diagnosed when the concentration rises by 180% above the latest serum value available in that patient and continued to rise thereafter (Fatemi et al, 2010). * Once the LH rise is detected, blood test for IVF1 to be performed after 2h, and then every 12h after LH rise for 2 days. * During luteal phase, IVF1 day 7 after LH rise and day 14 after LH rise. |
| Modified Natural Cycle | – | Drug: human chorionic gonadotropin* Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) on day 2/3 of cycle + hormones FSH, LH, E2, P4 (IVF1) * TVUS day 9-10 of cycle to identify dominant follicle. * Once the dominant follicle reaches 17mm or above, a bolus of 6500 rhCG (Ovitrelle, Merck-Serono) will be administered subcutaneously. IVF1 to be performed just before the rhCG-administration. * IVF1 2h after rhCG. * IVF1 every 12h for 2 days after rhCG. * During luteal phase, IVF1 day 7 after rhCG and day 14 after rhCG. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 39 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- healthy women with spontaneous ovulation
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Healthy women below 40 years
- Regular and Ovulatory cycles
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Previous adnexal surgery
- Endometriosis
- PCOs
- Using hormonal contraception during the previous 2 months: OCP, progesterone IUD
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| human chorionic gonadotropinAlso: Ovitrelleonce the dominant follicle reaches 17mm or above, a bolus of 6500 rhCG (Ovitrelle, Merck-Serono) will be administered subcutaneously | Drug | Modified Natural Cycle |
Primary outcome
Difference in hormone levels
Time frame: 35 days
Small sample data will be analyzed with the use of non-parametric test like Wilcoxon test to a paired a test of difference in hormones levels of the patients represented in both cycles (PNC and MNC) (dependent samples). This test will be preferred due to non-independent interval or ratio data in addition not to meet the normality or homogeneity of variances assumptions as paired t-test. Hormonal pattern over the days (measured for some days during cycle 1 and cycle 2) will be analyzed using trend analysis (line fit).
2 secondary outcomes
Number of visits in luteal phase
Time frame: 17 days
Luteal phase length
Time frame: 17 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 17367920Licht P, Fluhr H, Neuwinger J, Wallwiener D, Wildt L. Is human chorionic gonadotropin directly involved in the regulation of human implantation? Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007 Apr 15;269(1-2):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2006.09.016. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 20097333Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
- Background: PubMed 22796236Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Fatemi HM, Grimbizis GF, Theodoridis TD, Camus M, Tournaye H, Tarlatzis BC, Devroey P. Spontaneous triggering of ovulation versus HCG administration in patients undergoing IUI: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Sep;25(3):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 May 23.
- Background: PubMed 19248407Connelly LM. Pilot studies. Medsurg Nurs. 2008 Dec;17(6):411-2. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18183564Hertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health. 2008 Apr;31(2):180-91. doi: 10.1002/nur.20247.
- van Belle, G. (2002). Statistical rules of thumb. New York: John WileyLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Infertility, Female
RecruitingObservational study
Safety and Efficacy of Corifollitropin Alfa N02 Injection in Elderly Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)
Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Inherited Reproductive Disorders
Genetic Disorder, Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Biorepository in Participants Who Undergo OTC for Gonadotoxic Therapy
Acute Ovarian Failure, Infertility
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Linzagolix in Adenomyosis and Recurrent Implantation Failure
Adenomyosis of Uterus, Implantation Failure
Recruiting
225 IU Versus 300 IU Starting FSH Dose in PPOS for Good-Prognosis Women
Infertility (IVF Patients), Infertility Assisted Reproductive Technology
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
LAURA MELADO, PhD principal investigator
ART Fertility Clinics LLC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Infertility, Female, run by ART Fertility Clinics LLC at 1 site in United Arab Emirates.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Arab Emirates. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in hormone levels (time frame: 35 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05076981, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2023.