AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT05089669

Effects of an Interactive E-book to Enhance Nursing Skill

A study testing Interactive e-book and paper textbook in people with Healthy, run by Taipei Medical University at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

It is necessary for nursing students to have sufficient knowledge and correct nursing skill before clinical practicum to provide patients appropriate care and improve nursing quality. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Interactive e-book and paper textbook
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
62 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
2 Dec 2021to 21 Jan 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • students who major in nursing
  • students have not yet learned nasogastric tube feeding skill.

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Taipei Medical University

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Effects of an Interactive E-book to Enhance Nursing Students' Knowledge and Self-efficacy of Nursing Skill

It is necessary for nursing students to have sufficient knowledge and correct nursing skill before clinical practicum to provide patients appropriate care and improve nursing quality. The learning materials of nursing skills are mainly paper textbooks and handouts, which are one-way knowledge transmissions having limitations and deficiencies in nursing skill learning. Interactive e-books integrate multimedia such as text, images, and videos, which are more suitable for learning nursing skill and maximize the effectiveness of the learning materials. The present study aimed to develop a nasogastric tube feeding interactive e-book based on Information Processing Theory (IPT) and Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction Motivational Model (ARCS), hoping to improve students' learning motivation and learning effectiveness. This is a randomized controlled trial study. Convenience sampling will be applied. The participants will be recruited and randomly assigned into the experimental group and comparison group. The experimental group will read an interactive e-book to learn nasogastric tube feeding, while the comparison group will read a paper textbook.

Read the detailed description

It is necessary for nursing students to have sufficient knowledge and correct nursing skill before clinical practicum to provide patients appropriate care and improve nursing quality. The learning materials of nursing skills are mainly paper textbooks and handouts, which are one-way knowledge transmissions having limitations and deficiencies in nursing skill learning. Interactive e-books integrate multimedia such as text, images, and videos, which are more suitable for learning nursing skill and maximize the effectiveness of the learning materials. In addition, the learning content can be updated at any time, in order that students can learn the latest skills and connect with clinical. The present study aimed to develop a nasogastric tube feeding interactive e-book based on Information Processing Theory (IPT) and Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction Motivational Model (ARCS), hoping to improve students' learning motivation and learning effectiveness. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of using interactive e-book to enhance nursing students' knowledge and learning self-efficacy of nursing skill.

This is a randomized controlled trial study. Convenience sampling will be applied at a university in Northern Taiwan. It is expected that 60-100 participants will be recruited and randomly assigned into the experimental group and comparison group. The experimental group will read an interactive e-book to learn nasogastric tube feeding, while the comparison group will read a paper textbook. The questionnaires will be collected before the intervention, after the intervention, and after one month of the intervention. The questionnaires include demographic information, nasogastric tube feeding knowledge questionnaire, nasogastric tube feeding confidence scale, learning self-efficacy scale, nasogastric tube feeding skill test, and learning satisfaction questionnaire. This study will use SPSS 19.0 software for data analysis, including percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test, chi-square test, and generalized estimation equation (GEE).

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Interactive e-book, paper textbook
Keywords
Nursing students, Skill performance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interactive e-bookOther

    The nasogastric tube feeding interactive e-book has a lot of elements such as text content, videos, pictures, links, and other interactive content with which the students can interact. The participants can use the interactive e-book to learn nasogastric tube feeding.

  • paper textbookOther

    The paper textbook has text content and pictures. The participants can use the paper textbook to learn nasogastric tube feeding.

Study groups in NCT05089669
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
interactive e-bookExperimentalThe experimental group will read an interactive e-book for 90 minutes to learn nasogastric tube feeding.
Receives: Other: Interactive e-book
comparison groupActive comparatorThe comparison group will read a paper textbook for 90 minutes to learn nasogastric tube feeding.
Receives: Other: paper textbook

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Nasogastric Tube Feeding Quiz

    The Nasogastric Tube Feeding Quiz is a 15-item true/false questions with three responses (true, false, and not sure). Participants score 1 point for a correct answer and 0 for an incorrect answer or "not sure." The total score ranged 0-15 points. A higher score indicating a better knowledge of NG tube feeding.

    Measured: Baseline, before the intervention(T0)

  2. Nasogastric Tube Feeding Quiz

    The Nasogastric Tube Feeding Quiz is a 15-item true/false questions with three responses (true, false, and not sure). Participants score 1 point for a correct answer and 0 for an incorrect answer or "not sure." The total score ranged 0-15 points. A higher score indicating a better knowledge of NG tube feeding.

    Measured: Immediately following after the intervention(T1)

  3. Nasogastric Tube Feeding Quiz

    The Nasogastric Tube Feeding Quiz is a 15-item true/false questions with three responses (true, false, and not sure). Participants score 1 point for a correct answer and 0 for an incorrect answer or "not sure." The total score ranged 0-15 points. A higher score indicating a better knowledge of NG tube feeding.

    Measured: one month after the intervention(T2)

  4. Confidence scale (C-scale)

    A 5-item scale designed to measure participant's confidence level in performing a nursing skill. Each item had five responses and the total score ranged 5-25 points. A higher score indicating that nursing students felt more confident in performing the nursing skill.

    Measured: Baseline, before the intervention(T0)

  5. Confidence scale (C-scale)

    A 5-item scale designed to measure participant's confidence level in performing a nursing skill. Each item had five responses and the total score ranged 5-25 points. A higher score indicating that nursing students felt more confident in performing the nursing skill.

    Measured: Immediately following after the intervention(T1)

  6. Confidence scale (C-scale)

    A 5-item scale designed to measure participant's confidence level in performing a nursing skill. Each item had five responses and the total score ranged 5-25 points. A higher score indicating that nursing students felt more confident in performing the nursing skill.

    Measured: one month after the intervention(T2)

  7. Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (L-SES)

    A 12-item scale designed to measure student's learning self-efficacy for nasogastric tube feeding. Participants rate each item on a scale from 1 to 5. The total score ranged 12-60 points. A higher score indicating the nursing students have more confidence in their capability to learn nasogastric tube feeding.

    Measured: Baseline, before the intervention(T0)

  8. Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (L-SES)

    A 12-item scale designed to measure student's learning self-efficacy for nasogastric tube feeding. Participants rate each item on a scale from 1 to 5. The total score ranged 12-60 points. A higher score indicating the nursing students have more confidence in their capability to learn nasogastric tube feeding.

    Measured: Immediately following after the intervention(T1)

  9. Learning Self-Efficacy Scale (L-SES)

    A 12-item scale designed to measure student's learning self-efficacy for nasogastric tube feeding. Participants rate each item on a scale from 1 to 5. The total score ranged 12-60 points. A higher score indicating the nursing students have more confidence in their capability to learn nasogastric tube feeding.

    Measured: one month after the intervention(T2)

  10. Nasogastric tube feeding skill test

    The Nasogastric tube feeding skill test is designed to test nasogastric tube feeding skill performance and competence. It requires participants to perform NG tube feeding in front of an examiner. The participants will be asked to demonstrate NG tube feeding in 10 minutes. The total score ranged 0-100 points. A higher score indicating the nursing students have a better ability of NG tube feeding.

    Measured: three months after the intervention

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Satisfaction questionnaire

    A 10-item scale designed to measure participant's level of satisfaction in learning materials. Participants rate each item on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). The total score ranged 10-50. A higher score indicating high level of satisfaction in the learning materials.

    Measured: Immediately following after the intervention(T1)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2021
  2. Study start2 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion21 Jan 2022
  4. Study completion21 Jan 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05089669
Sponsor's protocol ID
N202108014
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
26 Sep 2021
Last updated
15 Feb 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Zuily S, Phialy L, Sevim E, Germain E, Unlu O, Dufrost V, Risse J, Clerc-Urmes I, Baumann C, Berman JR, Lockshin MD, Wahl D, Erkan D. Impact of antiphospholipid syndrome iBook on medical students' improvement of knowledge: An international randomized controlled study. Eur J Rheumatol. 2019 Sep 5;6(4):207-211. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19030. Print 2019 Oct.

    PubMed 31657703
  • Stirling A, Birt J. An enriched multimedia eBook application to facilitate learning of anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;7(1):19-27. doi: 10.1002/ase.1373. Epub 2013 May 6.

    PubMed 23650104
  • Payne KF, Goodson AM, Tahim A, Wharrad HJ, Fan K. Using the iBook in medical education and healthcare settings--the iBook as a reusable learning object; a report of the author's experience using iBooks Author software. J Vis Commun Med. 2012 Dec;35(4):162-9. doi: 10.3109/17453054.2012.747173.

    PubMed 23278413
  • Liu Y, Chou PL, Lee BO. Effect of an interactive e-book on nursing students' electrocardiogram-related learning achievement: A quasi-experimental design. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jul;90:104427. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104427. Epub 2020 Apr 10. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32311667
  • Hsiao CC, Tiao MM, Chen CC. Using interactive multimedia e-Books for learning blood cell morphology in pediatric hematology. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 14;16(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0816-9.

    PubMed 27842530

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Interactive e-book and paper textbook in people with Healthy, run by Taipei Medical University at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Nasogastric Tube Feeding Quiz (time frame: Baseline, before the intervention(T0)). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05089669, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in