InfertilityNCT05103228
Cumulative Pregnancy Rate With Lower and Higher Gonadotropin Dose During IVF Among Poor Responders
A study testing Follitropin Alfa, Follitropin delta and human menopausal gonadotropin in people with Infertility and Ovarian Dysfunction, run by Peter Kovacs MD at 1 site in Hungary.
Trial summary
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is an important step during in vitro fertilization (IVF). Its aim optimally is to recruit 10-15 oocytes. When deciding on the actual treatment, different stimulation protocols, various stimulating agents and wide range of gonadotropin dose can one choose from. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 42 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Infertility, Ovarian Dysfunction
- What is being tested?
- Follitropin Alfa, Follitropin delta and human menopausal gonadotropin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 190 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHungary
- Study dates
- 2 Dec 2021to 20 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 42 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Expected poor responder based on:
- AMH: 0.3-1.2 ng/ml or AFC <5,
- AMH>1.2 ng/ml or AFC≥5 but the retrieval of ≤ 4 oocytes during previous IVF treatment.
- motile sperm with normal morphology obtained from the ejaculate of testicular biopsy
- no more than 3 previous failed IVF cycles (if the patient had 2 or more previous cycles cancelled for poor response she cannot be included)
- BMI: 18-35 kg/m2
Show all 10Show fewer
- regular 24-35 day cycles
- intact uterine cavity
- indication for in vitro fertilisation treatment (tubal factor, male factor, low ovarian reserve, endometriosis, unexplained infertility)
- age 18-421 yrs
Who cannot join
- presence of hydrosalpinx
- positive HIV, hepatitis B, C screening tests
- planned preimplantation genetic testing of the embryos
- planned elective cryopreservation
- lack of consent
- not meeting the inclusion criteria
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Cumulative Pregnancy Rate With Lower and Higher Dose of Gonadotropin During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation During IVF Among Expected Poor Responders: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is an important step during in vitro fertilization (IVF). Its aim optimally is to recruit 10-15 oocytes. When deciding on the actual treatment, different stimulation protocols, various stimulating agents and wide range of gonadotropin dose can one choose from. Prior to the decision on the actual stimulation protocol and gonadotropin (Gn) dose the patient's expected response to stimulation is assessed primarily using ovarian reserve markers. Most medications used during stimulation exert their effect in a dose-dependent manner hence with a higher Gn dose one would expect a better response, more oocytes. More oocytes could translate into more embryos and potentially a higher pregnancy rate. The currently available evidence however does not support this practice as randomized controlled trials (RCT) have failed to show that the use of higher Gn dose results in higher pregnancy, live-birth rates. These studies however identified patients based on different criteria, compared different stimulation protocols and various Gn doses. There are only two RCTs that compared cumulative live birth rates (fresh + frozen embryo transfers) and they identified poor responders based on different criteria and used different drug regimens. Therefore, the aim of our study is to compare cumulative IVF clinical pregnancy rates using a lower and a higher gonadotropin dose among poor responders identified based on universally accepted criteria.
Read the detailed description
Background: IVF is started after proper evaluation based on an appropriate indication for the treatment. The first phase of the treatment is the stimulation with the aim to recruit sufficient number of oocytes. In general, 10-15 oocytes are aimed for. This many oocytes should be sufficient for the embryology laboratory procedures and should allow the provider to choose the embryo or embryos for transfer from a larger cohort. More oocytes are associated with more side effects and fewer oocytes limit the efficacy of the laboratory procedures. Stimulation is individualized and usually age, ovarian reserve markers, weight and response to previous stimulation are taken into consideration when decisions are made. Based on ovarian reserve markers patients are grouped as expected normal responders, hyper-responders or poor responders. A poor responder is a patient with low ovarian reserve or low number of oocytes in the ovaries. Their care can be challenging. Different pre-stimulation interventions and various stimulation approaches have been explored in this subset of patients. Typically, providers will prescribe higher gonadotropin doses and expect the retrieval of more oocytes resulting in more transferable embryos. Studies so far however have not supported this practice. In expected poor responders most studies have not shown the collection of more oocytes with higher dose gonadotropins. Those that did find more oocytes described an additional 1-2 oocytes only. None of the studies so far have reported improved pregnancy outcome, including cumulative outcome with more gonadotropins though. The literature is confounded by the various definitions of the poor responder patient, the use of various stimulation protocols in the active treatment versus control groups, the use of oral agents as active treatment and the different clinical endpoints tested (oocyte number, clinical pregnancy, live birth, cumulative live birth). Therefore, we plan to study patients identified as poor responders based on established criteria (POSEIDON criteria). We will use the same stimulation protocols, drug types in the experimental and control groups. We will study clinically meaningful outcomes, live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate.
Design: Investigator initiated prospective, randomized, multi-center, non-blinded trial to compared higher and lower gonadotropin in poor responder patients undegoing IVF-ICSI treatment identified based on Posedion III-IV criteria
Participants: The investigators will enroll patients who, based on their initial evaluation, reproductive history or prior fertility treatment, have a proper indication to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF)/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. A basic infertility evaluation includes: 1.) hormonal evaluation of ovarian function, including ovarian reserve testing (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH] level, antral follicle count [AFC]), 2) transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of female internal genital organs, 3) evaluation of the uterine cavity (hysterosalpingogram, saline sonohysterogram or hysteroscopy), 4) cervical cancer screening, 5) cervical culture for Chlamydia, 6) serologic testing for HIV, hepatitis B, C, syphilis (both partners), 7) semen analysis, 8) male andrological exam, 9) if needed male hormonal +/- genetic testing. IVF-ICSI treatment is started for advanced maternal age, diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), unexplained infertility after failed intrauterine inseminations, male factor infertility, endometriosis.
The investigators plan to recruit:
- infertile patients between the ages of 18-42 who require IVF-ICSI treatment and are identified as poor responders based on: a) AMH: 0.3-1.2 ng/ml or AFC <5, b) AMH>1.2 ng/ml or AFC≥5 but the retrieval of ≤ 4 oocytes during previous IVF treatment. (POSEIDON category III-IV, Alviggi et al. Fertility Sterility 2016)
Methods: prospective, multicenter (5 centers), randomized controlled trial comparing a higher or lower gonadotropin (Gn) dose treatment. In both the low and high groups two different drug regimens (follitropin alpha + hp human menopausal gonadotropin or follitropin delta + hp human menopausal gonadotropin) will be used. 150 IU follitropin alpha was shown to be equally effective to 10 mcg follitropin delta. Therefore, the investigators expect similar response (oocyte yield) with the two regimens within the high and low Gn dose groups but the study design still will allow the investigators to compare the two follitropin medications too, which is a secondary aim.
Lower-dose group:
- 150 IU follitropin alpha + 75 IU highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hpHMG)
- 10 mcg follitropin delta + 75 IU hpHMG
Higher-dose group:
- 225 IU follitropin alpha + 150 IU hpHMG
- 15 mcg follitropin delta + 150 IU hpHMG
Treatment protocol:
- The stimulation will get started on day 2 or 3 of the spontaneous menstrual cycle, or on the 5th day after oral contraceptive pill use or after luteal estradiol pretreatment.
- During the stimulation ultrasound +/- serum hormone measurements will be used to monitor response. The first ultrasound is scheduled for day 5 or 6 of stimulation. At the time of the ultrasound blood test for serum estradiol is planned too. At the time of the last scan serum estradiol and progesterone levels will be measured.
- According to the study protocol the patient will continue with the assigned medication dose throughout her treatment. Dose increase is not allowed. If there is evidence for hyper-response [estradiol level > 4000 pmol/l on day 6 or more than 15 follicles over 10 mm any time during the stimulation] the dose can be reduced.
- As soon as two or more follicles reach >17 mm in diameter human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonits [GnRH a] trigger injection will be used and 35-36 hours later transvaginal ultrasound guided follicle aspiration will be performed.
- The luteal phase will be supported by vaginal progesterone starting on the day after the retrieval.
- IVF or ICSI fertilization will be performed based on the semen parameters or previous fertilization records.
- The day after the retrieval the success of fertilization will be checked and the embryo(s) will be transferred 2-5 days after the retrieval. Embryo(s) will be transferred transcervically using soft transfer catheters under ultrasound guidance using the afterload technique.
- Surplus good quality embryos will be cryopreserved using vitrification. Elective cryopreservation (no transfer in the fresh cycle) will be performed if: 1) risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, 2) serum progesterone level over 1.5 ng/ml [5.5 nmol/l] prior to the oocyte collection, 3) any complications between the retrieval and planned fresh transfer (bleeding, infection, illness).
- 12-14 days after the transfer serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) measurement will determine whether implantation has occurred. If the test is positive in 2-3 weeks a vaginal ultrasound will be done to determine the size, location and number of gestational sacs. Viable pregnancies will be referred to a formal prenatal care around week 8-9 of pregnancy. Delivery and perinatal outcome data will be collected by phone call after the delivery.
- If the fresh IVF cycle is not successful but embryos have been cryopreserved then the patient will undergo a frozen embryo transfer treatment cycle either in her own cycle, or in a minimally stimulated or completely artificial cycle.
The care of the patients will not differ from the care of non-study patients in terms of potential medication dose, the number of clinic visits, retrieval and embryology procedures as well as prenatal care.
Randomization: Randomization will be performed according to a computer generated list. (www.randomizer.org) The planned sample size is 700 patients (350 in both the low- and high-dose groups).
Sample size calculation: In order to determine the sample size, the investigators calculated with a 20% pregnancy rate in a patient population that fits the inclusion-exclusion criteria. The investigators expect higher oocyte yield in the higher dose group that should result in more available embryos and therefore more frozen embryo transfers. The investigators calculate that this could increase the cumulative pregnancy rate by 50%. The investigators also believe that about 20% of the patients will drop out for various reasons. Therefore, 350 participants are needed in both arms of the study.
Statistical analysis: After the enrollment of the first 350 patients, a planned interim analysis will be performed to decide whether the planned sample size is sufficient to achieve our goal. Logistic regression analysis using a generalized, mixed linear model will be used to assess the impact of various Gn doses on pregnancy rates. Chi-square test will be used to test significance and OR will be calculated.
Data will be collected for the following parameters:
- Age
- Cycle day 3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol level
- anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)
- antral follicle count (AFC)
- Indication for IVF: male, tubal, unexplained, endometriosis, diminished ovarian reserve
- Smoking (yes-no)
- Body mass index
- Cycle number (fresh + frozen together)
- Estradiol level on day 6
- Estradiol + progesterone level at the last scan
- Number of follicles >10 mm at the end of stimulation
- Stimulation duration
- Endometrial thickness
- Gn dose (daily, total)
- Trigger mechanism (HCG vs. GnRh agonist)
- Sperm parameters
- Oocyte number
- Mature (MII) oocyte number
- Proportion of mature oocytes (MII/ oocyte number)
- IVF vs. ICSI fertilization
- Number of fertilized (2 pronuclei (PN)) oocytes
- Fertilization rate per oocyte
- Fertilization rate per mature oocyte
- The number of good quality embryos (morphology better than score "6B2" on day 3, or score >2BB on day 5) and proportion of good morphology embryos among all embryos
- Number of transferred embryos
- Number of cryopreserved embryos
- Pregnancy rate (positive hCG)
- Clinical pregnancy rate (sac with viable embryo in it)
- Cumulative pregnancy rate (fresh + frozen embryo transfers)
- Pregnancy/ neonatal outcome
- Conditions
- Infertility, Ovarian Dysfunction
- Being tested
- Follitropin Alfa, Follitropin delta, human menopausal gonadotropin
- Keywords
- gonadotropin, follitropin alpha, follitropin delta, high-dose gonadotropin, clinical pregnancy, cumulative pregnancy rate
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Follitropin AlfaDrug
Also called Ovaleap (Theramex Ireland Limited), Bemfola (Richter Gedeon Nyrt., Hungary), Gonal F (Merck Europe B.V.)
lower dose gonadotropin (follitropin alpha/ follitropin delta + hpHMG) vs. higher dose stimulation (Follitropin alpha/delta + hpHMG)
Follitropin deltaDrug
Also called Rekovelle (Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Denmark)
lower dose gonadotropin (follitropin alpha/ follitropin delta + hpHMG) vs. higher dose stimulation (Follitropin alpha/delta + hpHMG)
human menopausal gonadotropinDrug
Also called Menopur (Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Denmark)
lower dose gonadotropin (follitropin alpha/ follitropin delta + hpHMG) vs. higher dose stimulation (Follitropin alpha/delta + hpHMG)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lower gonadotropin dose stimulation | Experimental | Low-dose group:
* 150 IU follitropin alpha + 75 IU highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hpHMG)
* 10 mcg follitropin delta + 75 IU hpHMG Receives: Drug: Follitropin Alfa; Drug: Follitropin delta; Drug: human menopausal gonadotropin |
| Higher gonadotropin dose stimulation | Experimental | High-dose group:
* 225 IU follitropin alpha + 150 IU highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hpHMG)
* 15 mcg follitropin delta + 150 IU hpHMG Receives: Drug: Follitropin Alfa; Drug: Follitropin delta; Drug: human menopausal gonadotropin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cumulative Clinical Pregnancy Rate
an ultrasound confirmation of an intrauterine gestational sac with an embryo with detectable heartbeat in it after the fresh + if available frozen embryo transfer treatments
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Live Birth Rate
delivery of a viable newborn after 24 weeks gestation
Measured: 12 months
Cumulative Live Birth Rate
Cumulative live birth: delivery of a viable newborn after 24 weeks gestation after the fresh embryo transfer or if it is unsuccessful but surplus embryos were frozen then after any of the subsequent frozen embryo transfer cycles. All these transfers (fresh and frozen) are the result of a single stimulation. If a live birth is reached during the fresh or any of the subsequent frozen transfers from the same stimulation then it is considered a positive outcome; if the fresh transfer or any of the subsequent frozen transfers from the same stimulation do not result in a live birth it is considered a negative result.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2021
- Study start2 Dec 2021
- Primary completion20 Jul 2023
- Study completion20 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfertilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peter Kovacs MD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Peter Kovacs MD, Dunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF Center
- Investigators
- Peter Kovacs, MD, Principal investigator, Dunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05103228
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 52007-13/2021
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 13 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
van der Gaast MH, Eijkemans MJ, van der Net JB, de Boer EJ, Burger CW, van Leeuwen FE, Fauser BC, Macklon NS. Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Oct;13(4):476-80. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60633-5.
PubMed 17007663Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1768-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der106. Epub 2011 May 10.
PubMed 21558332Briggs R, Kovacs G, MacLachlan V, Motteram C, Baker HW. Can you ever collect too many oocytes? Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):81-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu272. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
PubMed 25362088Polyzos NP, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, Pellicer A, Santos-Ribeiro S, Tournaye H, Bosch E, Garcia-Velasco J. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including approximately 15,000 women. Fertil Steril. 2018 Sep;110(4):661-670.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.039.
PubMed 30196963Gougeon A. Human ovarian follicular development: from activation of resting follicles to preovulatory maturation. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2010 May;71(3):132-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2010.02.021. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
PubMed 20362973Fleming R, Broekmans F, Calhaz-Jorge C, Dracea L, Alexander H, Nyboe Andersen A, Blockeel C, Jenkins J, Lunenfeld B, Platteau P, Smitz J, de Ziegler D. Can anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations be used to determine gonadotrophin dose and treatment protocol for ovarian stimulation? Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 May;26(5):431-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.027. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
PubMed 23507133Nelson SM, Yates RW, Lyall H, Jamieson M, Traynor I, Gaudoin M, Mitchell P, Ambrose P, Fleming R. Anti-Mullerian hormone-based approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception. Hum Reprod. 2009 Apr;24(4):867-75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den480. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
PubMed 19136673Nelson SM. Biomarkers of ovarian response: current and future applications. Fertil Steril. 2013 Mar 15;99(4):963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.051. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
PubMed 23312225La Marca A, Sunkara SK. Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice. Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):124-40. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt037. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
PubMed 24077980Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org; Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020 Dec;114(6):1151-1157. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.134.
PubMed 33280722Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
PubMed 21505041Poseidon Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number); Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, Fischer R, Galliano D, Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK, Ubaldi FM, Humaidan P. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 26. No abstract available.
PubMed 26921622Leijdekkers JA, Torrance HL, Schouten NE, van Tilborg TC, Oudshoorn SC, Mol BWJ, Eijkemans MJC, Broekmans FJM. Individualized ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI treatment: it is time to stop using high FSH doses in predicted low responders. Hum Reprod. 2020 Sep 1;35(9):1954-1963. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez184.
PubMed 31838515van Tilborg TC, Torrance HL, Oudshoorn SC, Eijkemans MJC, Koks CAM, Verhoeve HR, Nap AW, Scheffer GJ, Manger AP, Schoot BC, Sluijmer AV, Verhoeff A, Groen H, Laven JSE, Mol BWJ, Broekmans FJM; OPTIMIST study group. Individualized versus standard FSH dosing in women starting IVF/ICSI: an RCT. Part 1: The predicted poor responder. Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec 1;32(12):2496-2505. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex318.
PubMed 29121326Liu X, Li T, Wang B, Xiao X, Liang X, Huang R. Mild stimulation protocol vs conventional controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in poor ovarian response patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 May;301(5):1331-1339. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05513-6. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
PubMed 32211953
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cumulative Pregnancy Rate With Lower and Higher Dose of Gonadotropin During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation During IVF Among Expected Poor Responders: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05103228
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 52007-13/2021
- Conditions
- Infertility, Ovarian Dysfunction
- Keywords
- gonadotropin, follitropin alpha, follitropin delta, high-dose gonadotropin, clinical pregnancy, cumulative pregnancy rate
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Peter Kovacs MDUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 13 Dec 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is an important step during in vitro fertilization (IVF). Its aim optimally is to recruit 10-15 oocytes. When deciding on the actual treatment, different stimulation protocols, various stimulating agents and wide range of gonadotropin dose can one choose from. Prior to the decision on the actual stimulation protocol and gonadotropin (Gn) dose the patient's expected response to stimulation is assessed primarily using ovarian reserve markers. Most medications used during stimulation exert their effect in a dose-dependent manner hence with a higher Gn dose one would expect a better response, more oocytes. More oocytes could translate into more embryos and potentially a higher pregnancy rate. The currently available evidence however does not support this practice as randomized controlled trials (RCT) have failed to show that the use of higher Gn dose results in higher pregnancy, live-birth rates. These studies however identified patients based on different criteria, compared different stimulation protocols and various Gn doses. There are only two RCTs that compared cumulative live birth rates (fresh + frozen embryo transfers) and they identified poor responders based on different criteria and used different drug regimens. Therefore, the aim of our study is to compare cumulative IVF clinical pregnancy rates using a lower and a higher gonadotropin dose among poor responders identified based on universally accepted criteria.
Detailed description
Background: IVF is started after proper evaluation based on an appropriate indication for the treatment. The first phase of the treatment is the stimulation with the aim to recruit sufficient number of oocytes. In general, 10-15 oocytes are aimed for. This many oocytes should be sufficient for the embryology laboratory procedures and should allow the provider to choose the embryo or embryos for transfer from a larger cohort. More oocytes are associated with more side effects and fewer oocytes limit the efficacy of the laboratory procedures. Stimulation is individualized and usually age, ovarian reserve markers, weight and response to previous stimulation are taken into consideration when decisions are made. Based on ovarian reserve markers patients are grouped as expected normal responders, hyper-responders or poor responders. A poor responder is a patient with low ovarian reserve or low number of oocytes in the ovaries. Their care can be challenging. Different pre-stimulation interventions and various stimulation approaches have been explored in this subset of patients. Typically, providers will prescribe higher gonadotropin doses and expect the retrieval of more oocytes resulting in more transferable embryos. Studies so far however have not supported this practice. In expected poor responders most studies have not shown the collection of more oocytes with higher dose gonadotropins. Those that did find more oocytes described an additional 1-2 oocytes only. None of the studies so far have reported improved pregnancy outcome, including cumulative outcome with more gonadotropins though. The literature is confounded by the various definitions of the poor responder patient, the use of various stimulation protocols in the active treatment versus control groups, the use of oral agents as active treatment and the different clinical endpoints tested (oocyte number, clinical pregnancy, live birth, cumulative live birth). Therefore, we plan to study patients identified as poor responders based on established criteria (POSEIDON criteria). We will use the same stimulation protocols, drug types in the experimental and control groups. We will study clinically meaningful outcomes, live birth rate and cumulative live birth rate.
Design: Investigator initiated prospective, randomized, multi-center, non-blinded trial to compared higher and lower gonadotropin in poor responder patients undegoing IVF-ICSI treatment identified based on Posedion III-IV criteria
Participants: The investigators will enroll patients who, based on their initial evaluation, reproductive history or prior fertility treatment, have a proper indication to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF)/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. A basic infertility evaluation includes: 1.) hormonal evaluation of ovarian function, including ovarian reserve testing (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH] level, antral follicle count [AFC]), 2) transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of female internal genital organs, 3) evaluation of the uterine cavity (hysterosalpingogram, saline sonohysterogram or hysteroscopy), 4) cervical cancer screening, 5) cervical culture for Chlamydia, 6) serologic testing for HIV, hepatitis B, C, syphilis (both partners), 7) semen analysis, 8) male andrological exam, 9) if needed male hormonal +/- genetic testing. IVF-ICSI treatment is started for advanced maternal age, diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), unexplained infertility after failed intrauterine inseminations, male factor infertility, endometriosis.
The investigators plan to recruit:
- infertile patients between the ages of 18-42 who require IVF-ICSI treatment and are identified as poor responders based on: a) AMH: 0.3-1.2 ng/ml or AFC <5, b) AMH>1.2 ng/ml or AFC≥5 but the retrieval of ≤ 4 oocytes during previous IVF treatment. (POSEIDON category III-IV, Alviggi et al. Fertility Sterility 2016)
Methods: prospective, multicenter (5 centers), randomized controlled trial comparing a higher or lower gonadotropin (Gn) dose treatment. In both the low and high groups two different drug regimens (follitropin alpha + hp human menopausal gonadotropin or follitropin delta + hp human menopausal gonadotropin) will be used. 150 IU follitropin alpha was shown to be equally effective to 10 mcg follitropin delta. Therefore, the investigators expect similar response (oocyte yield) with the two regimens within the high and low Gn dose groups but the study design still will allow the investigators to compare the two follitropin medications too, which is a secondary aim.
Lower-dose group:
- 150 IU follitropin alpha + 75 IU highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hpHMG)
- 10 mcg follitropin delta + 75 IU hpHMG
Higher-dose group:
- 225 IU follitropin alpha + 150 IU hpHMG
- 15 mcg follitropin delta + 150 IU hpHMG
Treatment protocol:
- The stimulation will get started on day 2 or 3 of the spontaneous menstrual cycle, or on the 5th day after oral contraceptive pill use or after luteal estradiol pretreatment.
- During the stimulation ultrasound +/- serum hormone measurements will be used to monitor response. The first ultrasound is scheduled for day 5 or 6 of stimulation. At the time of the ultrasound blood test for serum estradiol is planned too. At the time of the last scan serum estradiol and progesterone levels will be measured.
- According to the study protocol the patient will continue with the assigned medication dose throughout her treatment. Dose increase is not allowed. If there is evidence for hyper-response [estradiol level > 4000 pmol/l on day 6 or more than 15 follicles over 10 mm any time during the stimulation] the dose can be reduced.
- As soon as two or more follicles reach >17 mm in diameter human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonits [GnRH a] trigger injection will be used and 35-36 hours later transvaginal ultrasound guided follicle aspiration will be performed.
- The luteal phase will be supported by vaginal progesterone starting on the day after the retrieval.
- IVF or ICSI fertilization will be performed based on the semen parameters or previous fertilization records.
- The day after the retrieval the success of fertilization will be checked and the embryo(s) will be transferred 2-5 days after the retrieval. Embryo(s) will be transferred transcervically using soft transfer catheters under ultrasound guidance using the afterload technique.
- Surplus good quality embryos will be cryopreserved using vitrification. Elective cryopreservation (no transfer in the fresh cycle) will be performed if: 1) risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, 2) serum progesterone level over 1.5 ng/ml [5.5 nmol/l] prior to the oocyte collection, 3) any complications between the retrieval and planned fresh transfer (bleeding, infection, illness).
- 12-14 days after the transfer serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) measurement will determine whether implantation has occurred. If the test is positive in 2-3 weeks a vaginal ultrasound will be done to determine the size, location and number of gestational sacs. Viable pregnancies will be referred to a formal prenatal care around week 8-9 of pregnancy. Delivery and perinatal outcome data will be collected by phone call after the delivery.
- If the fresh IVF cycle is not successful but embryos have been cryopreserved then the patient will undergo a frozen embryo transfer treatment cycle either in her own cycle, or in a minimally stimulated or completely artificial cycle.
The care of the patients will not differ from the care of non-study patients in terms of potential medication dose, the number of clinic visits, retrieval and embryology procedures as well as prenatal care.
Randomization: Randomization will be performed according to a computer generated list. (www.randomizer.org) The planned sample size is 700 patients (350 in both the low- and high-dose groups).
Sample size calculation: In order to determine the sample size, the investigators calculated with a 20% pregnancy rate in a patient population that fits the inclusion-exclusion criteria. The investigators expect higher oocyte yield in the higher dose group that should result in more available embryos and therefore more frozen embryo transfers. The investigators calculate that this could increase the cumulative pregnancy rate by 50%. The investigators also believe that about 20% of the patients will drop out for various reasons. Therefore, 350 participants are needed in both arms of the study.
Statistical analysis: After the enrollment of the first 350 patients, a planned interim analysis will be performed to decide whether the planned sample size is sufficient to achieve our goal. Logistic regression analysis using a generalized, mixed linear model will be used to assess the impact of various Gn doses on pregnancy rates. Chi-square test will be used to test significance and OR will be calculated.
Data will be collected for the following parameters:
- Age
- Cycle day 3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol level
- anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)
- antral follicle count (AFC)
- Indication for IVF: male, tubal, unexplained, endometriosis, diminished ovarian reserve
- Smoking (yes-no)
- Body mass index
- Cycle number (fresh + frozen together)
- Estradiol level on day 6
- Estradiol + progesterone level at the last scan
- Number of follicles >10 mm at the end of stimulation
- Stimulation duration
- Endometrial thickness
- Gn dose (daily, total)
- Trigger mechanism (HCG vs. GnRh agonist)
- Sperm parameters
- Oocyte number
- Mature (MII) oocyte number
- Proportion of mature oocytes (MII/ oocyte number)
- IVF vs. ICSI fertilization
- Number of fertilized (2 pronuclei (PN)) oocytes
- Fertilization rate per oocyte
- Fertilization rate per mature oocyte
- The number of good quality embryos (morphology better than score "6B2" on day 3, or score >2BB on day 5) and proportion of good morphology embryos among all embryos
- Number of transferred embryos
- Number of cryopreserved embryos
- Pregnancy rate (positive hCG)
- Clinical pregnancy rate (sac with viable embryo in it)
- Cumulative pregnancy rate (fresh + frozen embryo transfers)
- Pregnancy/ neonatal outcome
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lower gonadotropin dose stimulation | Experimental | Drug: Follitropin Alfa, Drug: Follitropin delta, Drug: human menopausal gonadotropinLow-dose group: * 150 IU follitropin alpha + 75 IU highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hpHMG) * 10 mcg follitropin delta + 75 IU hpHMG |
| Higher gonadotropin dose stimulation | Experimental | Drug: Follitropin Alfa, Drug: Follitropin delta, Drug: human menopausal gonadotropinHigh-dose group: * 225 IU follitropin alpha + 150 IU highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hpHMG) * 15 mcg follitropin delta + 150 IU hpHMG |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 42 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Expected poor responder based on:
- motile sperm with normal morphology obtained from the ejaculate of testicular biopsy
- no more than 3 previous failed IVF cycles (if the patient had 2 or more previous cycles cancelled for poor response she cannot be included)
- BMI: 18-35 kg/m2
- regular 24-35 day cycles
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- presence of hydrosalpinx
- positive HIV, hepatitis B, C screening tests
- planned preimplantation genetic testing of the embryos
- planned elective cryopreservation
- lack of consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Follitropin AlfaAlso: Ovaleap (Theramex Ireland Limited), Bemfola (Richter Gedeon Nyrt., Hungary), Gonal F (Merck Europe B.V.)lower dose gonadotropin (follitropin alpha/ follitropin delta + hpHMG) vs. higher dose stimulation (Follitropin alpha/delta + hpHMG) | Drug | Higher gonadotropin dose stimulation, Lower gonadotropin dose stimulation |
| Follitropin deltaAlso: Rekovelle (Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Denmark)lower dose gonadotropin (follitropin alpha/ follitropin delta + hpHMG) vs. higher dose stimulation (Follitropin alpha/delta + hpHMG) | Drug | Higher gonadotropin dose stimulation, Lower gonadotropin dose stimulation |
| human menopausal gonadotropinAlso: Menopur (Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Denmark)lower dose gonadotropin (follitropin alpha/ follitropin delta + hpHMG) vs. higher dose stimulation (Follitropin alpha/delta + hpHMG) | Drug | Higher gonadotropin dose stimulation, Lower gonadotropin dose stimulation |
Primary outcome
Cumulative Clinical Pregnancy Rate
Time frame: 18 months
an ultrasound confirmation of an intrauterine gestational sac with an embryo with detectable heartbeat in it after the fresh + if available frozen embryo transfer treatments
2 secondary outcomes
Live Birth Rate
Time frame: 12 months
Cumulative Live Birth Rate
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Dec 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 17007663van der Gaast MH, Eijkemans MJ, van der Net JB, de Boer EJ, Burger CW, van Leeuwen FE, Fauser BC, Macklon NS. Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Oct;13(4):476-80. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60633-5.
- Results publication: PubMed 21558332Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1768-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der106. Epub 2011 May 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 25362088Briggs R, Kovacs G, MacLachlan V, Motteram C, Baker HW. Can you ever collect too many oocytes? Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):81-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu272. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
- Results publication: PubMed 30196963Polyzos NP, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, Pellicer A, Santos-Ribeiro S, Tournaye H, Bosch E, Garcia-Velasco J. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including approximately 15,000 women. Fertil Steril. 2018 Sep;110(4):661-670.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.039.
- Results publication: PubMed 20362973Gougeon A. Human ovarian follicular development: from activation of resting follicles to preovulatory maturation. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2010 May;71(3):132-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2010.02.021. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 23507133Fleming R, Broekmans F, Calhaz-Jorge C, Dracea L, Alexander H, Nyboe Andersen A, Blockeel C, Jenkins J, Lunenfeld B, Platteau P, Smitz J, de Ziegler D. Can anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations be used to determine gonadotrophin dose and treatment protocol for ovarian stimulation? Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 May;26(5):431-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.027. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 19136673Nelson SM, Yates RW, Lyall H, Jamieson M, Traynor I, Gaudoin M, Mitchell P, Ambrose P, Fleming R. Anti-Mullerian hormone-based approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception. Hum Reprod. 2009 Apr;24(4):867-75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den480. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 23312225Nelson SM. Biomarkers of ovarian response: current and future applications. Fertil Steril. 2013 Mar 15;99(4):963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.051. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 24077980La Marca A, Sunkara SK. Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice. Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):124-40. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt037. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 33280722Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org; Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020 Dec;114(6):1151-1157. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.134.
- Results publication: PubMed 21505041Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 26921622Poseidon Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number); Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, Fischer R, Galliano D, Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK, Ubaldi FM, Humaidan P. A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 26. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Inherited Reproductive Disorders
Genetic Disorder, Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
Biorepository in Participants Who Undergo OTC for Gonadotoxic Therapy
Acute Ovarian Failure, Infertility
Not yet recruiting
Implementing IVM for Fertility Treatment in Clinical Practice
Infertility
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Linzagolix in Adenomyosis and Recurrent Implantation Failure
Adenomyosis of Uterus, Implantation Failure
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Novel Aromatase Inhibitor, Leflutrozole, for Treatment of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia
Infertility Due to Azoospermia, Infertility, Male
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter Kovacs, MD principal investigator
Dunamenti REK Istenhegyi IVF Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Follitropin Alfa, Follitropin delta and human menopausal gonadotropin in people with Infertility and Ovarian Dysfunction, run by Peter Kovacs MD at 1 site in Hungary.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Dec 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cumulative Clinical Pregnancy Rate (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05103228, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2024.