AzTrials
AzTrials

TransgenderNCT05080335

Transgender Health: an Educational RCT

A study testing Short videos in people with Transgender and Health Attitude, run by Yale University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two different educational approaches on the healthcare of transgender and gender expansive (TGE) youth. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Transgender, Health Attitude
What is being tested?
Short videos
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2022to 1 Apr 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • English-speaking
  • Living in the US
  • Ages GE 18

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Yale Child Center

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06510

  • Yale Child Study Center

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06510

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Transgender and Gender-expansive Youth: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Healthcare Didactic Enhanced by Simulated Patient Video Clips

The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two different educational approaches on the healthcare of transgender and gender expansive (TGE) youth. Finding best practices to educate healthcare providers and the community at large stand to make an impact on the mental health of TGE youth by helping them feel more welcome and better understood by the communities in which they live.

The study aims are to evaluate two educational interventions: 1) The inclusion of a video clip component of two TGE youth (Video [V] vs No video [N]) into a one-hour didactic; and 2) The delivery of the same didactic content by a cis- [C] vs a trans-gender [TG] woman.

Read the detailed description

This will be a randomized control trial (RCT) of equal allotment to one of four parallel didactic conditions. The investigators will randomly assign participants to one of three teaching conditions: 1) Trans Video [TV]; 2) Cis Video [CV]; and 3) Cis No video [CN]. Participants will complete a baseline assessment (PRE) before the start of the same didactic content, but delivered in the three different ways described above. This design will help the investigators make comparisons across video use (yes/no), about type of presenter (trans/cis), and about the interaction of the two approaches. For the 'no video' condition (CN), the didactic will not include the videos until after completion of the POST assessment.

The study design will ensure that all participants will receive the exact same didactic content during whichever session they attend. All participants will then receive a follow up questionnaire two weeks later (2WK POST) to assess content retention.

Being tested
Short videos

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Short videosOther

    As an educational RCT, the didactic content will be the same across the four arms, but its deliver will vary by:

    1. TRANS- vs CIS-gender female instructors
    2. With or without short videos of transgender youth embedded into the didactic [TV or CV]; for the group with no embedded videos [NV], the same videos will be shown AFTER completion of the post measures)
    3. No-intervention control, in which TV will be delivered *after* collection of pre/post measures.
Study groups in NCT05080335
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TRANS-gender female instructor, with videos (TV)Active comparatorDidactic materials use embedded WITH short videos of transgender youth; lesson led by a TRANS-gender woman with extensive experience as an educator on transgender health
Receives: Other: Short videos
CIS-gender female instructor, with videos (CV)Active comparatorDidactic materials use embedded WITH short videos of transgender youth; lesson led by a CIS-gender woman with extensive experience as an educator on transgender health
Receives: Other: Short videos
CIS-gender female, with NO videos (CN)Active comparatorDidactic materials do NOT use short videos of transgender youth [until AFTER completion of the POST outcome measures]; lesson is led by a CIS-gender woman with extensive experience as an educator on transgender health
Receives: Other: Short videos
No intervention controlNo interventionSubjects randomized to this arm will complete the baseline assessment and the post assessment thirty days later, but just *before* receiving the intervention (TV).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in T-KAB TOTAL score (TOT)

    The T-KAB (Clark and Hughto, 2020) is a 22-item, 3-factor measure representing: acceptance of the gender spectrum (ACC), social tolerance (ST), and comfort and contact (CC) related to transgender people. The total score (TOT) is the sum of it three sub-scales.

    The adjusted T-KAB It is scored on a 6-point Likert scale (instead of the 4-point original) ranging from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 4 ("Strongly agree"). An even-number scale was utilized to ensure that participants choose either agreement or disagreement, and thus, a neutral option was not included in the scale.

    This results in an item-level score ranging from 1 to 6, and an overall TOT range from 22 to 132, with higher numbers representing better outcomes.

    We changed the wording and reverse-scoring of 6 items, which due to double-negative wording, proved confusing in pilot testing. This resulted in 9/22 reverse-scored items (R), from the original scale with 15/22 R's.

    Measured: Before / after viewing videos (within 60 minutes), and after 30 days.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change in T-KAB ACCEPTANCE sub-scale (ACC)

    The T-KAB ACCEPTANCE sub-scale (ACC) is an 8-item measure representing acceptance of the gender spectrum

    The adjusted ACC is scored on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 6 ("Strongly agree"). This adjustment resulted in an item-level score ranging from 1 to 6, and an overall TOT ranging from 8 to 48, with higher numbers representing better acceptance of the gender spectrum.

    Of note, all six items changed from double negative wording were part of the ACC sub-scale. As one example, we changed ACC item 1 from:

    A person with a vagina cannot can be a man. (R)

    to:

    A person with a vagina can can be a man.

    Measured: Before / after viewing videos (within 60 minutes), and after 30 days.

  2. Change in T-KAB SOCIAL TOLERANCE sub-scale (ST)

    The T-KAB SOCIAL TOLERANCE sub-scale (ST) is a 7-item measure representing social tolerance (ST) related to transgender people.

    The adjusted ST is scored on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 6 ("Strongly agree"). This adjustment resulted in an item-level score ranging from 1 to 6, and an overall TOT ranging from 7 to 42, with higher numbers representing better social tolerance related to transgender individuals.

    Measured: Before / after viewing videos (within 60 minutes), and after 30 days.

  3. Change in T-KAB COMFORT AND CONTACT sub-scale (CC)

    The T-KAB COMFORT AND CONTACT sub-scale (CC) is a 7-item measure representing social tolerance (ST) related to transgender people.

    The adjusted ST is scored on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 6 ("Strongly agree"). This adjustment resulted in an item-level score ranging from 1 to 6, and an overall TOT ranging from 7 to 42, with higher numbers representing better comfort and contact related to transgender individuals.

    Measured: Before / after viewing videos (within 60 minutes), and after 30 days.

  4. Change in SOCIAL comfort level (SOC)

    This item uses a slider ranging continuously from 0 ("Very uncomfortable") to 100 ("Very comfortable") in response to the question "How comfortable would you be interacting SOCIALLY with transgender individuals?") Higher numbers indicate higher comfort level.

    Measured: Before / after viewing videos (within 60 minutes), and after 30 days.

  5. Change in PROFESSIONAL comfort level (PROF)

    This item uses a slider ranging continuously from 0 ("Very uncomfortable") to 100 ("Very comfortable") in response to the question "How comfortable would you be interacting in a PROFESSIONAL or EDUCATIONAL setting with transgender individuals?") Higher numbers indicate higher comfort level.

    Measured: Before / after viewing videos (within 60 minutes), and after 30 days.

  6. Change in FAMILIAL comfort level (FAM)

    This item uses a slider ranging continuously from 0 ("Very uncomfortable") to 100 ("Very comfortable") in response to the question "How comfortable would you be interacting with a transgender individual in your FAMILY ") Higher numbers indicate higher comfort level.

    Measured: Before / after viewing videos (within 60 minutes), and after 30 days.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Oct 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2022
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
RCT of three different education / training approaches
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05080335
Sponsor's protocol ID
2000028980_c
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
22 Sep 2021
Last updated
4 May 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Short videos in people with Transgender and Health Attitude, run by Yale University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in T-KAB TOTAL score (TOT) (time frame: Before / after viewing videos (within 60 minutes), and after 30 days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 4 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in