Minimally Invasive Cardiac SurgeryNCT05104320
The Quality of Life and Patency Rate After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
A study testing MICS-CABG and sternotomy CABG in people with Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, run by Peking University Third Hospital.
Trial summary
This trial will address essential questions of the efficacy and safety of MICS-CABG in addition to the quality of life and patency rate of the grafts. The study will also address the impact of patients' preferences on external validity and internal validity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
- What is being tested?
- MICS-CABG and sternotomy CABG
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 248 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 31 Oct 2021to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria:(A patient will be included in the study when the following criteria and requirements are met)
① Patient age of ≥25 years but ≤85 years, and patients with CAD who require multivessel coronary bypass surgery. ② Angina that affects daily life and work and is uncontrollable with conservative treatment. ③ Significant stenosis in the left main (LM) coronary artery, left anterior descending (LAD) branch or left circumflex (LCX) branch >70%. ④ Severe stenosis (stenosis degree >75%) of three main branches of the coronary artery (anterior descending branch, circumflex branch, right coronary artery) with the need to undergo off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:(A patient will be excluded from the study if they meet any of the following criteria)
① Unstable preoperative hemodynamic status (vasoactive drugs such as dopamine, epinephrine or norepinephrine to maintain blood pressure, or an intra-aortic balloon pump [IABP] is implanted preoperatively) or requiring emergency surgery. ② Severe emphysema, hypoxemia [postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<70% and FEV1% predicted<50% or partial pressure of oxygen (pO2)<60 mmHg or partial pressure of carbon dioxide (pCO2)>40 mmHg without oxygen therapy. ③ Old extensive myocardial infarction without a viable myocardium based on isotope and echocardiography examination, significant cardiac enlargement (cardiothoracic ratio>0.75, EF<30%, left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDd)>60 mm, left ventricular aneurysm or severe arrhythmia). ④ Severe pleural adhesion, chest deformity, or previous thoracic radiotherapy. ⑤Previous thoracotomy surgery. ⑥ Simultaneous valve or other cardiac surgery. ⑦Planned cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. ⑧Poor condition of the distal coronary artery (diffuse stenosis, chronic total obstructive lesion with severe calcification or inability to match the graft due to a small diameter (<1.0 mm). ⑨Intolerance to surgery in combination with the following complications: Terminal cancer, uncontrolled infection, bleeding, severe brain injury, infarction or bleeding, multiple organ failure and other major organ dysfunction such as severe liver dysfunction or severe congestive heart failure.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: A Partially Randomized Patient Preference Trial to Assess the Quality of Life and Patency Rate After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: the MICS-CABG PRPP Trial
This trial will address essential questions of the efficacy and safety of MICS-CABG in addition to the quality of life and patency rate of the grafts. The study will also address the impact of patients' preferences on external validity and internal validity.
In this study, patients with a preference will be allocated to treatment strategies accordingly, whereas only those patients without a distinct preference will be randomized. The randomized trial is a 248-patient controlled, randomized, investigator-blinded trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with MICS-CABG is beneficial in comparison to CABG. This study is aimed to establish the superiority hypothesis for the physical component summary (PCS) accompanied by the noninferiority hypothesis for overall graft patency. Patients with no treatment preference will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms.
The primary efficacy endpoints are the PCS score at 30 days after surgery and the overall patency rate of the grafts within 14 days after surgery. Secondary outcome measures include the PCS score and patency rate at different time points. Safety endpoints include major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, complications, bleeding, wound infection, death, etc.
- Conditions
- Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
- Being tested
- MICS-CABG, sternotomy CABG
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MICS-CABGProcedure or surgery
Off-pump multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting via left thoracotomy under minimally invasive conditions.
sternotomy CABGProcedure or surgery
Off-pump multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting with conventional thoracotomy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MICS-CABG | Experimental | Patients undergoing MICS-CABG. Receives: Procedure: MICS-CABG |
| sternotomy CABG | Active comparator | Patients undergoing thoracotomy OPCABG. Receives: Procedure: sternotomy CABG |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
SF-36 PCS score
The SF-36 is a concise health test that features Physical Functioning (PF), Roe-Physical (RP), Bodily Pain, General Health (GH), Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Roe-Emotional (Emotional) and Mental Health (MH) functioning and comprehensively summarizes the quality of life of the respondents across 8 aspects. The PCS and mental component summary (MCS) can be calculated from the eight abovementioned indicators with different weights. The PCS and the MCS each range from 0 to 50, with a lower score indicating worse quality of life (QoL) and a higher score indicating better QoL.
Measured: 30 days after surgery
Overall patency rate of the grafts
the patency rates of the LIMA, RIMA, saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA) will be evaluated by the Fitzgibbon A+B grade
Measured: within 14 days after surgery
Secondary outcomes (11)
SF-36 PCS scores
The SF-36 is a concise health test that features Physical Functioning (PF), Roe-Physical (RP), Bodily Pain, General Health (GH), Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Roe-Emotional (Emotional) and Mental Health (MH) functioning and comprehensively summarizes the quality of life of the respondents across 8 aspects. The PCS and mental component summary (MCS) can be calculated from the eight abovementioned indicators with different weights. The PCS and the MCS each range from 0 to 50, with a lower score indicating worse quality of life (QoL) and a higher score indicating better QoL.
Measured: 7 days, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery
SF-36 MCS scores
The SF-36 is a concise health test that features Physical Functioning (PF), Roe-Physical (RP), Bodily Pain, General Health (GH), Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Roe-Emotional (Emotional) and Mental Health (MH) functioning and comprehensively summarizes the quality of life of the respondents across 8 aspects. The PCS and mental component summary (MCS) can be calculated from the eight abovementioned indicators with different weights. The PCS and the MCS each range from 0 to 50, with a lower score indicating worse quality of life (QoL) and a higher score indicating better QoL.
Measured: 7 days, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery
Patency rate of the different material grafts
the patency rates of the LIMA, RIMA, saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA) will be evaluated by the Fitzgibbon A+B grade
Measured: 14 days and 1 year after surgery
Length of incubation
the time of assisted respiratory ventilation after surgery
Measured: within 7 days after surgery
Hospitalization cost
total hospitalization cost of each patient
Measured: within 7 days after surgery
Length of postoperative hospitalization time
total postoperative hospitalization time of the patients
Measured: within 7 days after surgery
Bypass surgical variation index
The actual graft number is compared with the preoperative strategy. If the actual number of grafts is less than that in the preoperative plan, the results will be recorded.
Measured: within 7 days after surgery
Intrahospital RBC transfusion volume
the amount of red blood cells (U) to be transfused during hospitalization. Indications for blood transfusion include hemoglobin less than 90 g/L, severe intraoperative or postoperative active bleeding, or other blood transfusion considered necessary by the surgeons.
Measured: within 7 days after surgery
Wound infection rate
wound dehiscence, effusion and secondary debridement and suture
Measured: within 3 months after surgery
Number of Participants with re-exploration for bleeding or other causes (not including wound-related causes)
the requirement to return to the operating room for reopening of sternotomy or MICS CABG incision for any reason, such as bleeding, postoperative acute myocardial ischemia and unexplained circulatory instability. Debridement for DSWI or infection of anterior-lateral wounds will be excluded.
Measured: within 1 year after surgery
Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs)
Composite endpoint of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and target vessel ischemia-driven repeated revascularization (TVR).
Measured: 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2021
- Study start31 Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Minimally Invasive Cardiac SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking University Third HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 248 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yunpeng Ling, Study chair, Peking University Third HospitalYichen Gong, Principal investigator, Peking University Third Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05104320
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PKU MICS-CABG PRPP Trial
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 2 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Partially Randomized Patient Preference Trial to Assess the Quality of Life and Patency Rate After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: the MICS-CABG PRPP Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05104320
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PKU MICS-CABG PRPP Trial
- Conditions
- Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 248 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial will address essential questions of the efficacy and safety of MICS-CABG in addition to the quality of life and patency rate of the grafts. The study will also address the impact of patients' preferences on external validity and internal validity.
In this study, patients with a preference will be allocated to treatment strategies accordingly, whereas only those patients without a distinct preference will be randomized. The randomized trial is a 248-patient controlled, randomized, investigator-blinded trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with MICS-CABG is beneficial in comparison to CABG. This study is aimed to establish the superiority hypothesis for the physical component summary (PCS) accompanied by the noninferiority hypothesis for overall graft patency. Patients with no treatment preference will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms.
The primary efficacy endpoints are the PCS score at 30 days after surgery and the overall patency rate of the grafts within 14 days after surgery. Secondary outcome measures include the PCS score and patency rate at different time points. Safety endpoints include major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, complications, bleeding, wound infection, death, etc.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MICS-CABG | Experimental | Procedure: MICS-CABGPatients undergoing MICS-CABG. |
| sternotomy CABG | Active comparator | Procedure: sternotomy CABGPatients undergoing thoracotomy OPCABG. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MICS-CABGOff-pump multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting via left thoracotomy under minimally invasive conditions. | Procedure or surgery | MICS-CABG |
| sternotomy CABGOff-pump multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting with conventional thoracotomy. | Procedure or surgery | sternotomy CABG |
Primary outcome
SF-36 PCS score
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
The SF-36 is a concise health test that features Physical Functioning (PF), Roe-Physical (RP), Bodily Pain, General Health (GH), Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF), Roe-Emotional (Emotional) and Mental Health (MH) functioning and comprehensively summarizes the quality of life of the respondents across 8 aspects. The PCS and mental component summary (MCS) can be calculated from the eight abovementioned indicators with different weights. The PCS and the MCS each range from 0 to 50, with a lower score indicating worse quality of life (QoL) and a higher score indicating better QoL.
Overall patency rate of the grafts
Time frame: within 14 days after surgery
the patency rates of the LIMA, RIMA, saphenous vein graft (SVG) and radial artery (RA) will be evaluated by the Fitzgibbon A+B grade
11 secondary outcomes
SF-36 PCS scores
Time frame: 7 days, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery
SF-36 MCS scores
Time frame: 7 days, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after surgery
Patency rate of the different material grafts
Time frame: 14 days and 1 year after surgery
Length of incubation
Time frame: within 7 days after surgery
Hospitalization cost
Time frame: within 7 days after surgery
Length of postoperative hospitalization time
Time frame: within 7 days after surgery
Bypass surgical variation index
Time frame: within 7 days after surgery
Intrahospital RBC transfusion volume
Time frame: within 7 days after surgery
Wound infection rate
Time frame: within 3 months after surgery
Number of Participants with re-exploration for bleeding or other causes (not including wound-related causes)
Time frame: within 1 year after surgery
Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs)
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months after surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Nov 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
RecruitingObservational study
Product Surveillance Registry
Cardiac Rhythm Disorders, Urological Disorders
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Coagulation Profiles in Conventional and Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation
Coagulation Changes During Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Precision TOF-Guided Sugammadex Versus Spontaneous Recovery for Early Extubation in Minimally Invasive Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Minimally Invasive Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Propofol-Dexmedetomine Adjunction in Balanced Anesthesia for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Valve Surgery :Effect on Anesthetic Consumption ,Perioperative Outcomes,and Early Recovery
Balanced Anesthesia for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Valve Surgery
Recruiting
Multivessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Bypass Grafting as HYBRID Revascularization Versus Conventional Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Bypass, Cardiopulmonary
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yunpeng Ling study chair
Peking University Third Hospital
Yichen Gong principal investigator
Peking University Third Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MICS-CABG and sternotomy CABG in people with Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, run by Peking University Third Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yichen Gong, Doctor (8618611693463, 18611693463@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
SF-36 PCS score (time frame: 30 days after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.