SuicideNCT05103540
Suicide Ideation Intervention in Nigeria
A study testing Comprehensive SEM-Based Program in people with Suicide, run by Babcock University.
Trial summary
The research will use the Social Ecologic Model of behavior and WHO mhGAP framework to design a comprehensive intervention across three levels (individual, interpersonal, and social) of influence. The study will then pilot the intervention in 15 secondary schools through a Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 19 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Suicide
- What is being tested?
- Comprehensive SEM-Based Program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2025to Jun 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 19 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Duly enrolled students
- Aged 10-19 years
- No plans of leaving the school in the next year
- Give consent
- Parental/guardians' assent
Who cannot join
- Nil
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Patterns and Risk Factors for Suicide Ideation Among In-school Adolescents in Nigeria and a Comprehensive Suicide-behavior Prevention Intervention Pilot Study
The research will use the Social Ecologic Model of behavior and WHO mhGAP framework to design a comprehensive intervention across three levels (individual, interpersonal, and social) of influence. The study will then pilot the intervention in 15 secondary schools through a Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized trial. After screening for eligibility and selecting participating schools and individuals, investigators will randomize at the cluster level and switch the groups from control to intervention arms at three months' intervals till the research has moved all the clusters. The study will collect data at baseline, the switch points, and the end of the study. The goal is to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness of a comprehensive suicide behavior prevention intervention among in-school adolescents in Nigeria. Another aim is to identify barriers and facilitators of implementation and the best practices for scaling up the intervention. It is hypothesized that because our intervention is based on the best contextual evidence and built on a sound theoretical model, it will successfully mitigate suicide ideation. Also, the nature and efficiency of the stepped wedge cluster randomized design will enhance the feasibility in the local context, characterized by political, logistic, and ethical constraints.
Read the detailed description
The effect of comprehensive suicide behavior prevention intervention among in-school adolescents Nigeria: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a theory-based comprehensive suicide behavior prevention intervention among in-school adolescents in the Ikenne local government area (LGA) of Ogun State, Nigeria. The methodology of the study is a Stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial of a suicide behavior intervention among fifteen secondary schools in Nigeria. The study chose the stepped-wedge design because although the investigators expect the intervention to reduce suicidal ideation, the feasibility of a full implementation may be challenging due to political, logistical, and ethical constraints. The design fulfills a secondary role of serving as a scientific tool to incorporate a fair method to determine the order of intervention rollout under logistic impediments. The implementation of our intervention is feasible only at the cluster level.
Investigators will conduct a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trail among 15 secondary schools over one year. The participating schools will cross in a one-way switch over from the control to the intervention period. The sequence of switch over for the clusters will follow a stratified randomization scheme. All the schools will receive the intervention by the end of the study. All the groups will be recruited at the study onset and will act as control until the point of randomization into the intervention group. To mitigate contamination, the study will provide clear information on the purpose of the research to the participants. The clusters will get the details of intervention at the point of switching into the experimental group. The study will educate the intervention group against contamination. Also, the investigators will assess the exposure of the control group to the intervention before switching them. The study will report the level of contamination.
The study will recruit 15 secondary schools with a minimum of 100 enrolled students and do not have an existing suicide behavior intervention program. The school boards need to approve participation. Eligible students should be aged 10-19 years, give consent, and not have plans of leaving the school in the next year. Parental/guardians' assent is also a prerequisite for participation in the study. The study will not exclude non-participating students from the delivery of the intervention. The study will randomly select, by balloting, Five (three publicly and two privately-owned) schools in each of the three areas of the LGA. The selection of students will follow a probability sampling method. Eligible schools will be randomized into three sequences of five schools each, using a computer-generated stratified randomized sampling scheme. The stratification, which will be according to the area and ownership of the schools, will be supervised by the PIs. The nature of the experiment and intervention makes blinding unrealistic. However, investigators will ensure the conduct of the measurement of the study outcome objectively.
The intervention is a four-pronged comprehensive suicidal behavior prevention intervention in schools. The prongs consist of evidence-based interventions that use the Social Ecological Model (SEM). The SEM theorizes that there are multiple inter-related levels of influences on human behavior, and a successful preventive program should address factors at each stratum. The intervention addresses three levels; individual, interpersonal, and social. Firstly, the research will collaborate with relevant stakeholders to design and obtain a commitment from the schools to a suicidal behavior prevention policy and protocol document. Secondly, the intervention will train staff and students on best practices to improve students' connectedness thereby, creating a positive school environment. Thirdly, the study will identify and train gatekeepers on the proper response to suicidal thoughts and other suicidal behaviors; and serve as the link between the students and a school-linked mental health specialist. The research will train the gatekeepers to use school-based screening tools. Lastly, this research will educate all students on suicidal behaviors.
This prong will create awareness, promote case-finding, and provide information about available mental health resources. Also, the intervention will address the stereotypes that promote stigma and improve the students' coping abilities. The entire intervention will incorporate peer support and student involvement at all stages of planning and implementation.
The primary outcome is suicidal ideation, as assessed by the Positive Inventory of the Positive and negative Suicide Ideation (PANSI-PI). PANSI is a 14-item scale consisting of two subscales, the 6-item positive scale (PANSI-PI) and the 8-item negative (PANSI-NSA). Higher scores on PANSI-NSI scale and lower marks on PANSI-PI) symbolize the higher frequency of suicidal thoughts. The secondary outcomes are grit, gratitude, and mental health status. The study will use the gratitude questionnaire(GQ-6), the grit scales, and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to assess gratitude, determination, and mental health status, respectively.
The sample size was determined using the Shiny CRT Calculator, a power and sample size tool for cluster-randomized trials. The aim was to have three sequences with five clusters each, assuming an intra-cluster correlation coefficient of 0.01 (0 to 0.02) and individual autocorrelation of 0.08. The study desires a minimum statistical power of at least 90%, considering a type I error of 5% and a 10% increase in the mean PANSI-PI score from 17.71 (_6:35) attributable to the intervention. Some allowance will be made for a school dropout rate of 23.12%. The derived sample size was 30 per cluster.
The study will analyze the data using Stata/SE 15.1 statistical software. The statistical analysis is rooted in the principle of intention-to-treat and will use random effect mixed modeling to address missing data while assuming that missingness is at random. The research will use the linear mixed model for continuous outcomes and the generalized linear mixed model for categorical outcomes and adjust for the possible confounding effects of individual-level characteristics that our randomization did not capture. Also, the study will adjust for age, sex, number of years in the school, ethnicity, and secular trends (the school term), and will use multilevel analysis to adjust for cluster effect and the correlation between repeated measurements.
The expected outcome of the research includes a suicidal behavior prevention policy and protocol template for secondary schools in Nigeria and an effective suicide behavior prevention program that is scalable for Ogun State, Nigeria.
- Conditions
- Suicide
- Being tested
- Comprehensive SEM-Based Program
- Medical subject headings
- Suicide
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Comprehensive SEM-Based ProgramBehavioural
The SEM theorizes that there are multiple inter-related levels of influences on human behavior, and a successful preventive program should address factors at each stratum. My intervention addresses three levels; individual, interpersonal, and social. Firstly, the research will collaborate with relevant stakeholders to design and obtain a commitment from the schools to a suicidal behavior prevention policy and protocol document. Secondly, the intervention will train staff and students on best practices to improve students' connectedness thereby, creating a positive school environment. Thirdly, the study will identify and train gatekeepers on the proper response to suicidal thoughts and other suicidal behaviors; and serve as the link between the students and a school-linked mental health specialist. We will train the gatekeepers to use school-based screening tools. Lastly, this research will educate all students on suicidal behaviors.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Comprehensive theory-based suicide behavior program Receives: Behavioral: Comprehensive SEM-Based Program |
| Control | No intervention | No intervention will be given to the group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Suicide Ideation
Adolescent Suicide Ideation measured using the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation (PANSI) Inventory. The scores range from six to thirty for PANSI-Positive Inventory (PI) and eight to 40 for PANSI-Negative Suicide Inventory (NSI). Higher scores on PANSI-NSI scale and lower marks on PANSI-PI) symbolize the higher frequency of suicidal thoughts.
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Gratitude
Measured with the Gratitude Questionnaire. The aggregate score should be between six to 42. Participants scoring less than the 50th percentile (38) are low in gratitude.
Measured: 12 weeks
Grit
Measured with the Grit scale. The maximum aggregate is five (extremely gritty), and the minimum score is one (not at all gritty).
Measured: 12 weeks
Mental Health Status
Measured with the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). The obtainable scores range from 0 to 36. Scores less than12 suggest the absence of distress.
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2021
- Study startJul 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionJun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SuicideStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Babcock University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Olumide ABIODUN, Babcock University
- Investigators
- Olumide Abiodun, Principal investigator, Babcock University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05103540
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BU/002/21
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 7 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: All study data will be de-identified
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patterns and Risk Factors for Suicide Ideation Among In-school Adolescents in Nigeria and a Comprehensive Suicide-behavior Prevention Intervention Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05103540
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BU/002/21
- Conditions
- Suicide
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Babcock UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The research will use the Social Ecologic Model of behavior and WHO mhGAP framework to design a comprehensive intervention across three levels (individual, interpersonal, and social) of influence. The study will then pilot the intervention in 15 secondary schools through a Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized trial. After screening for eligibility and selecting participating schools and individuals, investigators will randomize at the cluster level and switch the groups from control to intervention arms at three months' intervals till the research has moved all the clusters. The study will collect data at baseline, the switch points, and the end of the study. The goal is to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness of a comprehensive suicide behavior prevention intervention among in-school adolescents in Nigeria. Another aim is to identify barriers and facilitators of implementation and the best practices for scaling up the intervention. It is hypothesized that because our intervention is based on the best contextual evidence and built on a sound theoretical model, it will successfully mitigate suicide ideation. Also, the nature and efficiency of the stepped wedge cluster randomized design will enhance the feasibility in the local context, characterized by political, logistic, and ethical constraints.
Detailed description
The effect of comprehensive suicide behavior prevention intervention among in-school adolescents Nigeria: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a theory-based comprehensive suicide behavior prevention intervention among in-school adolescents in the Ikenne local government area (LGA) of Ogun State, Nigeria. The methodology of the study is a Stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial of a suicide behavior intervention among fifteen secondary schools in Nigeria. The study chose the stepped-wedge design because although the investigators expect the intervention to reduce suicidal ideation, the feasibility of a full implementation may be challenging due to political, logistical, and ethical constraints. The design fulfills a secondary role of serving as a scientific tool to incorporate a fair method to determine the order of intervention rollout under logistic impediments. The implementation of our intervention is feasible only at the cluster level.
Investigators will conduct a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trail among 15 secondary schools over one year. The participating schools will cross in a one-way switch over from the control to the intervention period. The sequence of switch over for the clusters will follow a stratified randomization scheme. All the schools will receive the intervention by the end of the study. All the groups will be recruited at the study onset and will act as control until the point of randomization into the intervention group. To mitigate contamination, the study will provide clear information on the purpose of the research to the participants. The clusters will get the details of intervention at the point of switching into the experimental group. The study will educate the intervention group against contamination. Also, the investigators will assess the exposure of the control group to the intervention before switching them. The study will report the level of contamination.
The study will recruit 15 secondary schools with a minimum of 100 enrolled students and do not have an existing suicide behavior intervention program. The school boards need to approve participation. Eligible students should be aged 10-19 years, give consent, and not have plans of leaving the school in the next year. Parental/guardians' assent is also a prerequisite for participation in the study. The study will not exclude non-participating students from the delivery of the intervention. The study will randomly select, by balloting, Five (three publicly and two privately-owned) schools in each of the three areas of the LGA. The selection of students will follow a probability sampling method. Eligible schools will be randomized into three sequences of five schools each, using a computer-generated stratified randomized sampling scheme. The stratification, which will be according to the area and ownership of the schools, will be supervised by the PIs. The nature of the experiment and intervention makes blinding unrealistic. However, investigators will ensure the conduct of the measurement of the study outcome objectively.
The intervention is a four-pronged comprehensive suicidal behavior prevention intervention in schools. The prongs consist of evidence-based interventions that use the Social Ecological Model (SEM). The SEM theorizes that there are multiple inter-related levels of influences on human behavior, and a successful preventive program should address factors at each stratum. The intervention addresses three levels; individual, interpersonal, and social. Firstly, the research will collaborate with relevant stakeholders to design and obtain a commitment from the schools to a suicidal behavior prevention policy and protocol document. Secondly, the intervention will train staff and students on best practices to improve students' connectedness thereby, creating a positive school environment. Thirdly, the study will identify and train gatekeepers on the proper response to suicidal thoughts and other suicidal behaviors; and serve as the link between the students and a school-linked mental health specialist. The research will train the gatekeepers to use school-based screening tools. Lastly, this research will educate all students on suicidal behaviors.
This prong will create awareness, promote case-finding, and provide information about available mental health resources. Also, the intervention will address the stereotypes that promote stigma and improve the students' coping abilities. The entire intervention will incorporate peer support and student involvement at all stages of planning and implementation.
The primary outcome is suicidal ideation, as assessed by the Positive Inventory of the Positive and negative Suicide Ideation (PANSI-PI). PANSI is a 14-item scale consisting of two subscales, the 6-item positive scale (PANSI-PI) and the 8-item negative (PANSI-NSA). Higher scores on PANSI-NSI scale and lower marks on PANSI-PI) symbolize the higher frequency of suicidal thoughts. The secondary outcomes are grit, gratitude, and mental health status. The study will use the gratitude questionnaire(GQ-6), the grit scales, and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to assess gratitude, determination, and mental health status, respectively.
The sample size was determined using the Shiny CRT Calculator, a power and sample size tool for cluster-randomized trials. The aim was to have three sequences with five clusters each, assuming an intra-cluster correlation coefficient of 0.01 (0 to 0.02) and individual autocorrelation of 0.08. The study desires a minimum statistical power of at least 90%, considering a type I error of 5% and a 10% increase in the mean PANSI-PI score from 17.71 (_6:35) attributable to the intervention. Some allowance will be made for a school dropout rate of 23.12%. The derived sample size was 30 per cluster.
The study will analyze the data using Stata/SE 15.1 statistical software. The statistical analysis is rooted in the principle of intention-to-treat and will use random effect mixed modeling to address missing data while assuming that missingness is at random. The research will use the linear mixed model for continuous outcomes and the generalized linear mixed model for categorical outcomes and adjust for the possible confounding effects of individual-level characteristics that our randomization did not capture. Also, the study will adjust for age, sex, number of years in the school, ethnicity, and secular trends (the school term), and will use multilevel analysis to adjust for cluster effect and the correlation between repeated measurements.
The expected outcome of the research includes a suicidal behavior prevention policy and protocol template for secondary schools in Nigeria and an effective suicide behavior prevention program that is scalable for Ogun State, Nigeria.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Comprehensive SEM-Based ProgramComprehensive theory-based suicide behavior program |
| Control | No intervention | –No intervention will be given to the group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 to 19 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Duly enrolled students
- Aged 10-19 years
- No plans of leaving the school in the next year
- Give consent
- Parental/guardians' assent
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Nil
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive SEM-Based ProgramThe SEM theorizes that there are multiple inter-related levels of influences on human behavior, and a successful preventive program should address factors at each stratum. My intervention addresses three levels; individual, interpersonal, and social. Firstly, the research will collaborate with relevant stakeholders to design and obtain a commitment from the schools to a suicidal behavior prevention policy and protocol document. Secondly, the intervention will train staff and students on best practices to improve students' connectedness thereby, creating a positive school environment. Thirdly, the study will identify and train gatekeepers on the proper response to suicidal thoughts and other suicidal behaviors; and serve as the link between the students and a school-linked mental health specialist. We will train the gatekeepers to use school-based screening tools. Lastly, this research will educate all students on suicidal behaviors. | Behavioural | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Suicide Ideation
Time frame: 12 weeks
Adolescent Suicide Ideation measured using the Positive and Negative Suicide Ideation (PANSI) Inventory. The scores range from six to thirty for PANSI-Positive Inventory (PI) and eight to 40 for PANSI-Negative Suicide Inventory (NSI). Higher scores on PANSI-NSI scale and lower marks on PANSI-PI) symbolize the higher frequency of suicidal thoughts.
3 secondary outcomes
Gratitude
Time frame: 12 weeks
Grit
Time frame: 12 weeks
Mental Health Status
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Aug 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. All study data will be de-identified
Related trials for Suicide
Not yet recruiting
Reducing Stigma - A Treatment for Early Psychosis to Prevent Suicide
Suicide, Mental Health Stigma
RecruitingObservational study
Friends/Family of Individuals at Risk of Suicide Training Program
Caregiver, Caregiver Mental Health
Active, not recruiting
Motivational Interviewing to Address Suicidal Ideation for Veterans at High Risk for Suicide
Suicide, Attempted, Suicidal Ideation
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Reducing Firearm Suicide Among Veterans: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Peer-Delivered Lethal Means Counseling
Suicide, Secure Firearm Storage
Recruiting
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in the Management of Suicidal Ideation
Depression and Suicide
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Olumide Abiodun principal investigator
Babcock University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Comprehensive SEM-Based Program in people with Suicide, run by Babcock University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Olumide Abiodun (+2347038569725, abioduno@babcock.edu.ng), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Suicide Ideation (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.