OxytocinPhase 4STIMNCT05079841
The Stimulation To Induce Mothers Study
A Phase 4 study testing Electric breast pump and Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion without nipple stimulation. in people with Oxytocin and Labor Pain, run by Yale University at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators propose a parallel group randomized clinical trial of intrapartum nipple stimulation versus exogenous oxytocin infusion for nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor near term. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Oxytocin, Labor Pain, Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn
- What is being tested?
- Electric breast pump and Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion without nipple stimulation.
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 933 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2021to Mar 2029
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Nulliparous
- Gestational age 36 0/7 weeks and greater at enrollment
- Singleton gestation
- Planned to undergo initiation of exogenous oxytocin infusion by their maternity care provider
- Spontaneous rupture of membranes or if membranes intact, modified Bishop score ≥5 and cervix dilated <6 cm within one hour of enrollment
- Ability to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- Unable to understand English or Spanish
- Prior use of exogenous oxytocin or attempt at nipple stimulation during the current pregnancy
- Presence of tachysystole (defined as more than 5 contractions in 10 minutes averaged over 30 minutes), recurrent variable or late fetal decelerations, and bradycardia in the prior 30 minutes before enrollment
- Non-vertex presenting fetus at time of enrollment
- Planned for cesarean delivery or contraindication to labor by institutional policy (e.g., placenta previa, vasa previa, active genital herpes infection, previous transmural myomectomy)
- Multi-fetal gestation (e.g., twins, triplets, and higher-order multiples)
Show all 15Show fewer
- Intrauterine fetal death
- Major fetal anomaly suspected prenatally (defined as a fetal anomaly with anticipated neonatal intensive care unit admission)
- Suspected alloimmunization (given the increased likelihood for anticipated neonatal intensive care unit admission)
- Known severe fetal growth restriction (estimated fetal weight <3rd percentile) or abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies (given the increased likelihood for anticipated neonatal intensive care unit admission)
- HIV infection (nipple stimulation is not encouraged given the recommendation for these mothers not to breastfeed)
- Participation in another interventional study that influences management of labor and delivery or perinatal morbidity or mortality
- History of mastectomy or other contraindication to use of electronic breast pump
- Known allergic reactions to components of the electronic breast pump or to synthetic oxytocin intravenous solution
- Significantly impaired consciousness or executive function (e.g., intubated or sedated)
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Weill Cornell Medicine
New York, New York, 10065
About this study
Official title: The Stimulation To Induce Mothers (STIM) Study: A Parallel Group Randomized Controlled Trial
The investigators propose a parallel group randomized clinical trial of intrapartum nipple stimulation versus exogenous oxytocin infusion for nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor near term. The central hypothesis is that intrapartum nipple stimulation to induce labor increases spontaneous vaginal delivery, improves patient-centered outcomes such as childbirth satisfaction, labor agentry, and pain scores, and reduces adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes in nulliparous women. The investigators will pursue the following specific aims: 1) Assess the effectiveness of intrapartum nipple stimulation on the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women, 2) Breastfeeding as the sole source of nutrition at time of maternal hospital discharge (Primary Aims); 3) Maximal percent newborn weight loss during the birth hospitalization within 72 hours of life, 4) Determine the effect of intrapartum nipple stimulation on the rate of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, 5) Determine the impact of intrapartum nipple stimulation on patient-centered outcomes and 6) In a sub-cohort of women who are enrolled in the trial, investigators will measure the change in oxytocin concentration from baseline to time at which patient achieves a regular contraction pattern.
Read the detailed description
Primary Objectives
- To determine whether intrapartum nipple stimulation therapy with or without synthetic oxytocin changes the likelihood of achieving a spontaneous vaginal delivery compared to receipt of synthetic oxytocin infusion without nipple stimulation to induce labor.
- Breastfeeding as the sole source of nutrition at time of maternal hospital discharge
Secondary Objectives (if applicable)
The secondary objectives are as follows:
- Determine whether intrapartum nipple stimulation therapy with or without synthetic oxytocin changes the likelihood of achieving a spontaneous vaginal delivery compared to receipt of synthetic oxytocin infusion without nipple stimulation to induce labor.
- Determine if women who perform intrapartum nipple stimulation to induce labor have differences in other obstetric and maternal outcomes
- Determine if women who perform intrapartum nipple stimulation report differences in pain scores during labor, labor agentry and satisfaction scores, postpartum depression scores, and breastfeeding success compared to women who receive only intrapartum exogenous oxytocin infusion.
- Determine if women who perform intrapartum nipple stimulation to induce labor have similar fetal and neonatal outcomes compared to women who receive only intrapartum exogenous oxytocin infusion.
- Maximal percent newborn weight loss during the birth hospitalization within 72 hours of life
- At Yale, to measure the change in oxytocin concentration from baseline over the course of labor induction in patients undergoing induction of labor via intrapartum nipple stimulation versus continuous exogenous oxytocin infusion.
- At Yale, to measure circulating plasma and urine concentrations of proteins, microRNA, and small molecules using unbiased "omics" approaches, comparing patients undergoing induction of labor via intrapartum nipple stimulation versus continuous exogenous oxytocin infusion, un-ripened/unlabored control patients, and patients in spontaneous labor.
- Conditions
- Oxytocin, Labor Pain, Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn, Physiologic Effects of Drugs
- Being tested
- Electric breast pump, Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion without nipple stimulation.
- Medical subject headings
- Labor Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Electric breast pumpDevice
Participants randomized to the intrapartum nipple stimulation will use electric breast pump or nipple stimulate by hand (if preferred) (intervention) to induce labor for at least 2 hours
Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion without nipple stimulation.Drug
Also called Pitocin intravenous infusion
Participants randomized to the standard care arm will use exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion to induce labor as current standard of care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intrapartum nipple stimulation | Experimental | Participants randomized to the intrapartum nipple stimulation will use electric breast pump or stimulate by hand (intervention) to induce labor. Receives: Device: Electric breast pump |
| Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion | Active comparator | Participants randomized to the standard care arm will use exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion to induce labor. Receives: Drug: Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion without nipple stimulation. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Spontaneous vaginal delivery
Spontaneous vaginal delivery will be defined as delivery that occurs without the use of forceps, vacuum, or cesarean
Measured: At delivery
Breastfeeding as the sole source of nutrition (BSSN)
Number of participants using breastfeeding as the sole source of nutrition (BSSN) at time of maternal discharge or 72 hours of life (whichever is sooner)
Measured: up to 72 hours following delivery
Secondary outcomes (14)
Operative vaginal delivery
Delivery with the assistance of forceps or vacuum, and indication
Measured: At delivery
Cesarean delivery
Delivery by cesarean section
Measured: At delivery
Labor induction duration
Time interval from randomization to delivery
Measured: At delivery
Number of Participants with Postpartum hemorrhage
Cumulative blood loss of ≥1,000 mL within 24 hours after the birth process
Measured: From delivery to 24 hours postpartum
Number of Participants with Severe Postpartum hemorrhage
Transfusion; non-elective hysterectomy; use of ≥2 uterotonic medications other than oxytocin; other interventions such as uterine compression sutures, uterine artery ligation or embolization, hypogastric artery ligation, balloon tamponade
Measured: From delivery to 24 hours postpartum
Number of participants with suspected infection
Suspected intraamniotic infection, intrapartum chorioamnionitis, or postpartum endometritis (defined as maternal fever ≥38° Fahrenheit with planned or initiated administration of therapeutic antibiotics) after randomization and prior to delivery hospitalization discharge
Measured: 3-7 days postpartum
Lactational mastitis
Subject-reported occurrence of lactational mastitis
Measured: After delivery to 12 weeks postpartum
Number of maternal deaths
Incidence of maternal death prior to, during, or post delivery
Measured: immediately prior to up to immediately post delivery
Maternal Intensive Care Unit admission
Any admission to the Intensive Care Unit after delivery and prior to delivery hospitalization discharge
Measured: 3-7 days postpartum
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission
Any admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit From birth to birth hospitalization discharge or 28 days after birth, whichever is earlier
Measured: up to 28 days following birth
Neonatal Apgar score ≤3 at 5 minutes of life
The Neonatal Apgar score is scored from 0 to 10. A 5-minute Apgar score of 0-3 correlates with neonatal mortality in large population studies.
Measured: At 5 minutes after birth
Umbilical acidemia
Umbilical cord arterial pH <7.0 or base excess >12 mmol/L; or umbilical cord venous pH <7.0 or base excess >12 mmol/L if arterial blood sample not available
Measured: At delivery
Composite neonatal severe morbidity measure
Intrapartum fetal death or neonatal death; cardiorespiratory support within first 72 hours of life; neonatal encephalopathy; seizures; hypothermic treatment (cooling); sepsis; pneumonia; major birth injury; meconium aspiration syndrome; intracranial hemorrhage or subgaleal hemorrhage; or hypotension requiring pressor support
Measured: up to 28 days following delivery
Percent newborn weight loss
Maximal percent newborn weight loss in kilograms(kg)
Measured: At 72 hours of life or birth hospitalization discharge, whichever is earlier
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Oct 2021
- Study start15 Nov 2021
- Primary completionNov 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OxytocinStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 933 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Molly McAdow, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Yale UniversityBethany Stetson, MD, Principal investigator, Northwestern UniversityMoeun Son, MD, MSCI, Principal investigator, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05079841
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2000031338
- Other IDs
- 1R01HD111633-01, 231888-1
- Acronym
- STIM
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified data will be shared with academic researchers for secondary analyses or meta-analyses only after approval from the principal investigator and using an IRB-approved mechanism.
Publications
Tortal D, Shabanova V, Taylor S, Xu X, McAdow M, Stetson B, McCollum S, Sanchez E, Adjakple A, Leventhal J, Son M. Stimulation Therapy to Induce Mothers: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 29;13:e63463. doi: 10.2196/63463.
PubMed 39207839
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Stimulation To Induce Mothers (STIM) Study: A Parallel Group Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05079841
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STIM / 2000031338
- Conditions
- Oxytocin, Labor Pain, Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn, Physiologic Effects of Drugs
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 933 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators propose a parallel group randomized clinical trial of intrapartum nipple stimulation versus exogenous oxytocin infusion for nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor near term. The central hypothesis is that intrapartum nipple stimulation to induce labor increases spontaneous vaginal delivery, improves patient-centered outcomes such as childbirth satisfaction, labor agentry, and pain scores, and reduces adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes in nulliparous women. The investigators will pursue the following specific aims: 1) Assess the effectiveness of intrapartum nipple stimulation on the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women, 2) Breastfeeding as the sole source of nutrition at time of maternal hospital discharge (Primary Aims); 3) Maximal percent newborn weight loss during the birth hospitalization within 72 hours of life, 4) Determine the effect of intrapartum nipple stimulation on the rate of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, 5) Determine the impact of intrapartum nipple stimulation on patient-centered outcomes and 6) In a sub-cohort of women who are enrolled in the trial, investigators will measure the change in oxytocin concentration from baseline to time at which patient achieves a regular contraction pattern.
Detailed description
Primary Objectives
- To determine whether intrapartum nipple stimulation therapy with or without synthetic oxytocin changes the likelihood of achieving a spontaneous vaginal delivery compared to receipt of synthetic oxytocin infusion without nipple stimulation to induce labor.
- Breastfeeding as the sole source of nutrition at time of maternal hospital discharge
Secondary Objectives (if applicable)
The secondary objectives are as follows:
- Determine whether intrapartum nipple stimulation therapy with or without synthetic oxytocin changes the likelihood of achieving a spontaneous vaginal delivery compared to receipt of synthetic oxytocin infusion without nipple stimulation to induce labor.
- Determine if women who perform intrapartum nipple stimulation to induce labor have differences in other obstetric and maternal outcomes
- Determine if women who perform intrapartum nipple stimulation report differences in pain scores during labor, labor agentry and satisfaction scores, postpartum depression scores, and breastfeeding success compared to women who receive only intrapartum exogenous oxytocin infusion.
- Determine if women who perform intrapartum nipple stimulation to induce labor have similar fetal and neonatal outcomes compared to women who receive only intrapartum exogenous oxytocin infusion.
- Maximal percent newborn weight loss during the birth hospitalization within 72 hours of life
- At Yale, to measure the change in oxytocin concentration from baseline over the course of labor induction in patients undergoing induction of labor via intrapartum nipple stimulation versus continuous exogenous oxytocin infusion.
- At Yale, to measure circulating plasma and urine concentrations of proteins, microRNA, and small molecules using unbiased "omics" approaches, comparing patients undergoing induction of labor via intrapartum nipple stimulation versus continuous exogenous oxytocin infusion, un-ripened/unlabored control patients, and patients in spontaneous labor.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intrapartum nipple stimulation | Experimental | Device: Electric breast pumpParticipants randomized to the intrapartum nipple stimulation will use electric breast pump or stimulate by hand (intervention) to induce labor. |
| Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion | Active comparator | Drug: Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion without nipple stimulation.Participants randomized to the standard care arm will use exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion to induce labor. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Nulliparous
- Gestational age 36 0/7 weeks and greater at enrollment
- Singleton gestation
- Planned to undergo initiation of exogenous oxytocin infusion by their maternity care provider
- Spontaneous rupture of membranes or if membranes intact, modified Bishop score ≥5 and cervix dilated <6 cm within one hour of enrollment
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Unable to understand English or Spanish
- Prior use of exogenous oxytocin or attempt at nipple stimulation during the current pregnancy
- Presence of tachysystole (defined as more than 5 contractions in 10 minutes averaged over 30 minutes), recurrent variable or late fetal decelerations, and bradycardia in the prior 30 minutes before enrollment
- Non-vertex presenting fetus at time of enrollment
- Planned for cesarean delivery or contraindication to labor by institutional policy (e.g., placenta previa, vasa previa, active genital herpes infection, previous transmural myomectomy)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Electric breast pumpParticipants randomized to the intrapartum nipple stimulation will use electric breast pump or nipple stimulate by hand (if preferred) (intervention) to induce labor for at least 2 hours | Device | Intrapartum nipple stimulation |
| Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion without nipple stimulation.Also: Pitocin intravenous infusionParticipants randomized to the standard care arm will use exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion to induce labor as current standard of care | Drug | Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion |
Primary outcome
Spontaneous vaginal delivery
Time frame: At delivery
Spontaneous vaginal delivery will be defined as delivery that occurs without the use of forceps, vacuum, or cesarean
Breastfeeding as the sole source of nutrition (BSSN)
Time frame: up to 72 hours following delivery
Number of participants using breastfeeding as the sole source of nutrition (BSSN) at time of maternal discharge or 72 hours of life (whichever is sooner)
14 secondary outcomes
Operative vaginal delivery
Time frame: At delivery
Cesarean delivery
Time frame: At delivery
Labor induction duration
Time frame: At delivery
Number of Participants with Postpartum hemorrhage
Time frame: From delivery to 24 hours postpartum
Number of Participants with Severe Postpartum hemorrhage
Time frame: From delivery to 24 hours postpartum
Number of participants with suspected infection
Time frame: 3-7 days postpartum
Lactational mastitis
Time frame: After delivery to 12 weeks postpartum
Number of maternal deaths
Time frame: immediately prior to up to immediately post delivery
Maternal Intensive Care Unit admission
Time frame: 3-7 days postpartum
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission
Time frame: up to 28 days following birth
Neonatal Apgar score ≤3 at 5 minutes of life
Time frame: At 5 minutes after birth
Umbilical acidemia
Time frame: At delivery
Composite neonatal severe morbidity measure
Time frame: up to 28 days following delivery
Percent newborn weight loss
Time frame: At 72 hours of life or birth hospitalization discharge, whichever is earlier
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39207839Tortal D, Shabanova V, Taylor S, Xu X, McAdow M, Stetson B, McCollum S, Sanchez E, Adjakple A, Leventhal J, Son M. Stimulation Therapy to Induce Mothers: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 29;13:e63463. doi: 10.2196/63463.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified data will be shared with academic researchers for secondary analyses or meta-analyses only after approval from the principal investigator and using an IRB-approved mechanism.
Related trials for Oxytocin
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Identifying Oxytocin Deficiency in Pediatric Patients With Pituitary Disease
Arginine Vasopressin Deficiency, Oxytocin Deficiency
RecruitingPhase 1
Effects of Intranasal Oxytocin in Patients With Arginine-vasopressin Deficiency
Vasopressin Deficiency
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
Efficacy of Intravenous Oxytocin to Speed Recovery After THA
Total Hip Arthroplasty
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Evaluating Intranasal Oxytocin (TNX-1900) for Pain Relief and Recovery After Pituitary Surgery
Pain, Pituitary Surgery
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Analgesia on Oxytocin in Early vs Late Labor
Labor Analgesia, Labor Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Molly McAdow, MD, PhD principal investigator
Yale University
Bethany Stetson, MD principal investigator
Northwestern University
Moeun Son, MD, MSCI principal investigator
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Electric breast pump and Exogenous oxytocin intravenous infusion without nipple stimulation. in people with Oxytocin and Labor Pain, run by Yale University at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Spontaneous vaginal delivery (time frame: At delivery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05079841, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2026.