AzTrials
AzTrials

Valvular Heart DiseaseFFPP1NCT05089136

Transcatheter Para-Valvular Leak Closure: An International Prospective Multicentre Registry

An observational study of Valvular Heart Disease and Valve Disease, Heart, run by Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prosthetic paravalvular leaks (PVL) leading to heart failure and/or haemolysis can be treated by interventional cardiology or open-heart surgery. Predictors of clinical success of transcatheter closure remains little known and should be identified to help choose between these two options.Patient selection criteria for… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Valvular Heart Disease, Valve Disease, Heart
What is being tested?
transcatheter paravalvular leak closure
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
213 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2017to 31 Dec 2021
How long will I take part?
2 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: An electronic case-report form (eCRF, Easy-crf.com) was completed for each patient. The medical history (notably regarding heart surgery), symptoms, physical findings, laboratory test results, and echocardiographic parameters were collected. The EUROSCORE II risk score (http://euroscore.org) was determined, since surgical valve replacement was among the treatment options. Creatinine clearance below 60 mL/min defined renal failure and below 30 mL/min severe renal failure. Heart failure was defined according to the European Society of Cardiology as the presence of symptoms (dyspnoea, orthopnoea, asthenia) with physical signs of heart failure (limb oedema, hepato-jugular reflux, crackles on pulmonary auscultation) linked to the valvular disease. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin <13 g/dL in men and <12 g/dL in women and haemolytic anaemia as anaemia with lactic dehydrogenase elevation and/or schistocytes and/or low haptoglobin, in the absence of other causes of anaemia.

Who may be able to join

  • All centres included consecutive patients referred for PVLc. Patients were selected for transcatheter PVLc as opposed to first-line surgical PVLc if they were at high or prohibitive surgical risk or as an alternative option to surgery if transcatheter PVLc feasibility was high. Patients were selected by each heart-team of participating centre according to local practice.

Who cannot join

None listed.

About this study

Prosthetic paravalvular leaks (PVL) leading to heart failure and/or haemolysis can be treated by interventional cardiology or open-heart surgery. Predictors of clinical success of transcatheter closure remains little known and should be identified to help choose between these two options.Patient selection criteria for the best option are needed. The investigators aimed to identify predictors of clinical success after transcatheter PVL closure. Consecutive patients referred to 24 European centres for transcatheter PVL closure in 2017-2019 were included in a prospective registry (Fermeture de Fuite ParaProthétique, FFPP) and followed over 2 years

Read the detailed description

Prosthetic paravalvular leaks (PVL) are associated with congestive heart failure and haemolysis, for which the standard treatment is open-heart surgery with the attendant risks to the patient. Transcatheter closure has emerged as an alternative. Patient selection criteria for the best option are needed. The investigators aimed to identify predictors of clinical success after transcatheter PVL closure.

The investigators designed a prospective multicentre observational registry named Fermeture des Fuites Para-Prothétiques (FFPP, closure of PVLs). In Belgium, France, Poland, and Turkey, 24 centres each enrolled at least 1 patient, between 1 January, 2017 and 31 December, 2019. All centres included consecutive patients referred for PVL closure.

Patients were selected for transcatheter PVL closure as opposed to first-line surgical PVL closure if they were at high or prohibitive surgical risk or as an alternative option to surgery if transcatheter PVLc feasibility was high. Patients were selected by each heart-team of participating centre according to local practice.

The study was coordinated by the clinical research unit of the Marie Lannelongue Hospital (Le Plessis-Robinson, France) and was approved by an independent ethics committee (CCTIRS, 23 November 2016, n°16.622bis). It complied with the principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed and signed consent was obtained in all patients prior to the procedures.

Data collection An electronic case-report form (eCRF, Easy-crf.com) was completed for each patient. The medical history (notably regarding heart surgery), symptoms, physical findings, laboratory test results, and echocardiographic parameters were collected. The EUROSCORE II risk score (http://euroscore.org) was determined, since surgical valve replacement was among the treatment options. Creatinine clearance below 60 mL/min defined renal failure and below 30 mL/min severe renal failure. Heart failure was defined according to the European Society of Cardiology as the presence of symptoms (dyspnoea, orthopnoea, asthenia) with physical signs of heart failure (limb oedema, hepato-jugular reflux, crackles on pulmonary auscultation) linked to the valvular disease.20 Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin <13 g/dL in men and <12 g/dL in women and haemolytic anaemia as anaemia with lactic dehydrogenase elevation and/or schistocytes and/or low haptoglobin, in the absence of other causes of anaemia.

Definitions of technical and clinical success Both technical success and clinical success were defined according to the Paravalvular Leak Academic Research Consortium. Technical success was implantation of at least one device within the leak, with an at least 1-grade decrease in the echocardiographic leak-severity grade, no valve dysfunction, and no surgical conversion of the procedure. Clinical success was survival at one month without re-admission for heart failure, blood transfusion, or open-heart valvular surgery.

Adverse events The investigators recorded intra-procedural adverse events, in-hospital adverse events (during the index hospitalisation), and adverse events within the first month after the procedure. Adverse events occurring beyond the first month but during the index hospitalisation were classified as in-hospital adverse events.

Adverse event severity are graded using a five-level scale. Major adverse events were potentially life-threatening. Bleeding, haemolytic anaemia, acute kidney injury, vascular complications, and life-threatening events were defined according to the Paravalvular Leak Academic Research Consortium.

Prospective follow-up is performed over to year.The end of follow-up is expected on the 31th of december 2021

Being tested
transcatheter paravalvular leak closure
Keywords
cardiac valve, cardiac catheterization, paravalvular leak
Medical subject headings
Heart Valve Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • transcatheter paravalvular leak closureDevice

    Transcatheter paravalvular leak closure (PVLc) was first described in 1992 and has since then emerged as an attractive alternative to repeat surgery. Many implantable devices that can be used for transcatheter PVLc have been marketed, although few are specifically designed for this purpose. It consist in implanting an occluder in the paravalvular leak to stop or reduce the regurgitant flow.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Death or secondary valve replacement

    Rate of death or secondary valve replacement (transcatheter or surgical replacement)

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Hospitalization for heart failure

    Number of hospitalization for heart failure after the procedure

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Hemolysis

    Number of hemolysis requiring blood transfusion

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2021
  2. Study start1 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
213 participants (actual)
Target duration
2 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05089136
Sponsor's protocol ID
16.622
Acronym
FFPP1
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
11 Oct 2021
Last updated
19 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hascoet S, Smolka G, Blanchard D, Kloeckner M, Brochet E, Bouisset F, Leurent G, Thambo JB, Combes N, Dumonteil N, Bauer F, Nejjari M, Pilliere R, Dauphin C, Bonnet G, Ciobotaru V, Ketelers R, Gallet R, Hammoudi N, Mangin L, Bouvaist H, Spaulding C, Aminian A, Kilic T, Popovic B, Armero S, Champagnac D, Gerardin B. Predictors of Clinical Success After Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: An International Prospective Multicenter Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct;15(10):e012193. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012193. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

    PubMed 36256693

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Valvular Heart Disease and Valve Disease, Heart, run by Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Death or secondary valve replacement (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05089136, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in