AzTrials
AzTrials

Stretta DeviceStrettaNCT05094895

Stretta Treatment in GERD After SG

A study testing Stretta in people with Stretta Device, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the effect and explore the mechanism of action behind the potential effect of Stretta® on GERD after SG. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Stretta Device
What is being tested?
Stretta
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
29 Jan 2021to 29 Jan 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 to 65 years old;
  • History of typical GERD symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) during PPI treatment, at least 3 times per week for 12 weeks ('refractory GERD') or unwillingness to take/continue PPIs. The symptoms can be de novo (onset after sleeve gastrectomy) or pre-existing (as documented by medication use, findings during endoscopy or medical history);
  • In case of refractory GERD symptoms during PPI treatment the following criteria need to be fulfilled: Pathological catheter-based 24h pH-MII monitoring off-PPI (>6% of total time pH<4 and/or number of reflux episodes >80 (irrespective of acidity) or positive symptom association probability (SAP) for typical reflux symptoms) based on the Lyon consensus (23);
  • More than 12 months after sleeve gastrectomy;
  • Willing to take contraceptive measurements.

Who cannot join

  • Hiatal hernia of >2cm as determined during HRiM (based on Chicago Classification v3.0. (24)) and/or endoscopy or hiatal hernia repair;
  • Esophagitis LA classification grade C or D during gastroscopy off-PPI;
  • Circumferential Barrett's esophagus >1cm (columnar lined esophageal mucosa with intestinal metaplasia) or history of ablation of Barrett's esophagus;
  • Esophageal or fundus varices during gastroscopy;
  • Esophageal strictures during gastroscopy;
  • Abnormalities in sleeve (e.g. sleeve migration) observed during gastroscopy and/or barium test;
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Known cirrhosis or portal hypertension from other causes;
  • History of surgery to the upper gastrointestinal tract other than sleeve gastrectomy, including redo after previous bariatric surgery;
  • Autoimmune or a connective tissue disorder (scleroderma, dermatomyositis, Calcinosis-Raynaud's-Esophagus Sclerodactily Syndrome (CREST), Sjogren's Syndrome, etc.);
  • Achalasia, EGJ-outflow obstruction, jackhammer esophagus or absent contractility as defined by the 3rd revision of the Chicago classification for primary esophageal motility disorders24 assessed during HRiM with meal (see study protocol (25));
  • Significant cardiopulmonary or other comorbidity precluding safe sedation;
  • Pacemaker or implanted cardiac defibrillator;
  • Coagulopathy or use of anticoagulants;
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Unable or unwilling to consent for an invasive procedure.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Annelies Geeraerts

    Leuven, 3000

    Annelies Geeraerts, PhD student, 01643385, annelies.geeraerts@kuleuven.be

    Recruiting

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Radiofrequency Energy Delivery to the Gastro-esophageal Junction (Stretta®) in Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease After Sleeve Gastrectomy

To evaluate the effect and explore the mechanism of action behind the potential effect of Stretta® on GERD after SG.

Read the detailed description

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), i.e. the occurrence of troublesome symptoms or lesions as a consequence of retrograde flow of gastric contents into the esophagus, is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal disorders. Obesity, defined by a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 30 kg/m2, is an increasingly important problem in the Western world and a well-known risk factor for GERD related symptoms and esophagitis. Possible underlying mechanisms include an increased gastroesophageal pressure gradient, upward positional shift of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and increased occurrence of transient LES relaxations (TLESRs) after a meal.

Bariatric surgery has emerged as a highly effective treatment for obesity and its associated metabolic complications. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) currently account for the majority of the procedures. Several studies have reported improvement of GERD after gastric bypass and SG, probably through a combination of reduction of the acid-producing gastric mucosa and weight loss. However, in up to 34% of patients who underwent SG, de novo GERD or worsening of pre-existent GERD becomes evident, which established baseline GERD symptoms one of the few relative contra-indications for SG in many centers. Several post-operative alterations have been hypothesized to explain the increased incidence of GERD after SG: increased incidence of hiatal hernia due to the sleeve formation, dissection of the phreno-esophageal ligament, intrathoracic sleeve migration, increased intragastric pressure due to decreased gastric compliance and disruption of the competency of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ).

Despite the fact that the majority of patients will respond to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, a significant proportion of patients continue to experience regurgitation and/or heartburn despite acid suppression although treatment outcome data are largely missing in the literature. These patients with refractory GERD symptoms after SG pose a challenge to surgeons and gastroenterologists since the postoperative anatomy does not allow classic fundoplication procedures.

Stretta® (Mederi RF LLC, Houston TX, USA) is an endoscopic anti-reflux procedure using the delivery of radiofrequency energy to the LES. Stretta® is supported by the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES, ASGE and NICE) for the treatment of GERD in selected patients and is long-term cost-effective. Several controlled studies and a meta-analysis have reported improved symptoms after Stretta® although the effect on esophageal acid exposure time is inconsistent. Stretta® decreases the compliance of the EGJ without inducing fibrosis since the effect was reversed by administration of a nitric oxide donor and decreased sensitivity to distal acid perfusion. However, studies evaluating the symptomatic benefit of Stretta® in patients after SG are lacking, which is the primary goal of our study (primary endpoint). With the secondary endpoints, the effect of Stretta® will also be investigated on various aspects, which will provide an insight in the mechanism of action behind the potential effect of the intervention.

Conditions
Stretta Device
Being tested
Stretta, Sham

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • StrettaProcedure or surgery

    Radiofrequency energy delivered to the gastro-esophageal junction

  • ShamProcedure or surgery

    Patients that have the sham condition will have a procedure using a 24Fr Savary bougie dilator over the guidewire, with the same sedation.

Study groups in NCT05094895
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Stretta TreatmentActive comparatorPatients will receive the Stretta treatment
Receives: Procedure: Stretta
Sham treatmentSham comparatorPatients will receive the sham treatment
Receives: Procedure: Sham

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Symptom severity

    Primary efficacy endpoint will be the change in symptom severity assessed by validated reflux questionnaires (ReQuest questionnaire and diaries) at week -1

    Measured: ReQuest questionnaire score will be assessed at week -1 after treatment

  2. Symptom severity

    Primary efficacy endpoint will be the change in symptom severity assessed by validated reflux questionnaires (ReQuest questionnaire and diaries) at week 12

    Measured: ReQuest questionnaire score will be assessed at week 12 after treatment

  3. Symptom severity

    Primary efficacy endpoint will be the change in symptom severity assessed by validated reflux questionnaires (ReQuest questionnaire and diaries) at week 24

    Measured: ReQuest questionnaire score will be assessed at week 24 after treatment

  4. Symptom severity

    Primary efficacy endpoint will be the change in symptom severity assessed by validated reflux questionnaires (ReQuest questionnaire and diaries) 1 year after treatment

    Measured: ReQuest questionnaire score will be assessed at 1 year after treatment

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Objective reflux parameters

    change in the objective reflux parameters on 24h pH-impedance (pH-MII) measurement

    Measured: Will be assessed week -1, week 12 and week 24

  2. High Resolution impedance manometry

    Change in HRiM paramters

    Measured: Will be assessed week -1 and week 24

  3. EGJ distensibility (Endoflip)

    Change in EGJ distensibility

    Measured: Will be assessed week -1 and week 24

  4. Esophageal sensitivity

    Change in esophageal sensitivity

    Measured: Will be assessed week -1 and week 24

  5. Esophageal permeability

    Change in esophageal permeability assessed by transepithelial electrical resistance

    Measured: Will be assessed week -1 and week 24

  6. Microscopic esophagitis (ESOHISTO score)

    Change in esophagitis using esohisto scoring system

    Measured: Will be assessed week -1 and week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2021
  2. Study start29 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion29 Jan 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion29 Jan 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients will receive the Stretta treatment or the Sham treatment. Patients assigned to the Sham treatment condition, will have an open label period and are able to receive the Stretta treatment as wel.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05094895
Sponsor's protocol ID
S64212
Acronym
Stretta
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
20 Oct 2021
Last updated
3 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stretta in people with Stretta Device, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Annelies Geeraerts (+321643385, annelies.geeraerts@kuleuven.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Symptom severity (time frame: ReQuest questionnaire score will be assessed at week -1 after treatment). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in