Emotional DisorderNCT05098288
Clinical Effectiveness of the MultiCentre Pain Monitor to Guide and Personalize Psychological Treatments: A Single Case Design
A study testing Multicentre Pain Monitor + Unified Protocol in people with Emotional Disorder, run by Universitat Jaume I.
Trial summary
The present project aims at testing the clinical effectiveness of an app-based system called Multicentre Pain Monitor for routine outcome monitoring of adult patients with emotional disorders while they are administered a self-applied transdiagnostic psychological intervention (Unified Protocol). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Emotional Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Multicentre Pain Monitor + Unified Protocol
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to 1 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Anxiety or depression problems are the main problematic symptoms
- The patient is over 18 years of age
- The patient is fluent in the language in which the therapy is performed (Spanish in the present study)
- The patient is able to attend to the evaluation and treatment sessions
- The patient signs the informed consent form
Who cannot join
- The patient presents a severe mental disorder (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or an organic mental disorder) or there is suicide risk at the time of assessment
- The patient has used substances in the last three months (excluding cannabis, coffee, and / or nicotine)
- The patient has previously received 8 or more sessions of psychological treatment with clear and identifiable CBT principles in the past 12 months or is currently receiving psychological treatment
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
The present project aims at testing the clinical effectiveness of an app-based system called Multicentre Pain Monitor for routine outcome monitoring of adult patients with emotional disorders while they are administered a self-applied transdiagnostic psychological intervention (Unified Protocol).
Read the detailed description
Anxiety and depressive disorders, commonly known as emotional disorders (EDs), are the most frequent mental health problems why patients seek for medical care globally. According to recent epidemiologic studies, lifetime prevalence rates reveal that anxiety and depression disorders affect approximately an estimated 31.9% and 33.7% of people worldwide, respectively. In Spain, a nationwide study showed a prevalence of anxiety and depression disorders of 5.2% and 4.1%, approximately. Consequently, EDs lead to considerable direct and indirect economic losses for countries, as well as a great negative impact on the quality of life and overall functioning of individuals. Adding up to the previous, the current covid-19 pandemic not only has boosted the incidence of mental disorders in healthy people, but also has exacerbated emotional problems in vulnerable populations.
Encouragingly, the effectiveness of psychotherapy for the treatment of EDs, especially cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), has been supported by a vast amount of scientific evidence. In particular, Internet-delivered CBT (iCBT), where patients sign in to a safe website to access online psychotherapeutic materials within several modules, has emerged in recent years as an effective alternative to face-to-face psychotherapy in an attempt to reduce costs, save therapists' and clients' time, bring psychological treatments closer to the population, and disseminate interventions easily. The growth of digital care has become even more obvious during the covid-19 pandemic and the associated quarantine, where great efforts have been made to adapt evidence-based treatments to a new digital format. Therefore, the current situation has become an opportunity to develop and implement promising digital interventions, which are now more sensible than ever.
To make evidence-based treatments even more accessible, extensions and innovations of CBT have been developed in recent years. The latest research supports a transdiagnostic perspective for the treatment of EDs, where cognitive-behavioural techniques are included to target different EDs altogether. Indeed, the transdiagnostic approach appears to be an effective alternative to single disorder interventions in order to address the high comorbidity rates between anxiety and depressive disorders, as well as the shared mechanisms and the overlapping symptomatology across different disorders which play an essential role in the onset and maintenance of them. In particular, the Unified Protocol (UP), a transdiagnostic extension of CBT which works on regulate emotions in a more adaptive way through different core treatment modules, has been developed for the treatment of EDs. Specifically, the UP shows promising effects not only when delivered onsite, but also online, which makes it an excellent psychological approach to reach a large number of individuals with a single treatment protocol.
In this line, some interesting proposals emphasize the need for a paradigm shift from randomized controlled trials that work on average towards personalized treatments that allow to focus more on the individual (to avoid what group average can mask). In particular, measurement-based care, which consists of routine patient monitoring, periodic feedback to the therapist (or both therapist and patient), and adaptation of the intervention according to such feedback appears to be a feasible option in order to adapt treatments to patients' needs. Fortunately, with the rapid growth of new technologies in our society such as mobile applications (apps), measurement-based care can be implemented more effectively as the apps can be used as support tools for the assessment of several psychological outcome variables. This procedure is commonly known as Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) and can help overcome some of the obstacles that traditional, retrospective face-to-face assessments hold. EMA has the potential to assess patients repeatedly and frequently over time, allows to observe fluctuations in patient outcomes, and early interventions can be administered in response to pre-set clinical alarms.
To our knowledge, studies that use technology to improve the management of emotional problems have generally opted for using apps that report on the evolution of treatment to obtain more reliable measures of the evolution of patients or, more frequently, have used different technologies such as web pages or apps to facilitate self-applied treatments based on pre-established modules. The present study goes one step further and explores not only the usefulness of the EMA by means of an app for the improvement of the assessment process of patients with emotional problems/EDs, but also the feasibility of using it to make adjustments in real time or very short-term (e.g., in weekly visits) during the psychotherapeutic process, resembling an ecological momentary intervention (EMI). Several studies have supported the use of EMA to deliver the most personalized feedback or psychological support in real life for a given patient in order to enhance psychotherapy effectiveness and facilitate tailored treatments.
Objectives The current study aims at testing the clinical effectiveness of an app-based system called Multicentric Pain Monitor, which has been recently validated in an empirical study, that monitors individuals with EDs daily and is used as an adjunct tool to the self-applied Internet-delivered transdiagnostic program (UP). The main goal is to explore whether the treatment with the innovative information and communication technologies (ICT) support is effective for persons with emotional disorders.
- Conditions
- Emotional Disorder
- Being tested
- Multicentre Pain Monitor + Unified Protocol
- Keywords
- Multicentre Pain Monitor, Transdiagnostic approach, Emotional Disorder, Unified Protocol, Clinical effectiveness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multicentre Pain Monitor + Unified ProtocolBehavioural
Also called Multicentre Pain Monitor
The intervention will consist in a self-applied online transdiagnostic intervention for emotional problems together with an app-based EMA. In terms of monitoring, the Multicentre Pain Monitor is a mobile app whose contents have been adapted to conduct ecological momentary assessments in different health conditions. The app assesses important psychological variables, namely anxiety, depressive symptoms,etc. Participants respond daily to the questions in the app. In terms of the online self-applied intervention, the Unified Protocol is a transdiagnostic extension of CBT which works on regulate emotions in a more adaptive way through 5 core treatment modules: present-focused emotional awareness, cognitive flexibility, identification and prevention of emotional avoidance patterns, increasing awareness and tolerance to emotion-elicited physical sensations, and graded (interoceptive and situational) exposure procedures.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| App + Unified Protocol Arm | Experimental | Participants at this condition will be daily monitored by the app (Multicentre Pain Monitor) while they are administered a self-applied online transdiagnostic intervention (Unified protocol) for their emotional disorders. Alarms will be generated in the face of certain pre-set undesired events.
Therapists will receive pre-set clinical alarms in real time in the presence of relevant clinical events previously determined by the clinical staff (e.g., clinical worsening or no improvement of functionality, mood or psychological mechanisms worked in therapy). This information will be used to make clinical decisions in a short period of time (e.g., call the patient, or send additional therapeutic material by mail or through the app (momentary ecological intervention), or for its implementation during the course of psychological therapy in order to make the therapy more efficient, safe, personalized and adapted to the needs of the patient Receives: Behavioral: Multicentre Pain Monitor + Unified Protocol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Anxiety
In a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (completely), "how was your level of anxiety today?"
Measured: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in Depression
In a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (completely), "how was your level of depression today?"
Measured: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change in Activity level
In a scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), "what was your activity level today?"
Measured: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in Emotion Conceptualization
In a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely), "I see difficult emotions as something bad"
Measured: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in Emotional Avoidance
In a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely), "Today, I tried to get rid of my unpleasant emotions at all costs"
Measured: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in present-focused emotional awareness (Mindfulness)
In a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely), "Today, it was easy for me to pay attention to the present moment non-judgmentally"
Measured: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in Cognitive Flexibility
In a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely), "Today, I was able to consider different interpretations for the bad things that happened to me"
Measured: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in Exposure to situations
In a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely), "Today, I tried to avoid potentially uncomfortable situations"
Measured: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in Exposure to physical sensations
In a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely), "Today, I tried to get rid of my unpleasant physical sensations at all costs"
Measured: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 2021
- Study start1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Emotional DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Single Case Design (n=1) (multiple baselines)
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitat Jaume I
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Patricia Gual- Montolio, Study chair, Universitat Jaume IJuana Maria Bretón-López, Ph.D., Study chair, Universitat Jaume I
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05098288
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ROMEMIUJI
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 9 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be shared with other researchers.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Effectiveness of the MultiCentre Pain Monitor to Guide and Personalize Psychological Treatments: A Single Case Design
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05098288
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ROMEMIUJI
- Conditions
- Emotional Disorder
- Keywords
- Multicentre Pain Monitor, Transdiagnostic approach, Emotional Disorder, Unified Protocol, Clinical effectiveness
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitat Jaume IUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present project aims at testing the clinical effectiveness of an app-based system called Multicentre Pain Monitor for routine outcome monitoring of adult patients with emotional disorders while they are administered a self-applied transdiagnostic psychological intervention (Unified Protocol).
Detailed description
Anxiety and depressive disorders, commonly known as emotional disorders (EDs), are the most frequent mental health problems why patients seek for medical care globally. According to recent epidemiologic studies, lifetime prevalence rates reveal that anxiety and depression disorders affect approximately an estimated 31.9% and 33.7% of people worldwide, respectively. In Spain, a nationwide study showed a prevalence of anxiety and depression disorders of 5.2% and 4.1%, approximately. Consequently, EDs lead to considerable direct and indirect economic losses for countries, as well as a great negative impact on the quality of life and overall functioning of individuals. Adding up to the previous, the current covid-19 pandemic not only has boosted the incidence of mental disorders in healthy people, but also has exacerbated emotional problems in vulnerable populations.
Encouragingly, the effectiveness of psychotherapy for the treatment of EDs, especially cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), has been supported by a vast amount of scientific evidence. In particular, Internet-delivered CBT (iCBT), where patients sign in to a safe website to access online psychotherapeutic materials within several modules, has emerged in recent years as an effective alternative to face-to-face psychotherapy in an attempt to reduce costs, save therapists' and clients' time, bring psychological treatments closer to the population, and disseminate interventions easily. The growth of digital care has become even more obvious during the covid-19 pandemic and the associated quarantine, where great efforts have been made to adapt evidence-based treatments to a new digital format. Therefore, the current situation has become an opportunity to develop and implement promising digital interventions, which are now more sensible than ever.
To make evidence-based treatments even more accessible, extensions and innovations of CBT have been developed in recent years. The latest research supports a transdiagnostic perspective for the treatment of EDs, where cognitive-behavioural techniques are included to target different EDs altogether. Indeed, the transdiagnostic approach appears to be an effective alternative to single disorder interventions in order to address the high comorbidity rates between anxiety and depressive disorders, as well as the shared mechanisms and the overlapping symptomatology across different disorders which play an essential role in the onset and maintenance of them. In particular, the Unified Protocol (UP), a transdiagnostic extension of CBT which works on regulate emotions in a more adaptive way through different core treatment modules, has been developed for the treatment of EDs. Specifically, the UP shows promising effects not only when delivered onsite, but also online, which makes it an excellent psychological approach to reach a large number of individuals with a single treatment protocol.
In this line, some interesting proposals emphasize the need for a paradigm shift from randomized controlled trials that work on average towards personalized treatments that allow to focus more on the individual (to avoid what group average can mask). In particular, measurement-based care, which consists of routine patient monitoring, periodic feedback to the therapist (or both therapist and patient), and adaptation of the intervention according to such feedback appears to be a feasible option in order to adapt treatments to patients' needs. Fortunately, with the rapid growth of new technologies in our society such as mobile applications (apps), measurement-based care can be implemented more effectively as the apps can be used as support tools for the assessment of several psychological outcome variables. This procedure is commonly known as Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) and can help overcome some of the obstacles that traditional, retrospective face-to-face assessments hold. EMA has the potential to assess patients repeatedly and frequently over time, allows to observe fluctuations in patient outcomes, and early interventions can be administered in response to pre-set clinical alarms.
To our knowledge, studies that use technology to improve the management of emotional problems have generally opted for using apps that report on the evolution of treatment to obtain more reliable measures of the evolution of patients or, more frequently, have used different technologies such as web pages or apps to facilitate self-applied treatments based on pre-established modules. The present study goes one step further and explores not only the usefulness of the EMA by means of an app for the improvement of the assessment process of patients with emotional problems/EDs, but also the feasibility of using it to make adjustments in real time or very short-term (e.g., in weekly visits) during the psychotherapeutic process, resembling an ecological momentary intervention (EMI). Several studies have supported the use of EMA to deliver the most personalized feedback or psychological support in real life for a given patient in order to enhance psychotherapy effectiveness and facilitate tailored treatments.
Objectives The current study aims at testing the clinical effectiveness of an app-based system called Multicentric Pain Monitor, which has been recently validated in an empirical study, that monitors individuals with EDs daily and is used as an adjunct tool to the self-applied Internet-delivered transdiagnostic program (UP). The main goal is to explore whether the treatment with the innovative information and communication technologies (ICT) support is effective for persons with emotional disorders.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Single Case Design (n=1) (multiple baselines)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| App + Unified Protocol Arm | Experimental | Behavioral: Multicentre Pain Monitor + Unified ProtocolParticipants at this condition will be daily monitored by the app (Multicentre Pain Monitor) while they are administered a self-applied online transdiagnostic intervention (Unified protocol) for their emotional disorders. Alarms will be generated in the face of certain pre-set undesired events. Therapists will receive pre-set clinical alarms in real time in the presence of relevant clinical events previously determined by the clinical staff (e.g., clinical worsening or no improvement of functionality, mood or psychological mechanisms worked in therapy). This information will be used to make clinical decisions in a short period of time (e.g., call the patient, or send additional therapeutic material by mail or through the app (momentary ecological intervention), or for its implementation during the course of psychological therapy in order to make the therapy more efficient, safe, personalized and adapted to the needs of the patient |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Anxiety or depression problems are the main problematic symptoms
- The patient is over 18 years of age
- The patient is fluent in the language in which the therapy is performed (Spanish in the present study)
- The patient is able to attend to the evaluation and treatment sessions
- The patient signs the informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- The patient presents a severe mental disorder (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or an organic mental disorder) or there is suicide risk at the time of assessment
- The patient has used substances in the last three months (excluding cannabis, coffee, and / or nicotine)
- The patient has previously received 8 or more sessions of psychological treatment with clear and identifiable CBT principles in the past 12 months or is currently receiving psychological treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multicentre Pain Monitor + Unified ProtocolAlso: Multicentre Pain MonitorThe intervention will consist in a self-applied online transdiagnostic intervention for emotional problems together with an app-based EMA. In terms of monitoring, the Multicentre Pain Monitor is a mobile app whose contents have been adapted to conduct ecological momentary assessments in different health conditions. The app assesses important psychological variables, namely anxiety, depressive symptoms,etc. Participants respond daily to the questions in the app. In terms of the online self-applied intervention, the Unified Protocol is a transdiagnostic extension of CBT which works on regulate emotions in a more adaptive way through 5 core treatment modules: present-focused emotional awareness, cognitive flexibility, identification and prevention of emotional avoidance patterns, increasing awareness and tolerance to emotion-elicited physical sensations, and graded (interoceptive and situational) exposure procedures. | Behavioural | App + Unified Protocol Arm |
Primary outcome
Change in Anxiety
Time frame: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
In a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (completely), "how was your level of anxiety today?"
Change in Depression
Time frame: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
In a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (completely), "how was your level of depression today?"
7 secondary outcomes
Change in Activity level
Time frame: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in Emotion Conceptualization
Time frame: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in Emotional Avoidance
Time frame: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in present-focused emotional awareness (Mindfulness)
Time frame: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in Cognitive Flexibility
Time frame: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in Exposure to situations
Time frame: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Change in Exposure to physical sensations
Time frame: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Nov 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be shared with other researchers.
Related trials for Emotional Disorder
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Test the Effects of Centanafadine in Adults With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Emotional Dysregulation
Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Emotional Dysregulation
Recruiting
AI-assisted Home-based Intervention for ADHD Children
ADHD - Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity, ADHD - Combined Type
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patricia Gual- Montolio study chair
Universitat Jaume I
Juana Maria Bretón-López, Ph.D. study chair
Universitat Jaume I
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Multicentre Pain Monitor + Unified Protocol in people with Emotional Disorder, run by Universitat Jaume I.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Carlos Suso-Ribera, Ph.D. (964 387643, susor@uji.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Anxiety (time frame: Change from baseline to posttreatment. The outcome will be evaluated daily (at 9pm) during 31 days. Changes will be investigated from baseline to posttreatment using all corresponding time points (baseline to posttreatment)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Nov 2021.