Soft Tissue MassesNCT05079997
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING in Superficial Soft Tissue Masses
An observational study of Soft Tissue Masses, run by Assiut University.
Trial summary
This study responds to these raise up questions: Can we use Diffusion Weighted MR complemented with numerical ADC values \& in association with routine MRI in the discrimination between different malignant and benign superficial soft tissue masses. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Soft Tissue Masses
- What is being tested?
- MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 2021to Mar 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: patients with superficial soft tissue masses
Who may be able to join
- patients with superficial soft tissue masses clinically
- patients underwent us detection of superficial soft tissue masses
- uncharactized superficial soft tissue mass by other modalities
Who cannot join
- MRI claustrophobia
- recurrent cases
- patients under treatment
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Role of MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING in Characterization of Superficial Soft Tissue Masses
This study responds to these raise up questions: Can we use Diffusion Weighted MR complemented with numerical ADC values \& in association with routine MRI in the discrimination between different malignant and benign superficial soft tissue masses.
Read the detailed description
In the clinical practice, there is a large number \& variety of superficial soft tissue masses. The differentiation of such masses represents a major obstacle for the surgeons. Benign \&malignant neoplasms as well as non-neoplastic swellings may have similar clinical presentation. The differentiation between malignant \& benign superficial soft tissue neoplasms is required for appropriate therapeutic planning and decisions. Masses can be characterized in terms of their size, number, component \&vascularity using US and Doppler US. However, US is operator dependent \& may display a number of artifacts that can result in misinterpretation. So MRI is superior in the assessment of such soft tissue masses due its brilliant soft tissue discrimination. Some features that will help distinguish malignant from benign lesions are evident on MRI examination such as signal characteristics,enhancement pattern,margin,lobulation,necrosis, haemorrhage,internal septation,peritumoral edema and extension through the deep fascia .However very forcful tumors may show benign behavior \& appear similar to benign masses , Thus further histopathology is required for accurate diagnosis. Diffusion weighted MRI visualizes the random microscopic motion of molecules. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is the technique which allows measurement of the Brownian motion of water in the tissue microenvironment depending on the organization of the tissue, integrity of cell membranes, and tortuosity of extracellular space. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) is a numerical parameter which is calculated from DWI. Previously, DWI technique was used with great success in the central nervous system (CNS), in the differentiation between benign and malignant tumors in addition to its great value in early diagnosis of recent strokes. Nowadays, DWI was used in the differentiation between malignant and benign soft tissue masses. Malignant tumors have abundant cellularity than benign tumors hence they have more restricted diffusion. The addition of quantitative ADC values plays a fundamental role in more accurate diagnosis of malignant superficial soft tissue neoplasms.
- Conditions
- Soft Tissue Masses
- Being tested
- MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGINGDevice
s a medical imaging technique used in radiology to form pictures of the anatomy and the physiological processes of the body. MRI scanners use strong magnetic fields, magnetic field gradients, and radio waves to generate images of the organs in the body. MRI does not involve X-rays or the use of ionizing radiation, which distinguishes it from CT and PET scans. MRI is a medical application of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) which can also be used for imaging in other NMR applications, such as NMR spectroscopy.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
benign and malignant masses
The discrimination between benign and malignant superficial soft tissue mass by Non invasive available technique
Measured: from october 2021 to october2022
Secondary outcomes (1)
Type of malignant superficial soft tissue masses
Differentiation type of malignant superficial soft tissue masses
Measured: From October 2021 to October 2022
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Oct 2021
- Study startOct 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completionOct 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Soft Tissue MassesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fatma Alzahraa Mohamed Hassan Anwar, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05079997
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- mri in soft tissue
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 26 Sep 2021
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Song Y, Yoon YC, Chong Y, Seo SW, Choi YL, Sohn I, Kim MJ. Diagnostic performance of conventional MRI parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient values in differentiating between benign and malignant soft-tissue tumours. Clin Radiol. 2017 Aug;72(8):691.e1-691.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
PubMed 28274509Thawait GK, Subhawong TK, Tatizawa Shiga NY, Fayad LM. "Cystic"-appearing soft tissue masses: what is the role of anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR imaging techniques in their characterization? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Mar;39(3):504-11. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24314. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
PubMed 24532375Toprak H, Kilic E, Serter A, Kocakoc E, Ozgocmen S. Ultrasound and Doppler US in Evaluation of Superficial Soft-tissue Lesions. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014 Feb 27;4:12. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.127965. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24744969Calleja M, Dimigen M, Saifuddin A. MRI of superficial soft tissue masses: analysis of features useful in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Dec;41(12):1517-24. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1385-6. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
PubMed 22491777Herneth AM, Ringl H, Memarsadeghi M, Fueger B, Friedrich KM, Krestan C, Imhof H. Diffusion weighted imaging in osteoradiology. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jun;18(3):203-12. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3180cac61d.
PubMed 17762384Panicek DM, Gatsonis C, Rosenthal DI, Seeger LL, Huvos AG, Moore SG, Caudry DJ, Palmer WE, McNeil BJ. CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology. 1997 Jan;202(1):237-46. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988217.
PubMed 8988217Fayad LM, Jacobs MA, Wang X, Carrino JA, Bluemke DA. Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques. Radiology. 2012 Nov;265(2):340-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111740.
PubMed 23093707Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Radiologic evaluation of soft-tissue masses: a current perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Sep;175(3):575-87. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750575. No abstract available.
PubMed 10954433Gielen JL, De Schepper AM, Vanhoenacker F, Parizel PM, Wang XL, Sciot R, Weyler J. Accuracy of MRI in characterization of soft tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions. A prospective study in 548 patients. Eur Radiol. 2004 Dec;14(12):2320-30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2431-0. Epub 2004 Jul 29.
PubMed 15290067Kauppinen RA. Monitoring cytotoxic tumour treatment response by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and proton spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 2002 Feb;15(1):6-17. doi: 10.1002/nbm.742.
PubMed 11840548Baur A, Reiser MF. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the musculoskeletal system in humans. Skeletal Radiol. 2000 Oct;29(10):555-62. doi: 10.1007/s002560000243.
PubMed 11127677Szafer A, Zhong J, Gore JC. Theoretical model for water diffusion in tissues. Magn Reson Med. 1995 May;33(5):697-712. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910330516.
PubMed 7596275Subhawong TK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Insights into quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI for musculoskeletal tumor imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Sep;203(3):560-72. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12165.
PubMed 25148158Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, Chenevert TL, Thoeny HC, Takahara T, Dzik-Jurasz A, Ross BD, Van Cauteren M, Collins D, Hammoud DA, Rustin GJ, Taouli B, Choyke PL. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia. 2009 Feb;11(2):102-25. doi: 10.1593/neo.81328.
PubMed 19186405Ross BD, Moffat BA, Lawrence TS, Mukherji SK, Gebarski SS, Quint DJ, Johnson TD, Junck L, Robertson PL, Muraszko KM, Dong Q, Meyer CR, Bland PH, McConville P, Geng H, Rehemtulla A, Chenevert TL. Evaluation of cancer therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003 Jun;2(6):581-7.
PubMed 12813138
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Role of MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING in Characterization of Superficial Soft Tissue Masses
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05079997
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- mri in soft tissue
- Conditions
- Soft Tissue Masses
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study responds to these raise up questions: Can we use Diffusion Weighted MR complemented with numerical ADC values \& in association with routine MRI in the discrimination between different malignant and benign superficial soft tissue masses.
Detailed description
In the clinical practice, there is a large number \& variety of superficial soft tissue masses. The differentiation of such masses represents a major obstacle for the surgeons. Benign \&malignant neoplasms as well as non-neoplastic swellings may have similar clinical presentation. The differentiation between malignant \& benign superficial soft tissue neoplasms is required for appropriate therapeutic planning and decisions. Masses can be characterized in terms of their size, number, component \&vascularity using US and Doppler US. However, US is operator dependent \& may display a number of artifacts that can result in misinterpretation. So MRI is superior in the assessment of such soft tissue masses due its brilliant soft tissue discrimination. Some features that will help distinguish malignant from benign lesions are evident on MRI examination such as signal characteristics,enhancement pattern,margin,lobulation,necrosis, haemorrhage,internal septation,peritumoral edema and extension through the deep fascia .However very forcful tumors may show benign behavior \& appear similar to benign masses , Thus further histopathology is required for accurate diagnosis. Diffusion weighted MRI visualizes the random microscopic motion of molecules. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is the technique which allows measurement of the Brownian motion of water in the tissue microenvironment depending on the organization of the tissue, integrity of cell membranes, and tortuosity of extracellular space. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) is a numerical parameter which is calculated from DWI. Previously, DWI technique was used with great success in the central nervous system (CNS), in the differentiation between benign and malignant tumors in addition to its great value in early diagnosis of recent strokes. Nowadays, DWI was used in the differentiation between malignant and benign soft tissue masses. Malignant tumors have abundant cellularity than benign tumors hence they have more restricted diffusion. The addition of quantitative ADC values plays a fundamental role in more accurate diagnosis of malignant superficial soft tissue neoplasms.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- patients with superficial soft tissue masses
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients with superficial soft tissue masses clinically
- patients underwent us detection of superficial soft tissue masses
- uncharactized superficial soft tissue mass by other modalities
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- MRI claustrophobia
- recurrent cases
- patients under treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGINGs a medical imaging technique used in radiology to form pictures of the anatomy and the physiological processes of the body. MRI scanners use strong magnetic fields, magnetic field gradients, and radio waves to generate images of the organs in the body. MRI does not involve X-rays or the use of ionizing radiation, which distinguishes it from CT and PET scans. MRI is a medical application of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) which can also be used for imaging in other NMR applications, such as NMR spectroscopy. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
benign and malignant masses
Time frame: from october 2021 to october2022
The discrimination between benign and malignant superficial soft tissue mass by Non invasive available technique
1 secondary outcome
Type of malignant superficial soft tissue masses
Time frame: From October 2021 to October 2022
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2021.
- Background: PubMed 28274509Song Y, Yoon YC, Chong Y, Seo SW, Choi YL, Sohn I, Kim MJ. Diagnostic performance of conventional MRI parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient values in differentiating between benign and malignant soft-tissue tumours. Clin Radiol. 2017 Aug;72(8):691.e1-691.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
- Background: PubMed 24532375Thawait GK, Subhawong TK, Tatizawa Shiga NY, Fayad LM. "Cystic"-appearing soft tissue masses: what is the role of anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR imaging techniques in their characterization? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Mar;39(3):504-11. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24314. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
- Background: PubMed 24744969Toprak H, Kilic E, Serter A, Kocakoc E, Ozgocmen S. Ultrasound and Doppler US in Evaluation of Superficial Soft-tissue Lesions. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014 Feb 27;4:12. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.127965. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 22491777Calleja M, Dimigen M, Saifuddin A. MRI of superficial soft tissue masses: analysis of features useful in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Dec;41(12):1517-24. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1385-6. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
- Background: PubMed 17762384Herneth AM, Ringl H, Memarsadeghi M, Fueger B, Friedrich KM, Krestan C, Imhof H. Diffusion weighted imaging in osteoradiology. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jun;18(3):203-12. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3180cac61d.
- Background: PubMed 8988217Panicek DM, Gatsonis C, Rosenthal DI, Seeger LL, Huvos AG, Moore SG, Caudry DJ, Palmer WE, McNeil BJ. CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology. 1997 Jan;202(1):237-46. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988217.
- Background: PubMed 23093707Fayad LM, Jacobs MA, Wang X, Carrino JA, Bluemke DA. Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques. Radiology. 2012 Nov;265(2):340-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111740.
- Background: PubMed 10954433Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Radiologic evaluation of soft-tissue masses: a current perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Sep;175(3):575-87. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750575. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 15290067Gielen JL, De Schepper AM, Vanhoenacker F, Parizel PM, Wang XL, Sciot R, Weyler J. Accuracy of MRI in characterization of soft tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions. A prospective study in 548 patients. Eur Radiol. 2004 Dec;14(12):2320-30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2431-0. Epub 2004 Jul 29.
- Background: PubMed 11840548Kauppinen RA. Monitoring cytotoxic tumour treatment response by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and proton spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 2002 Feb;15(1):6-17. doi: 10.1002/nbm.742.
- Background: PubMed 11127677Baur A, Reiser MF. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the musculoskeletal system in humans. Skeletal Radiol. 2000 Oct;29(10):555-62. doi: 10.1007/s002560000243.
- Background: PubMed 7596275Szafer A, Zhong J, Gore JC. Theoretical model for water diffusion in tissues. Magn Reson Med. 1995 May;33(5):697-712. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910330516.
Related trials for Soft Tissue Masses
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Role of MRI and US in Superficial Soft Tissue Masses
Superficial Soft Tissue Masses
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Single High-dose Brachytherapy for Giant Osteosarcoma Masses
Osteosarcoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Soft Tissue Masses, run by Assiut University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Fatma Alzahraa mohamed hassan (01004009026, fatma.mohamed9071995@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
benign and malignant masses (time frame: from october 2021 to october2022). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05079997, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2021.