AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerNCT05079828

Head-to-head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-PSMA-1007

A study testing 18F-PSMA-1007 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to provide robust data on the head-to-head comparison of the two ligands of the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) available in Switzerland for positron emission tomography (PET)-imaging, i.e. 68Ga-PSMA-11 und 18F-PSMA-1007. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostate Cancer
What is being tested?
18F-PSMA-1007 and 68Ga-PSMA-11
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
7 Jul 2022to 30 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with known biochemical recurrence of a histologically confirmed prostate cancer post radical prostatectomy, defined as two consecutive prostate specific antigen (PSA) values > 0.2 ng/ml:
  • Post prostatectomy: Patients > 18 y/o
  • PSA measured within ± 4 weeks of the first PSMA-PET/CT
  • Patients providing written informed consent
  • No change in PC treatment in the period between the first and second scans

Who cannot join

  • Patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) within 6 months prior to the PSMA-PET/CT
  • Patients with contraindication to diuresis with 20mg Furosemide
  • Patients with renal dialysis or relevant renal impairment (eGFR < 35 ml/min)
  • Inability to provide written informed consent
  • Inability to schedule and attend two consecutive PET examinations
  • Patients undergoing active treatment for a second non-prostatic malignancy at the time of the first scan.
  • Known sensitivity or allergy to PSMA-ligands or one of the components of the radiotracer solutions used.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern

    Bern, 3010

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Head-to-head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-PSMA-1007 for the Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT

The aim of this study is to provide robust data on the head-to-head comparison of the two ligands of the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) available in Switzerland for positron emission tomography (PET)-imaging, i.e. 68Ga-PSMA-11 und 18F-PSMA-1007.

Read the detailed description

Prostate Cancer (PC) is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Despite initial therapy at early stage disease, biochemical recurrence remains a commonly encountered entity and presents a challenge for conventional imaging modalities given their limited abilities to detect disease at early stages of recurrence.

PET/CT with ligands of the prostate specific membrane antigen has been shown to have a significant impact on treatment and is now the sine qua non for staging of recurrent PC. For example, accurate identification of PC lesions allows for more accurate radiotherapy planning, allowing for an individualised treatment strategy. There is therefore a substantial clinical requirement for the accurate identification and stratification of individuals in whom prostate cancer is diagnosed and at earlier stages of recurrent disease when the chance of a curative treatment is at its highest.

It is in this context that PSMA has become the focus of much attention owing to its high levels of expression on PC cells and has rapidly established itself as the investigation of choice in recurrent PC. Furthermore, PSMA-directed radioligand therapy is a rapidly evolving treatment modality for metastatic disease, creating an additional therapeutic role for PSMA-ligand molecular imaging, for which the term "theragnostics" has been coined. The challenge for nuclear medicine is therefore to develop tracers and examination protocols that provide optimal detection and characterisation of disease, thus improving upon this promising technique.

There are currently no published prospective head-to-head studies comparing these two tracers in recurrent PC. Because of this lack of data, there are no clear recommendations about which tracer to use and in which situation.

This study aims to fill this gap and provide comprehensive data with the potential to improve the diagnosis of PC. By providing robust data comparing the two tracers, such data will also provide guidance to clinicians faced with the scenario of an initially negative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET as to the diagnostic utility of an additional 18F-PSMA-1007 PET, or vice-versa, and in which scenarios repeated scanning may be justified.

Finally, the application of the radiotracer into the same patient allows for a comparison of tracer kinetics. Although radiotracer kinetics are well known from the original pioneering dosimetric publications, they have never been compared in a head to head fashion and not in biochemical recurrence. Obtaining dynamic scans over the first hour post injection will allow intra-individual dosimetry and a head-to-head comparison of parametric imaging parameters, allowing a direct comparison of the radiotracer's affinity using standard parametric imaging techniques.

Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Being tested
18F-PSMA-1007, 68Ga-PSMA-11
Keywords
PSMA, 68Ga-PSMA-11, 18F-PSMA-1007, PET/CT, recurrent prostate cancer
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 18F-PSMA-1007Diagnostic test

    PET/CT scan using 18F-PSMA-1007

  • 68Ga-PSMA-11Diagnostic test

    PET/CT scan using 68Ga-PSMA-11

Study groups in NCT05079828
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1Active comparatorPatients receive first a PET/CT with 68Ga-PSMA-11 and a second PET/CT with 18F-PSMA-1007
Receives: Diagnostic Test: 18F-PSMA-1007; Diagnostic Test: 68Ga-PSMA-11
Arm 2Active comparatorPatients receive first a PET/CT with 18F-PSMA-1007 and a second with 68Ga-PSMA-11
Receives: Diagnostic Test: 18F-PSMA-1007; Diagnostic Test: 68Ga-PSMA-11

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient-level detection rate

    The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with a pathological PSMA-positive finding (= patient-based sensitivity) at one time-point (2h) with the existing standard-of-care (68Ga-PSMA-11) compared to the new tracer (18F-PSMA-1007).

    Measured: 3-6 months following final scan

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Comparison of tracer kinetics

    Intra-individual comparison of the parametric imaging parameter KD (measure of tracer affinity) for the two radiotracers.

    Measured: For the first n=10 individuals, expected to be after 3 months

  2. Per region-based detection rate

    • The number of pathological, benign and uncertain lesions for each tracer in five regions (prostate bed, pelvic lymph nodes, extra-pelvic lymph nodes, bone, or other organs) classified by six blinded readers (three for each tracer) using previously published interpretation guidelines (PSMA-Rads 1.0)

    Measured: Confirmed by 12 months' follow up from date of scan to a composite standard

  3. Interreader reliability

    Readers shall independently classify all PSMA-avid lesions according to previously published diagnostic criteria. The frequency of benign, equivocal and pathological lesions will be noted. Lesions will additionally be classified by region (prostate bed (T), pelvic lymph nodes (N), extrapelvic lymph nodes (M1a), bone (M1b) or other organs (M1c)). The interreader reliability for these classifications will be compared between all readers.

    Measured: Within 3-6 months of last scan

  4. Region based PPV

    • The positive predictive value (PPV) stratified by region (local recurrence, lymph node, solid organ, bone) i.e. the percentage of pathological lesions that are confirmed pathological at the twelve months follow-up (based on the subset of patients and lesions with follow-up data at twelve months).

    Measured: 12 months from the last scan

  5. Lesion semiquantitative radiotracer uptake

    • semiquantitative radiotracer uptake will be assessed by standardised uptake values (SUV) as well as tumour to background contrast in a lesion based analysis. The tumour to background ratio (TBR) is defined as lesion SUV ÷ SUV of reference background region, where the background uptake is defined by convention as the left gluteal musculature

    Measured: Within 6 months of scan date

  6. Number of patients with adverse events and their severity

    • Number and severity of adverse events per tracer (up to 48 hours follow up).

    Measured: 48 hours

  7. Lesion based PPV

    In a second round of tumour classification, two readers (in consensus) will classify each lesion as pathological, benign or uncertain in a lesion-specific approach and perform a lesion based follow-up to assess PPV on the lesion level.

    Measured: 12 months from the last scan

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Oct 2021
  2. Study start7 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion1 May 2024
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Patients will be randomised to receive a PET/CT with either 18F-PSMA-1007 and a second exam with 68Ga-PSMA-11 or vice-versa, in the reverse order.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05079828
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020-02903
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
13 Jul 2021
Last updated
10 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Data available upon reasonable request

Publications

  • Alberts I, Butikofer L, Rominger A, Afshar-Oromieh A. A randomised, prospective and head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]PSMA-1007 for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in PSMA-ligand PET/CT-Protocol design and rationale. PLoS One. 2022 Jul 19;17(7):e0270269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270269. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 35853017

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 18F-PSMA-1007 and 68Ga-PSMA-11 in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient-level detection rate (time frame: 3-6 months following final scan). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05079828, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in