Colonic PolypNCT05099432
The CARMA Technique Study
A study testing CARMA technique in people with Colonic Polyp and Colonic Sessile Serrated Lesion, run by Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
Colonoscopic removal of polyps is an important and well-established tool in the prevention of colorectal cancers. However, high polyp recurrence rates after endoscopic resection, with resultant development of interval cancers, remains a problem; this most commonly stems from unrecognised incomplete polyp resection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colonic Polyp, Colonic Sessile Serrated Lesion
- What is being tested?
- CARMA technique
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- Nov 2021to Nov 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- any polypectomy (though only a maximum of two polyps from one individual participant)
Who cannot join
- polyps less than 10mm which were resected under endoscopic view with a definite > 1mm clear margin
- scar site recurrence polyps
- polyps with endoscopic evidence of invasion
- pedunculated polyps
- pseudopolyps
- participants who will not be available for follow up endoscopy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Australia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Alexander Huelsen, MD, +61 7 3176 2111, alexander.huelsenkatz@health.qld.gov.au
Alexander Huelsen
About this study
Official title: The Cap-Assisted Resection Margin Assessment (CARMA) Technique After Polyp Resection: a Prospective Feasibility Study of a "Novel" Approach to Reduce Polyp Recurrence
Colonoscopic removal of polyps is an important and well-established tool in the prevention of colorectal cancers. However, high polyp recurrence rates after endoscopic resection, with resultant development of interval cancers, remains a problem; this most commonly stems from unrecognised incomplete polyp resection. Thus, a standardised endoscopic technique is needed that will allow endoscopists to consistently achieve a clear margin of resection. The investigators believe the Cap Assisted Resection Margin Assessment (CARMA) technique will address this problem. This novel technique focuses on a standardised assessment of the resection margin after endoscopic polypectomy utilising available standard high-definition video endoscopes with imaging features including narrow band imaging (NBI) and magnification endoscopy.
- Conditions
- Colonic Polyp, Colonic Sessile Serrated Lesion
- Being tested
- CARMA technique
- Medical subject headings
- Colonic Polyps
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CARMA techniqueProcedure or surgery
Once standard polyp resection and assessment of the polypectomy site without magnification is completed, the CARMA technique will be applied. This will involve an assessment of the entire polypectomy margin using cap assisted magnification endoscopy with the ability to also use NBI (at the endoscopist's discretion) and documentation of any residual polyp noted.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CARMA Technique | Experimental | All included participants undergo polyp resection using standard of care polypectomy techniques, followed by the CARMA technique Receives: Procedure: CARMA technique |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of achieving a clear resection margin using the CARMA technique
Measured: Established during index procedure
Secondary outcomes (11)
Sensitivity and specificity of the CARMA technique for residual polyp detection
Measured: Established during index procedure
Frequency of residual polyp without CARMA assessment
Measured: Established during index procedure
Incomplete resection rate with use of CARMA technique
Measured: Established during index procedure
Incomplete resection rate with use of the CARMA technique in polyps > 10mm with hot snare
Measured: Established during index procedure
Incomplete resection rate with use of the CARMA technique in polyps > 10mm with cold snare
Measured: Established during index procedure
Residual polyp rate after CARMA technique with hot snare
Measured: Established during index procedure
Residual polyp rate after CARMA technique with cold snare
Measured: Established during index procedure
Time required for application of the CARMA technique with < 10mm
Measured: Established during index procedure
Time required for application of the CARMA technique with > 10mm
Measured: Established during index procedure
Polyp recurrence rate for < 10mm polyps
Measured: Established during surveillance procedure (following national guidelines - between 6 months to 5 years)
Polyp recurrence rate for > 10mm polyps
Measured: Established during surveillance procedure (following national guidelines - between 6 months to 5 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2021
- Study startNov 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completionMay 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Colonic PolypStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alexander Huelsen, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Investigators
- Alexander Huelsen, MD, Principal investigator, Princess Alexandra Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05099432
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 75076
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 15 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Cap-Assisted Resection Margin Assessment (CARMA) Technique After Polyp Resection: a Prospective Feasibility Study of a "Novel" Approach to Reduce Polyp Recurrence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05099432
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 75076
- Conditions
- Colonic Polyp, Colonic Sessile Serrated Lesion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, AustraliaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- May 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Colonoscopic removal of polyps is an important and well-established tool in the prevention of colorectal cancers. However, high polyp recurrence rates after endoscopic resection, with resultant development of interval cancers, remains a problem; this most commonly stems from unrecognised incomplete polyp resection. Thus, a standardised endoscopic technique is needed that will allow endoscopists to consistently achieve a clear margin of resection. The investigators believe the Cap Assisted Resection Margin Assessment (CARMA) technique will address this problem. This novel technique focuses on a standardised assessment of the resection margin after endoscopic polypectomy utilising available standard high-definition video endoscopes with imaging features including narrow band imaging (NBI) and magnification endoscopy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CARMA Technique | Experimental | Procedure: CARMA techniqueAll included participants undergo polyp resection using standard of care polypectomy techniques, followed by the CARMA technique |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- any polypectomy (though only a maximum of two polyps from one individual participant)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- polyps less than 10mm which were resected under endoscopic view with a definite > 1mm clear margin
- scar site recurrence polyps
- polyps with endoscopic evidence of invasion
- pedunculated polyps
- pseudopolyps
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CARMA techniqueOnce standard polyp resection and assessment of the polypectomy site without magnification is completed, the CARMA technique will be applied. This will involve an assessment of the entire polypectomy margin using cap assisted magnification endoscopy with the ability to also use NBI (at the endoscopist's discretion) and documentation of any residual polyp noted. | Procedure or surgery | CARMA Technique |
Primary outcome
Rate of achieving a clear resection margin using the CARMA technique
Time frame: Established during index procedure
11 secondary outcomes
Sensitivity and specificity of the CARMA technique for residual polyp detection
Time frame: Established during index procedure
Frequency of residual polyp without CARMA assessment
Time frame: Established during index procedure
Incomplete resection rate with use of CARMA technique
Time frame: Established during index procedure
Incomplete resection rate with use of the CARMA technique in polyps > 10mm with hot snare
Time frame: Established during index procedure
Incomplete resection rate with use of the CARMA technique in polyps > 10mm with cold snare
Time frame: Established during index procedure
Residual polyp rate after CARMA technique with hot snare
Time frame: Established during index procedure
Residual polyp rate after CARMA technique with cold snare
Time frame: Established during index procedure
Time required for application of the CARMA technique with < 10mm
Time frame: Established during index procedure
Time required for application of the CARMA technique with > 10mm
Time frame: Established during index procedure
Polyp recurrence rate for < 10mm polyps
Time frame: Established during surveillance procedure (following national guidelines - between 6 months to 5 years)
Polyp recurrence rate for > 10mm polyps
Time frame: Established during surveillance procedure (following national guidelines - between 6 months to 5 years)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Nov 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colonic Polyp
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective Registry of Patients With Endoscopically Resected Malignant Colorectal Polyps (pT1 Colorectal Cancer)
Malignant Colorectal Polyp, Colorectal Cancer
Enrolling by invitation
Cold Snare Piecemeal Resection vs Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
Colon Polyp, Colon Adenoma
Enrolling by invitation
Six Versus Twelve Month Index Follow-up After Large Colon Polyp Resection
Colon Polyp, Adenoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing for Safety and Colorectal Cancer Preventive Effects of ONC201
Colorectal Adenomatous Polyp, Colorectal Carcinoma
Recruiting
Performance and Safety of MiWEndo-assisted Colonoscopy (MiWEndo II)
Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Polyp
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Alexander Huelsen, MD principal investigator
Princess Alexandra Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CARMA technique in people with Colonic Polyp and Colonic Sessile Serrated Lesion, run by Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alexander Huelsen, MD (+61 7 3176 2111, alexander.huelsenkatz@health.qld.gov.au), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of achieving a clear resection margin using the CARMA technique (time frame: Established during index procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2021.