TeachersCOMP-SNCT05107323
Feasibility and Effectiveness Study of a Compassionate Mind Training Program for Teachers
A study testing Compassionate Mind Training for Teachers in people with Teachers, run by University of Coimbra at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
Given the growing research on the multidimensional benefits of compassion cultivation, the current study sought to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of a Compassionate Mind Training intervention for Teachers (CMT-T) on teachers' psychological distress, wellbeing and compassion to self and others using a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Teachers
- What is being tested?
- Compassionate Mind Training for Teachers
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 155 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2018to 30 Aug 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- being a teacher in the enrolled schools
- provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- not being a teacher in the enrolled schools
- not provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Portugal1 site
Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive and Behavioural Intervention (CINEICC)
Coimbra, 3000
About this study
Official title: Compassionate Schools: Feasibility and Effectiveness Study of a Compassionate Mind Training Program to Promote Teachers Wellbeing
Given the growing research on the multidimensional benefits of compassion cultivation, the current study sought to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of a Compassionate Mind Training intervention for Teachers (CMT-T) on teachers' psychological distress, wellbeing and compassion to self and others using a randomised controlled and stepped wedge design. The CMT-T specifically aimed at promoting positive affect and satisfaction with professional life and reducing symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, and burnout, by increasing the flows of compassion (for self, for others and from others), self-compassion and compassion to others motivations and actions, and by diminishing fears of compassion (for self, for others and from others) and self-criticism. Furthermore, the present study aimed to explore the impact of the CMT-T on heart rate variability (HRV), an indicator of vagal regulatory activity and a physiological marker of a person's ability to flexibly respond to environmental challenges and regulate emotional responses. In light of previous research pointing to the role of individual differences in self-criticism on how individuals respond to compassion-based interventions, this study aimed to examine how self-criticism would influence the effects of the CMT-T intervention. Baseline self-criticism was hypothesized to impact the CMT-T effects on the primary and secondary outcome variables. In addition, the current study aimed to examine whether the effects of attending the CMT-T were sustained at 3-month post-intervention. Given that the inter-relationship between the three flows of compassion (i.e., compassion for others, being open to compassion from others, and self-compassion) is a key aspect of the CMT approach, the study sought to explore whether the associations between the flows of compassion would change from before to after the CMT-T, particularly whether these were strengthened after training. Finally, this study aimed to examine the mechanisms of change for the primary outcome variables at post-intervention. It is hypothesized that the changes occurred after the CMT-T intervention were mediated by changes in competencies for compassion for self, for others and from others, decreased levels fears of compassion for self, from others and from others, enhanced affect regulation, diminished self-criticism.
Read the detailed description
The main aim of COMP-S is to test the impact of a compassionate mind training intervention for teachers: CMT-T on indicators of mental, physiological and professional wellbeing.
The major goals of this project are to:
- Test the effects of the CMT-T on psychological primary outcomes (i.e. overall positive affect, symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress, burnout and professional wellbeing) and secondary outcomes (i.e. compassion, fears of compassion, self-criticism, affect regulation).
- Test the impact of the CMT-T on autonomic (i.e. heart-rate variability) biomarkers related to positive affect systems linked to affiliation and prosociality;
- Test the mediator effect of changes in the psychological processes targeted by the intervention (i.e. secondary outcomes: compassion, fears of compassion, self-criticism, affect regulation) on the impact of the CMT-T on the primary psychological outcomes, and on the biophysiological markers.
- Investigate the moderator effect of baseline individual differences in self-criticism, depressive symptoms and sociodemographic variables (i.e. age, gender) and occurrence of major life events, on the impact of the CMT-T on the psychological and biophysiological outcomes.
- Assess the moderator effect of practice frequency and helpfulness, and embodiment of compassionate qualities on everyday life, on the impact of the CMT-T on the psychological and biophysiological outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN The study was a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT), with one intervention group (CMT-T) and one waitlist control group (WLC), and a stepped-wedge design where all groups and participants in groups were offered the intervention. Prior to data collection, the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the University of Coimbra (CEDI22.03.2018).
Given the stepped wedge design, there were four assessment moments in the study: 1) Time 1 (T1) - baseline/pre-intervention assessment, was completed by the CMT-T group and the WLC group during the week previous to the start of the CMT-T intervention; 2) Time 2 (T2) - post-intervention assessment one was completed by CMT-T group and WLC group during the first-week post-intervention; 3) Time 3 (T3) - post-intervention assessment two, was completed by WLC group participants one week after they had also received the CMT-T intervention; 4) 3-months Follow-up assessment, this was conducted three months after the CMT-T conclusion (for all participants who completed the intervention). In T1, T2, and T3 all participants completed a set of self-report questionnaires. A subsample of participants from both conditions underwent the HRV measurement at T1, T2, and T3. In the 3-month follow-up assessment, only self-report data were collected.
PARTICIPANTS AND RECRUITMENT Participants were eligible for participation if they: (a) were teachers in the enrolled schools; and (b) provided informed consent. Participants were recruited amongst teaching staff in public schools (pre to high school grades) in the centre region of Portugal. Schools' boards were invited to participate in the study. With their authorization, a 2-hour recruitment session was conducted at the school and all teaching staff invited by the board. The session included a brief description of the study aims, procedures and ethical considerations. Teachers interested in participating provided their contact information. They were then contacted via email assessed for inclusion criteria and required to provide informed consent. Informed consent clarified the voluntary, confidential and anonymous nature of the study and data protection rights. Participants who meet the eligibility criteria to enter the study were randomly assigned within each school (using a computer-based random allocation) to either the CMT-T intervention or the waitlist control (WLC) group. The WLC group started the CMT-T after the first CMT-T group had completed the intervention. In total, six groups received the CMT-T, which was delivered in the school setting.
INTERVENTION The Compassionate Mind Training Program for Teachers (CMT-T) is a psychological intervention program delivered in a group format across eight sessions of approximately 2.5 hours each. In each session, besides presenting relevant theoretical constructs addressed in that session, participants are invited to complete experiential exercises, compassion and mindfulness meditation practices, and work in small groups to share their experiences, followed by a plenary session. There are six different modules addressed during the 8-sessions CMT-T.
Teachers attending the 8-week CMT-T were invited to practice the CMT-T exercises daily. In addition to self-report measures, teachers were asked to complete weekly Practice Diaries and Session Evaluation forms. Access to the Project website (https://escolascompassivas.wixsite.com/cmtescolas) allowed participants further information about the program, psychoeducation information and materials, practices instructions and audio files containing the meditation practices. Weekly gentle reminder emails were sent to participants motivating them to practice the exercises. A final CMT and Forest Bathing 1-day retreat was held at the end of the intervention.
DATA ANALYSIS Power analysis was calculated at priori using G*Power 3.1 for Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Results indicated that a sample size of 27 per group (n = 54) was needed, using a significance level of .05 and a power of 95% to detect significant fixed effects, main effects, and interaction effects, with a large effect size (f = 0.25).
All data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 27.0), and the alpha level was set at .05. For continuous variables, independent samples t-tests were conducted, and for categorical variables, chi-square tests were performed.
To examine mean differences between pre-intervention (T1) and post-intervention (T2) in the primary and secondary outcome variables, a series of 2 (condition) × 2 (time) repeated measures ANOVAs were performed. To examine the mean differences in the study variables within each group, a series of repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted for each group comparing pre and post-intervention. For ANOVAs, effect sizes were calculated using partial eta square (ƞ2p). For independent and paired-samples t-tests, effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d. A confidence interval of 95% was used in all the analyses. A stepped wedge analysis was performed in the subgroup of participants who participated in the WLC group between T1 and T2 and then completed the CMT-T between T2 and T3. Repeated Measures ANOVAs were performed to test differences in all study's variables from baseline to pre-intervention and post-intervention. Post-Hoc analyses were used to explore pairwise differences (baseline-to-pre-intervention; baseline-to-post-intervention, and pre-to-post-intervention).
To assess whether the post-CMT results were maintained, repeated measures ANOVAs were computed to test for mean differences between post-treatment (T2) and 3-months follow-up (T3). Pearson product-moment correlation analyses were calculated to explore whether the CMT-T would strengthen the associations between the three flows of compassion from pre- to post-intervention in all participants who completed the CMT-T.
Finally, to explore the psychological processes that underlie the changes in the primary outcomes after the CMT-T intervention MEMORE macro (Mediation and Moderation analysis for Repeated measures designs) was used. MEMORE allows for the estimation of total, direct, and indirect effects of independent variable (X) on dependent variable (Y) through one or more mediators (M) simultaneously two-occasion within-subjects design.
- Conditions
- Teachers
- Being tested
- Compassionate Mind Training for Teachers
- Keywords
- Compassionate Mind Training, Teachers, Feasibility study, Effectiveness study, Psychophysiological wellbeing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Compassionate Mind Training for TeachersBehavioural
Compassionate Mind Training for Teachers is a biopsychosocial evidence-based approach that aims to foster compassion, affect regulation, prosocial qualities and wellbeing in teachers.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CMT-T | Experimental | The CMT-T is a Compassionate Mind Training program tailored for teachers, delivered in a group format across eight sessions of approximately 2.5 hours each. In each session, besides presenting relevant theoretical constructs addressed in that session, participants are invited to complete experiential exercises, compassion and mindfulness meditation practices, and work in small groups to share their experiences, followed by a plenary session. There are six different modules addressed during the 8-sessions CMT-T Receives: Behavioral: Compassionate Mind Training for Teachers |
| Waiting list | No intervention | Participants in the waiting list control group were not offered an intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in positive affect
Assessed by the Types of Positive Affect Scale (TPAS). The TPAS is an 18-item scale that measures the degree to which people experience different positive emotions. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (ranging from 0 to 4). Higher scores mean higher levels of positive affect.
Measured: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Changes in satisfaction with teachers' professional life
Assessed by the Satisfaction with Teachers' Professional Life (SWTPL). The SWTPL is a 5-item scale aimed to assess global satisfaction with teachers' professional life. Each item is rated on a 5 Likert-type scale, ranging from I completely disagree (1) to I completely agree (5). Higher scores reflect higher satisfaction with teachers' life.
Measured: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Changes in symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress
Assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales-21(DASS-21). The DASS-21 is a self-report instrument comprising three subscales that address depressive (seven items), anxiety (seven items) and stress symptoms (seven items). Participants are asked to rate the frequency of symptoms during the previous week using a 4-point scale from did not apply to me at all (0) to applied to me very much, or most of the time (3). Higher scores in the each subscale indicate higher levels of depressive, anxiety or stress symptoms.
Measured: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Changes in burnout
Assessed by the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM). The SMBM is a 14-items self-report measure addressing work-related burnout using a 7-point scale, ranging from never (1) to always (7). The SMBM comprises three dimensions associated with work: physical exhaustion, cognitive weariness, and emotional exhaustion, with higher scores reflecting greater burnout symptoms.
Measured: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Changes in the flows of compassion (self-compassion, compassion to others and compassion from others)
Assessed by the Compassionate Engagement and Action Scales (CEAS). The CEAS assesses the three flows of compassion according to Gilbert's evolutionary multidimensional model of compassion and the Compassion Focused Therapy framework: 1) Self-compassion, 2) Compassion for others, 3) Compassion from others. Items are rated according to the frequency of responding to one's own suffering, others' suffering or the experience of receiving compassion from others. A response scale ranging from never (1) to always (10) is used for rating the items. Higher scores e each scale reflect higher compassion for self, for others and from others (respectively).
Measured: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Changes in self-compassion and compassion to others motivation and action
Assessed by the Compassion Motivation and Action Scales (CMAS) The CMAS is a 30-item self-report measure designed to be specifically used as a measure of the change in compassionate motivation and action over time. The self-compassion dimension encompasses 18 items, the compassion to others dimension includes 12 items. A 7-point scale ranging from completely disagree (1) to completely agree (7) is used to rate each item. Higher scores in each dimension mean elevated levels of self-compassion and compassion to others motivation and action.
Measured: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Changes in fears of compassion (for self, for others, from others)
Assessed by the Fears of Compassion Scale (FoC). The FoC is a broadly used self-report measure of fears, blocks and resistances to compassion. It assesses barriers to giving compassion to others (10 items), receiving compassion from others (13 items), and being self-compassionate (15 items). The 38 items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from don't agree at all (0) to completely agree (4). Higher scores reflect higher fears of compassion (for self, for others, from others).
Measured: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Changes in self-criticism
Assessed by the Forms of Self-Criticism and Self-Reassurance Scale (FSCRS). The FSCRS is a 22-items self-report instrument assessing how one thinks and reacts when dealing with failures or setbacks. The FSCRS encompasses two forms of self-criticism: (1) inadequate-self and (2) hated-self and (3) assesses the ability to be self-reassuring. Respondents are asked to choose in a 5-point scale, ranging from not at all like me (0) to extremely like me (4), the degree to which each item relates to their own experience. Higher scores on the self-criticism subscales indicate higher levels of self-criticism.
Measured: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Changes in perceived emotional climate at work
Assessed by the Emotional Climate in Organizations Scales (ECOS). ECOS was developed based on the affect regulation systems model proposed by Gilbert (106) and assesses the presence/activation of the three affect regulation systems: threat, drive, soothing/safeness. Each scale comprises 15 items (five items for each type of emotion system), rated in a 5-point Likert-type scale scored between never (0) and always (4). Higher scores are indicative of higher levels of threat, drive or soothing/safeness emotions at work.
Measured: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Nov 2021
- Study start1 Apr 2018
- Primary completion30 Aug 2019
- Study completion30 Aug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TeachersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 155 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Coimbra
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Compassionate Mind Foundation, Reed Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marcela Matos, University of Coimbra
- Investigators
- Paul Gilbert, PhD, OBE, Study chair, University of Derby; Compassionate Mind Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05107323
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CINEICC-01-MM
- Acronym
- COMP-S
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Matos, M., Palmeira, L., Albuquerque, I., Cunha, M., Lima, M.P., Galhardo, A., Maratos, F., & Gilbert, P. (2021). Building Compassionate Schools: Pilot study of a Compassionate Mind Training intervention to promote teachers' well-being. Mindfulness. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01778-3
Maratos, F.*, Matos, M.*, Albuquerque, I., Wood, W., Palmeira, L., Cunha, M., Lima, M.P., & Gilbert, P. (2020). Exploring the international utility of progressing Compassionate Mind Training in School Settings: A comparison of Implementation Effectiveness of the same curricula in the UK and Portugal. Psychology of Education Review, 44(2), 73-82
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Compassionate Schools: Feasibility and Effectiveness Study of a Compassionate Mind Training Program to Promote Teachers Wellbeing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05107323
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COMP-S / CINEICC-01-MM
- Conditions
- Teachers
- Keywords
- Compassionate Mind Training, Teachers, Feasibility study, Effectiveness study, Psychophysiological wellbeing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 155 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CoimbraUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Compassionate Mind Foundation, Reed Foundation
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Given the growing research on the multidimensional benefits of compassion cultivation, the current study sought to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of a Compassionate Mind Training intervention for Teachers (CMT-T) on teachers' psychological distress, wellbeing and compassion to self and others using a randomised controlled and stepped wedge design. The CMT-T specifically aimed at promoting positive affect and satisfaction with professional life and reducing symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress, and burnout, by increasing the flows of compassion (for self, for others and from others), self-compassion and compassion to others motivations and actions, and by diminishing fears of compassion (for self, for others and from others) and self-criticism. Furthermore, the present study aimed to explore the impact of the CMT-T on heart rate variability (HRV), an indicator of vagal regulatory activity and a physiological marker of a person's ability to flexibly respond to environmental challenges and regulate emotional responses. In light of previous research pointing to the role of individual differences in self-criticism on how individuals respond to compassion-based interventions, this study aimed to examine how self-criticism would influence the effects of the CMT-T intervention. Baseline self-criticism was hypothesized to impact the CMT-T effects on the primary and secondary outcome variables. In addition, the current study aimed to examine whether the effects of attending the CMT-T were sustained at 3-month post-intervention. Given that the inter-relationship between the three flows of compassion (i.e., compassion for others, being open to compassion from others, and self-compassion) is a key aspect of the CMT approach, the study sought to explore whether the associations between the flows of compassion would change from before to after the CMT-T, particularly whether these were strengthened after training. Finally, this study aimed to examine the mechanisms of change for the primary outcome variables at post-intervention. It is hypothesized that the changes occurred after the CMT-T intervention were mediated by changes in competencies for compassion for self, for others and from others, decreased levels fears of compassion for self, from others and from others, enhanced affect regulation, diminished self-criticism.
Detailed description
The main aim of COMP-S is to test the impact of a compassionate mind training intervention for teachers: CMT-T on indicators of mental, physiological and professional wellbeing.
The major goals of this project are to:
- Test the effects of the CMT-T on psychological primary outcomes (i.e. overall positive affect, symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress, burnout and professional wellbeing) and secondary outcomes (i.e. compassion, fears of compassion, self-criticism, affect regulation).
- Test the impact of the CMT-T on autonomic (i.e. heart-rate variability) biomarkers related to positive affect systems linked to affiliation and prosociality;
- Test the mediator effect of changes in the psychological processes targeted by the intervention (i.e. secondary outcomes: compassion, fears of compassion, self-criticism, affect regulation) on the impact of the CMT-T on the primary psychological outcomes, and on the biophysiological markers.
- Investigate the moderator effect of baseline individual differences in self-criticism, depressive symptoms and sociodemographic variables (i.e. age, gender) and occurrence of major life events, on the impact of the CMT-T on the psychological and biophysiological outcomes.
- Assess the moderator effect of practice frequency and helpfulness, and embodiment of compassionate qualities on everyday life, on the impact of the CMT-T on the psychological and biophysiological outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN The study was a two-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT), with one intervention group (CMT-T) and one waitlist control group (WLC), and a stepped-wedge design where all groups and participants in groups were offered the intervention. Prior to data collection, the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the University of Coimbra (CEDI22.03.2018).
Given the stepped wedge design, there were four assessment moments in the study: 1) Time 1 (T1) - baseline/pre-intervention assessment, was completed by the CMT-T group and the WLC group during the week previous to the start of the CMT-T intervention; 2) Time 2 (T2) - post-intervention assessment one was completed by CMT-T group and WLC group during the first-week post-intervention; 3) Time 3 (T3) - post-intervention assessment two, was completed by WLC group participants one week after they had also received the CMT-T intervention; 4) 3-months Follow-up assessment, this was conducted three months after the CMT-T conclusion (for all participants who completed the intervention). In T1, T2, and T3 all participants completed a set of self-report questionnaires. A subsample of participants from both conditions underwent the HRV measurement at T1, T2, and T3. In the 3-month follow-up assessment, only self-report data were collected.
PARTICIPANTS AND RECRUITMENT Participants were eligible for participation if they: (a) were teachers in the enrolled schools; and (b) provided informed consent. Participants were recruited amongst teaching staff in public schools (pre to high school grades) in the centre region of Portugal. Schools' boards were invited to participate in the study. With their authorization, a 2-hour recruitment session was conducted at the school and all teaching staff invited by the board. The session included a brief description of the study aims, procedures and ethical considerations. Teachers interested in participating provided their contact information. They were then contacted via email assessed for inclusion criteria and required to provide informed consent. Informed consent clarified the voluntary, confidential and anonymous nature of the study and data protection rights. Participants who meet the eligibility criteria to enter the study were randomly assigned within each school (using a computer-based random allocation) to either the CMT-T intervention or the waitlist control (WLC) group. The WLC group started the CMT-T after the first CMT-T group had completed the intervention. In total, six groups received the CMT-T, which was delivered in the school setting.
INTERVENTION The Compassionate Mind Training Program for Teachers (CMT-T) is a psychological intervention program delivered in a group format across eight sessions of approximately 2.5 hours each. In each session, besides presenting relevant theoretical constructs addressed in that session, participants are invited to complete experiential exercises, compassion and mindfulness meditation practices, and work in small groups to share their experiences, followed by a plenary session. There are six different modules addressed during the 8-sessions CMT-T.
Teachers attending the 8-week CMT-T were invited to practice the CMT-T exercises daily. In addition to self-report measures, teachers were asked to complete weekly Practice Diaries and Session Evaluation forms. Access to the Project website (https://escolascompassivas.wixsite.com/cmtescolas) allowed participants further information about the program, psychoeducation information and materials, practices instructions and audio files containing the meditation practices. Weekly gentle reminder emails were sent to participants motivating them to practice the exercises. A final CMT and Forest Bathing 1-day retreat was held at the end of the intervention.
DATA ANALYSIS Power analysis was calculated at priori using G*Power 3.1 for Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Results indicated that a sample size of 27 per group (n = 54) was needed, using a significance level of .05 and a power of 95% to detect significant fixed effects, main effects, and interaction effects, with a large effect size (f = 0.25).
All data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 27.0), and the alpha level was set at .05. For continuous variables, independent samples t-tests were conducted, and for categorical variables, chi-square tests were performed.
To examine mean differences between pre-intervention (T1) and post-intervention (T2) in the primary and secondary outcome variables, a series of 2 (condition) × 2 (time) repeated measures ANOVAs were performed. To examine the mean differences in the study variables within each group, a series of repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted for each group comparing pre and post-intervention. For ANOVAs, effect sizes were calculated using partial eta square (ƞ2p). For independent and paired-samples t-tests, effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d. A confidence interval of 95% was used in all the analyses. A stepped wedge analysis was performed in the subgroup of participants who participated in the WLC group between T1 and T2 and then completed the CMT-T between T2 and T3. Repeated Measures ANOVAs were performed to test differences in all study's variables from baseline to pre-intervention and post-intervention. Post-Hoc analyses were used to explore pairwise differences (baseline-to-pre-intervention; baseline-to-post-intervention, and pre-to-post-intervention).
To assess whether the post-CMT results were maintained, repeated measures ANOVAs were computed to test for mean differences between post-treatment (T2) and 3-months follow-up (T3). Pearson product-moment correlation analyses were calculated to explore whether the CMT-T would strengthen the associations between the three flows of compassion from pre- to post-intervention in all participants who completed the CMT-T.
Finally, to explore the psychological processes that underlie the changes in the primary outcomes after the CMT-T intervention MEMORE macro (Mediation and Moderation analysis for Repeated measures designs) was used. MEMORE allows for the estimation of total, direct, and indirect effects of independent variable (X) on dependent variable (Y) through one or more mediators (M) simultaneously two-occasion within-subjects design.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CMT-T | Experimental | Behavioral: Compassionate Mind Training for TeachersThe CMT-T is a Compassionate Mind Training program tailored for teachers, delivered in a group format across eight sessions of approximately 2.5 hours each. In each session, besides presenting relevant theoretical constructs addressed in that session, participants are invited to complete experiential exercises, compassion and mindfulness meditation practices, and work in small groups to share their experiences, followed by a plenary session. There are six different modules addressed during the 8-sessions CMT-T |
| Waiting list | No intervention | –Participants in the waiting list control group were not offered an intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- being a teacher in the enrolled schools
- provide informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- not being a teacher in the enrolled schools
- not provide informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Compassionate Mind Training for TeachersCompassionate Mind Training for Teachers is a biopsychosocial evidence-based approach that aims to foster compassion, affect regulation, prosocial qualities and wellbeing in teachers. | Behavioural | CMT-T |
Primary outcome
Changes in positive affect
Time frame: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Assessed by the Types of Positive Affect Scale (TPAS). The TPAS is an 18-item scale that measures the degree to which people experience different positive emotions. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (ranging from 0 to 4). Higher scores mean higher levels of positive affect.
Changes in satisfaction with teachers' professional life
Time frame: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Assessed by the Satisfaction with Teachers' Professional Life (SWTPL). The SWTPL is a 5-item scale aimed to assess global satisfaction with teachers' professional life. Each item is rated on a 5 Likert-type scale, ranging from I completely disagree (1) to I completely agree (5). Higher scores reflect higher satisfaction with teachers' life.
Changes in symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress
Time frame: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales-21(DASS-21). The DASS-21 is a self-report instrument comprising three subscales that address depressive (seven items), anxiety (seven items) and stress symptoms (seven items). Participants are asked to rate the frequency of symptoms during the previous week using a 4-point scale from did not apply to me at all (0) to applied to me very much, or most of the time (3). Higher scores in the each subscale indicate higher levels of depressive, anxiety or stress symptoms.
Changes in burnout
Time frame: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Assessed by the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM). The SMBM is a 14-items self-report measure addressing work-related burnout using a 7-point scale, ranging from never (1) to always (7). The SMBM comprises three dimensions associated with work: physical exhaustion, cognitive weariness, and emotional exhaustion, with higher scores reflecting greater burnout symptoms.
5 secondary outcomes
Changes in the flows of compassion (self-compassion, compassion to others and compassion from others)
Time frame: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Changes in self-compassion and compassion to others motivation and action
Time frame: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Changes in fears of compassion (for self, for others, from others)
Time frame: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Changes in self-criticism
Time frame: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Changes in perceived emotional climate at work
Time frame: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2021.
- BackgroundMatos, M., Palmeira, L., Albuquerque, I., Cunha, M., Lima, M.P., Galhardo, A., Maratos, F., & Gilbert, P. (2021). Building Compassionate Schools: Pilot study of a Compassionate Mind Training intervention to promote teachers' well-being. Mindfulness. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01778-3
- BackgroundMaratos, F.*, Matos, M.*, Albuquerque, I., Wood, W., Palmeira, L., Cunha, M., Lima, M.P., & Gilbert, P. (2020). Exploring the international utility of progressing Compassionate Mind Training in School Settings: A comparison of Implementation Effectiveness of the same curricula in the UK and Portugal. Psychology of Education Review, 44(2), 73-82
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Teachers
Active, not recruiting
Parent-Educator Action Response
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Directed Self Learning Versus Instructor-Led Teaching Using an Identical Standardized Instructional Module on Infection Prevention and Control Among Undergraduate Allied Health Sciences Students
Infection Prevention and Control Education, Health Professions Education
Recruiting
School-based Prevention of Teacher Violence Against Children in Zambia
Violence by Teachers
Not yet recruiting
Acute Effects of Mat Pilates on Blood Pressure Response to Mental Stress in Higher Education Teachers
Behavior
Not yet recruiting
Instructor Interpersonal Behaviours in Classical Pilates as a Pathway to Improve Blood Pressure Control and Well-being in Hypertensive Adults
High Blood Pressure (& [Essential Hypertension]), Motivation for Physical Activity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul Gilbert, PhD, OBE study chair
University of Derby; Compassionate Mind Foundation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Compassionate Mind Training for Teachers in people with Teachers, run by University of Coimbra at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in positive affect (time frame: up to 6 months (from baseline to 3-months follow-up)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05107323, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2021.