AzTrials
AzTrials

SepsisNCT05095324

The Biomarker Prediction Model of Septic Risk in Infected Patients

An observational study of Sepsis and Early Diagnosis, run by Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection. Sepsis is associated with high mortality because of the complex mechanisms. In China, the mortality of sepsis in ICU was up to 35.5%. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Sepsis, Early Diagnosis, Biomarkers
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
7 Sep 2021to 14 Sep 2022
How long will I take part?
1 Year
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: patients who visit the emergency of the research center hospital

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who meet any of the diagnostic criteria of "suspected infection", "confirmed infection" and "suspected sepsis".

Who cannot join

  • age < 18 years old; pregnancy or breast-feeding; lack of informed consent by the patients or relatives.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Tsinghua Changgung Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 102218

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: The Biomarker Prediction Model of Septic Risk in Infected Patients: Observational Multi-center Study

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection. Sepsis is associated with high mortality because of the complex mechanisms. In China, the mortality of sepsis in ICU was up to 35.5%. As a major and urgent global public health challenge,sepsis is hard to treat because of the complexion and highly heterogeneous in clinical manifestation. The early diagnosis and stratification of the infection is very important. If we can identify the patients who may developed into the sepsis, the therapeutic regimen was not only antibiotic, but also included stable the vascular endothelial cells,regulation of coagulation function and protection of organ functions. Biomarkers have an important place in sepsis because they are strictly related to the organ damage. Each organ has its own specific biomarkers, and these biomarkers will change according to the severity of the disease. So the investigators want to find the difference of biomarkers of each organ in patients from infection to spesis.

Read the detailed description

According to the definition, infection is the original source of sepsis. How can diagnose organ failure early is the most impotent thing which can prevention the sepsis. In 2021, the guidelines for management of septic and septic shock recommend Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) to diagnose sepsis. The standards of SOFA were acquired from clinical manifestations,such as blood pressure, oxygenation index, platelet, etc. These indexes can abnormal at the end of organ failure. On the other hand, it is difficult to acquire these indexes in emergency. There is wide variation in diagnostic accuracy of these tools with most having poor predictive values.

The number of publications related to sepsis biomarkers has increased over the years. The proportion of new biomarkers has decreased. Because of the complexity of the sepsis response, single biomarker might be fruitless. The investigators want to use the cytokines which have found and can represent the function of the organ in septic patients. The investigations can use these biomarkers of respiratory system, circulation, liver, renal system, coagulation and nervous system, to build up a prediction model of septic risk in infected patients.

The participants will be divided into "training set" and "verification set" randomly. The proportion of training set: verification set is 3:2. In the training set, the investigators will compare the cytokines between infection and sepsis. In sepsis patients, the investigators will compare the data between "organ failure group" and "control group", and use these data to build up the prediction model of septic risk. These data will be verify the validity and accuracy of the model in the verification set.

Medical subject headings
Sepsis, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT05095324
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
controlthe infection patients who didn't have organ failure according to the SOFA score: 1. respiratory system: PaO2/FiO2≥<400 mmHg; 2. MAP≥70mmHg; 3. Liver: Bilirubin<1.2mg/dL; 4. Renal system: Creatinine<1.2mg/dL or Urine output≥500ml/d; 5. Platelets≥150×10^9/L; 6. nervous system:Glasgow coma score=15.
organ failurethe patients who had sepsis in follow up period: 1. respiratory system:PaO2/FiO2<400mmHg; 2. Circulation: MAP<70mmHg or administration of vasopressors required; 3. Liver: Bilirubin≥1.2mg/dL; 4. Renal system: Creatinine≥1.2mg/dL or Urine output<500ml/d; 5. Coagulation: Platelets<150×10^9/L; 6. nervous system: Glasgow coma score <15.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the change of biomarkers between the septic patients with and without ARDS

    endocan (the cutoff value is 2.45 ng/ml to diagnose ARDS); sydecan-1 and Ang 2 are also the biomarkers of ARDS, they can but the cutoff values are not certain.

    Measured: Participant will be followed up to 14 days to observe whether they can be diagnosed sepsis or not.

  2. the change of biomarkers between the septic patients with and without disturbance of consciousness

    neuron-specific enolase (NSE), the cutoff value is 24.15 ng/ml to diagnose Septic encephalopathy; S100β: is a calcium-binding protein released by brain astrocytes. The increase of S100β is represents breakdown of the blood-brain barrier.

    Measured: Participant will be followed up to 14 days to observe whether they can be diagnosed sepsis or not.

  3. the change of biomarkers between the septic patients with and without abnormal coagulation function

    tissue factor (TF): as the important components of exogenous coagulation pathways, TF will be elevated in sepsis. the cutoff value is 1005.8 pg/ml.

    Measured: Participant will be followed up to 14 days to observe whether they can be diagnosed sepsis or not.

  4. the change of biomarkers between the septic patients with and without circulatory failure

    heart type fatty acid-binding protein (hFABP): The expression was increased in patients with septic myocardial injury, with intercept value ≥4.5 ng/mL, sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 73%. The myocardial enzyme will also be tested.

    Measured: Participant will be followed up to 14 days to observe whether they can be diagnosed sepsis or not.

  5. the change of biomarkers between the septic patients with and without acute kidney failure

    neutrophil gelatinase-associated apolipoprotein (NGAL) and serial serum cell adhesion molecules (the cutoff value is 124.4 ng/ml)

    Measured: Participant will be followed up to 14 days to observe whether they can be diagnosed sepsis or not.

  6. the change of biomarkers between the septic patients with and without liver failure

    Golgi body 73 (GP73): is rarely or not expressed in normal liver cells, but is relatively stable in bile duct epithelial cells of the liver. When liver lesions occur, the expression level of GP73 is significantly higher. endothelin-1 is another biomarker to evaluate the liver function in sepsis

    Measured: Participant will be followed up to 14 days to observe whether they can be diagnosed sepsis or not.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Oct 2021
  2. Study start7 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion7 Sep 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion14 Sep 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target duration
1 Year
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05095324
Sponsor's protocol ID
20210520
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
23 Sep 2021
Last updated
27 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Wang Z, Wang X, Guo Z, Liao H, Chai Y, Wang Z, Wang Z. In silico high-throughput screening system for AKT1 activators with therapeutic applications in sepsis acute lung injury. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Dec 12;12:1050497. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1050497. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 36579349

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Sepsis and Early Diagnosis, run by Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the change of biomarkers between the septic patients with and without ARDS (time frame: Participant will be followed up to 14 days to observe whether they can be diagnosed sepsis or not.). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05095324, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in